Professor Mufti Abdul Ghani Azhari: Scholar, Sufi, Historian, and Social Reformer of Kashmir

Mufti Abdul Ghani Azhari

Professor Mufti Abdul Ghani Azhari (1922–2023), also known as Abdul Ghani Shah al-Shashi, was one of India’s most respected Islamic scholars, Sufi teachers, historians, and community reformers. Born in Poonch, Jammu and Kashmir, he belonged to the Gujjar community, a group often marginalised in society. Over his long life of nearly 100 years, he dedicated himself to spreading Islamic knowledge, guiding people spiritually, and uplifting the poor through education and support. His work touched the lives of thousands, especially Gujjar Muslims in Kashmir and across South Asia, leaving a lasting legacy of compassion, wisdom, and unity.

Early Life

Abdul Ghani Azhari was born in 1922 in Poonch, a hilly region of Jammu and Kashmir, to Ali Miyan Shashi. Growing up in the Gujjar community, he saw the challenges faced by his people, including poverty and lack of education. From a young age, he loved learning and had a deep respect for Islamic teachings. His grandfather, Maulana Abdul Halim al-Shashi, a well-known Gujjar scholar of the Quran, played a big role in shaping his early years, encouraging his passion for knowledge and faith. Later, Azhari moved to Sogam, Kokernag, in Anantnag, where he spent much of his life.

Education

Azhari’s thirst for knowledge took him to some of the world’s top Islamic institutions, where he studied under great scholars and gained expertise in many fields:

  • Darul Uloom Deoband (1943): At this famous Islamic school in India, Azhari studied under Hussain Ahmad Madani, a scholar and freedom fighter who taught him key Islamic texts like Sahih al Bukhari and Sunan al Tirmidhi. Madani’s passion for India’s freedom also inspired Azhari to serve his country and community.
  • Mazahir Uloom Saharanpur (1949): Here, he learned from Muhammad Zakariyya Kandhlawi, a leading expert in Hadith (sayings of the Prophet Muhammad). He studied important books like Bulugh al Maram and Mishkat al Masabih, which deepened his understanding of Islamic teachings and spirituality.
  • Al-Azhar University, Cairo (1966): Azhari earned a PhD in Hadith studies with a thesis called Al Imam Al Muslim Wa Manhajuhu Fi Al Hadith Riwayatn Wa Dirayatan (The Methodology of Imam Muslim in Hadith Narration and Analysis). He also gained a diploma in psychology, which helped him combine religious and modern knowledge. His teachers included Abdel-Halim Mahmoud and Abdul Wahhab Abdul Latif, both renowned scholars.

Azhari was also influenced by Maulana Abul Kalam Azad, India’s first education minister, who encouraged blending traditional Islamic learning with modern ideas. This mix made Azhari a unique scholar who could connect with both religious and academic audiences.

Academic and Teaching Career

After his studies, Azhari became a teacher, sharing his knowledge with students and communities. He first taught at Madinatul Uloom in Hazratbal, Srinagar, where he made complex Islamic ideas easy to understand. Later, he became head of the Arabic Department at the University of Kashmir, a role he held until he retired in 1997. His teaching style was clear and inspiring, helping students from all backgrounds learn about Islam, Arabic, and more.

Azhari was a master of many Islamic sciences, including:

  • Quranic Interpretation (Tafsir): He explained the Quran’s meanings, often teaching Tafsir Jalalayn, a well-known commentary.
  • Hadith: As a muhaddith (Hadith scholar), he certified others to teach Hadith and had a chain of transmission going back to Shah Waliullah Dehlawi, a famous 18th-century scholar. He gave famous lectures, like teaching Sahih al Bukhari in just 13 days in Kuwait and at Masjid-e-Nabawi in Madinah.
  • Islamic Law (Fiqh): He was an expert in both Hanafi and Shafi’i schools of Islamic law, teaching books like Bahr al Raiq (Hanafi) and Al Umm (Shafi’i).
  • Sufism (Tasawwuf): As a Naqshbandi Sufi, he guided people towards spiritual growth and inner peace.

He believed the Quran should be read with understanding in any language and urged Muslims to follow its teachings as their guide. He also taught that Hadith should be studied for its own sake, not twisted to fit personal views, following the approach of great scholars like Muhammad Yunus Jaunpuri.

Sufi Teachings

As a follower of the Naqshbandi Sufi order, Azhari focused on the spiritual side of Islam. He believed in:

  • Inner Purification: Remembering Allah to cleanse the heart and soul.
  • Following the Quran and Sunnah: Living by the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad with sincerity.
  • Unity and Peace: Bringing Muslims together and building good relations with other communities.

His sermons were heartfelt and easy to understand, inspiring people to live with love, kindness, and tolerance. His diploma in psychology helped him understand the human heart, making his spiritual guidance even more powerful. He followed the teachings of Imam Ghazali, a famous Sufi scholar, and was seen as a Jamiul Salasil (someone who combined all Sufi orders). He held the title of Amir al Shari‘ah and Sadr al Muftiyeen (chief jurist) of Jammu and Kashmir, showing his high standing as a spiritual leader.

Institutions Founded

Azhari believed education could change lives, especially for those who were poor or marginalised. He set up several schools and seminaries to provide free education, food, and clothing, focusing on the Gujjar community and others in need. These institutions followed the principles of Ahl-i Sunnat wal Jama‘at (Sunni Islam) and taught subjects like Arabic, Persian, Urdu, and logic. Some of his key institutions include:

  • Maktabah Anwar al Uloom (Kokernag, 1950s): Co-founded with Maulana Hafiz Muhammad Chiragh Qasmi, this centre helped Gujjar students learn about their faith and culture.
  • Maktabah al Azhariya (1960, later a Darul Uloom in 1980): A major hub for Islamic learning in Kashmir, serving as the heart of Azhari’s work.
  • Darul Uloom Kawthariya (New Theed, Harwan, 1990): Built near Zabarwan Hills in Srinagar for advanced Islamic studies.
  • Darul Uloom Shah Wali Allah (Donipawa, Anantnag, 2003): A centre for Islamic law and spirituality.
  • Darul Uloom Nizamiyya Madinatul Islam (Badshahibagh, Saharanpur): A leading seminary with an open school up to the 10th standard, serving both poor and privileged students.
  • Seminaries in Jammu: Set up in areas like Nagrota, Sidrah, and Tandah to reach more people.

These schools gave thousands of students, especially from the Gujjar community, a chance to learn and grow, breaking the cycle of poverty through education.

Books and Writings

Azhari wrote several important books that are still used by students and scholars. His works cover Islamic teachings, Sufism, and the history of the Gujjar community. Some of his most notable books include:

  • Qadim Tarikh-e-Gujjar: A detailed history of the Gujjar people, showing their important role in South Asia’s culture and history. This book helped Gujjars feel proud of their heritage and fought against feelings of inferiority. It also had an impact abroad, challenging atheistic ideas in places like Russia.
  • Ma La Budda Minh: An Urdu translation of a book by Mir Syed Ali Hamdani, a great Sufi saint, covering key Islamic beliefs like faith, worship, and kindness.
  • Noor-i Irfan: A collection of Naqshbandi Sufi teachings and letters by Peer Muhammad Sharifuddin, explaining spiritual practices and the lives of Sufi leaders.
  • Gulzar-i Marifat: A book in Punjabi about Sufism and spiritual growth.
  • Urdu Translation of Amir Kabir Mir Syed Ali Hamdani’s Works: Making the teachings of this Sufi saint available to more people.
  • Talimat-e Qur’an: Unfinished writings on the Quran’s teachings, showing his deep love for the holy book.

These books helped preserve Gujjar culture, spread Islamic knowledge, and guide people towards a spiritual life.

Social Work and Gujjar Upliftment

Azhari spent over 70 years helping the poor, especially orphans and those from marginalised groups like the Gujjars. He provided clothing, shelter, and education to anyone in need, regardless of their background. His work gave hope to the Gujjar community, who faced social and economic challenges. By writing about their history and setting up schools, he helped them gain confidence and respect.

Azhari also worked to bring people together, promoting peace between Muslims and other communities. His efforts were praised by scholars like Emmanuel David Singh, who noted his role in fostering harmony in South Asia. Inspired by freedom fighters like Hussain Ahmad Madani and Abul Kalam Azad, Azhari believed in serving both his faith and his country, working to make India a better place for all.

Final Years and Legacy

In his later years, Azhari lived in Sogam, Kokernag, and Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, where he continued teaching and guiding people. He passed away on 19 January 2023 in Saharanpur at the age of about 100. His funeral, led by Moulana Mohammad Aaqil, was attended by thousands, showing the love and respect he had earned. Leaders like Farooq and Omar Abdullah paid tributes, calling him a great scholar and spiritual guide.

Professor Abdul Ghani Azhari’s legacy lives on through his schools, books, and the many lives he changed. He was a scholar who made complex ideas simple, a Sufi who spread love and peace, a historian who gave the Gujjars pride, and a reformer who fought for equality and education. For the people of Kashmir and beyond, his work continues to inspire, proving that one person’s dedication can make a difference for generations.

Faith, Family & the Future: Navigating Chaos with Purpose

Kashmir Fruit Growers Face Heavy Losses as Highway Closure Disrupts Transport

From Boom to Bust: How the April 22 Terror Attack Shattered Pahalgam’s Tourism Dream

11 Dead in Ramban and Reasi Weather Tragedies as Landslides and Cloudburst Devastate Jammu

Budgam’s Sadiq Ali Mir Selected as Astronaut Candidate for U.S.-Based Titans Space Industries’ 2029 Mission

Sadiq Ali Mir

In a landmark achievement for the scientific community in Kashmir and India at large, 21-year-old Sadiq Ali Mir, hailing from the remote Labartal village in Budgam district, has been selected as an Astronaut Candidate (ASCAN) by the prestigious Titans Space Industries Inc., a private aerospace company based in the United States.

Mir’s selection marks the first time a youth from Jammu and Kashmir has been chosen for an international space mission of such calibre, symbolizing a leap forward for aspiring scientists and engineers from conflict-affected regions.


From Snowy Kashmir to the Stars

Born into a humble household in Labartal, Mir’s story is one of perseverance, ambition, and excellence. His early education took place at IPS School and Al-Asma Educational Institute, Budgam, followed by higher secondary education at Government Higher Secondary School, Sholipora. Despite limited resources, his academic journey was marked by determination and a deep fascination with space.

The turning point in his life came during a snowfall in Kashmir when he was in the 7th grade. “I saw a bright object moving across the sky and thought it was a comet,” Mir told Rising Kashmir. “Later in 8th grade, I learned it was the International Space Station. That moment planted the seed of my dream—to become an aerospace engineer and astronaut.”


Academic and Professional Excellence

In 2021, Mir secured admission to the prestigious RV College of Engineering (RVCE) in Bengaluru, where he completed his Bachelor’s degree in Aerospace Engineering in August 2025. During his time at RVCE, he distinguished himself academically and as a leader of student-led innovation.

He co-founded Team AeroAstro, a student-driven aerospace initiative focusing on electric aircraft and space technology. Under his leadership as Team Leader and Project Manager, the team developed groundbreaking research and prototypes, garnering attention from professionals in India and abroad. He currently serves as an advisor to the team.

Mir also co-authored two research papers presented at the Annual AESI CFD Conference at BIT Mesra, focusing on:

  • Supersonic aerodynamic analysis of performance reconnaissance aircraft via CFD
  • CFD-driven design and analysis of a novel SR-72 Variant

He further served as Lead Systems Engineer for a lunar rover project at Milo Mission Academy, a collaborative initiative backed by NASA.


