Trump Under Pressure as Iran War Drags On into Sixth Week
Washington, April 4, 2026 — As the United States continues its military campaign against Iran, criticism of President Donald Trump is increasing. The conflict, now in its sixth week, has left 365 American troops wounded and 13 dead, raising serious concerns about how the war is being handled.
In a national address on April 1–2, Trump described Operation Epic Fury as a “tremendous success.” He claimed that key goals — including weakening Iran’s missile systems, naval forces, and nuclear threat — are close to being achieved. He also suggested the war could end within two to three weeks.
At the same time, Trump warned that the United States could launch stronger attacks, possibly targeting Iran’s energy facilities and bridges, if Tehran does not agree to U.S. demands. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Growing Criticism Over Strategy and Messaging
Despite the President’s confidence, critics say the situation is becoming more risky and unclear.
One major concern is changing timelines and mixed messages. At the start, Trump suggested the conflict would be short. However, it has now lasted more than five weeks. His statements have also shifted — from claiming quick victory to warning of severe destruction, while still talking about possible negotiations.
Rising Human and Economic Costs
The human cost of the war is becoming harder to ignore. Many of the injured soldiers were affected by Iranian drone and missile attacks.
At the same time, the global economy is feeling the pressure. Oil prices have risen sharply, with Brent crude crossing $105 per barrel in recent reports. This has added to concerns about the wider economic impact of the conflict.
Iran Continues to Resist
Iran has shown no sign of backing down. Its leadership has rejected calls for a ceasefire, stating clearly there will be “no ceasefire, no surrender.”
Analysts believe the U.S. may have underestimated Iran’s ability to respond through indirect or asymmetric tactics. There are also fears that Iran could threaten key shipping routes like the Strait of Hormuz, which is vital for global oil supply.
Political Pressure Builds at Home
Back in the United States, political pressure on Trump is growing. Early signs of public support have not lasted, and reports suggest his approval ratings on the Iran issue are falling.
Even within conservative circles, there are concerns about a long war without a clear exit plan. As the conflict continues, it may become a major political issue in upcoming elections.
White House Defends the Operation
The Trump administration continues to defend its approach. Officials say the operation has achieved major military success, weakening Iran’s capabilities and leadership.
They stress that diplomacy is still an option but insist the U.S. will not allow Iran to develop nuclear weapons or continue its regional activities. Trump has repeatedly said, “America is winning.”
Supporters argue that strong military action was necessary after years of failed diplomacy and rising tensions.
Why Critics Say Trump Is “Losing Control”
Some media outlets and analysts have raised concerns about:
Confusion over goals — whether the aim is limited strikes or regime change
Underestimating Iran’s resistance
Political risks as the war continues longer than expected
Others, however, believe such criticism is too early and driven by politics, pointing to the U.S. military’s strength on the ground.
What Happens Next?
The situation remains uncertain and can change quickly. The Pentagon continues to share updates, while reports suggest that quiet diplomatic talks may still be taking place.
This war carries serious consequences — for U.S. troops, global stability, oil markets, and Trump’s leadership. The coming weeks will be crucial in deciding whether the conflict moves towards an end or becomes even more intense.
(Content Published written By News Of Kashmir Desk)
The ongoing war between the United States, Israel, and Iran has already caused huge suffering for millions of ordinary people. In just one month, thousands have died, cities have been damaged, and global oil prices have risen sharply. Families in Iran fear nightly airstrikes. Israelis live under constant missile threat. People across the world, including in India, are paying more for fuel, food, and transport. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
At this point, continuing the war makes no real sense. All sides have already hit major military targets. More fighting will only bring more deaths, poverty, and long-term hatred — without any clear winner.
The Human Cost Is Too High
This war is not just about politics or military power. It is about real people.
In Iran, more than 1,200–1,900 people have reportedly been killed, including many civilians and children. Homes, schools, and hospitals have been damaged. Thousands are injured or displaced.
In Israel, missile attacks have also killed civilians and caused injuries. The United States has lost military personnel as well.
Millions of families are living in fear. Children cannot go to school. Parents struggle to find food, medicine, and safe shelter. Hospitals are under pressure.
Every extra day of war means more suffering — more orphans, more widows, and more broken lives.
Global Economic Damage
The war is not only affecting the region — it is hurting the entire world.
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz, through which about 20% of the world’s oil passes, has pushed oil prices above $100–120 per barrel.
This has caused:
Higher fuel prices worldwide
Expensive food and transport
Rising costs for farmers and businesses
Risk of inflation and economic slowdown
In countries like India, this means daily life becomes more expensive for common people. Poor and middle-class families suffer the most.
History Shows War Often Fails
History clearly shows that long wars rarely bring real success.
The Iran-Iraq War (1980–1988) killed up to a million people, but ended with no major change.
The Vietnam War cost the US billions and many lives, but failed to achieve its main goals.
The Iraq War (2003) led to instability and long-term problems in the region.
These wars prove one thing: conflict destroys lives and economies but rarely delivers clear victory.
No Clear Winner in This War
In the current conflict:
The US and Israel have weakened Iran’s military systems
Iran has shown it can strike back and disrupt global shipping
But no side can fully defeat the other without causing even greater global damage.
Even US President Donald Trump has indicated he may reduce military operations and move toward diplomacy. Some oil tankers are already moving again due to talks.
This shows that dialogue works better than war.
The Right Path: Peace and Talks
Instead of continuing the conflict, all sides should take immediate steps:
Agree to a ceasefire to stop the violence
Start serious negotiations through neutral countries or global organisations
Focus on reopening the Strait of Hormuz safely
Protect civilians and rebuild damaged areas
Peace is not weakness. It is the smartest and most responsible choice.
Final Thoughts
The people of Iran, Israel, and the United States all want safety and stability. People around the world want lower prices and peace.
This war has already caused enough damage. Continuing it will only make things worse.
The world is watching. Leaders must now choose peace over destruction, because in the end, humanity wins only when the fighting stops.
US President Donald Trump is facing a very difficult decision in the ongoing US-Iran war (Operation Epic Fury), as reports suggest a possible high-risk commando operation inside Iran.
According to reports, the United States may send special forces deep into Iran to seize or destroy the country’s remaining highly enriched uranium. Experts warn that this could become one of the most dangerous missions ever for the US Army. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
What Is the Planned Operation?
So far, US and Israeli airstrikes have heavily damaged Iran’s nuclear sites, including Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan. However, officials believe Iran still has a large amount of near-weapons-grade uranium stored underground.
The proposed mission would involve elite US commandos entering Iranian territory to locate, secure, and remove or destroy this material. Reports suggest that hundreds or even more than 1,000 troops could be involved, with support from Army Rangers and Marines.
The main goal is to stop Iran from quickly developing nuclear weapons.
Why This Mission Is Very Dangerous
Military experts say this operation would be extremely risky for several reasons:
1. Fighting Inside Iran US troops would enter active war zones deep inside Iran. They could face attacks from Iranian forces, drones, missiles, and ambushes.
2. Radiation and Chemical Risk The uranium is stored in a toxic form. If containers break, soldiers could be exposed to dangerous chemicals and radiation, even with protective gear.
3. Very Difficult Logistics The uranium containers are large and heavy. Removing them from underground bunkers and transporting them safely under enemy fire would be very challenging.
4. Risk of Casualties and Escalation Experts say this could be one of the most complex missions ever. There is a high risk of US soldiers being injured, killed, or captured. It could also lead to a wider war in the region.
Some former US military commanders have called it a “very high-risk mission”, warning it may be nearly impossible without a larger ground war.
Bigger Concerns
The war has already seen US troops injured in missile and drone attacks. A ground raid inside Iran would mark a major escalation beyond current airstrikes.
While the mission could slow Iran’s nuclear programme, many fear it could start a longer and more dangerous conflict. Public opinion in the US is divided, with growing concern about the safety of American soldiers.
President Trump has said that all options remain open and that the US is moving “ahead of schedule.” However, the decision remains highly sensitive.
Conclusion
A commando raid to seize Iran’s uranium could reduce the nuclear threat, but it comes with serious risks. Experts warn that the dangers include combat, radiation exposure, and a wider war.
As the situation develops, the world is closely watching how the US will act next and what it means for global stability.
The growing confrontation between Iran and Israel is increasingly being portrayed as a narrow conflict over nuclear weapons and regional security. Yet the scale, rhetoric and strategic alignments surrounding the crisis suggest something far deeper. What is unfolding in West Asia is not merely a military standoff between two rival states; it is part of a larger geopolitical struggle that could reshape the balance of power between the Global North and the Global South.
For decades, Israel has viewed the prospect of a nuclear-capable Iran as an existential threat. Under the leadership of Benjamin Netanyahu, Israel has repeatedly declared that it will not allow Tehran to develop nuclear weapons capability. This doctrine has justified covert sabotage operations, cyberattacks and targeted killings of Iranian nuclear scientists over the past two decades. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel From Israel’s perspective, these actions are pre-emptive self-defence. From Iran’s perspective, however, they represent a sustained attempt to prevent the country from emerging as a major regional power. The truth lies somewhere between these competing narratives. Iran’s nuclear programme has undoubtedly raised legitimate international concerns. Yet the broader geopolitical context cannot be ignored. Iran is not just another Middle Eastern state pursuing technological advancement; it is also one of the few regional powers openly challenging the strategic architecture that the West has maintained in West Asia since the end of the Cold War. This is why the confrontation has gradually evolved from a regional rivalry into a theatre of global power politics. On one side stands Israel, strongly backed by the United States and several Western allies. On the other side stands Iran, increasingly supported diplomatically and economically by Russia and China. The emerging divide mirrors a larger global shift in which the old Western-dominated order is being challenged by a coalition of states seeking a more multipolar world.
