The US Diversity Visa (DV) Lottery, also known as the Green Card Lottery, is a programme run by the US Department of State. Every year, it randomly selects up to 55,000 people from around the world to receive immigrant visas and become permanent residents of the United States. Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
This programme was created under the Immigration Act of 1990 to increase diversity among immigrants in the US. It mainly helps people from countries that have sent fewer immigrants to America in recent years.
Applying for the DV Lottery is completely free, but being selected does not guarantee a visa. Winners must still meet education or work experience requirements and go through the full visa process, which includes fees, background checks, and interviews.
For the DV-2026 programme (visas issued between October 2025 and September 2026), registration opened on 2 October 2024 and closed on 7 November 2024. Results were released on 3 May 2025, and as of 17 October 2025, selected applicants from eligible countries are now completing their visa procedures.
Why Indians Cannot Apply for the DV-2026 Lottery
Indian citizens are not eligible for the DV-2026 lottery because India has sent too many immigrants to the US in recent years.
Eligibility Rule
To qualify, a person must be born in a country that sent fewer than 50,000 immigrants to the United States in the past five years (2019–2023). Countries that exceed this limit are automatically excluded from the lottery so that underrepresented nations can benefit.
India’s Situation
India has sent over 60,000 immigrants each year to the US during this period, mostly through employment-based visas like H-1B and family-sponsored categories. Because of this high number, India is not eligible and is expected to stay excluded until at least the DV-2029 lottery (which will open in late 2028).
This rule is part of US immigration law (Section 203(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act). It is not a punishment or a new policy—it’s a fixed rule to keep the diversity system fair for countries with fewer immigrants.
Other Countries Not Eligible for DV-2026
Here’s the full list of ineligible countries for the 2026 lottery:
Country
Reason for Ineligibility
Bangladesh
High immigration to the US
Brazil
High immigration
Canada
High immigration
China (including Hong Kong)
High immigration
Colombia
High immigration
Cuba
High immigration
Dominican Republic
High immigration
El Salvador
High immigration
Haiti
High immigration
Honduras
High immigration
India
High immigration (over 60,000/year)
Jamaica
High immigration
Mexico
High immigration
Nigeria
High immigration
Pakistan
High immigration
Philippines
High immigration
South Korea
High immigration
Venezuela
High immigration
Vietnam
High immigration
Note: If your spouse was born in an eligible country, or if neither of your parents was born or living in your country of birth, you might still qualify using their country’s eligibility. Northern Ireland is treated separately from the UK (eligible), and Macau follows China’s status.
Options for Indians Who Still Want a US Green Card
Although Indians cannot join the DV Lottery, there are other legal ways to apply for US permanent residency. However, these paths often involve long waiting times due to per-country visa limits.
1. Employment-Based (EB) Visas
These are the most common for skilled workers, such as H-1B professionals. Categories like EB-2 and EB-3 often have waiting times of 10 years or more for Indian applicants.
2. Family-Sponsored Visas
US citizens can sponsor close relatives for green cards. Immediate family members face little to no delay, but others may wait many years.
3. EB-5 Investor Visa
This option requires investing between $800,000 and $1.05 million in a US business that creates jobs for Americans.
4. Asylum or Refugee Status
Available to those who can prove they are facing persecution in their home country.
5. Student or Work Visas (F-1, J-1)
Although temporary, these visas can sometimes lead to permanent residency later through employment or marriage.
Important Advice
Always apply through the official US government website — dvprogram.state.gov. Do not pay anyone to enter the lottery. Many scam websites falsely claim to guarantee selection or charge for registration.
India’s ineligibility is simply due to its strong immigration numbers to the US, not because of any new restrictions or political reasons.
The Department of Geomatics, Islamic University of Science and Technology (IUST), in collaboration with the Healthy Climate Initiative (HCI), organized a Leadership Workshop on Climate Action and Innovation. The workshop aimed to fosterleadership and innovation in tackling climate change through research, technology, and community engagement brought together experts, academicians, and practitioners to discuss innovative solutions for climate resilience and sustainability.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Delivering the keynote address, Prof. Shakil A. Romshoo, Vice Chancellor, highlighted the vulnerability of the Himalayan region to climate change and called for localized research and adaptive strategies. Dr. Soumitra Das, Chairman and Executive Director, HCI, spoke about innovative cooling technologies to mitigate the climate crisis, while Mr. Rituraj Phukan,
Director, HCI, emphasized climate justice and equitable action. Environmental lawyer Mr. Nadeem Qadri stressed the importance of environmental governance and community participation. Earlier, welcoming the guests, Dr. Tariq Abdullah, Head, Department of Geomatics, who emphasized the role of geospatial technologies in addressing climate challenges. The event also showcased IUST’s eco-friendly infrastructure, and concluded with a vote of thanks by Dr. Jasia Bashir, Assistant Professor, Department of Geomatics.