Titans Space Industries and the 2029 Mission

Following a rigorous selection process, Mir was chosen as an Astronaut Candidate (ASCAN) for Engineering and Development by Titans Space Industries Inc. His selection involved multiple technical assessments, personal interviews, and a background check by senior leaders at Titans, including:

  • CEO Neal Lachman
  • Chief Astronaut William McArthur (former NASA astronaut and U.S. Army Colonel)
  • CTO Franklin Ratliff

The upcoming 2029 mission, in which Mir will participate, will be commanded by William McArthur and Marcos Pontes—Brazil’s first astronaut and the current Deputy Chief Astronaut at Titans. The mission will focus on:

  • Orbital operations
  • Scientific experimentation in space
  • Long-duration habitation
  • Advancing sustainable space exploration

Mir’s involvement is a recognition of his exceptional academic record, innovative contributions, and leadership in student aerospace projects.


Further Education and International Recognition

In addition to his astronaut training, Mir has secured admission to the Master’s in Space Systems program at Kepler Space University in Florida. Here, he will specialise in space systems design and mission planning, further aligning his academic trajectory with his mission role.

“This opportunity is not just about personal success,” said Mir. “It’s about representing India, Kashmir, and my alma mater RVCE on the global aerospace stage. I carry this responsibility with immense pride and humility.”


Acknowledgements and Gratitude

Mir credits his journey to the support of his family, mentors, and peers. He expressed special thanks to:

  • Suhana Arsh – friend and supporter
  • Vaseema Hussain – mentor and guide
  • Titans Space leadership including Neal Lachman, Dr. V Vijay, Marcus Beaufort, and Franklin Ratliff

He also acknowledged faculty members at RVCE, including:

  • Dr. K.N. Subramanya
  • Dr. Ravindra S. Kulakarni
  • Dr. Promio Charles F
  • Dr. Supreeth R
  • Dr. Benjamin Rohit
  • Group Captain Deepak Bana
  • Mr. George Salazar

A New Chapter for Kashmir

Mir’s selection as an astronaut candidate is more than just a personal victory—it’s a symbol of hope and inspiration for the youth of Jammu and Kashmir, especially those who dream of scientific careers in the face of adversity. His journey exemplifies that with talent, vision, and perseverance, even the most distant dreams can be reached.

As he trains for the 2029 mission, Sadiq Ali Mir stands as a proud ambassador of Budgam, of Kashmir, and of the boundless human spirit that dares to reach for the stars.


Nine Soldiers Missing After Flash Floods Hit Army Camp in Uttarakhand’s Harshil

Supreme Court to Hear Plea on August 8 Seeking Time-Bound Restoration of J&K Statehood

Mehbooba Mufti Slams Centre on Article 370 Anniversary, Calls It a Threat to Democracy Across India

Why Strengthening BRICS Better Serves India’s Future Than Leaning Towards the United States

DrTalat Majid Alaie

In the evolving Geo-Political shift from Global North to Global South , India finds itself at a critical crossroads: should it deepen its engagement with the BRICS alliance or tilt more decisively towards the United States? While partnerships with the U.S. bring certain benefits—especially in defense and technology—the long-term National interests of India are better served by reinforcing its role in BRICS.

Strategic Autonomy: A Non-Negotiable Principle

India’s foreign policy has historically been guided by the principle of strategic autonomy. BRICS enables this autonomy. Unlike alliances that often come with conditions and ideological alignment, BRICS allows India to operate independently, free from the shadow of major power rivalries. This is vital in a multipolar world where flexibility is strength.

Economic Sovereignty Through South-South Cooperation

BRICS represents over 40% of the global population and a substantial share of global GDP. By trading with member countries and supporting the New Development Bank (NDB), India reduces its dependence on Western-dominated financial systems and institutions. Importantly, BRICS allows India to pursue rupee-based trade, insulating its economy from dollar volatility and external sanctions.

While the U.S. offers cutting-edge defense technology, it often comes with strings attached. In contrast, BRICS provides a strategic balance—India continues to procure military equipment from Russia and others, while maintaining interoperability with friendly democracies. The goal is to diversify, not depend.

Technology and Innovation: Inclusive and Affordable

India’s collaboration with BRICS nations—especially Brazil and South Africa—on healthcare, renewable energy, and AI reflects a vision of inclusive innovation. Unlike the West’s profit-driven model, BRICS nations focus on affordability, accessibility, and equity—critical for a nation still battling poverty and underdevelopment.

Countering China—With Diplomacy, Not Conflict

India’s tensions with China are real. However, isolating China through U.S.-backed blocs may inflame conflict. BRICS offers a non-confrontational platform for engagement, economic cooperation, and diplomatic management of disputes—an approach more suitable for regional stability.

Voice of the Global South

India’s leadership in BRICS enhances its credibility among African, Latin American, and Asian nations. Through BRICS, India can lead global advocacy on climate justice, equitable trade, and reform of institutions like the UN, IMF, and World Bank—issues often ignored by Western powers.

Conclusion: Multi-Alignment, Not Blind Alignment

India must resist the temptation of falling into a binary choice. While relations with the U.S. are important, strengthening BRICS is essential to preserve India’s sovereignty, foster regional stability, and shape a fairer global order. The future lies not in choosing sides, but in creating a third pole of power, where India leads—not follows.

Dr. Shaheena Akhtar Becomes First Female PhD in Persian

Renowned Sufi Saint Peer Muhammad Aslam of Sallar Passes Away, Kashmir Mourns

Lalla Ded Hospital Video Sparks Probe After Doctor Films Inside OT; Health Dept Orders 24-Hour Inquiry

JDF Under Fire: Internal Dissent Emerges as Jamaat Seniors Question Strategy, Leadership Denies Allegations of Compromise

JDF

A fresh wave of controversy has hit the Justice and Development Front (JDF), a political group formed by former members of the banned Jamaat-e-Islami Jammu and Kashmir (JeI). While JDF was launched with the promise of peaceful political engagement and helping to lift the ban on Jamaat, some senior Jamaat leaders are now criticising the group, claiming it has failed to achieve its main goal.

These internal disagreements have raised concerns about unity within the broader Jamaat community and the future direction of JDF’s political journey.


The Background: What is JDF?

The Justice and Development Front was formed in early 2025 by ex-members of Jamaat-e-Islami. The aim was to create a political front that would work within the Indian constitutional framework, contest elections, and help bring Jamaat-e-Islami back into legal and social space after it was banned in 2019 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act.

JDF claimed it would carry forward the ideals and vision of Jamaat—through legal, peaceful, and democratic means. It began taking part in local politics and gained attention in some areas like Kulgam and Pulwama during the 2024 Assembly elections, although it did not win any seats.


The Criticism from Jamaat Seniors

Recently, several senior members of Jamaat-e-Islami have come forward with harsh criticism of JDF’s approach. They accuse the group of:

  • Failing to get the Jamaat ban lifted, despite promising to focus on that goal.
  • Acting independently without full consultation or approval from the broader Jamaat leadership.
  • Allegedly being influenced or used by Indian state agencies, according to rumours circulating in some conservative circles.

These allegations have sparked a wave of internal debate. Some believe JDF has taken a risky path by entering the electoral space while Jamaat remains banned, and worry it could damage the image of the original organisation.


JDF’s Strong Response

In reply to these accusations, JDF leaders have firmly denied all claims. They say the senior Jamaat figures who are now criticising them had already been informed and taken into confidence during the formation of the JDF.

A senior JDF representative said:

“We are deeply hurt by these false accusations. Some unseen and unknown people are putting pressure on respected Jamaat seniors to speak against us. They are wrongly accusing us of working for Indian agencies, which is totally baseless.”

JDF leadership has stressed that:

  • They remain committed to the peaceful mission of Jamaat-e-Islami.
  • Their political work is aimed at uplifting the people of Jammu and Kashmir, especially the youth.
  • They oppose any form of bloodshed, extremism, or unconstitutional activity.
  • Their only goal is to serve the people legally, ethically, and peacefully.

Public Reaction and Political Impact

The disagreement has led to confusion among supporters, especially young people who were hopeful that JDF could become a fresh voice for change within the limits of the law.

Some Jamaat sympathisers are now divided—some support JDF’s political efforts, while others prefer to wait for the ban to be lifted before any political step is taken.

At the same time, mainstream political observers in Kashmir are watching this closely. The entry of JDF could change electoral dynamics, especially in south Kashmir where Jamaat once had strong grassroots support.


Conclusion

The situation reflects a serious moment of reflection for both JDF and the wider Jamaat-e-Islami family. While the goal of reviving Jamaat remains common, the methods and approaches are now under debate.

JDF insists it is working with sincerity, transparency, and within the law. Its leaders say their efforts are not a betrayal but a necessary evolution in difficult times. However, unless dialogue and mutual respect return between the old guard and the new generation, this rift could harm the wider cause both groups claim to support.


“We are not here to divide. We are here to rebuild—peacefully, legally, and faithfully.”

— A JDF Leader

Certainly, here is a balanced and clear paragraph on that point:


From the very beginning, many within Jamaat-e-Islami have been seen as being in too much of a hurry to achieve immediate results. However, for an ideological and long-standing organisation like Jamaat, this approach can be harmful. Such movements require patience, strategic thinking, and long-term vision. The current generation of youth, including those in groups like JDF, should be given space and trust to make efforts through peaceful, legal, and constitutional means. Quick anger or unrealistic expectations can lead to internal divisions and missed opportunities. It is important to stay calm, support one another, and understand that real change takes time, wisdom, and unity.


The Tragedy of Karbala: Remembering the Martyrdom on 10th Muharram

Karbala

The 10th of Muharram, known as Yawm-e-Ashura, marks one of the most painful and significant days in Islamic history—the martyrdom of Imam Husain (R.A), the beloved grandson of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, at Karbala. For Sunni Muslims, this day is not only about grief and sorrow, but also about honouring the legacy of truth, justice, and unwavering faith.

While both Sunni and Shia Muslims deeply mourn the events of Karbala, the Sunni perspective focuses more on the spiritual lessons drawn from the tragedy, the importance of standing against tyranny, and the virtues of patience (sabr) and sacrifice shown by Imam Husain (R.A) and his companions.


Background to the Battle

After the passing of the Prophet Muhammad ﷺ, the leadership of the Muslim Ummah passed through the Khulafa-e-Rashideen—Abu Bakr (R.A), Umar (R.A), Uthman (R.A), and Ali (R.A). Following the assassination of Ali (R.A), his son Imam Hasan (R.A) made peace with Muawiyah (R.A) to prevent further bloodshed, with the understanding that no hereditary claim would be made to the caliphate after Muawiyah’s death.

However, Yazid ibn Muawiyah assumed leadership after his father’s death in 60 AH (680 CE), in what many saw as a political shift from Khilafah to monarchy. Yazid demanded allegiance (bay’ah) from prominent figures, including Imam Husain (R.A), who refused on the grounds of moral and religious integrity. Husain (R.A) could not accept a leader whose lifestyle and policies contradicted Islamic values.


The Journey to Karbala

Upon receiving calls for support from the people of Kufa, Imam Husain (R.A), accompanied by his family and a small group of companions, travelled from Makkah toward Iraq. However, upon reaching Karbala, they were intercepted by Yazid’s army under the command of Umar ibn Sa’d.

They were surrounded and denied water for days under the scorching heat of the desert. Despite knowing the dangers, Imam Husain (R.A) refused to submit to tyranny and made it clear that he sought only truth and justice, not power.