West Asia is becoming the testing ground for that transformation. The region sits at the heart of global energy flows. Nearly a fifth of the world’s oil supply passes through the Strait of Hormuz, making stability in the region critical for the global economy. Any sustained conflict between Israel and Iran could disrupt shipping lanes, trigger energy shocks and deepen the already fragile economic recovery across the developing world. For countries of the Global South, the stakes are therefore enormous. Unlike Western powers, many developing nations cannot afford prolonged energy shocks or geopolitical instability. Their economies remain heavily dependent on imported energy, remittances from migrant workers in the Gulf, and stable maritime trade routes across the Indian Ocean. Among these countries, India faces a particularly delicate challenge. New Delhi has built strong strategic ties with Israel in defence, technology and intelligence cooperation. At the same time, India has historically maintained civilisational and economic links with Iran, which remains a crucial gateway to Central Asia through projects such as the Chabahar Port. Balancing these relationships has always required careful diplomacy.
But as the confrontation deepens, that balancing act is becoming increasingly difficult. India’s West Asia policy over the last decade has focused on strategic partnerships with Gulf monarchies and Israel, while quietly managing relations with Iran. However, the risk today is that escalating military tensions could force regional alignments that narrow India’s strategic space. More importantly, the conflict raises a larger question about India’s geopolitical voice. For decades, India positioned itself as a bridge between the Global North and the Global South. Through institutions such as the Non‑Aligned Movement, New Delhi advocated strategic autonomy and diplomatic balance during periods of great-power rivalry. Yet in the current crisis, India’s voice appears relatively muted compared to its historical role as a mediator and stabilising force. This silence risks weakening India’s credibility among developing nations that continue to look toward New Delhi for leadership on global governance and conflict resolution. The Israel–Iran confrontation is not simply a military confrontation. It is also a reminder that the international system is entering a new era of geopolitical fragmentation. As Western influence faces growing challenges from emerging powers, regional conflicts are increasingly becoming arenas where global rivalries play out. In this environment, the Global South cannot afford to remain passive spectators. Countries such as India must rediscover the strategic imagination that once defined their foreign policy. Rather than viewing the conflict solely through the lens of bilateral relationships, New Delhi should push for broader diplomatic initiatives that prioritise regional stability, energy security and multilateral dialogue. Ultimately, the stakes extend far beyond Israel and Iran. What is unfolding in West Asia could shape the contours of the emerging world order. Whether that order becomes more cooperative or more confrontational will depend not only on the actions of great powers but also on whether influential Global South nations choose to assert a more independent diplomatic role.
US F-35 Fighter Jet: Complete Guide in Easy UK English
The F-35 Lightning II is one of the most advanced fighter jets in the world. It is a fifth-generation stealth aircraft designed by Lockheed Martin for the United States and its allies. The jet combines stealth technology, advanced sensors, and powerful weapons to carry out multiple roles in modern warfare. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
What is the F-35 Fighter Jet?
The F-35 is a multi-role combat aircraft, which means it can perform different missions such as:
Air combat (fighting enemy aircraft)
Ground attacks (targeting enemy bases or vehicles)
Intelligence gathering and surveillance
Electronic warfare
It is considered the backbone of modern air forces, especially for the United States and NATO allies.
Key Features of the F-35
1. Stealth Technology
The F-35 is designed to avoid radar detection. Its special shape and materials make it very hard for enemy systems to track.
2. Advanced Sensors
The jet has powerful sensors that give the pilot a complete picture of the battlefield. It can detect threats from long distances and share data with other aircraft.
3. Helmet Display System
Instead of a traditional cockpit display, pilots use a high-tech helmet that shows real-time data, targeting systems, and even allows them to “see through” the aircraft.
4. Network-Centric Warfare
The F-35 can share information with other jets, ships, and ground forces, making it a key part of modern connected warfare systems.
There are three main versions of the F-35:
F-35A (Conventional Take-Off and Landing)
Used by the US Air Force
Designed for normal runways
F-35B (Short Take-Off and Vertical Landing)
Can take off from short runways and land vertically
Used by the US Marine Corps and UK Royal Navy
F-35C (Carrier-Based Version)
Designed for aircraft carriers
Has larger wings and stronger landing gear
F-35 Variants
ost of the F-35 Programme
Each F-35 jet costs around $80 to $110 million, depending on the variant.
However, the total programme cost is estimated at around $2 trillion over its lifetime. This includes:
Development
Production
Maintenance
Fuel and operations
Upgrades over decades
This makes it one of the most expensive military programmes in history.
Strengths of the F-35
Extremely advanced stealth capabilities
Powerful sensors and data sharing
Multi-role flexibility
Strong global support network
Criticism and Challenges
Despite its strengths, the F-35 programme has faced criticism:
High costs and maintenance expenses
Technical issues during early development
Dependence on software and upgrades
Role in Modern Warfare
The F-35 is not just a fighter jet—it is a flying data centre. It plays a key role in modern wars by:
Leading coordinated attacks
Sharing intelligence in real-time
Supporting ground and naval forces
It is widely used in missions across the Middle East, Europe, and Asia.
Global Users of the F-35
Many countries operate or have ordered the F-35, including:
United States
United Kingdom
Israel
Japan
Italy
Australia
South Korea
This makes it a central part of allied defence strategies worldwide.
Conclusion
The F-35 Lightning II represents the future of air combat. With its advanced technology, stealth design, and powerful capabilities, it has changed how modern wars are fought.
While it remains expensive and complex, its importance in global defence continues to grow, making it one of the most important military aircraft of the 21st century.
Dr Shujaat Bukhari (25 February 1968 – 14 June 2018) was one of the most respected journalists in Jammu and Kashmir. He was widely known for his brave reporting, balanced views, and strong support for peace during years of conflict in the region. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
He is often remembered with the title “Dr.” in tributes. He founded and edited Rising Kashmir, a leading English-language newspaper based in Srinagar. His killing in 2018 shocked the media world and showed the risks journalists face in conflict areas.
Early Life and Education
Shujaat Bukhari was born in Kreeri village in Baramulla district, about 25 miles from Srinagar. From a young age, he loved news and storytelling. As a school student, he even started a small local news agency in his village.
He first worked in accounting but soon realised his passion was journalism. He left his job to become a full-time journalist, which made him truly happy.
He worked with local newspapers like Kashmir Times and Daily Bombay. Later, he studied journalism abroad and earned a Master’s degree from Ateneo de Manila University in the Philippines. He also received training in the United States through the World Press Institute.
These global experiences helped him develop a balanced and thoughtful style of reporting.
Journalism Career
Shujaat Bukhari worked in journalism for more than 20 years. From 1997 to 2012, he was the Srinagar correspondent and bureau chief for The Hindu, one of India’s top newspapers.
He reported on Kashmir with care, balance, and honesty. Many people saw him as a reliable voice on the region.
In 2008, he started Rising Kashmir, an independent newspaper that focused on moderate and peaceful views. He also launched Buland Kashmir (Urdu daily) and Kashmir Parcham (Urdu weekly).
Under his leadership, Rising Kashmir became very popular and trained many young journalists.
Bukhari supported dialogue instead of violence. He wrote for international platforms like the BBC and encouraged peace efforts, including ceasefires during Ramadan.
Image ref 72317904. Copyright Rex Shutterstock No reproduction without permission. Please see www.rexfeatures.com for more information.
Assassination and Legacy
On 14 June 2018, 29 Ramadan, Shujaat Bukhari was shot dead in Srinagar’s Press Enclave. He was leaving his office for an iftar gathering when gunmen attacked his vehicle.
He was killed along with two police guards. He was 50 years old.
The attack shocked everyone, as it happened in a high-security area. It was believed that militants were behind the killing, possibly to silence his voice for peace.
Many global organisations, including the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders, strongly condemned the attack.
Remembering Shujaat Bukhari
Every year on 14 June, people remember him with prayers and tributes, especially in his hometown Kreeri.
He is still seen as a symbol of truth, courage, and peace in journalism. His newspaper Rising Kashmir continues his mission, and many journalists he trained carry forward his legacy.
His life reminds us of the price journalists sometimes pay for speaking the truth.
Youm-e-Arafah 2026: Importance, Virtues, Fasting and Best Worship Practices
Youm-e-Arafah (Day of Arafah) is one of the most sacred and spiritually powerful days in Islam. It falls on the 9th day of Dhul-Hijjah, the final month of the Islamic calendar, just one day before Eid al-Adha.
This blessed day holds deep importance for all Muslims around the world, especially those performing Hajj. It is a day filled with mercy, forgiveness, acceptance of prayers, and closeness to Allah.
What is Youm-e-Arafah?
Youm-e-Arafah is the day when millions of pilgrims gather on the plains of Arafat near Makkah during Hajj. They spend the day in worship, standing in humility before Allah, making sincere dua, and asking for forgiveness.
This act is known as Wuquf-e-Arafah (standing at Arafah), and it is the most important pillar of Hajj.
The Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) said: “Hajj is Arafah.” (Abu Dawud)
The following day, 27 May 2026, will be Eid al-Adha, one of the biggest Islamic festivals.