Dr. A P J Abdul Kalam (Dr. Avul Pakir Jainulabdeen Abdul Kalam) fondly known as the “People’s President,” remains one of India’s most beloved and respected figures. His life story is not just one of personal achievement but of relentless service, humility, and inspiration. From humble beginnings in Rameswaram to becoming the 11th President of India, Dr. Kalam’s journey embodies the spirit of perseverance, education, and dedication to national progress.
Early Life and Education
Dr. Kalam was born on October 15, 1931, in a modest Tamil Muslim family in Rameswaram, Tamil Nadu. His father, Jainulabdeen, was a boat owner, and his mother, Ashiamma, a homemaker. Despite limited means, the family valued education deeply. Young Kalam sold newspapers to support his studies while nurturing a deep curiosity for science and flight.
He graduated in physics from St. Joseph’s College, Tiruchirappalli, in 1954 and later studied aeronautical engineering at the Madras Institute of Technology (MIT). His early dreams of becoming a pilot faced disappointment, but destiny had greater plans — to make him India’s “Missile Man.”
Scientific Career and Contributions
Dr. Kalam joined the Defence Research and Development Organisation (DRDO) and later the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO). At ISRO, he played a crucial role in developing India’s first indigenous satellite launch vehicle, SLV-III, which successfully deployed the Rohini satellite in 1980.
His leadership in India’s missile development programme earned him the title “Missile Man of India.” He was the driving force behind projects like Agni and Prithvi, which strengthened India’s defence capabilities. Dr. Kalam also contributed significantly to India’s nuclear tests at Pokhran in 1998, marking a major step in the nation’s strategic autonomy.
The People’s President (2002–2007)
In 2002, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam became the 11th President of India, succeeding K. R. Narayanan. His presidency was marked by accessibility, humility, and compassion — a rare combination in politics. He connected directly with citizens, particularly students, earning the affectionate title “People’s President.”
He transformed Rashtrapati Bhavan into a hub of learning, inviting school children and young innovators. His simple lifestyle, honesty, and devotion to the nation deeply touched people across social and political lines.
Vision for India: Dreams of 2020
Dr. Kalam was not only a scientist and statesman but also a visionary thinker. His book “India 2020: A Vision for the New Millennium” outlined his dream of transforming India into a developed nation through science, technology, and moral strength.
He believed that empowering youth was the key to national development. His famous quote, “Dream, dream, dream. Dreams transform into thoughts and thoughts result in action,” continues to inspire millions of young minds to pursue innovation and excellence.
A Teacher at Heart
Even after completing his tenure as President, Dr. Kalam returned to his true passion — teaching. He taught at institutions like the Indian Institute of Management (IIM) and Anna University, inspiring students through lectures on creativity, leadership, and ethics. He often said, “If I am remembered by every student as a good teacher, that will be the biggest honour for me.”
Awards and Recognition
Dr. Kalam’s contributions earned him numerous honours, including:
Padma Bhushan (1981)
Padma Vibhushan (1990)
Bharat Ratna (1997) — India’s highest civilian award
He was also honoured with doctorates from over 40 universities worldwide, reflecting his global impact as a thinker and humanitarian.
Final Moments and Legacy
On July 27, 2015, Dr. Kalam passed away while delivering a lecture at the Indian Institute of Management, Shillong — doing what he loved most: inspiring young minds. His sudden demise left the entire nation in mourning, but his legacy continues to live through his books, ideas, and the countless lives he touched.
Conclusion
Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam’s life is a timeless reminder that greatness is born not from privilege but from passion, hard work, and faith. He showed India that dreams, when combined with discipline and dedication, can shape the destiny of a nation.
He remains a guiding light for generations — a scientist who dreamed, a teacher who inspired, and a President who loved his people.
As Dr. Kalam once said,
“Don’t take rest after your first victory because if you fail in the second, more lips are waiting to say that your first victory was just luck.”
His words, like his life, continue to ignite minds across the world.