10th Muharram – The Day of Ashura

On Ashura, 10th Muharram 61 AH (10 October 680 CE), the battle reached its devastating climax. Imam Husain (R.A) and his 72 companions were vastly outnumbered. One by one, his family members and companions—Ali Akbar (R.A), Qasim (R.A), Abbas (R.A), and others—fell in battle.

Despite hunger, thirst, and emotional grief, Imam Husain (R.A) remained firm, offering salah, speaking words of wisdom, and calling for peace and reform. Eventually, he too was martyred in a brutal and heartbreaking manner.

His noble head was severed, and the surviving women and children of the Ahl al-Bayt were taken captive—marking a moment of deep sorrow for the entire Ummah.


Sunni Perspective on Karbala

Sunni scholars throughout history have condemned the tragedy of Karbala and expressed sorrow and love for Imam Husain (R.A). However, they discourage acts of self-harm or attributing blame to the Sahaba (R.A) as some sectarian narratives may do.

Key Sunni beliefs include:

  • Imam Husain (R.A) is a Shaheed and leader of the youth of Paradise, as stated in authentic hadith.
  • The tragedy of Karbala is a lesson in standing against falsehood, even in the face of certain death.
  • Ashura is observed through fasting, dua, reflection, and remembering the sacrifices of the righteous.
  • The Prophet ﷺ himself used to fast on 10th Muharram, and advised his followers to also fast on either the 9th or 11th along with it to distinguish from Jewish practices.

Lessons from Karbala

  1. Standing for Truth: Imam Husain (R.A) refused to give allegiance to an unjust ruler. His stance reminds us to never remain silent in the face of oppression.
  2. Faith Over Fear: Despite knowing the risks, he chose the path of sacrifice for the sake of preserving the Deen.
  3. Value of Family and Loyalty: Karbala also shows the strength and bravery of the family of the Prophet ﷺ—especially the women who showed resilience even in captivity.
  4. Patience (Sabr): Imam Husain (R.A) exemplified the highest level of sabr, a core teaching in Sunni Islam.

Commemorating Ashura in Sunni Islam

In the Sunni tradition, Ashura is marked with:

  • Fasting on the 9th and 10th (or 10th and 11th) of Muharram.
  • Charity and feeding the poor.
  • Reciting Quran and making du’a.
  • Reflecting on the lives of the Prophets and martyrs.

The Prophet Muhammad ﷺ also associated Ashura with historical events, such as the victory of Prophet Musa (A.S) over Pharaoh, which further deepens its spiritual value.


Conclusion

The Tragedy of Karbala is a unifying pain for the Muslim Ummah, regardless of sect or school of thought. For Sunnis, Imam Husain (R.A) remains a symbol of truth, courage, and sacrifice, whose martyrdom continues to inspire generations.

His legacy is not just a part of history—it is a living message: never trade truth for power, never surrender to injustice, and always stand firm in faith.


“The best of people are those who stand for justice, even if they stand alone.” – A lesson from Karbala


The Tragedy of Karbala: A Defining Moment in Islamic History

Karbala

The Battle of Karbala, which took place on the 10th of Muharram in 61 AH (10 October 680 CE), stands as one of the most heart-rending and significant events in Islamic history. This event, deeply mourned and commemorated by Muslims around the world—especially during Muharram—represents the ultimate sacrifice made by Imam Husain ibn Ali (R.A), the beloved grandson of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), in his stand against tyranny, corruption, and injustice.


Historical Background

After the passing of Prophet Muhammad (ﷺ), the leadership of the Muslim Ummah passed through a series of caliphs, beginning with the Rightly Guided Caliphs (Khulafa-e-Rashideen). Imam Husain (R.A), the son of Hazrat Ali (R.A) and Fatima (R.A), and thus the Prophet’s direct descendant, lived through the caliphates of Abu Bakr (R.A), Umar (R.A), Uthman (R.A), and his own father Ali (R.A), the fourth caliph.

After the martyrdom of Hazrat Ali (R.A) and the brief caliphate of Imam Hasan (R.A), Muawiyah ibn Abi Sufyan established the Umayyad rule. In an unprecedented move, Muawiyah designated his son Yazid as his successor—introducing hereditary monarchy into Islamic governance, which contradicted the spirit of shura (consultation) practiced during the earlier caliphates.

When Yazid assumed power, he demanded allegiance from prominent Muslim figures. Imam Husain (R.A) refused, stating that someone like him could not give bay’ah (allegiance) to someone like Yazid due to the latter’s corrupt and immoral behavior. This principled stand would lead him to Karbala.


Journey to Karbala

Imam Husain (R.A) received letters from the people of Kufa (in present-day Iraq), inviting him to come and lead them in opposition to Yazid’s rule. Believing that Kufa held a strong base of support, Husain (R.A) set out from Makkah with his family and companions—around 72 in total, including women and children.

However, Yazid’s forces intercepted the caravan near the plain of Karbala. Despite the early promises of support from Kufa, the people withdrew under threat and pressure from Yazid’s governor, Ubaydullah ibn Ziyad. Imam Husain (R.A) and his small group were soon surrounded by an army of over 30,000 men.


The Events of Ashura

From the 2nd to the 10th of Muharram, Husain (R.A) and his companions camped at Karbala. During this time, Yazid’s forces cut off access to the Euphrates River, denying them water in the scorching desert heat.

On the 10th of Muharram, known as Ashura, the battle commenced. Despite being vastly outnumbered, Husain (R.A) and his companions displayed unmatched bravery, defending their principles rather than surrendering. One by one, his brothers, sons, nephews—including the young Ali Asghar—were martyred.

In the final moments, Imam Husain (R.A) stood alone, wounded but unyielding. He was eventually martyred, his head severed and taken to Yazid. His body was left on the plains of Karbala, while the women and children were taken captive.


Aftermath and Legacy

The martyrdom of Imam Husain (R.A) sent shockwaves throughout the Muslim world. Far from silencing dissent, it became a powerful symbol of resistance against tyranny. His sister, Hazrat Zainab (R.A), and son, Imam Zain ul Abideen (R.A), played a crucial role in spreading the truth about what happened at Karbala.

The memory of Karbala lives on as a reminder that standing up for truth may demand the highest sacrifice. It transcends sectarian lines and continues to inspire Muslims and non-Muslims alike who seek justice and moral courage in the face of oppression.


Karbala and Islamic Thought

The message of Karbala is deeply embedded in Islamic ethics and spirituality:

  • Truth vs. Falsehood: Husain (R.A) chose martyrdom over compromise with injustice.
  • Sacrifice: He gave his family, wealth, and life for the higher cause of Islam.
  • Patience (Sabr): The endurance shown by Husain (R.A), Zainab (R.A), and the captives is a model for believers.
  • Resistance: Karbala teaches that silence in the face of injustice is complicity.

Commemoration in the Muslim World

Muslims worldwide remember the tragedy of Karbala every year, particularly during Muharram. For Shia Muslims, it is a central pillar of their religious identity. Sunni Muslims also honour Imam Husain (R.A) and his sacrifice with prayers, sermons, and fasting on the day of Ashura.


Authentic Sources & References

  1. Ibn Kathir’s Al-Bidaya wa’l-Nihaya – An authoritative Sunni source chronicling the events of Karbala.
  2. Tarikh al-Tabari – One of the most detailed historical records of early Islamic events.
  3. Siyar A‘lam al-Nubala by Al-Dhahabi – Contains detailed biographies including that of Imam Husain (R.A).
  4. Sahih Muslim & Musnad Ahmad – Hadith sources referring to the virtues of Imam Husain (R.A).

Conclusion

The tragedy of Karbala is not just a historical event—it is a living moral lesson. It reminds every generation that faith, truth, and justice require commitment, courage, and sometimes even the ultimate sacrifice. Imam Husain (R.A) left behind a legacy that forever changed the course of Islamic history. His words echo in the hearts of all who strive for justice:
“I did not rise to cause corruption or oppression, but to reform the Ummah of my grandfather.”


Justice and Development Front (JDF) : A New Voice for Jammu and Kashmir

Justice and Development Front

In the politically turbulent and deeply contested landscape of Jammu and Kashmir, a new political entity, the Justice and Development Front (JDF), has emerged as a significant force aiming to reshape the region’s political discourse. Launched on April 27, 2025, in Srinagar, the JDF positions itself as a movement rooted in justice, development, and public welfare, seeking to address the longstanding issues of marginalization, representation, and socio-political exclusion. With ties to the banned Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI), the JDF represents a strategic pivot for former JeI members to re-enter mainstream politics through a democratic framework, navigating a complex socio-political environment marked by historical grievances and recent upheavals, particularly the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019. This article explores the origins, objectives, challenges, and potential impact of the JDF in Jammu and Kashmir’s evolving political landscape.

Origins and Context

The JDF was formed by a faction of former Jamaat-e-Islami members who sought to channel their ideological and social influence into a formal political platform. The JeI, a socio-political and religious organization established in 1941 by Maulana Abul Ala Maududi, has been a significant player in Jammu and Kashmir since its regional branch was formalized in 1953. Historically, JeI participated in electoral politics, notably winning five seats in the 1972 assembly elections, but faced severe repression, including bans in 1975, 1990, and 2019 under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) for alleged ties to militancy. The most recent ban, extended in February 2024, followed the 2019 Pulwama attack, which killed 40 CRPF personnel, intensifying scrutiny on the organization.

The JDF’s formation marks a shift from JeI’s 30-year election boycott (1989–2019), prompted by post-Article 370 changes and a desire to address grassroots issues through constitutional means. The party was launched at a low-key event in Nowgam, Srinagar, with key figures like Shamim Ahmad Thokar (president), Abdul Rehman Shalla (vice-president), and Sayar Ahmad Reshi (general secretary), all former JeI members who contested the 2024 assembly elections as independents. Despite their electoral losses, Reshi’s strong performance in Kulgam, securing 34.4% of votes, underscored JeI’s lingering influence, particularly in south Kashmir districts like Kulgam, Shopian, and Anantnag.

A People’s Movement Rooted in Marginalization

The JDF distinguishes itself from traditional political parties by framing itself as a grassroots movement born from the struggles of the marginalized. Its leadership emphasizes that it is not driven by elite patronage or electoral opportunism but by the pain of communities sidelined by decades of conflict, political neglect, and systematic suppression. The abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, which stripped Jammu and Kashmir of its special status and statehood, coupled with a subsequent crackdown on dissent, intensified feelings of disenfranchisement. The JDF aims to give voice to those affected by conflict, including families of political prisoners, activists criminalized for their beliefs, and communities lacking genuine representation.

The movement draws moral and ideological legitimacy from JeI’s historical resilience. Many JDF leaders are veterans who endured persecution during the 1970s and 1980s, when aligning with JeI often led to arrests and property seizures. This legacy of sacrifice lends the JDF credibility among segments of the population disillusioned with mainstream parties like the National Conference (NC) and People’s Democratic Party (PDP), which are perceived as complicit in perpetuating elite-driven politics.

The Jamaat-e-Islami Connection

The JDF’s ties to JeI are central to its identity, providing both strengths and challenges. JeI’s ideological framework, rooted in Islamic universalism and the pursuit of a theocentric societal order, has historically shaped its educational, social, and political initiatives. In Jammu and Kashmir, JeI built a parallel civil infrastructure—mosques, schools, and welfare trusts—that challenged state authority and fostered a sense of community among its supporters. Despite bans, this infrastructure sustained JeI’s influence, particularly in south Kashmir, where it has a strong support base.