Why Youm-e-Arafah is So Important
1. Completion of Islam
On this day, during the Farewell Hajj of the Prophet (peace be upon him), Allah revealed a very important verse:
“This day I have perfected for you your religion, completed My favour upon you, and chosen Islam as your religion.” (Quran 5:3 – Surah Al-Ma’idah)
This makes Youm-e-Arafah a historic and deeply meaningful day in Islam.
2. The Day of Forgiveness
Youm-e-Arafah is known as a day when Allah shows immense mercy.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “There is no day on which Allah frees more people from the Fire than the Day of Arafah.”
On this day, Allah forgives countless people and accepts sincere repentance.
3. A Day When Duas Are Accepted
This is one of the best days to make dua.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “The best supplication is the supplication on the Day of Arafah.”
Muslims are encouraged to ask Allah for everything they need — forgiveness, guidance, health, and success.
4. A Special Day Even for Non-Pilgrims
Even if you are not performing Hajj, Youm-e-Arafah is still extremely important.
It is a golden opportunity to earn great rewards through simple acts of worship.
Fasting on Youm-e-Arafah
Fasting on this day is highly recommended for those who are not performing Hajj.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said: “Fasting on the Day of Arafah expiates the sins of the previous year and the coming year.” (Sahih Muslim)
This means one fast can wipe away sins of two years — a huge blessing.
However, pilgrims performing Hajj are not required to fast, as they need strength for worship.
What Do Pilgrims Do on This Day?
Pilgrims spend the entire day at Arafat:
Standing in prayer from noon until sunset
Making long and heartfelt duas
Asking for forgiveness
Remembering Allah continuously
This moment is considered the peak of Hajj and the most emotional part of the journey.
Best Acts of Worship on Youm-e-Arafah
Muslims should make full use of this blessed day through the following acts:
1. Fasting
One of the most rewarding fasts of the year after Ramadan.
2. Dhikr (Remembrance of Allah)
Repeat frequently:
La ilaha illallah (There is no god but Allah)
Allahu Akbar (Allah is the Greatest)
Alhamdulillah (All praise is for Allah)
3. Make Sincere Dua
Ask Allah with full heart and belief. This is a day when duas are highly accepted.
4. Seek Forgiveness (Istighfar)
Keep asking Allah for forgiveness of sins.
5. Pray More and Read Quran
Offer extra prayers and spend time reading and understanding the Quran.
6. Give Charity
Helping others on this day increases reward and brings blessings.
7. Reflect on Your Life
Think about your actions, your relationship with Allah, and make intention to improve.
A Powerful Dua for Youm-e-Arafah
The Prophet (peace be upon him) recommended this powerful declaration:
“La ilaha illallah, wahdahu la sharika lahu, lahul mulk wa lahul hamd, wa huwa ‘ala kulli shay’in qadeer.”
Meaning: There is no god but Allah alone, without partner. To Him belongs all kingdom and praise, and He has power over everything.
Conclusion
Youm-e-Arafah is not just another day — it is a day of mercy, forgiveness, and spiritual renewal. Whether you are performing Hajj or staying at home, this day offers a chance to reconnect with Allah and seek His blessings.
Make the most of Youm-e-Arafah by fasting, praying, making dua, and remembering Allah throughout the day.
Shab-e-Qadr, also known as Laylatul Qadr or the Night of Power/Destiny, is the most sacred night in the Islamic calendar. It is the night during which the first verses of the Holy Quran were revealed to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) through the angel Jibreel (Gabriel). Muslims believe that on this single night, the decrees of the entire year are written, prayers are answered, and blessings descend upon the earth in abundance. The night is described in the Quran as being “better than a thousand months” – an entire lifetime of worship compressed into a few blessed hours. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Quranic Foundation
The entire 97th chapter of the Quran, Surah Al-Qadr, is dedicated to this night:
“Indeed, We sent it [the Quran] down during a blessed night. Indeed, We were to warn [mankind]. On that night the angels and the Spirit descend by permission of their Lord for every matter. Peace it is until the emergence of dawn.” (Surah Al-Qadr 97:1-5)
The Quran further states:
“The Night of Decree is better than a thousand months.” (Surah Al-Qadr 97:3)
This single verse transforms one night into the spiritual equivalent of more than 83 years of continuous worship. No other night in human history carries such immense reward.
Historical Context
According to authentic narrations, the revelation began on the 27th night of Ramadan in the year 610 CE in the Cave of Hira, near Makkah. Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was in seclusion when Jibreel appeared and commanded him with the first five verses of Surah Al-Alaq (“Iqra” – Read). The Prophet was illiterate, yet he miraculously recited the words. This event marked the beginning of the 23-year revelation of the Quran.
Scholars differ slightly on the exact date, but the overwhelming consensus among the Companions and later scholars (including Imam Bukhari and Imam Muslim) is that Shab-e-Qadr falls within the last ten nights of Ramadan, specifically on one of the odd nights: 21st, 23rd, 25th, 27th, or 29th.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
“Search for Laylatul Qadr in the odd-numbered nights of the last ten nights of Ramadan.” (Sahih Bukhari & Sahih Muslim)
Many narrations point strongly toward the 27th night as the most probable date, though the Prophet kept the exact night hidden so that Muslims would strive in worship throughout the last ten nights.
Why Shab-e-Qadr is So Powerful
On this night:
The angels, led by Jibreel, descend to the earth in such numbers that the sky appears crowded.
Every matter of destiny (qadr) for the coming year is decreed – health, sustenance, life, death, and guidance.
The gates of Paradise are opened and the gates of Hell are closed.
Sins are forgiven for those who stand in prayer with sincerity.
Duas are accepted with greater certainty than on any other night.
The Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
“Whoever stands in prayer on the Night of Qadr out of faith and seeking reward, his previous sins will be forgiven.” (Sahih Bukhari & Sahih Muslim)
How to Observe Shab-e-Qadr
There is no fixed “ritual” that must be performed; the emphasis is on sincere worship, repentance, and supplication. Recommended acts include:
Qiyamul Layl (Night Prayer) Perform as many rak’ats of nafl (voluntary) salah as possible. The Prophet used to pray 11 rak’ats in the last ten nights, often reciting long surahs.
Recitation of the Quran Read as much Quran as possible. Many Muslims complete one or more full recitations (khatam) on this night.
Special Dua The most famous dua taught by the Prophet (peace be upon him) for this night:
“Allahumma innaka ‘afuwwun tuhibbul ‘afwa fa’fu ‘anni” (O Allah, You are the Most Forgiving, You love forgiveness, so forgive me.)
This dua should be repeated hundreds of times.
Istighfar (Seeking Forgiveness) The night is especially for repenting from past sins and making firm intentions for the future.
I’tikaf Many men (and some women in their homes) perform i’tikaf – seclusion in the mosque – during the last ten days to maximise the chance of catching Shab-e-Qadr.
Traditions in Kashmir and the Indian Subcontinent
In Kashmir, Shab-e-Qadr is observed with extraordinary devotion. Mosques remain open all night. Special Tarawih and Qiyam prayers are led by renowned qaris. Hundreds of thousands gather at historic mosques such as Jamia Masjid Srinagar, Hazratbal Shrine, and Dastgeer Sahib. The entire valley echoes with the recitation of Surah Al-Qadr and heartfelt duas. People distribute sheer (milk pudding), fruit, and dates after prayers. Many families stay awake the entire night, especially on the 27th of Ramadan, which is widely believed to be the most probable date in Kashmir.
In India and Pakistan too, “Shab-e-Qadr” is announced with great fanfare. Television channels air live prayers from Makkah and Madinah, and local mosques hold all-night programmes. Women pray at home in large numbers, often gathering in groups for collective dua.
Common Misconceptions
Shab-e-Qadr is not a fixed date every year; the Islamic calendar shifts by about 10–11 days annually.
It is not only about staying awake; the reward lies in sincere intention and worship, even if one sleeps a little.
Lighting lamps or fireworks (a practice seen in some regions) has no basis in Sunnah and should be avoided.
The night’s blessings are not limited to the 27th; one should strive in all odd nights of the last ten days.
Scientific and Spiritual Wonder
Modern science has no explanation for how one night can outweigh a thousand months, yet for believers it is a matter of faith. The night reminds us that time is not linear in the sight of Allah. A few hours spent in His remembrance can rewrite one’s destiny.
Conclusion
Shab-e-Qadr is not merely a date on the calendar – it is an opportunity that comes only once a year to change our entire future. The Prophet (peace be upon him) said:
“The best of you are those who seek Laylatul Qadr in the last ten nights.”
May Allah grant every Muslim the ability to catch this blessed night, accept our prayers, forgive our sins, and decree for us the best of this world and the Hereafter. Ameen.
Ramadan Kareem. Search for Shab-e-Qadr with full heart – it may be the night that changes everything.
Youm-ul-Badr, often referred to as Yaum-ul-Furqan or the “Day of Criterion,” marks one of the most pivotal moments in Islamic history. Observed annually on the 17th of Ramadan, this day commemorates the Battle of Badr, fought in 624 CE (2 AH) between a small band of early Muslims led by Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him – PBUH) and a much larger Meccan force from the Quraysh tribe. The victory at Badr was not merely a military triumph but a divine affirmation of faith, distinguishing truth from falsehood and bolstering the nascent Muslim community in Medina. Referred to in the Quran as the “Day of Decision,” Youm-ul-Badr symbolizes resilience, divine intervention, and the ultimate success of righteousness over oppression. This article delves into the historical backdrop, the unfolding of the battle, its profound significance, and how it continues to inspire Muslims worldwide today. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Historical Context
The roots of Youm-ul-Badr trace back to the early 7th century in the Arabian Peninsula, a land of tribal rivalries, polytheistic idolatry, and stark social inequalities. Mecca, the bustling trade hub controlled by the Quraysh tribe, was home to the Kaaba – a sacred sanctuary that drew pilgrims from afar. It was here, in 610 CE, that Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) received his first revelation from Allah through the Angel Gabriel, calling him to proclaim the oneness of God (Tawhid) and combat the moral decay of society.
The Prophet’s message quickly polarized Meccan society. While a dedicated group of followers – the Sahaba (companions) – embraced Islam, the Quraysh elite, fearing loss of their religious and economic dominance, unleashed waves of persecution. Converts like Bilal ibn Rabah were tortured, and others boycotted or exiled. In 622 CE, facing imminent annihilation, the Prophet and his followers undertook the Hijrah (migration) to Yathrib (later renamed Medina), an oasis city with a mix of Jewish tribes and Arab clans seeking a mediator.
In Medina, the Prophet established the first Islamic state, forging the Constitution of Medina – a groundbreaking pact uniting Muslims, Jews, and pagans under mutual protection. However, the Quraysh did not relent. They seized Muslim properties in Mecca and plotted invasions. To sustain the community and reclaim losses, the Prophet authorized raids on Quraysh trade caravans, a common Arabian practice. These tensions simmered until early 624 CE, setting the stage for Badr.
Prelude to the Battle
By Ramadan 2 AH (March 624 CE), intelligence reached Medina of a massive Quraysh caravan returning from Syria, laden with merchandise worth 50,000 dinars and guarded by 40 men under Abu Sufyan ibn Harb. The Prophet saw this as an opportunity to strike economically, potentially forcing the Quraysh to negotiate. He mobilized 313 fighters – 82 Muhajirun (Meccan emigrants) and 231 Ansar (Medinan helpers, comprising 61 from the Aws tribe and 170 from Khazraj) – with meager resources: two horses, 70 camels (shared among riders), and provisions for a short journey. The force included 60 emigrants and the rest locals, many fasting despite the rigors of the desert march.
Alerted by scouts, Abu Sufyan rerouted the caravan safely via the coastal path and dispatched the urgent messenger Damdam bin Amr al-Ghifari to Mecca, who dramatically warned of the Muslim threat by tearing his shirt and crying alarms. This spurred the Quraysh to assemble a retaliatory army of nearly 1,000 men (estimates vary from 600 to 1,300), equipped with 100 horses and 170 camels, led by the arrogant Amr ibn Hisham (known as Abu Jahl, “Father of Ignorance”). Prominent nobles like Utbah ibn Rabi’ah and Umayyah ibn Khalaf joined, viewing the expedition as a chance to crush Islam decisively.
The Muslim army departed Medina on 10 Ramadan (12 March), taking a northern route to intercept at Badr, a fertile oasis 80 miles southwest with wells vital for travelers. En route, rain on 15 Ramadan softened the sandy soil, aiding the Muslims’ footing while bogging down the heavier Quraysh advance. Upon reaching Badr, the Prophet consulted his companions. Abu Bakr and Umar ibn al-Khattab urged resolve, while al-Miqdad ibn Amr and Sa’d ibn Mu’adh pledged unwavering support: “O Messenger of Allah, proceed as Allah has commanded you. We will not say as the Children of Israel said to Moses, ‘Go you and your Lord and fight, we will stay here.'” The Muslims seized control of the wells, poisoning or filling others to deny water to the enemy.
The Battle Unfolds
Dawn broke on 17 Ramadan (13 March 624 CE) with the two armies facing each other across the valley of Badr. The Muslims, outnumbered three-to-one, formed ranks with the Prophet directing from a shaded howdah (litter) on a camel, flanked by his standard-bearer Mus’ab ibn Umayr. The air was thick with tension as the Quraysh, confident in their superiority, advanced under colorful banners.
The clash began traditionally with single combats (mubahala). Three Quraysh champions – Utbah ibn Rabi’ah, Shaybah ibn Rabi’ah, and al-Walid ibn Utbah – stepped forward, demanding Muslim counterparts. Hamza ibn Abdul-Muttalib (the Prophet’s uncle), Ali ibn Abi Talib (his cousin), and Ubaydah ibn al-Harith responded. In fierce duels, Hamza slew al-Aswad bin Abdul-Asad (a Quraysh scout who had earlier attacked the Muslim camp), while Ali and Hamza dispatched Shaybah and al-Walid; Ubaydah was wounded but survived.
With honors thus initiated, the Prophet threw a handful of dust toward the enemy, invoking, “Defaced be those faces!” as arrows flew. The Quraysh charged, but the Muslims held firm, their lines unbreakable. Eyewitness accounts describe a supernatural pall of dust and confusion enveloping the disbelievers. The Prophet prayed fervently: “O Allah, accomplish for me what You have promised… If this band of Muslims perishes today, there will be no one left to worship You.” Tradition holds that angels, numbering 1,000 or 3,000, descended to aid the faithful, striking terror into Quraysh hearts.
By midday, the battle turned decisively. Key Muslim warriors like Ali (who slew 22 foes), Hamza, and the young Abdullah ibn Rawahah broke enemy formations. Panic spread among the Quraysh as leaders fell: Abu Jahl was mortally wounded by Mu’adh ibn Amr and finished by Abdullah ibn Mas’ud; Umayyah ibn Khalaf was killed by Bilal’s father. The rout was complete by afternoon, with the survivors fleeing toward Mecca.
Aftermath and Immediate Impact
The casualty toll underscored the miracle of Badr: 14 Muslims were martyred (six Muhajirun and eight Ansar), a profound loss for the small community, yet their sacrifice cemented their legacy. In contrast, 70 Quraysh were slain – including 13 nobles like Abu Jahl, Utbah, and Umayyah – and another 70 captured. The prisoners received exemplary treatment; the Prophet allowed ransoms (often 1,000 dirhams or release for teaching ten Muslims to read and write), and even shared meals with them, leading conversions like that of al-Abbas ibn Abdul-Muttalib (the Prophet’s uncle). Spoils of war were divided equitably, with one-fifth allocated to the Prophet for communal needs.
News of the victory electrified Medina, where women like Umm Salamah sang praises. Tribes across Arabia, previously hesitant, now courted alliances with the Muslims, recognizing their rising power. The Quraysh, humiliated, saw their prestige shattered; Abu Sufyan assumed leadership, vowing revenge that would culminate in Uhud. Badr’s veterans, known as the “Badriyyun,” earned eternal honor, their names etched in Islamic annals.
Quranic References and Spiritual Significance
The Quran immortalizes Badr as “Yawm al-Furqan” (Day of Criterion) in Surah Al-Anfal (8:41), signifying the clear demarcation between belief and disbelief, guidance and misguidance. Verses in Surah Al-Anfal detail the prelude: Allah reassures the Prophet against fear (8:5-6) and describes angelic aid (8:9-12: “I will cast terror into the hearts of those who disbelieved”). Surah Aal-E-Imran (3:123-125) emphasizes divine favor: “Allah had helped you at Badr when you were weak… Nay, but you loved that the arrow should be given by you.”
Theologically, Badr exemplifies tawakkul (reliance on God). Despite odds, victory came through unity, strategy, and faith – not numbers. It teaches that truth prevails, as echoed in hadith: “The Battle of Badr was fought on a Friday, and it was the day when Allah honored Islam and the Muslims.” Lessons include consultation (shura), as the Prophet sought counsel; mercy in victory; and gratitude, prompting increased prayers and charity.
Lessons from Youm-ul-Badr
Beyond history, Youm-ul-Badr offers timeless wisdom. First, divine support manifests in apparent weakness: outnumbered and outarmed, Muslims triumphed through piety. Second, unity among diverse groups – Muhajirun and Ansar – models communal harmony. Third, ethical warfare: no mutilation, humane treatment of foes. Fourth, strategic foresight: controlling resources like wells decided the outcome. Finally, it warns against arrogance, as Abu Jahl’s hubris led to downfall.
Scholars like Ibn Kathir in his tafsir highlight 12 lessons, including perseverance in fasting during battle and the power of dua (supplication).
Modern-Day Observance
Today, Youm-ul-Badr is commemorated globally during Ramadan, blending solemn reflection with communal gatherings. Mosques host special Jumu’ah prayers, lectures (dars), and nasheeds recounting the battle. In Pakistan and India, schools like Usman Public School organize events emphasizing “faith, sacrifice, and triumph,” with students reciting Quranic verses and sharing stories of the Sahaba.
In the West, communities like those in the US hold annual commemorations, such as the March 7, 2026, event in Medina, featuring talks on Badr’s relevance to contemporary struggles. Yemen’s Ansar Allah movement links it to political marches, affirming solidarity amid conflicts. In the UK, grand masjids like Jamiul Futuh host unified gatherings with Indian Grand Muftis, fostering interfaith dialogue. Social media amplifies these, with posts urging reflection: “On this day, Muslims around the world ponder the remarkable Battle of Badr.”
Fasting, ittar (perfume), and increased sadaqah (charity) are common, echoing the companions’ devotion.