The JDF leverages this network while distancing itself from JeI’s more controversial aspects, such as its alleged links to militancy through groups like Hizbul Mujahideen in the 1990s. Leaders like Shamim Ahmad Thokar emphasize a commitment to democratic processes, condemning violence (e.g., the 2025 Pahalgam attack that killed 26 people) and focusing on issues like education, healthcare, youth employment, and community empowerment. The JDF’s formation reflects a pragmatic adaptation, aiming to mainstream JeI’s ideology within a secular political space, though this shift has sparked debate among observers who question the compatibility of JeI’s theocratic roots with democratic participation.

Strategic Alliances and Political Vision

On June 30, 2025, the JDF joined the People’s Alliance for Change (PAC), a coalition with the Jammu and Kashmir Peoples Conference (JKPC) led by Sajad Gani Lone and the People’s Democratic Front (PDF) led by Hakeem Mohammad Yaseen. The PAC, announced at a press conference in Srinagar, aims to address the “crisis of leadership and accountability” in Jammu and Kashmir, prioritizing the restoration of statehood, the release of political prisoners, and the reintegration of marginalized communities. Lone, who won the Handwara seat in the 2024 assembly elections, described the alliance as a “moral and political necessity” to represent the victims of decades-long turmoil.

The PAC’s agenda includes restoring Articles 370 and 35-A, addressing systemic biases in government recruitment (e.g., Lone’s claim that 90% of new jobs favor Jammu over Kashmir), and advocating for compassion toward political prisoners like Shabir Shah. The JDF’s participation in the PAC signals its intent to collaborate rather than compete alone, as Thokar noted, “We cannot succeed alone. To serve the people effectively, we must unite.” This alliance enhances the JDF’s visibility and influence, though it faces competition from entrenched parties like the NC, which won 42 seats in 2024, and the BJP, with 29 seats.

Challenges and Criticisms

The JDF faces significant hurdles in establishing itself as a credible political force. First, its association with the banned JeI invites scrutiny from authorities and skepticism from secular analysts. The 2019 UAPA ban and subsequent crackdowns, including the seizure of JeI properties and books by Maududi in 2025, underscore the government’s view of JeI as a threat to national security. The JDF must navigate this stigma while proving its commitment to non-violence and constitutional politics.

Second, the JDF’s electoral prospects are uncertain. In the 2024 assembly elections, JeI-backed independents, including Reshi and Talat Majid, failed to win seats, though their participation marked a departure from JeI’s boycott strategy. The upcoming panchayat and municipal elections in April and May 2026 will test the JSamim Ahmad Thokar has been appointed as the president of the JDF, with Abdul Rehman Shalla as vice-president and Sayar Ahmad Reshi as general secretary, all of whom contested the 2024 elections as independents. Their experience in electoral politics, despite setbacks, fuels their resolve to formalize the JDF as a registered party with the Election Commission of India, with a planned launch in Srinagar pending clearance.

A Counter-Narrative to Delegitimization

The JDF’s emergence has sparked accusations from mainstream parties and critics of being a divisive force or a proxy for external agendas, including allegations of BJP sponsorship to fragment the Kashmiri vote. JDF leaders have countered these claims, urging the public to resist “manipulative narratives” that undermine their legitimacy. They argue that such accusations are attempts to silence a genuine people’s movement rooted in ethical principles and accountability. The JDF’s emphasis on sacrifice—many members have left stable careers to join the cause—reinforces its narrative of being driven by conviction rather than ambition.

The Road Ahead

The JDF’s success hinges on its ability to maintain ideological clarity, broaden its outreach, and offer tangible solutions to pressing issues like unemployment, education, and healthcare disparities. Its appeal, particularly among youth and those disillusioned with mainstream politics, is evident, but translating this into electoral success requires overcoming bureaucratic hurdles, political isolation, and public skepticism. The PAC alliance provides a platform to amplify its message, but the JDF must also address internal JeI factionalism, as the decision to enter electoral politics has split the organization.

If the JDF can sustain its focus on justice and development while navigating these challenges, it could emerge as a transformative force in Jammu and Kashmir. By prioritizing dignity, accountability, and grassroots empowerment, the JDF offers a vision of politics guided by truth and sacrifice, potentially restoring trust in a region long scarred by conflict and mistrust.

Conclusion

The Justice and Development Front represents a bold attempt to reframe Jammu and Kashmir’s political narrative, drawing on JeI’s historical resilience while adapting to a new democratic context. Its formation amid the grief of the 2025 Pahalgam tragedy and ongoing political repression underscores its symbolic and strategic significance. As it prepares for the 2026 local body elections and strengthens its role in the People’s Alliance for Change, the JDF has the potential to reshape the region’s politics—if it can overcome the formidable obstacles in its path. Whether it becomes a fleeting experiment or a lasting voice for the marginalized will depend on its ability to translate moral conviction into effective governance.

(Columnist Sheikh Mohammad Isa)

He Went to Invade Afghanistan—40 Years Later, This Russian Soldier Returned Home as a Muslim Grandfather

Noor Mohammad

After four decades in Afghanistan, Noor Mohammad—once known as Sergei Yurevich Krasnoperov—has finally returned to his native Russia. Now 60 years old, he left behind a life defined by war, faith, and resilience to briefly revisit his roots in Kurgan, a city in the West Siberian Plain. His journey from Soviet soldier to Afghan citizen is a rare and extraordinary tale of transformation, survival, and belonging.

From Siberia to the Afghan Front

In 1983, Sergei Krasnoperov was conscripted into the Soviet Army and dispatched to Afghanistan during one of the most brutal periods of the Cold War. The Soviet invasion, which began in 1979, aimed to support Afghanistan’s communist government but triggered a fierce and protracted resistance from the mujahideen. The conflict would ultimately claim the lives of over 15,000 Soviet soldiers and hundreds of thousands of Afghans.

Sergei’s story took a dramatic turn when he made a decision that changed the course of his life: he left his military base unarmed. According to him, it was a moment of instinct and reflection. “I didn’t know what awaited me, but I knew I couldn’t be part of this anymore,” he says.

When he was captured by Afghan fighters, they chose not to harm him. “Because I was unarmed, they showed mercy,” he recalls. “The commander told his men, ‘This man came of his own will, leave him be.’” That moment marked the beginning of his new life.

A New Identity: Noor Mohammad

Accepted by the mujahideen, Sergei converted to Islam and adopted the name Noor Mohammad. He was not sent to the frontlines but contributed to the resistance in support roles—fueling tanks, managing supplies, and loading ammunition. “It was all part of the war effort,” he explains.

He recalls the early days of his new life with a mixture of nostalgia and humility. “I wasn’t religious before. Back in Russia, we only cared about vodka and women. But here, people respected me, taught me their ways, and helped me find peace.”

Noor Mohammad quickly learned the local language and integrated into the community. The mujahideen encouraged him to marry and build a life in Afghanistan. He did just that—marrying an Afghan woman and eventually fathering 13 children, though heartbreak shadowed their joy: seven of his children died in infancy. Today, he has six surviving children and two grandchildren.

A Quiet Life in Kabul

Over the years, Noor Mohammad worked as a diesel generator mechanic for Afghanistan’s national energy company. He led a modest life, earning around 5,000 Afghanis (roughly 100 U.S. dollars) per month. Despite the financial hardship, he never wavered in his commitment to his adopted country.

Even when the Russian embassy offered to repatriate him and his family, he declined. “My mother came in the 1990s and begged me to return, but I couldn’t,” he says. “Russia is no longer the superpower it once was. People there struggle. Here, even the Taliban respect me.”

His life became so intertwined with Afghan culture that most wouldn’t guess his Russian origins—except perhaps for his daughter, who rides a motorbike, a rare sight in conservative Afghan society.

Return to Russia

Now, after 40 years, Noor Mohammad has returned to Russia—but not to resettle. He came back to visit his aging mother, who is now 80 years old and still living in Kurgan. The reunion is bittersweet. “This place feels distant, almost unfamiliar,” he says. “But I had to see my mother one last time.”

His visit has drawn attention not just for the personal reunion, but as a powerful symbol of the unexpected paths taken during the Soviet-Afghan War. Noor Mohammad is one of the few former Soviet soldiers who never returned home after the war—by choice, not by force.

A Man Between Two Worlds

Noor Mohammad embodies a rare duality: a man born Russian, shaped by war, but ultimately defined by faith and adopted family. He holds an Afghan passport, speaks Dari fluently, and considers Afghanistan his true home.

“I’m a proud Afghan,” he says simply. “I found peace, purpose, and people who treated me like one of their own. That’s more than I ever had back in Russia.”

His journey reflects the broader human consequences of global conflicts—stories not of generals or governments, but of individuals caught in the crosswinds of history, who forge new identities and find unexpected belonging far from home.

As he prepares to return once again to Kabul, Noor Mohammad leaves behind not just a country, but a chapter of a life that began with a war and transformed into a tale of faith, resilience, and quiet dignity.

General Asim Munir Named Field Marshal, Backed by Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari, Raising Fears of Democratic Backsliding

General Asim Munir

On May 20, 2025, Pakistan’s federal cabinet, under the leadership of Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif, approved the promotion of Chief of Army Staff General Syed Asim Munir to the rank of Field Marshal, a ceremonial five-star position not awarded since General Ayub Khan in 1965. This decision, reportedly backed by influential political figures Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari, has sparked widespread debate, with critics arguing it consolidates military dominance and undermines Pakistan’s fragile democratic framework. The move comes amid heightened tensions with India following Operation Sindoor and a controversial ceasefire, as well as ongoing domestic political turmoil, including the prolonged imprisonment of former Prime Minister Imran Khan. This article explores the implications of Munir’s promotion, its political backing, and its impact on Pakistan’s democratic values.

Background of the Promotion

The rank of Field Marshal, a rare and prestigious honor in Pakistan’s military hierarchy, was conferred on General Asim Munir for his “exemplary role” in managing a recent military escalation with India, particularly during the U.S.-brokered ceasefire following Operation Sindoor. The promotion was unanimously approved by the cabinet, chaired by Shehbaz Sharif, and announced by the Prime Minister’s Office. However, the decision has drawn scrutiny due to the timing and context, with some sources suggesting it was a strategic move to bolster Munir’s authority amid internal and external challenges.

General Munir, appointed as Chief of Army Staff in November 2022 by Shehbaz Sharif, has been a polarizing figure. His tenure has been marked by allegations of orchestrating the ouster of Imran Khan and suppressing the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party. Prior to his current role, Munir served as the director general of the Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) until his removal by Khan in 2019, which reportedly created tensions between the two. His promotion to Field Marshal is seen by some as a reward for his loyalty to the Sharif and Zardari political camps, raising concerns about the military’s growing influence over civilian governance.

Political Backing by Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari

Nawaz Sharif, the leader of the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N), and Asif Ali Zardari, co-chairman of the Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP), have been vocal supporters of the military’s role in recent national security efforts. On May 18, 2025, both leaders publicly commended the armed forces for their “professional excellence” and “unshakable courage” during tensions with India. Zardari, accompanied by Munir, visited Gujranwala Cantonment, while Nawaz praised the military’s professionalism at a meeting in Jati Umra. These endorsements suggest a close alignment between the military and the PML-N-PPP coalition, which critics argue has facilitated Munir’s rapid rise and the marginalization of democratic institutions.

Posts on X reflect public skepticism about this alliance, with some users claiming that Nawaz and Zardari have effectively turned the Pakistan Army into a tool for political control, likening it to a “Punjab police force.” This perception is fueled by the military’s alleged role in rigging elections and installing Shehbaz Sharif as a “puppet” prime minister after Khan’s ouster. The promotion of Munir, seen as a loyalist to both leaders, is viewed as a strategic move to solidify this military-political nexus, further sidelining opposition voices like those of the PTI.

Undermining Democratic Values

The promotion of General Munir to Field Marshal has raised significant concerns about the erosion of democratic values in Pakistan. The country’s history is replete with instances of military dominance, with army chiefs like Zia-ul-Haq and Pervez Musharraf staging coups to overthrow civilian governments. Munir’s elevation, coupled with recent judicial and legislative developments, is seen as a continuation of this trend. The Pakistan Supreme Court’s May 7, 2025, ruling, which overturned a previous decision and allowed civilians to be tried in military courts, has further strengthened Munir’s hand. This decision, passed in a 5-2 ruling led by Justice Aminuddin Khan, enables the prosecution of PTI supporters involved in the May 2023 anti-army protests following Khan’s arrest, which many believe was orchestrated by Munir.

The 26th Constitutional Amendment, which facilitates military trials for civilians, has been criticized as a blow to judicial independence and democratic norms. By empowering the military to suppress dissent, this ruling aligns with Munir’s broader strategy to control political opposition, particularly the PTI, which continues to demand Khan’s release. The prolonged imprisonment of Imran Khan, who has been detained since 2023 on corruption charges he claims are politically motivated, is seen as a direct consequence of this military-political collusion. Khan’s supporters argue that Munir, backed by Nawaz and Zardari, has orchestrated a crackdown to weaken the PTI, with the Field Marshal promotion serving as a reward for these efforts.

Moreover, Munir’s leadership has been accused of pushing Pakistan toward economic collapse and internal unrest. Retired Lieutenant General Rakesh Sharma has noted that Munir’s policies have undermined civilian governance and exacerbated tensions in regions like Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa. The military’s heavy-handed approach, including the handling of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) security, has strained relations with key allies like China, further destabilizing the country.

Public and International Reactions

Public sentiment, as reflected on X, is divided. Some view Munir’s promotion as a deserved honor for his role in navigating the recent India-Pakistan conflict, citing the success of the ceasefire as a testament to his leadership. Others, however, see it as a dangerous consolidation of military power, with one user describing it as a move that “escalates friction with PTI and Imran Khan loyalists.” The international community, particularly India, has expressed skepticism about Pakistan’s intentions. Indian media outlets have portrayed Munir’s promotion as a face-saving measure following military setbacks during Operation Sindoor, where India targeted Pakistani airbases and terrorist camps.

The U.S., which played a key role in brokering the ceasefire, has urged de-escalation but has not publicly commented on Munir’s promotion. However, the timing of the promotion, shortly after U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio’s call with Munir, suggests a complex interplay of international pressures and domestic politics.

Implications for Pakistan’s Future

The promotion of General Asim Munir to Field Marshal, backed by Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari, signals a troubling shift toward greater military control in Pakistan. By aligning with the PML-N-PPP coalition, Munir has solidified his position as the de-facto ruler, overshadowing civilian leadership. This move not only undermines democratic institutions but also risks further alienating opposition groups, particularly the PTI, which continues to rally for Khan’s release. The military’s expanded powers, bolstered by the Supreme Court’s ruling and the 26th Constitutional Amendment, create a dangerous precedent for the suppression of dissent and the erosion of judicial independence.

As Pakistan grapples with economic challenges, regional insurgencies, and strained international relations, the elevation of Munir to Field Marshal may deepen internal divisions and hinder the country’s path to democratic stability. The international community, including allies like China and the U.S., will likely watch closely as Pakistan navigates this precarious balance between military dominance and democratic aspirations.

Conclusion

The promotion of General Syed Asim Munir to Field Marshal, supported by Nawaz Sharif and Asif Ali Zardari, is a pivotal moment in Pakistan’s political landscape. While framed as a recognition of his leadership during a tense military standoff with India, the decision has far-reaching implications for the country’s democratic framework. By strengthening the military’s grip on power and prolonging the political marginalization of figures like Imran Khan, this move risks further destabilizing Pakistan’s already fragile democracy. As the nation faces internal and external challenges, the need for transparent, civilian-led governance has never been more critical.

Hashim Ali, Dal Lake Shikara Fruit Seller, Offers Free Fruit Chaat to Tourists After Pahalgam Attack

Dal Lake Shikara Fruit Seller

Srinagar, Jammu and Kashmir – In the heart of Srinagar’s famous Dal Lake, where the soft splash of oars and the quiet hum of shikaras set a peaceful rhythm, a humble fruit seller named Hashim Ali has turned his small boat into a symbol of solidarity and compassion. In a heartfelt gesture that has touched many, Hashim has begun offering free fruit chaat to tourists, hoping to spread kindness in the wake of the tragic Pahalgam terror attack that claimed 26 innocent lives, including several tourists.

A Response of Kindness Amid Tragedy

The April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, one of the deadliest on civilians in Kashmir in two decades, has left a deep scar across the Valley. The tragedy prompted security concerns, travel anxieties, and emotional distress—particularly among those visiting or planning to visit Kashmir.

But Hashim Ali, a shikara-based fruit vendor who has spent years catering to visitors on the shimmering waters of Dal Lake, decided to respond differently—not with fear or silence, but with generosity and empathy.

“I don’t have much,” Hashim told local media, “but I have fruits, and I have love for those who come to visit my Kashmir. Offering a bowl of fruit chaat is the least I can do to show that this land still cares, that we are not defined by terror.”

Creating Safe, Welcoming Spaces

Hashim’s initiative began the day after news of the Pahalgam attack spread. Tourists visiting Dal Lake noticed something unusual: Hashim waving them over and refusing to take money for his signature fruit chaat. “This is for peace,” he would say with a gentle smile, ladling fresh fruit into paper bowls aboard his vibrantly decorated shikara.

His act has since gained attention on social media, with posts praising his “humanity in times of heartbreak” and calling him “the real face of Kashmir.” Many visitors have been moved to tears by his gesture, some even returning later with small gifts or words of appreciation.

Tourist Rehana Qureshi from Mumbai shared her experience: “When we came to Kashmir, our families were worried. But meeting people like Hashim restored our faith. His fruit chaat was delicious, but his kindness was unforgettable.”

More Than Just a Gesture

While Hashim’s offering may seem simple, it carries a powerful message: terror cannot silence compassion. In a region long affected by conflict, his shikara has become a floating sanctuary of hope. His story reminds both locals and outsiders that Kashmiris, especially those whose livelihoods depend on tourism, are deeply invested in peace.

Hashim also hopes that his gesture will encourage more acts of kindness, saying, “We don’t need to be rich to help. A small effort can change someone’s heart.”

A Call for Unity

Hashim’s story arrives at a time when unity is needed most. As authorities tighten security and investigations into the Pahalgam attack continue, the people of Kashmir are doing their part to ensure that love and hospitality rise above fear and violence.

In the words of one passerby: “Terrorists tried to scare the world away from Kashmir. But Hashim, with just a bowl of fruit, reminded everyone what Kashmir truly is—a place of warmth, culture, and unmatched beauty.”

Conclusion

As the sun sets behind the Zabarwan mountains and shikaras glide across Dal Lake, Hashim Ali continues to serve fruit chaat with a smile, turning grief into grace, and fear into friendliness. In doing so, he has not only honored the memory of those lost in the Pahalgam attack but has also rekindled the spirit of Kashmiriyat—a legacy of harmony, hospitality, and resilience.

What Technology Proved: The Value of What We Already Had

The Value

In our constant race towards progress, we often forget the treasures we already own. Over time, human beings have replaced natural ways with modern inventions, believing them to be better. But as we move forward, we begin to realise something important: what we thought was outdated often turns out to be more valuable than we imagined. Technology, in many surprising ways, has proved this very truth — that many of the things we left behind were actually wiser, healthier, and closer to nature.


From Clay to Steel and Back Again

Years ago, our ancestors used clay pots to cook and store food. These earthen pots kept the water cool and added natural minerals to our meals. But with time, we moved to steel, plastic, and non-stick utensils. It was all about convenience and modern style. Later, health experts warned us about harmful chemicals in plastics and non-stick surfaces. People began returning to clay pots, realising they were not only safe but also added a natural taste to the food. In the end, technology helped us circle back to what was always good for us.


Thumbprint to Signature and Back Again

In the early days, most people couldn’t read or write, so they used thumb impressions as a form of identity. As education spread, we started using signatures to show literacy and personal identity. Now, in the digital age, we’re scanning our thumbs again — for smartphones, ID checks, and bank logins. Ironically, we’re back to the thumb, not because we are uneducated, but because it is now seen as the most secure and personal form of identity. What was once seen as basic has now become advanced.


Simple Clothes to Fashion and Back to Simplicity

There was a time when people wore simple, clean clothes. With modern fashion, we began wearing expensive branded clothes, following the latest trends. Soon enough, fashion trends brought back torn jeans and “rugged” looks — something that was once linked with poverty or hard labour. Today, we pay extra for clothes that look old or worn out, forgetting that they were once seen as a sign of hardship. Again, fashion took us full circle.


Hard Work to Fitness Centres

Our ancestors lived tough lives, full of physical work. Then came machines, offices, and comfort. We stopped walking and lifting, and diseases like obesity and diabetes became common. To fight this, we now pay money to join gyms, jog on walking tracks, and lift weights — all to stay healthy. We are doing the same physical work, but in a modern setting. The message is clear: the hard work we avoided was actually keeping us fit.


Natural Foods to Packaged Products and Back to Organic

There was a time when food came fresh from the farm. As technology improved, we began eating processed and packaged foods for the sake of ease. But with these came preservatives, chemicals, and health risks. Today, “organic food” is a growing market — a return to natural farming, chemical-free vegetables, and fresh dairy. We are going back to the way our elders ate, understanding that it was far better for our bodies.


Old and Simple to Branded and Back to Vintage

Old furniture, handmade tools, and traditional items were once considered outdated. We threw them out and filled our homes with branded, factory-made goods. But slowly, we began to admire “antiques” — old clocks, wooden chests, and traditional crafts. People now collect them proudly and pay large amounts to own a piece of the past. Once again, the charm of the old has returned.


From Dusty Playgrounds to Clean Homes and Back to Nature

Earlier, children played outside, got dirty in mud, and built strong immune systems. With fear of germs, we brought them indoors, gave them screens, and sterilised their toys. But now, doctors advise outdoor play and exposure to natural elements to build immunity. We are learning, once more, that a little dirt is not the enemy — it is part of growing up healthy.


The Hidden Message

All these examples show one thing clearly: modern technology often proves the value of what we already had. Our religion, culture, and natural lifestyles gave us simple solutions that worked. They were not backed by data or marketing, but by deep understanding of life and health.

Technology is not the enemy, but it helps us realise that not everything new is better — and not everything old is useless. Sometimes, progress means going back to where we started, with better understanding and appreciation.

In the end, what we left behind in search of something new, might just be the very thing we need the most today.

We walked away from earthen clay,
To shiny pots and steel so grey,
But now we stir the meals once more,
In mud that kept our health in store.

We signed our names with fancy pride,
Left thumbprints quietly aside,
Yet now we scan that print again,
A circle drawn, not made in vain.

From torn old clothes we ran so fast,
To fashion’s shine that couldn’t last,
And now we wear, with pride and grin,
What once was poor is now “a trend” within.

We left the fields, the sweat, the strain,
To chase our dreams on comfort’s train,
But now we jog, and lift with might,
To bring back strength we left in flight.

Fresh food gave way to cans and packs,
With sugar, salt, and plastic wraps,
But now we seek the farmer’s land,
With “organic” labels, clean and grand.