Conclusion
Youm-ul-Badr stands as a beacon of hope, reminding humanity that no tyranny endures against steadfast faith. From the dusty sands of 624 CE to modern lecture halls, its echo resounds: “And Allah had certainly given you victory at Badr while you were few” (Quran 3:123). As Muslims gather each 17th Ramadan, they renew vows of unity and justice, ensuring the Day of Criterion illuminates paths forward. In an era of division, Badr’s legacy urges: Stand firm, trust in the Divine, and let truth prevail.
What is life but a fleeting moment between dawn and sunset: it begins with a cry and ends in silence, passing like a drifting cloud that never settles in one state. A person runs after hopes and gathers from the world whatever he can, imagining that tomorrow stretches endlessly before him. Yet suddenly he realises that life has been swifter than his own steps, and that the days have been racing him towards their end. Then—death. That reality which never misses its appointed hour and asks permission of no one. It comes unannounced; the clamour falls silent, the voices fade, the pages are folded, and a person stands alone before what his own hands have sent ahead. Neither wealth avails, nor rank suffices, nor lineage intercedes; what remains is righteous action, sincere intention, and the good trace a person leaves in the hearts of others.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel Let death therefore remain present in our consciousness, not as a cause for despair, but as an impulse towards reform. It reminds us of our limits, refines our ambitions, and restores the proper balance to our hearts. Whoever prepares for it with an alert mind and a sound heart will find it a passage into mercy and justice; but whoever neglects it will be seized by it unawares, having squandered what can never be recovered.
Wherever you cast your gaze, you behold rampant evil and blazing corruption; wherever you alight or journey on, trials receive you in succession like the ceaseless waves of an unquiet sea, and wars follow one upon another as though they were a fate unwilling to loosen its grip upon this earth. Turn away from this world with deliberate resolve, and say to it in the calm of one assured: Peace be upon you; I am not of you, nor are you of me. Recite within yourself the words of the Friend: “I love not those that set.” For what declines deserves not to be adored, and what perishes ought not to be made a homeland for the heart. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel Fashion for yourself another world, one unseen by eyes yet apprehended by insight; a world you build in your depths, brick by brick: a brick of patience, a brick of certainty, and a roof of hope raised high above them. Turn towards your own soul as a lover turns towards the beloved, and enter into an inward retreat wherein you cleanse the mind of its impurities, the heart of its dust, and restore the spirit to its first clarity, when it was nearer to heaven than to earth. Let not the clamour of people trouble you thereafter, nor their disputes, nor the trifles over which they contend; they are but passing shadows and a mirage that the thirsty supposes to be water. Make your chief concern the worship of your Lord and the seeking of His pleasure, and say in the humility of the knower and the certainty of the convinced: “Indeed, I have turned my face towards Him who created the heavens and the earth, inclining wholly to truth, and I am not of those who associate others with Him.” When you do this, what was turbulent within you shall grow still, what was agitated shall be calmed, and you will perceive that though the edges of the world tremble with unrest, within the heart there remains a spaciousness for a peace no war can disturb, and a light no trial can extinguish. Then you will understand that salvation lies not in fleeing from people, but in rising above them, elevating your soul until you behold things as they truly are: small, though they seem great; fleeting, though they appear enduring. And there remains only the Face of your Lord, full of Majesty and Honour.
Picture this: It’s June 2023 in Tehran. Giant billboards pop up across the city, showing a sleek new missile with bold text in Persian, Arabic, and Hebrew: “400 seconds… to Tel Aviv.” The message was impossible to miss. Iran had just unveiled the Fattah-1, its first claimed “hypersonic” ballistic missile, and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) was making sure everyone — especially Israel — got the point. From launch sites in western Iran, they said, this weapon could cover roughly 1,400 km and hit Israel’s biggest city in under seven minutes. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Fast-forward to early 2026, and the Fattah family isn’t just propaganda anymore. Iran has fired these missiles in real combat multiple times, rebuilt its arsenal after heavy fighting in 2024–2025, and continues to improve the system despite renewed UN sanctions. Here’s the remarkable (and controversial) story of how Iran pulled this off.
The Fattah Missiles: What Iran Actually Built
Fattah-1 was unveiled on 6 June 2023 after being announced in late 2022. Iran claims it reaches Mach 13–15 (roughly 16,000–18,500 km/h), has a 1,400 km range, and carries a 350–450 kg warhead. The key feature is a maneuverable re-entry vehicle (MaRV) with its own small solid-fuel motor and thrust-vector control, letting the warhead dodge defenses in the final phase of flight — and even do some maneuvering outside the atmosphere.
Fattah-2 followed in November 2023. It swaps in a hypersonic glide vehicle (HGV) for even more agility across the entire trajectory. Iran says it can hit 1,500 km and is even harder to intercept. Both are solid-fuel designs (at least the booster stage), meaning they can be launched quickly from mobile trucks or underground silos — a big upgrade over older liquid-fuel missiles that need hours to prepare.
The “400 seconds” claim comes straight from IRGC commander Brig. Gen. Amir Ali Hajizadeh. It’s marketing as much as math (a pure Mach-15 flight over 1,400 km would actually be faster), but the point was clear: this missile is designed to overwhelm Israel’s layered defenses — Arrow, David’s Sling, and Iron Dome.
From the Battlefield: Real-World Use (2024–2026)
Iran didn’t wait long to test its claims in combat:
April 2024 — First direct strike on Israel; debris analysis later confirmed Fattah-1 parts.
1 October 2024 (“Operation True Promise II”) — Roughly 200 ballistic missiles, including Fattah-1s, in the largest attack yet. Some penetrated defenses and caused damage.
2025 strikes (including waves in June) — Iran again claimed Fattah-1 and -2 use, with the IRGC boasting that the missiles “shook the shelters of the Zionists.”
Early 2026 — Amid fresh US-Israeli strikes on Iran, Tehran launched retaliatory barrages (reportedly “Operation True Promise” follow-ons) that included Fattah variants alongside Sejjil and older systems. Iranian state media and analysts say the hypersonic weapons targeted Israeli and US bases in the region.
Despite losses in the 2024–2025 exchanges, Iran has rebuilt its stockpile to an estimated 1,500–3,000+ ballistic missiles by early 2026, including precision-guided and hypersonic types. Underground “missile cities” and rapid replenishment (helped by fresh Chinese propellant shipments) made this possible.
How They Did It: Sanctions Backfired
Iran’s missile program was born in desperation. During the 1980–88 Iran-Iraq War, Saddam Hussein rained Scud missiles on Iranian cities. Tehran had almost no air force left, so it begged for help. Libya sent the first 20 Scud-Bs in 1984. North Korea and China followed with more missiles, launchers, and know-how.
Sanctions kicked in hard after the revolution and tightened over the nuclear program. Instead of crippling the effort, they forced Iran to get creative:
Reverse engineering became the national sport. Iranian engineers took apart imported Scuds and produced the Shahab-1 (330 km) and Shahab-2 (500 km) by the early 1990s. The Shahab-3 (based on North Korea’s Nodong) gave them a 1,300 km reach by the late 1990s.
Solid-fuel revolution. Older liquid-fuel missiles were slow to fuel and vulnerable on the launch pad. Iran shifted to solid propellants (thanks to the Shahid Bagheri Industrial Group) so missiles could be fired in minutes from mobile launchers or hidden silos.
IRGC takes charge. The Revolutionary Guard’s Aerospace Force, led for years by the late Hassan Tehrani Moghaddam (the “father of Iran’s missiles”), drove the program. Facilities like the Shahid Hemmat Industrial Group (liquid engines) and underground complexes in Khojir, Semnan, and Isfahan kept production going.
Space program crossover. Work on satellites gave Iran lightweight composite casings and heat-resistant materials needed for high-speed re-entry.
Universities and young engineers were pulled in. Sanctions made imports almost impossible, so Iran built its own machine tools, gyroscopes, and guidance systems. The result? A genuinely indigenous industry that now exports drones and missiles to Russia, the Houthis, and others.
The Foreign Help That Never Stopped
Self-reliance has limits. Iran still got (and gets) outside assistance, often through shadowy networks:
North Korea — The biggest early partner. Designs, engines, and even entire missiles flowed in the 1980s–2000s. Similarities between Iranian and North Korean systems are obvious.
China — Supplied components, machine tools, and — crucially — huge shipments of ammonium perchlorate and sodium perchlorate (solid-propellant ingredients). In 2025 alone, Iran received thousands of tons from China, enough for hundreds of new missiles. Recent reports suggest Beijing is also helping with anti-ship missiles.
Russia — More recent cooperation, especially after Iran supplied drones for Ukraine. Some analysts see Russian fingerprints in upgrades to guidance and maneuverability.
These ties continue despite sanctions because the players use front companies, third countries, and barter deals (oil for tech).
The Reality Check: Hype vs. Capability
Western and Israeli experts are skeptical about the “Mach 15” label. Most say the Fattah is not a true hypersonic glide vehicle that stays in the atmosphere at hypersonic speeds the whole way. It’s a ballistic missile with a fancy MaRV that maneuvers mainly in the terminal phase — impressive, but not revolutionary like China’s or Russia’s scramjet-powered designs.
That said, even critics admit two things:
The maneuverability makes interception much harder.
Iran has now proven it can hit Israel with these weapons, and some got through.
In short: not invincible, but a serious step forward that forces Israel and the US to spend billions on better defenses.
Why This Story Matters
Sanctions were meant to stop Iran from building advanced weapons. Instead, they accelerated a homegrown defense industry, pushed Tehran closer to Russia, China, and North Korea, and turned the IRGC into a missile superpower in the Middle East.