Old things we once threw far away,
Are now antiques we proudly display,
The wooden chest, the rusted bell,
All hold the tales we wish to tell.

We stopped the kids from dirt and play,
Afraid of germs along the way,
But now we know the mud was wise,
It builds the strength that truly lies.

So here we stand, not lost but wise,
With open hearts and clearer eyes,
What once we thought was old and plain,
Is gold we seek, again… again.

Afghan Refugees Face New Crackdown in Pakistan: ‘In Pakistan We’re Afghans, in Afghanistan We’re Treated as Pakistanis

Afghan Refugees

The Pakistani government has started sending Afghan refugees back to Afghanistan again. This time, most of the action is happening in Punjab and Islamabad, where police are arresting Afghan citizens who are living without legal documents.

Some Afghan people told BBC that they feel scared all the time. One person said, “We don’t have a home anymore. In Pakistan, we are called Afghans, and in Afghanistan, we are treated like Pakistanis.”

Arrests and Raids

The government is running a big operation against Afghans who don’t have legal papers or only have Afghan Citizen Cards. Since April 1, over 8,115 Afghan refugees have been sent back to Afghanistan through the Torkham border. The operation is still going on.

However, in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa (KP), no arrests have been made yet. Instead, local police are making a list of Afghan residents in areas like Peshawar, Board, Tajabad, and Tehkal. Police have asked many families to return to Afghanistan on their own.

Life in Punjab

In Punjab, the crackdown is the strongest. Every day, hundreds of Afghan refugees are being arrested and taken to holding centres. After checking their documents, they are sent to the Torkham border to go back to Afghanistan.

One Afghan woman teacher in Peshawar told a doctor that if she’s forced to return, she’ll fall into depression. She is scared and has started taking medicines for mental stress. She said that in Taliban-ruled Afghanistan, women are not allowed to work, while in Pakistan she had a job.

In Rawalpindi, another Afghan man said police have told bus stations not to sell tickets to Afghan people. Even those who have Afghan Citizen Cards are afraid.

Past and Present

Afghan refugees started coming to Pakistan many years ago, especially after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Now, the third generation of Afghan refugees is growing up in Pakistan. But many still live in fear that they could be sent back at any time.

Even though no arrests have happened in KP, Afghan people there are still scared. Some have already packed their things, not knowing what will happen next.

Role of KP Government

KP’s Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur said that the federal government is following a wrong policy and that his government will not force anyone to leave. He said that camps will be made for those who want to go back voluntarily and they will be sent back with respect.

His brother, MPA Faisal Amin Gandapur, said that if the UK and US can give nationality to children born there, then Pakistan should also make a policy to give nationality to Afghan refugees. He said that many Afghans have invested in Pakistan and that sending them back will hurt the economy of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa.

What’s Happening in KP?

Since September 2023, around 488,187 Afghan refugees have already been sent back through the Torkham border.

Some people believe that Afghan refugees might move to Khyber Pakhtunkhwa from Punjab and Islamabad, but no proof of this has been found yet. Property dealers in Peshawar said they haven’t seen a big increase in Afghan customers looking for homes.

Artists and Women are Most Worried

The refugees who are most afraid are women, students, and musicians. In Peshawar and Quetta, over 500 Afghan artists are living in fear. They came to Pakistan when the Taliban came to power in Afghanistan.A music artist named Rashid Khan said, “If we are sent back, it will be like death for us. In Afghanistan, the Taliban don’t allow music or art.”

Sulaiman Al Rajhi: The Billionaire Who Donated Over ₹1.3 Lakh Crore to Charity

Sulaiman Al Rajhi

In the world of billionaires, where wealth is often accumulated and expanded, Sulaiman Al Rajhi stands out as a remarkable exception. The Saudi businessman, who once ranked among the richest men in the world, made headlines not for his fortune but for his extraordinary act of generosity. He donated over $16 billion (₹1.3 lakh crore) of his wealth to charity, making him one of the greatest philanthropists in history. His inspiring journey from extreme poverty to immense wealth, and then to giving it all away, is a testament to his faith, humility, and commitment to the well-being of others.

From Rags to Riches: The Early Life of Sulaiman Al Rajhi

Born in 1929 in Saudi Arabia, Sulaiman bin Abdul Aziz Al Rajhi grew up in a modest family with little financial security. His early years were marked by hardships, and he had to work from a young age to support himself. At just nine years old, he worked as a porter in a local market, carrying shopping bags for customers. By the age of 12, he was collecting dates for meager wages, often sleeping on gravel with only the clothes on his back.

Despite these challenges, Al Rajhi had an entrepreneurial spirit and an unwavering belief in hard work. He took on various jobs and gradually saved money, always looking for opportunities to improve his financial situation. His journey was filled with struggles, but his perseverance paid off when he and his brothers ventured into the financial sector.

Building an Empire: The Rise of Al Rajhi Bank

In 1957, Sulaiman Al Rajhi co-founded Al Rajhi Bank with his three brothers. What started as a small financial venture soon grew into one of the largest Islamic banks in the world. Al Rajhi Bank became a leader in Sharia-compliant banking, offering interest-free financial services that aligned with Islamic principles.

Over the decades, the bank expanded rapidly, amassing billions in assets and making the Al Rajhi family one of the wealthiest non-royal families in Saudi Arabia. With his business success, Sulaiman Al Rajhi accumulated a fortune worth billions of dollars. However, he never lost sight of his humble beginnings and remained committed to giving back to society.

A Legacy of Generosity: The Unprecedented Donation

Unlike many billionaires who focus on growing their wealth, Sulaiman Al Rajhi believed in redistributing his fortune for the greater good. He made a historic decision to donate the majority of his wealth—over $16 billion (₹1.3 lakh crore)—to charitable causes. This massive donation was structured as a waqf, an Islamic endowment that ensures the funds are used for public welfare indefinitely.

He split his wealth into three parts:

  • Two-thirds went to charity in the form of waqf, supporting education, healthcare, and social welfare projects.
  • One-third was given to his family.
  • He personally chose to live a simple and humble life despite his vast wealth.

Philanthropic Contributions: Transforming Lives

Sulaiman Al Rajhi’s generosity has had a far-reaching impact across Saudi Arabia and beyond. Some of his major contributions include:

1. Sulaiman Al Rajhi University

He established a non-profit university that focuses on health sciences, business, and Islamic banking. The institution provides high-quality education to students, ensuring that knowledge and skills are accessible to all.

2. Healthcare and Social Welfare

Al Rajhi’s donations have funded hospitals, medical research, and healthcare initiatives, improving access to medical services for underprivileged communities.

3. Hunger Relief and Poverty Alleviation

Through his charitable foundation, he has funded numerous projects aimed at eradicating hunger and poverty, ensuring that basic necessities are available to those in need.

4. Islamic Banking and Financial Support

His contributions to Islamic banking continue to support ethical financial practices and provide interest-free financial services that align with Islamic principles.

A Simple Life Despite Immense Wealth

Despite being a billionaire, Sulaiman Al Rajhi lived a remarkably modest life. He believed that wealth was a test from God and that it should be used for the betterment of society. He avoided extravagance and focused on meaningful philanthropy. In interviews, he often emphasized that money was a means to serve humanity, not a tool for personal luxury.

Recognition and Awards

In recognition of his unparalleled generosity, Sulaiman Al Rajhi received numerous awards, including the King Faisal International Prize in 2012 for his outstanding contributions to philanthropy. His impact on society continues to be celebrated as an example of selflessness and devotion to the welfare of others.

The Enduring Legacy of Sulaiman Al Rajhi

At 95 years old, Sulaiman Al Rajhi’s story serves as an inspiration to millions. His decision to donate his fortune rather than keep it for himself or his heirs is a rare and commendable act. He has set an example for other wealthy individuals, showing that true success is measured not by the wealth one accumulates, but by the impact one has on others.

Through his charitable foundation, educational institutions, and humanitarian projects, Sulaiman Al Rajhi’s legacy of kindness and generosity will live on for generations to come. His life is proof that even in a world driven by wealth and power, there are still those who choose to give rather than take.

Sisi’s Secret Plan for Gaza Evacuation Sparks Outrage,Reports Claim Egypt Planned to Move 500,000 Palestinians

Sisi's Secret Plan

Egyptian President Abdel Fattah el-Sisi is facing massive backlash after reports surfaced about a secret plan to move 500,000 Palestinians from Gaza to Egypt’s Sinai region. The Lebanese newspaper Al-Akhbar first reported the claim, and several social media users on X backed it up. While Sisi has denied approving any such plan, the controversy has sparked anger and raised big questions about Egypt’s role in the ongoing Israel-Gaza war.

What’s the Alleged Plan?

According to reports, Sisi was open to temporarily relocating half a million Palestinians to a special city in North Sinai. The proposal was reportedly discussed with Arab leaders and linked to conditions set by the U.S. for rebuilding Gaza. Some sources even claim Jordan was involved in the talks.

Though described as a “temporary” move, there were no clear details about how long people would stay or whether they could return home. Many feared this could become a permanent displacement, reminding Palestinians of past forced removals, like the 1948 Nakba.

Sisi has repeatedly rejected any plan to push Palestinians into Sinai. In 2023, he warned that such a move could turn the area into a battleground for attacks against Israel. In January 2025, he also refused a similar suggestion from former U.S. President Donald Trump, calling it “unfair and dangerous for Egypt.”

Furious Reactions from Palestinians

News of the alleged plan triggered strong reactions, especially from Palestinian groups. Hamas reportedly called it a “dark morning,” fearing that it would lead to permanent exile. Many Palestinians believe that once they leave their land, they may never be allowed to return.

Sisi’s own words have added to the controversy. In a speech from November 2024, he warned that moving Palestinians to Sinai could “bring the fight from Gaza into Egypt.” This has worried many Egyptians, who fear it could invite attacks and instability.

Egypt’s Tough Position

Egypt plays a key role in mediating between Israel and Hamas. It has helped negotiate ceasefires and aid deliveries, making it a crucial player in the conflict. But if Egypt is seen as supporting Palestinian displacement, it could damage its reputation in the Arab world and spark protests at home.

Some reports claim Egypt is under pressure from the U.S. to take in refugees in exchange for financial aid. However, allowing mass relocation could create security risks, especially in Sinai, where Egyptian forces already battle extremist groups.

What Happens Next?

If Egypt were to approve such a plan, it could change the region’s balance. Sinai might become a new conflict zone, Israel-Egypt relations could suffer, and other Arab countries—like Jordan—might also feel pressured to take in refugees. The U.S. and other global powers could also face criticism for allegedly pushing for displacement under the cover of humanitarian aid.

For now, Sisi continues to deny any involvement, but the reports have already caused global outrage. Whether this was a real plan or just speculation, one thing is clear—any talk of Palestinian displacement will always be a highly sensitive and explosive issue.

References:

  1. The New Arab: Reports on Egypt’s alleged plan for Gaza evacuation.
  2. Egyptian Foreign Ministry: Official statement denying the relocation plan.
  3. Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem: Comments on the proposed plan.
  4. Arab League: Statement reaffirming support for Palestinian rights.
  5. President El-Sisi’s public address: Denial of the relocation proposal.

The Battle of Badr Islam’s Historic Victory

Battle of Badr

The Battle of Badr, fought on March 13, 624 CE (17th Ramadan, 2 AH in the Islamic calendar), was a defining moment in early Islamic history. It was the first major military confrontation between the newly established Muslim community in Medina, led by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), and the powerful Quraysh tribe of Mecca. Despite being vastly outnumbered, the Muslim forces secured a decisive victory, reinforcing their faith and solidifying their presence in the Arabian Peninsula. This battle is remembered not just as a military triumph but as a pivotal event that shaped the course of Islam.