Today, the Fattah series is in serial production, Iran’s arsenal is being replenished faster than many expected, and the “400 seconds to Tel Aviv” threat feels a lot more real than it did in 2023. Whether the missiles will ever be used at full scale is a political question, not a technical one. But the fact that Iran built them at all — under the harshest sanctions in modern history — is a masterclass in resilience, reverse engineering, and geopolitical defiance.
The billboards are gone now, but the missiles remain. And in a region already on edge in 2026, that’s a message no one can ignore.
Politics in Kashmir is loud, emotional, and often bitter. Public speeches are filled with sharp attacks, harsh language, and constant blame. On television debates, in press conferences, and across social media, political leaders appear locked in permanent conflict. For the common Kashmiri, the message seems clear: these leaders are sworn enemies.
But that perception tells only half the story
Behind the curtains of public politics lies a quieter, rarely discussed reality. Kashmiri politicians, despite their fierce public rivalry, are often connected by personal respect, shared culture, and long-standing relationships. Away from cameras, they attend each other’s family events, offer condolences during times of loss, and extend support in moments of difficulty. In private spaces, political bitterness gives way to human connection.
This is not unique to Kashmir; it is a global political phenomenon. However, in a conflict-sensitive region like Jammu and Kashmir, the gap between public posturing and private conduct carries deeper consequences.
In public, leaders from different parties exchange strong statements, sometimes appearing incapable of sitting together. Yet in private settings—Ramadan iftar gatherings, weddings, funerals, and informal meetings—the scene is very different. They share traditional meals like wazwan, drink tea, laugh, recall old memories, and discuss issues affecting the people. These moments are real, but they are carefully kept away from public view.
The reason is political necessity. A visible display of warmth toward rivals risks alienating loyal supporters. Political survival demands a strong image of opposition, even if personal relations remain intact. As a result, political rivalry is performed on stage, while human bonds remain hidden.
The cost of this performance is paid by the people
Many ordinary Kashmiris, with their deep emotions and trusting nature, take political rhetoric at face value. They internalize the anger they see and begin to view fellow citizens through the same lens of hostility. Political rivalry at the top slowly translates into social division at the grassroots.
This is where the danger lies
Kashmiri politicians understand the difference between political competition and personal enmity. The public, however, is rarely shown this distinction. When leaders shout in public but reconcile in private, society is left carrying unnecessary bitterness, suspicion, and division.
It is important to state this clearly: Kashmiri leaders are not personal enemies of one another. Their disagreements revolve around power, policy, and votes—not hatred. Outside political platforms, many share a sense of brotherhood shaped by common culture, history, and social ties.
Recognizing this reality does not weaken democracy; it strengthens it. Disagreement is essential in politics, but manufactured hostility should not poison social harmony. In a region that has endured decades of pain and division, people deserve honesty, not theatrical hatred.
Politics may demand loud voices and sharp words, but Kashmir’s soul lies in its humanity, warmth, and shared traditions. True unity does not always require public displays of friendship. Yet when political theatre begins to divide society, it becomes necessary to remind ourselves: enemies on stage are often brothers at heart.
I admit that the reality is this: over the past fifty years I have trained thousands of people, delivered millions of Qur’an lessons and sermons, and tried to improve others’ character — yet I could not improve my own character to the standard it should have been.
Even now, I do not have the patience I should have. I do not have the tolerance I should have. I get angry very quickly, become agitated, and then my tongue completely slips out of control.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Just the other day is a clear example. A business deal was done with an organisation. Initially, the discussion continued through messages and calls. The person on the other side turned out to be Pakistani, so the communication shifted from English to Urdu.
Later in the evening, I went to their office, passing through central London. The discussion was put into writing and turned into a deal. They issued an invoice, and trusting them, I made the full payment immediately. They said I would receive the item the next day at eleven.
The next day, I started waiting from ten o’clock. When it did not arrive by eleven, I immediately called — their phone was switched off. My temper flared up, and negative thoughts began flooding my mind, mixed with abuse: Pakistanis are not trustworthy; why did I trust them; what a fool I am to fall for their sweet talk; like Hatim Tai, I kicked his grave and handed over such a large amount in one go.
A short while later, someone from their office called and said, “Sir, it will reach you within an hour.”
Even after an hour, it still did not arrive. I called again, and the poor man kept saying politely, “Sir, please give us just one more hour.”
Another hour passed. I called their other office; from there too I received the same soft and courteous response: “Sir, there has been a small administrative issue.”
That’s when I completely lost control. I called and messaged for the third and fourth time, hurling abuse and using words close to outright insults, saying, You Pakistanis are all the same — cheats, fraudsters.
During this time, I started searching for contacts and emails of the police, intelligence, and scam and fraud departments to teach them a lesson. I threatened them, saying that if this was not resolved within two hours, I would personally come to their office and report them to all the relevant departments — this is not Pakistan, this is Britain, where you can commit fraud so easily.
Those poor people, one after another, kept pleading, apologising, while I was raging like fire.
Eventually, within two hours, the item I had purchased was delivered, and I finally calmed down.
Later, I felt deep regret over my behaviour and my words. I kept seeking forgiveness from Allah through prayers, and I also apologised to those Pakistani people.
And once again I started thinking: the reality is that over the past fifty years I have trained thousands of people and worked on improving their character, yet I could not improve my own character to the level it should have been.
Even now, I lack the patience I should have. I lack the tolerance I should have. I get angry too quickly, become provoked, and then my tongue is no longer under control.
May Allah forgive me and continue to grant me the ability to constantly reform myself.
The Hajj Executive Office J&K Haj Committee, Srinagar/Jammu. Sub:Complaint regarding Haj training. Sir/ Madam, With due regard I have to express my concern about the Haj training sessions conducted by your committee. I have recently attended a training programme at Masjid Firdosabad Sunjwan,Jammu, where the trainer made irrelevant statements about Haj rituals and claimed Haj is not acceptable a pilgrim with a short or no beard on his face and exaggerated the importance of 100 rakats of Tahajjud during Haj. Such distortions are misleading and compromise the sanctity and spirit of Haj experience. The trainers lack in Islamic academic background and aren’t well equipped to impart updated training to facilitate the performance as per the standards of Haj. I, therefore, request you to kindly:
Review trainer qualifications and credentials
Ensure trainers are knowledgeable about Haj rituals and Islamic teachings
Take action to prevent such distortions in future training sessions
Include scholars with expertise in Fiqh and Hadith to oversee training content
Provide pilgrims with authentic study materials based on Quran and Sunnah
Conduct refresher courses for trainers to update their knowledge
Establish a feedback mechanism for pilgrims to report inaccuracies.
Lady Haj trainers should be inducted for the training of female pilgrims,
Ensure use of digital display systems such as Interactive whiteboard with maps of the holy sites. This will definitely help pilgrims to receive accurate information and perform their Haj with ease according to the teachings of Quran and Sunnah.
Sincerely, Abdul Qayyum Nadvi, Intending Pilgrim, Bathindi Jammu. *Copy to the worthy Chairperson for information; *Copy to the district Haj officers. Dated: 05.02.2026
For more than a decade after Libya’s 2011 revolution, one name continued to cast a long shadow over the country’s broken politics: Saif al-Islam Gaddafi. Once groomed as his father’s successor, later a wanted war crimes suspect, and in recent years a controversial political comeback figure, Saif al-Islam symbolised Libya’s unresolved past.
Today, that chapter ended. Saif al-Islam Gaddafi was killed, according to reports, bringing a dramatic close to one of the most unsettling storylines of Libya’s post-revolution era. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
His death does not simply mark the fall of an individual. It exposes the depth of Libya’s failure to achieve justice, reconciliation and stable governance since the overthrow of Muammar Gaddafi.
From Reformist Image to Revolutionary Enemy
Before 2011, Saif al-Islam presented himself as the modern face of the Gaddafi regime. Educated in the UK and fluent in English, he spoke about reform, civil society and opening Libya to the world. Western governments saw him as a bridge to gradual change.
That image collapsed when protests erupted. In a televised speech, he warned Libyans of “rivers of blood” and pledged loyalty to the regime’s violent crackdown. The International Criminal Court later issued a warrant for his arrest for crimes against humanity.
From that moment, he became inseparable from the brutality of the old regime.
Capture, Survival and Political Return
Captured alive in 2011, Saif al-Islam spent years in detention under militia control, surviving while Libya descended into chaos. A death sentence issued in Tripoli and an unresolved ICC case kept him in legal limbo, while state authority continued to crumble.
His release in 2017 allowed him to quietly rebuild influence. By 2021, he re-emerged as a presidential candidate, appealing to tribes and communities exhausted by war and instability. His message was simple: unity, sovereignty and an end to chaos.
Though elections collapsed, he remained politically active, becoming a living reminder of how unfinished Libya’s revolution truly was.
Why His Death Matters
Saif al-Islam’s killing removes one of Libya’s most polarising figures, but it does not resolve the problems that allowed his return.
To supporters, he represented lost stability. To opponents, he embodied repression and bloodshed.
His survival for so long reflected the failure of Libya’s institutions — courts, governments and reconciliation efforts — to deliver justice or closure. His death, coming outside any clear legal process, underlines that failure even more sharply.
Conclusion: Closure Without Resolution
The death of Saif al-Islam Gaddafi ends a political ghost story, but it does not heal Libya’s wounds. The country remains divided, armed groups still dominate, and foreign influence continues to shape its future.
For some Libyans, his killing will feel like long-delayed justice. For others, it will deepen fears of endless cycles of revenge.
What is certain is this: Saif al-Islam Gaddafi’s life — and death — stand as proof that Libya’s revolution never truly finished. It removed a dictator, but never replaced him with a state strong enough to move forward.
Prof. Khurshid Iqbal Andrabi: A Life in Research, Teaching & Leadership
In the world of academia, few careers are as distinguished as those that masterfully weave together groundbreaking research, dedicated teaching, and visionary leadership. Professor Khurshid Iqbal Andrabi, the 19th Vice-Chancellor of the University of Kashmir, exemplifies this rare blend. His journey from the laboratories of Harvard to the administrative helm of one of India’s premier universities is a story of intellectual brilliance, unwavering commitment to education, and profound service to his homeland.
From Srinagar to the Global Scientific Stage
Born in Srinagar on July 15, 1963, Khurshid Andrabi’s academic prowess was evident early. His foundational training in biochemistry began at the prestigious Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) in Chandigarh, where he not only earned his master’s degree in 1985 with a gold medal and distinction but also completed his PhD in 1990.
The quest for deeper knowledge took him across the Atlantic for postdoctoral research at some of America’s finest institutions. His tenure at Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital (1992-1996) was particularly formative. Here, he worked on insulin receptor signaling in collaboration with Nobel Laureate Edwin G. Krebs, immersing himself in the then-nascent field of molecular cell signaling—a focus that would define his life’s work.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
A Pioneer in Kashmir’s Biotechnology Landscape
After nearly a decade abroad, including a stint as an Assistant Professor at the Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Prof. Andrabi made a pivotal decision: to return to Kashmir and contribute directly to its academic growth. Joining the University of Kashmir as faculty, he played an instrumental role in establishing the Department of Biotechnology in 2003.
Under his stewardship as its founding head, the department grew from an idea into a nationally recognized centre of excellence, gaining support and acclaim from the Government of India’s Department of Biotechnology (DBT). This was a legacy-building act—creating an ecosystem for advanced biological research in the Valley that would nurture generations of future scientists.
The Researcher: Decoding Cellular Mysteries
At his core, Prof. Andrabi remained a dedicated researcher. His primary area of investigation is cell signaling, with a specific emphasis on the mTORC1 pathway. This complex biological mechanism is crucial for understanding cellular growth, metabolism, and survival. His work has provided significant insights into how dysregulation of this pathway contributes to major human ailments, including cancer, diabetes, and aging. With over 85 published research papers and the guidance of more than 25 PhD and 20 MPhil students, he has built a robust research legacy that continues to impact the global scientific community.
The Leader: Stewardship as Vice-Chancellor
In 2014, his proven capabilities as an administrator—having served as Dean, Head of Department, and Director of Research—led to his appointment as the Vice-Chancellor of the University of Kashmir. His tenure from 2014 to 2018 was marked by efforts to modernize academic infrastructure, promote research culture, and navigate the university through challenging times with a focus on stability and academic integrity. He championed the integration of the university’s rich traditional strengths with the demands of 21st-century science and humanities.
A Trusted Voice in Academia
Beyond the university campus, Prof. Andrabi’s expertise has been sought by numerous national and international bodies. He has served as a member of the University Grants Commission (UGC) Peer Team, contributed to advisory boards for the Department of Science and Technology (DST), and been associated with the Indo-Australian Higher Education Commission and the British Council for Higher Education. His role as an editor and reviewer for several international journals underscores his standing in the global academic fraternity.
The Enduring Legacy
Today, even after his vice-chancellorship, Prof. Khurshid Iqbal Andrabi remains a professor in the department he helped create—a full-circle moment for a man dedicated to the cycle of learning and mentorship. His life stands as a powerful testament to the idea that true academic greatness lies not just in personal achievement, but in the ability to build institutions, mentor minds, and illuminate pathways for others to follow. In the annals of Kashmiri and Indian academia, he is remembered not only as a scientist and a leader but as a builder of futures.
Article 35A: The Complete Story of Kashmir’s “Special Status” Law
For decades, a single constitutional provision stood at the heart of India’s most complex political and emotional debate: Article 35A. More than just a legal clause, it was the bedrock of Jammu & Kashmir’s unique identity within India—a symbol of autonomy for its supporters, and a mark of discrimination for its critics. To understand the journey of modern Jammu & Kashmir, you must understand the story of Article 35A: where it came from, what it did, why it sparked such passion, and how it came to an end.
1. The Origin Story: A Promise of Protection
Article 35A didn’t come from India’s original Constitution. It was born in 1954 through a Presidential Order rooted in Article 370—the article that granted Jammu & Kashmir its special autonomous status after it acceded to India in 1947. Think of it like this: Article 370 was the framework of the special relationship, and Article 35A was the key rule created under it. It was designed to protect the state’s demographic character after the turmoil of Partition by letting the state itself define who belonged there.
2. The Core Function: Defining the “Permanent Resident”
So what did Article 35A actually do? In simple terms, it gave the Jammu & Kashmir legislature the exclusive power to define the state’s “Permanent Residents.” Only these residents could access a special set of rights that were off-limits to other Indian citizens. This wasn’t just about voting—it was about creating a legal fence around jobs, land, and state benefits. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
3. The Special Rights: Land, Jobs and Identity
Under Article 35A, being a Permanent Resident came with concrete privileges:
Property Ownership: Only residents could buy land or a house in Jammu & Kashmir.
State Government Jobs: Public sector employment was reserved for them.
State Scholarships and Educational Aid.
Political Rights: Only residents could vote in state elections or run for the state assembly.
In essence, Article 35A made residency a prerequisite for full economic and political participation in the state.
4. The Rising Controversy: Charges of Discrimination
Over time, Article 35A became deeply controversial. Critics argued it was unfair and unconstitutional on several grounds:
Gender Bias: If a Kashmiri woman married an “outsider” (a non-resident Indian), she could lose her residency status and property rights—a rule later softened but not fully resolved.
Stranded Communities: Groups like the Valmikis (brought as sanitation workers in 1957) and West Pakistan Refugees (who fled in 1947/65) lived there for generations but were denied full residency rights—barring them from most jobs and property ownership.
Constitutional Questions: Many legal experts argued that because Article 35A was added via Presidential Order—bypassing Parliament’s amendment process—it was legally shaky. They also said it violated the Indian Constitution’s promise of equality and the right to settle anywhere in India.
5. The Legal and Political Standoff
For years, Article 35A was challenged in the Supreme Court, which heard arguments but never gave a final verdict. Politically, opinions were sharply split:
In Kashmir: Mainstream parties saw Article 35A as an “article of faith”—essential to protecting Kashmiri identity and autonomy.
In New Delhi and Jammu: Many, including the BJP and groups in Jammu, saw it as an unfair anomaly that held back investment, fueled separatism, and denied rights to women and refugees.
6. The Historic Revocation: August 2019
The debate reached a dramatic climax in August 2019. The Central Government took these decisive steps:
A New Presidential Order replaced the 1954 order that contained Article 35A, effectively voiding it.
Article 370 itself was revoked through a Parliamentary resolution.
Jammu & Kashmir was reorganized into two Union Territories.
Since Article 35A existed only through Article 370, its legal foundation disappeared overnight.
The Legacy: What Remains After Article 35A
Today, Article 35A is history—but its legacy is very much alive.
For Supporters of the move, its end corrected a “historical wrong,” opened the path for economic investment, and brought equality by allowing all Indian citizens to own property and access opportunities in the region.
For Critics, its revocation marked the unilateral end of a constitutional promise, deepening a sense of political disempowerment in Kashmir and raising concerns about demographic change.
Article 35A was more than law—it was a defining marker of identity and belonging. Its story captures the tension between regional autonomy and national integration, between protection and discrimination. Whether seen as a shield or a barrier, understanding Article 35A remains essential to understanding the past and navigating the future of Jammu & Kashmir.
Article 370 was a key part of the Indian Constitution that gave special status to the region of Jammu and Kashmir. This provision allowed the area a level of independence not seen in other Indian states. Over the years, Article 370 sparked much debate and controversy. In 2019, the Indian government decided to remove it, leading to big changes in the region. This article explores the full story of Article 370, from its beginnings to its end, and what it means today. We’ll look at the history, the rules it set, how it was scrapped, and the effects on Jammu and Kashmir.
The Historical Background of Article 370
The story of Article 370 starts in the late 1940s, just after India gained independence from British rule. Jammu and Kashmir was a princely state ruled by Maharaja Hari Singh. In 1947, when India and Pakistan split, the Maharaja faced pressure from both sides. Pakistan-backed tribes invaded Kashmir, forcing the Maharaja to seek help from India.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
To get Indian military support, the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession on 26 October 1947. This document joined Jammu and Kashmir to India but only in matters of defence, foreign affairs, and communications. Other areas stayed under the state’s control. This setup formed the basis for Article 370 in the Indian Constitution, which came into force in 1950.
Article 370 was meant to be temporary. It was added to bridge the gap until Jammu and Kashmir could decide its future through a Constituent Assembly. In 1951, this assembly was formed, and by 1957, it had created the state’s own constitution. After that, the assembly dissolved, but Article 370 remained in place.
For decades, Article 370 symbolised the unique relationship between Jammu and Kashmir and the rest of India. It protected the region’s identity and autonomy amid ongoing disputes with Pakistan over Kashmir.