Background and Causes of the Battle

The tensions leading to the Battle of Badr stemmed from years of persecution faced by Muslims in Mecca, which ultimately forced them to migrate to Medina in 622 CE (the Hijra). Although the Muslims had settled in their new home, hostilities with the Quraysh persisted. The immediate cause of the battle was economic: the Muslims planned to intercept a lucrative Meccan trade caravan led by Abu Sufyan, which was returning from Syria with goods essential to the Quraysh’s wealth.

Realizing the danger, Abu Sufyan changed his route and sent word to Mecca, seeking reinforcements. In response, the Quraysh assembled a formidable army of around 1,000 warriors, including many of their strongest fighters, to confront the Muslims. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) gathered a small force of 313 men, with limited resources: only two horses and 70 camels. Despite the overwhelming odds, the Muslims were prepared to fight for their survival and faith.

The Course of the Battle

The two armies met at Badr, near a series of wells southwest of Medina, a strategically important location. Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) displayed remarkable military acumen by securing control of the water sources, limiting the Quraysh’s access.

The battle commenced with the traditional Arabian practice of single combat. Three warriors from each side engaged in duels, with the Muslim champions – Ali ibn Abi Talib, Hamza ibn Abdul Muttalib, and Ubayda ibn al-Harith – emerging victorious. This initial success boosted the morale of the Muslim army.

As the full battle erupted, the Muslims, despite their numerical disadvantage, displayed exceptional discipline and resilience. According to Islamic tradition, divine intervention played a role in their victory, as described in the Quran (Surah Al-Anfal 8:17): “You did not kill them, but it was Allah who killed them.” By the end of the battle, around 70 Quraysh fighters, including their leader Abu Jahl, had been killed, and another 70 were taken as prisoners. In contrast, the Muslims lost only 14 men, who are revered as martyrs in Islamic history.

The Impact and Significance of the Victory

The Battle of Badr had far-reaching consequences for the young Muslim community and the broader Islamic movement:

  1. Strengthened the Muslim Community: The victory at Badr significantly boosted the morale of Muslims and solidified Prophet Muhammad’s (PBUH) leadership. It reassured his followers that their faith in Islam and their sacrifices were not in vain.
  2. Weakened the Quraysh’s Influence: The loss at Badr severely damaged the reputation of the Quraysh, who had previously been regarded as invincible. Their political and economic power in Arabia began to wane.
  3. Established Islam as a Political Force: Until Badr, Islam was primarily seen as a spiritual movement. The battle demonstrated that the Muslims were a formidable political and military entity, capable of defending themselves and influencing regional affairs.
  4. Set the Stage for Future Battles: The Quraysh sought revenge, leading to further conflicts such as the Battle of Uhud (625 CE) and the Battle of the Trench (627 CE). However, the eventual conquest of Mecca in 630 CE can be traced back to the momentum generated by the victory at Badr.
  5. Religious and Cultural Significance: Badr is commemorated annually by Muslims as a moment of divine support and unwavering faith. The 14 fallen Muslims are honored as martyrs, and the battle remains a symbol of perseverance against adversity.

Badr’s Legacy in the Modern Era

Even today, the Battle of Badr is remembered as a powerful lesson in faith, resilience, and strategic thinking. It continues to inspire Muslims worldwide, serving as a reminder that belief, unity, and determination can overcome even the most daunting challenges. Events commemorating the battle, such as the gathering at Aali Masjid Eidgah in Srinagar on March 18, 2025, where Mirwaiz Umar Farooq honored its martyrs, highlight its enduring significance.

The Battle of Badr was more than just a military victory; it was a turning point that paved the way for Islam’s expansion and the eventual establishment of a unified Muslim state. Its lessons remain relevant, reminding believers of the power of faith, justice, and perseverance in the face of adversity.

Why Indian Muslim Leaders Are Finally Taking to the Streets ?

Indian Muslim Leaders

On March 17, 2025, the iconic Jantar Mantar in New Delhi transformed into a sea of voices, banners, and determination as Indian Muslim leaders spearheaded what many are calling a groundbreaking protest movement. For the first time, the All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB), joined by a coalition of community figures, political allies, and everyday citizens, took to the streets in a unified stand. The air was thick with emotion, and the timing—right in the middle of Ramadan—only amplified the stakes. So, what pushed these leaders to this unprecedented step? The answer lies in a single piece of legislation that’s ignited a firestorm of debate: the Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024.

The Spark That Lit the Flame

At the heart of this historic demonstration is a proposed law that has sent shockwaves through India’s Muslim community. The Waqf (Amendment) Bill 2024 aims to overhaul how Waqf properties—think mosques, madrasas, graveyards, and other community assets—are managed. For the AIMPLB and its supporters, this isn’t just a policy tweak; it’s a direct challenge to their rights and heritage. They argue that the bill threatens the autonomy of these properties, potentially opening the door to government overreach and disrupting a system that’s been in place for generations.

The protest kicked off with a clear demand: scrap the bill entirely. Leaders from the AIMPLB took to the stage at Jantar Mantar, their voices echoing through the crowd as they explained why this moment felt like a breaking point. For them, it’s not just about the Waqf properties themselves—it’s about a deeper frustration with a system they believe has ignored their concerns for far too long. The bill, in their eyes, was the final straw, a symbol of years of grievances piling up without resolution.

A Historic Gathering in Unlikely Times

What makes this protest stand out isn’t just its scale—it’s the timing. Ramadan, a month of fasting, reflection, and prayer, isn’t typically when you’d expect a mass demonstration. Yet, here were thousands of people, braving the day’s heat and their own physical limits, to make their voices heard. The sight of community leaders rallying during such a sacred time sent a powerful message: this isn’t business as usual. This is a community saying, “Enough is enough.”

The crowd wasn’t just AIMPLB members, either. Opposition politicians, religious scholars, and activists from across the spectrum joined in, turning the event into a rare show of unity. Heavy police presence lined the area, but the demonstration stayed peaceful, with participants channeling their energy into speeches and chants rather than confrontation. It was a striking scene: a diverse group coming together under one banner, driven by a shared sense of urgency.

What’s Really at Stake?

So, why all the fuss over a bill about property management? For the protesters, it’s more than just land—it’s identity. Waqf properties aren’t just assets; they’re tied to the cultural and religious fabric of India’s Muslim community. The fear is that the amendments could weaken their control over these spaces, handing more power to the government and potentially disrupting their purpose. Some even worry it’s a step toward erasing a vital part of their legacy.

On the flip side, supporters of the bill see it differently. Government voices and some political leaders argue that the changes are long overdue. They point to issues like mismanagement and disputes over Waqf properties, suggesting that reforms—like digitizing records and tightening oversight—could bring clarity and benefit the community, especially its poorest members. It’s a classic clash of perspectives: one side sees a threat, the other sees progress.

A Debate That’s Bigger Than One Bill

This protest isn’t happening in a vacuum. It’s the culmination of years of tension, where many in the Muslim community feel their voices haven’t been heard on issues ranging from legal rights to social policies. The Waqf bill became the lightning rod, but the emotions on display at Jantar Mantar hint at something broader—a demand for recognition and respect within India’s complex democratic framework.

Critics of the protest, including some within the community, question whether this is the right fight. They wonder if the AIMPLB’s focus on the bill is more about politics than people, pointing to internal debates about how best to address the community’s needs. Meanwhile, the government and its allies are digging in, framing the amendments as a practical fix rather than a power grab. With both sides entrenched, the stage is set for a showdown that could ripple through India’s political landscape.

What Happens Next?

As the sun set on March 17, the protesters dispersed, but the energy lingered. The AIMPLB vowed to keep pushing, hinting at more actions if their demands aren’t met. With the bill still under review and parliamentary discussions looming, all eyes are on how the government—and its coalition partners—will respond. Will this historic protest force a rethink, or will it deepen the divide?

One thing’s clear: this isn’t just about a law anymore. It’s about a community stepping into the spotlight, demanding to be heard. Whether you see it as a bold stand or a risky gamble, the events at Jantar Mantar have changed the conversation. And as India watches, the question remains: what will it take to bridge this gap?


Former TTP Spokesman Ehsanullah Ahsan Warns of Pakistan Reactivating Jihadi Groups in Kashmir

Ehsanullah Ahsan

In a significant and alarming revelation, former Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) spokesman Ehsanullah Ahsan has warned that Pakistan is once again resorting to its old strategy of using jihadist groups as proxies to advance its geopolitical interests. In an article published in The Sunday Guardian, Ahsan claimed that Pakistan’s security establishment is facilitating the reactivation of militant groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) in Kashmir, with the aim of escalating instability in the region.

Ahsan stated that Pakistan’s foreign policy has long been interventionist and shaped by a military mindset, prioritizing regional influence over internal stability. However, recent developments, particularly the strengthening diplomatic and economic ties between India and the Taliban-led Afghanistan, have reportedly left Pakistan frustrated. Islamabad had long sought to maintain its influence over Afghanistan, but the Taliban’s independent foreign policy, which includes fostering better relations with India, has put Pakistan’s establishment in a difficult position.

This growing India-Taliban closeness has compelled Pakistan to return to its traditional reliance on jihadi factions to maintain its influence in Kashmir and counter India’s regional ascendancy. Ahsan noted that the reactivation of these groups is not only a desperate attempt to revive the armed insurgency in Kashmir but also serves as a distraction from Pakistan’s mounting internal crises and diplomatic setbacks.

According to Ahsan, Pakistan’s Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) has directed groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba and Jaish-e-Mohammed to resume operations in Kashmir. He warned that the renewed activities of these groups could lead to increased violence, cross-border terrorism, and heightened tensions between India and Pakistan.

This revelation is particularly concerning as these organizations have long been accused of carrying out deadly attacks in India. LeT was responsible for the 2008 Mumbai attacks, while JeM has been linked to multiple suicide bombings, including the 2019 Pulwama attack that killed 40 Indian paramilitary personnel.

Ahsan also alleged that Pakistan has been using jihadist groups as a proxy arm of ISIS in Afghanistan, further fueling instability in the region. By backing these militant outfits, Pakistan is not only endangering Kashmir but also risking a broader conflict that could impact South Asia as a whole.

Ahsan argued that Pakistan’s reliance on jihadist groups stems from its worsening internal situation. The country is facing a deep economic crisis, international pressure over its alleged links to terrorism, and increasing diplomatic isolation. These challenges have reportedly forced the Pakistani establishment to revert to old strategies of state-sponsored terrorism to deflect attention from its failing governance.

Pakistan has long faced accusations from India and the global community for harboring terrorist networks and providing them with logistical and financial support. In recent years, international watchdogs like the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) have repeatedly placed Pakistan on its grey list for failing to curb terror financing. Reactivating jihadist groups in Kashmir could push Islamabad further into international scrutiny and invite stringent sanctions.

India has consistently maintained that Pakistan is the primary sponsor of terrorism in Kashmir and has called for global action against Islamabad’s terror infrastructure. If Ahsan’s claims are accurate, this development could lead to increased cross-border attacks, security concerns, and a potential escalation in Indo-Pakistan hostilities.

New Delhi has strengthened counter-terrorism measures, enhanced border security, and intensified diplomatic efforts to expose Pakistan’s terror links on the global stage. The Indian government may also push for further economic and diplomatic sanctions against Pakistan if credible evidence emerges regarding the reactivation of jihadist groups in Kashmir.

Ehsanullah Ahsan’s warnings about Pakistan’s renewed efforts to reactivate jihadist groups in Kashmir are deeply troubling. If his claims hold true, South Asia could be on the verge of another cycle of violence and instability. The international community must closely monitor Pakistan’s activities and hold it accountable for any actions that threaten peace and security in the region. India, on its part, will need to stay vigilant and continue its diplomatic and strategic efforts to counteract these emerging threats.

Locals Angry as 90% of Pahalgam Construction Notices Target Small Homeowners, Not Hoteliers

Omar Abdullah

The Jammu and Kashmir government has issued 256 new notices for construction deviations in Pahalgam, adding to the growing concerns among locals over alleged bias in enforcement actions. Residents claim that while small homeowners are being penalized for minor extensions like bathrooms and storage spaces, large hotel owners who have constructed multi-story buildings with hundreds of rooms continue to operate without any action.

Government Issues Fresh Notices

On Thursday, the Jammu and Kashmir government confirmed that a total of 256 notices had been issued under the Pahalgam Development Authority (PDA) for violations in construction regulations. This follows an earlier announcement of 269 notices, making it a total of 525 notices in recent weeks. The notices were issued as part of an official effort to curb unauthorized constructions in the region.

However, the move has sparked outrage among the local population, who argue that nearly 90% of these notices target small homeowners, particularly those who have built minor structures such as bathrooms or storage areas outside their homes. Many believe this enforcement is unfair, as it does not seem to apply equally to wealthy hoteliers who have built massive structures in the area.

Locals Raise Questions Over Selective Action

Residents have questioned why large hotels, some of which have constructed eight-story buildings with hundreds of rooms, have not received a single notice. They allege that authorities are focusing on small homeowners while ignoring big business interests in the region.

“Why are only locals being targeted? We have a right to build small extensions like bathrooms and stores. Meanwhile, luxury hotels are expanding without any restrictions,” said a local resident.

Another protester stated, “If the government is serious about maintaining Pahalgam’s natural beauty and preventing unauthorized construction, they should take action against everyone equally, not just the weaker sections of society.”

Waheed-ur-Rehman Para’s Role in Raising the Issue

MLA Pulwama, Waheed-ur-Rehman Para, had earlier raised a question in the Assembly about the total number of illegal and unauthorized constructions in Pahalgam. However, locals feel that he should have specifically asked how many of the notices were issued to small homeowners and how many were given to hoteliers.

They argue that the real issue is not just the number of notices but who is receiving them. “Waheed Para should have asked how many notices were given to local residents versus hotel owners. The government must answer this question,” said a resident.

Authorities Defend Their Actions

In response to these concerns, the Jammu and Kashmir government has maintained that the notices are issued based on clear violations of the law. The Chief Minister, who also serves as the Minister of Tourism, stated that the Pahalgam Development Authority is responsible for ensuring that all constructions adhere to legal permissions.

“The PDA is the nodal agency for checking deviations and unauthorized constructions in the notified areas. Demolition drives are carried out whenever required,” the minister said.

However, critics argue that enforcement should be fair and transparent. They demand that the government release a detailed breakdown of the notices, specifying how many were issued to local homeowners and how many to hotel businesses.

Growing Public Outrage

The issue has sparked protests in Pahalgam, with many locals calling for a review of the notices. They are demanding an independent investigation into the enforcement process to ensure that it is not biased against small property owners.

“We are not against laws, but they should apply to everyone. The government must take strict action against illegal hotel constructions as well,” said another resident.

The ongoing controversy has put pressure on the government to address public concerns and ensure fairness in its actions. As the debate continues, locals are determined to fight for their rights and seek justice in what they see as a deeply unfair situation.

Naya Kashmir: Economic Transformation, Growth Drivers, and Future Challenges

naya kashmir

The concept of “Naya Kashmir” has become synonymous with transformation and progress in the region of Jammu and Kashmir. Since the abrogation of Article 370 in 2019, the government has implemented several initiatives aimed at fostering economic development, improving infrastructure, and diversifying the economy. While these changes have led to a visible shift in the economic landscape, challenges remain that need to be addressed for sustainable and inclusive growth.

Kashmir Tourism 2025

Key Drivers of Economic Growth

Increased Investment

One of the most significant aspects of economic transformation in Naya Kashmir is the surge in private and public investments. The government has actively promoted the region as a favorable investment destination by offering incentives and streamlining business processes. As a result, investments worth approximately ₹33,000 crore have been committed across various sectors. This influx of capital has spurred industrial development, job creation, and economic expansion.

Infrastructure Development

A strong emphasis has been placed on upgrading infrastructure, recognizing its importance for long-term economic growth. Key developments include:

Travel Kashmir
  • Road and Transport Networks: Improved connectivity with upgraded highways, tunnels, and bridges, enhancing accessibility across the region.
  • Power and Energy Infrastructure: Strengthening of electricity grids and renewable energy projects to ensure stable power supply.
  • Digital Connectivity: Expansion of internet infrastructure, including the rollout of 4G and 5G services, fostering digital inclusion and e-governance. These initiatives are creating a more business-friendly environment and improving the quality of life for residents.

Tourism Revival

Tourism has traditionally been the backbone of Kashmir’s economy, and recent efforts to enhance security and infrastructure have led to a revival of this sector. Key factors driving this resurgence include:

  • Increased tourist footfall due to improved security measures.
  • Promotion of offbeat destinations and adventure tourism.
  • Revival of traditional handicrafts and cultural tourism, benefiting local artisans and small businesses. This revival is contributing to job creation, boosting local businesses, and reinforcing Kashmir’s status as a premier tourist destination.

Economic Diversification

Reducing reliance on traditional sectors has been a key focus of the government. Efforts are being made to strengthen and expand industries such as:

  • Agriculture and Horticulture: Promotion of high-value crops such as saffron, apples, and walnuts.
  • Fisheries: Expansion of trout farming as a means of generating additional revenue.
  • Handicrafts and Small-Scale Industries: Revival of Kashmiri Pashmina, carpet weaving, and other traditional crafts through government support and global marketing initiatives. By fostering a diversified economy, the region is becoming more resilient to external economic fluctuations.

Challenges and Considerations

Addressing Unemployment

Despite economic growth, unemployment remains a pressing issue. To tackle this, the government needs to:

  • Enhance vocational training and skill development programs.
  • Encourage startups and entrepreneurship by providing financial and infrastructural support.
  • Create more job opportunities in sectors beyond government employment. A comprehensive employment strategy will be crucial to ensuring that economic benefits reach all sections of society.

Environmental Sustainability

Rapid development poses environmental challenges, particularly in a region known for its fragile ecosystem. Sustainable development measures must include:

  • Strict environmental regulations to prevent deforestation and pollution.
  • Investment in eco-friendly tourism practices.
  • Promotion of renewable energy sources to reduce dependence on fossil fuels. Balancing development with environmental conservation is essential for long-term sustainability.

Political and Social Stability

Maintaining peace and stability is critical for sustained economic progress. Efforts should be made to:

  • Address political grievances through dialogue and confidence-building measures.
  • Strengthen law enforcement while respecting civil liberties.
  • Promote social cohesion and inclusivity in governance and policy-making. A stable socio-political environment will foster investor confidence and economic growth.

Conclusion

Naya Kashmir is witnessing a remarkable transformation, driven by investment, infrastructure development, and economic diversification. However, challenges such as unemployment, environmental concerns, and political stability must be addressed to ensure sustainable progress. By implementing strategic policies and inclusive development measures, Jammu and Kashmir can emerge as a model of economic resilience and prosperity. The vision of Naya Kashmir is within reach, but it requires continued efforts and collaboration from all stakeholders to fully realize its potential.

Zelensky Stands Firm: Why Ukraine Cannot Accept Trump’s Ceasefire Demands

Trump

The Oval Office witnessed a heated confrontation between U.S. President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. What was meant to be a diplomatic discussion on a minerals deal and a potential ceasefire in Ukraine’s war against Russia instead turned into a tense shouting match that revealed deep divisions. While Trump demanded gratitude and concessions from Ukraine, Zelensky stood firm, refusing to gamble with his nation’s survival. His defiant stance was not just about pride—it was about justice, security, and the future of Ukraine’s sovereignty.

Ukraine’s Fight: More Than Just a U.S. Investment

Trump’s primary argument revolved around the idea that Ukraine owed the United States for the financial and military aid it had received. “We’ve given you $350 billion, military equipment, and a lot of backing,” Trump asserted, implying that Zelensky should show more deference and comply with his demands for a ceasefire. But this transactional view ignored a fundamental truth: Ukraine was not a mere beneficiary of American charity—it was a nation fighting for its existence against an aggressive invader.

Zelensky rightly pointed out that Ukraine had repeatedly expressed gratitude to the American people. However, gratitude did not mean submission. “We are in our own country, and we have stayed strong all this time,” he fired back. The U.S. aid was not a favor but a necessary response to Russia’s illegal war, a conflict that threatened not just Ukraine but the stability of Europe and democratic values worldwide.

The Danger of a Forced Ceasefire

Trump’s insistence on an immediate ceasefire as a solution to the war ignored the historical reality of Russian aggression. Time and again, Russia has violated peace agreements. From the annexation of Crimea in 2014 to the failed Minsk agreements of 2019, Moscow has consistently used ceasefires as a tool to regroup and launch further attacks.

Zelensky understood this pattern and refused to walk into the same trap. “Putin broke the ceasefire, he killed our people,” he reminded Trump and Vice President JD Vance, who had also criticized Ukraine’s stance. Accepting a ceasefire without firm security guarantees—such as NATO membership or a binding U.S. commitment—would leave Ukraine vulnerable to another Russian assault.

U.S. Policy Should Be About Justice, Not Transactions

Vice President Vance accused Zelensky of disrespecting the U.S. by challenging Trump in public. But Zelensky was not being disrespectful—he was defending his nation’s right to survive. “Come once!” he urged Vance. “Everybody has problems during the war, even you. But you have a nice ocean and don’t feel it now—you will feel it in the future.” His words were a stark reminder that Russia’s ambitions did not stop at Ukraine’s borders. A weak response today could embolden Putin to test NATO’s resolve tomorrow.

Trump’s assertion that “We’re trying to solve a problem here” disregarded the complex stakes at play. The conflict was not just about stopping bullets—it was about ensuring that Ukraine remained free and independent. Trump’s approach, which prioritized a quick deal over a just resolution, risked legitimizing Russia’s aggression and encouraging further global instability.

The Aftermath: Zelensky’s Defiance Resonates

Following the heated meeting, Trump dismissed Zelensky’s concerns, posting on Truth Social that “Zelensky disrespected the United States in its cherished Oval Office.” But Ukrainians rallied behind their president. One Kyiv resident summed up the sentiment: “They don’t respect the people of Ukraine—they don’t even hide it.”

Zelensky’s firm stance was not about being difficult or ungrateful. It was about refusing to let Ukraine be sacrificed for the sake of political expediency. His rejection of a hasty, ill-conceived ceasefire was a necessary stand for his people’s survival.

The Path Forward: A Just Peace, Not a Hollow Deal

Ukraine’s fight is not just its own—it is a fight for the principles of sovereignty, democracy, and international law. Zelensky understands that accepting a weak ceasefire without security guarantees would not bring peace but merely delay the next war. His defiance in the Oval Office was not about opposing the U.S. but about ensuring that any agreement truly secures Ukraine’s future.

Trump’s push for a quick deal may be politically convenient, but history has shown that appeasing aggressors only leads to greater conflict. The world should stand with Zelensky in demanding a peace that lasts—not one that serves short-term political interests. Ukraine does not need ultimatums; it needs unwavering support in its fight for freedom.

Verified by MonsterInsights