Key Provisions of Article 370
Article 370 outlined how the Indian Constitution applied to Jammu and Kashmir. Unlike other states, not all parts of the Constitution automatically covered the region. Instead, the President of India could extend provisions with the agreement of the state’s government.
Here are the main features:
Limited Central Power: The Indian Parliament could only make laws on defence, foreign affairs, finance, and communications without the state’s consent. For other matters, like land or education, the state had its own rules.
Own Constitution and Flag: Jammu and Kashmir had its own constitution and state flag, alongside the Indian one.
Residency Rights: Linked to Article 35A (added in 1954 via a presidential order), it defined ‘permanent residents’ and gave them special rights, such as buying property or getting government jobs. Outsiders could not easily settle or own land in the state.
No Emergency Powers: The President could not declare a financial emergency in the state under Article 360 of the Indian Constitution.
These rules aimed to preserve the cultural and demographic makeup of Jammu and Kashmir, a Muslim-majority area in a diverse country.
Article 35A: The Companion to Article 370
Article 35A was closely tied to Article 370. It came from a 1954 presidential order and let the Jammu and Kashmir legislature define who counted as a permanent resident. Only these residents could own land, vote in state elections, or access scholarships and jobs.
This article faced criticism for being discriminatory, especially against women who married outsiders—they could lose their rights. Supporters argued it protected the region’s identity from outside influence. When Article 370 was removed, Article 35A went with it.
The Abrogation of Article 370 in 2019
The push to end Article 370 grew stronger under the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP), led by Prime Minister Narendra Modi. The party had promised to scrap it in their 2014 and 2019 election manifestos, seeing it as a barrier to full integration.
On 5 August 2019, while Jammu and Kashmir was under President’s Rule (meaning central control via the governor), Home Minister Amit Shah announced changes in Parliament. The government issued Presidential Order CO 272, which amended Article 367. This changed ‘Constituent Assembly’ to ‘Legislative Assembly’ in Article 370.
Since there was no state assembly, the governor’s approval stood in. This allowed the President to apply the full Indian Constitution to Jammu and Kashmir. The next day, 6 August 2019, Presidential Order CO 273 made most of Article 370 inoperative, except for a clause saying all Indian laws now applied.
At the same time, Parliament passed the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 2019. This split the state into two Union Territories: Jammu and Kashmir (with a legislature) and Ladakh (without one). The changes took effect on 31 October 2019.
The move came with a communications blackout, curfews, and arrests of local leaders to prevent unrest. It drew mixed reactions—cheers from some parts of India, protests in Kashmir, and concern from abroad.
Legal Challenges and the Supreme Court Verdict
Many challenged the abrogation in the Supreme Court, arguing it was unconstitutional without the state’s consent. They said Article 370 became permanent after the Constituent Assembly dissolved in 1957.
On 11 December 2023, a five-judge bench unanimously upheld the changes. The court called Article 370 ‘temporary’ and said the President had the power to revoke it. It noted the abrogation promoted integration and development.
The judges ordered assembly elections by September 2024 and said Jammu and Kashmir should regain statehood ‘at the earliest’. This ruling ended major legal doubts but left some questions about the process.
Omar Abdullah. Image Courtesy: PTI
Impacts of Abrogating Article 370 on Jammu and Kashmir
The end of Article 370 brought sweeping changes:
Political Shifts: Without special status, Jammu and Kashmir lost its separate constitution and flag. Elections in 2024 brought back a local government after years of central rule.
Economic Growth: The government claims investments have risen, with better infrastructure, tourism, and jobs. Laws now allow outsiders to buy land, aiming to boost development. By 2025, on the sixth anniversary, the Prime Minister highlighted improved security and progress.
Social Changes: Permanent residency rules ended, opening doors for non-locals. This raised fears of demographic shifts in the Muslim-majority area. Women’s rights improved in some ways, as old discriminatory laws vanished.
Security and Human Rights: Supporters say militancy dropped, with fewer attacks. Critics point to ongoing tensions, internet shutdowns, and claims of rights violations.
International View: Pakistan condemned the move, straining ties. The UN and others watched closely, but India called it an internal matter.
By 2026, symbols like the Tricolour lighting up Srinagar’s Lal Chowk on Republic Day show greater integration.
Current Status of Article 370 in 2026
As of February 2026, Article 370 remains abrogated. Jammu and Kashmir is a Union Territory with an elected assembly, while Ladakh stays without one. The Supreme Court’s 2023 verdict stands, and statehood restoration is discussed but not yet done.
The region sees ongoing development, but debates continue over autonomy and identity. The abrogation is seen as a step towards unity, yet it divides opinions in Kashmir.
Conclusion
Article 370 shaped Jammu and Kashmir’s place in India for nearly 70 years. Its abrogation in 2019 marked a bold shift towards full integration, upheld by the courts. While it promises growth and equality, it also raises questions about local rights and culture. Understanding Article 370 helps grasp India’s complex federal system and the ongoing Kashmir story. As time passes, its true impact will become clearer.
The Indian commodity market witnessed a historic and brutal selloff over the last weekend of January, sending shockwaves through investor portfolios. In an unprecedented move, gold prices on the Multi-Commodity Exchange (MCX) plummeted by around 20% in just two trading sessions, with silver following suit in a sharp decline. This dramatic collapse erased nearly two months of steady gains, leaving both leveraged traders and long-term investors reeling.
The Timeline of a Meltdown
The storm began brewing on Saturday. After a period of consistent weekly gains, gold prices on the MCX came under heavy pressure, closing down 5.4% at ₹1,69,470 per 10 grams for 24-carat gold. The real carnage, however, unfolded on Sunday, the Union Budget day.
The session opened with 24-carat gold at ₹1,46,800 per 10 grams.
Sustained and intense selling pressure, coupled with extreme intraday volatility, then pushed prices into a freefall.
By the end of the day, gold had crashed to ₹1,36,185 per 10 grams—marking a staggering near-20% drop from the levels seen just 48 hours prior.
Silver mirrored the panic. On the MCX, silver prices nosedived 9% in a single session on Sunday, landing at ₹2,65,900 per kilogram, abruptly halting its own strong bullish rally. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
The Global Context
The weakness was not isolated to India. International spot gold prices also witnessed a severe correction, tumbling over 9% to USD 4,887 per ounce. This global selloff added significant downward pressure on domestic prices, as India’s gold prices are intrinsically linked to international benchmarks, accounting for customs duty and the USD/INR exchange rate.
The “Why”: Unpacking the Perfect Storm
Market experts point to a confluence of factors that created this perfect storm:
Leveraged Positions Unwinding: The primary trigger is attributed to a massive unwinding of leveraged speculative positions. Over the preceding two months, a large number of investors and traders, attracted by the steady climb, had entered gold and silver trades using borrowed money (leverage). When prices began to fall, these leveraged positions faced margin calls, forcing traders to sell their holdings to cover losses. This selling triggered further price drops, creating a vicious downward spiral.
Profit-Booking After a Rally: The sharp and consistent price rises in both metals had built up significant paper profits. The initial dip on Saturday likely prompted a wave of profit-booking, which accelerated into panic selling on Sunday.
Budget Day Liquidity and Sentiment: The occurrence of the crash on Budget Day added a unique layer. Market participants often reposition portfolios ahead of major events, which can exacerbate volatility. While no direct policy trigger was identified, the overall market sentiment and liquidity conditions may have amplified the move.
Mystery of Large Institutional Trades: Speculation swirled about large institutional orders or “fat finger” trades (accidental large orders) that may have initiated the initial plunge. However, experts like Ajay Bagga, Banking and Market Expert, noted that such theories remain unverified. The sheer scale suggests a systemic rush for the exit rather than a single actor.
Expert Advice: Navigating the Aftermath
In the wake of the meltdown, experts are urging a calibrated, long-term perspective.
For Long-Term Investors: Analysts emphasize that the fundamental reasons for holding gold and silver—central bank buying, fiat currency debasement concerns, government deficits, and robust industrial demand for silver from EV and renewable sectors—remain intact. Household investors who hold physical gold or sovereign gold bonds (SGBs) without leverage are advised to stay the course.
A Caution Against Leverage: Ajay Bagga strongly cautioned against the use of leverage in volatile commodity markets. “The meltdown would have hurt these [leveraged] positions… let us keep the discourse measured and avoid the leverage,” he told ANI. The event serves as a stark reminder of the risks associated with borrowed money in trading.
Portfolio Reassessment: Investors were advised to reassess their asset allocation. Bagga suggested that those with a 10-15% strategic allocation to gold and silver may continue to hold for diversification. However, investors uncomfortable with such extreme volatility could consider liquidating to preserve capital and peace of mind.
Avoiding the Noise: The key takeaway is that commodity downturns can be prolonged and violent, but short-term noise should not derail long-term financial goals. Patience and a focus on core fundamentals, rather than speculative trading, are paramount.
Conclusion
The 20% gold crash is a dramatic lesson in market mechanics, highlighting the dangers of speculative leverage and the inherent volatility of commodity markets. While it has inflicted painful short-term losses, particularly on traders, it reinforces the classic investment wisdom: precious metals are best held as a long-term, non-leveraged hedge within a diversified portfolio, not as a short-term bet for exponential gains. The market’s focus now shifts to how prices stabilize and whether this event marks a deep correction or a change in the longer-term bullish trend.