Government Degree College (GDC) for Women, Baramulla, organised an insightful extension lecture on the life, works, and contributions of the revered Sufi scholar and reformer, Mir Syed Ali Hamadani (RA). The event was held under the guidance of the college Principal, Prof. (Dr.) Neelofar Bhat, and aimed to shed light on the multidimensional impact of Hamadani’s teachings on Kashmir’s spiritual, cultural, and intellectual evolution.
The lecture was delivered by Prof. Hamid Naseem Rafiabadi, a distinguished scholar and former Chairperson of the Department of Islamic and Religious Studies at the Central University of Kashmir. Prof. Rafiabadi has also served as the Director of the Shah-i-Hamadan Institute of Islamic Studies, Dean of the Schools of Social Sciences and Media Studies at the Central University of Kashmir, and Director of the International Centre for Spiritual Studies at the Islamic University of Science and Technology, Awantipora. He is currently a Visiting Researcher at ISTAC, International Islamic University Malaysia.
In his address, Prof. Rafiabadi offered a comprehensive overview of Mir Syed Ali Hamadani’s (RA) spiritual mission and intellectual legacy. He described the 14th-century Sufi saint as a bridge between Central Asian scholarship and Kashmiri civilisation, noting that Hamadani’s arrival in Kashmir introduced a transformative era in art, spirituality, and social ethics.
Highlighting his contributions to Persian literature, calligraphy, crafts, and architecture, Prof. Rafiabadi explained how Hamadani (RA) helped shape the very identity of Kashmir as a centre of culture and spirituality. He particularly emphasised his influence on the introduction of handicrafts and shawl weaving in the Valley, which later became the hallmark of Kashmiri economy and aesthetics.
The speaker further reflected on Hamadani’s efforts to reform society through education, ethical trade, and moral discipline, underscoring that his teachings were deeply rooted in the Quran and Sunnah. “Mir Syed Ali Hamadani (RA) was not only a spiritual leader but also a visionary social reformer who understood the importance of knowledge, unity, and economic independence,” Prof. Rafiabadi remarked.
Principal Prof. (Dr.) Neelofar Bhat, in her concluding remarks, appreciated the enlightening lecture and said that understanding figures like Hamadani (RA) is crucial for young generations to reconnect with their spiritual and cultural roots. She also stressed the need to integrate such legacy-based discourses into academic learning for a holistic educational experience.
Faculty members, students, and scholars from different departments attended the event, engaging actively in the interactive session that followed. The lecture concluded with a note of gratitude to Prof. Rafiabadi for his scholarly insights and to the organising committee for successfully hosting a session that celebrated one of Kashmir’s most influential spiritual personalities.
Surah An-Naziat: In the opening line, the words are related to the verb naza,meaning to drag away or strip out forcibly. Other common words in Arabic derived from the same root include meanings like struggle, death struggle, the agony of death. Connected here with garqa, destruction and drowning, wa-n-naziati garqa brings to mind an irresistible power carrying life to its end. But that is not explicit. The next line wa-n-nashitati nashta brings to mind a rushing release of energy, of unstoppable momentum. The third verse wa-s-sabihati sabha evokes the ordered serenity of the heavens – the celestial bodies are at rest in obedience to the Creator’s will, and so they float unresisting in their vast and complex orbits, supported and carried by the command of God. This evocation of the sheer immensity and infinitude of the power at God’s command is explanatory of the fourth and fifth verse, fa-sabiqati sabqa fa-mudabbirati amra: and so the out-strippers outstrip and they compel the affair to what God has ordained for it. The scale here is not of the particular but of the whole – all life, all existence, is being rushed forward to the conclusion ordained for it. It cannot be deflected or delayed. Human beings have no more power over the matter than they have over the orbits of sun and moon – rather, all our existence is subject to the complex harmonies of those orbits.
Human beings are deluded by their freedom of will, the freedom to obey or disobey. That freedom is true and real. The delusion is that, precisely because freedom of will is true and real, human beings come to think too highly of their own agency. So someone will plant a seed in the ground and say “Look, I grew this.” But the entire ordered universe, and all the conditions and rules governing its existence and operation, must pre-exist that human effort of planting a seed before the human action can bear any fruit. The plant’s debt to the human effort is negligible, as compared to its debt to the Creator of everything. But humans forget; they even forget that they did not create themselves. Some become proud of their agency and say “Look, what I have achieved! look at my fine deeds! look, how great a force for good in the world I am.” Yet, the reality is that even if the deeds are good, their full outcome will not be good. To be among those who have no cause to fear or to grieve, a person’s good deeds must come out of and be combined with belief in God and the Last Day. In other words, human beings cannot be saved by their good deeds alone, but they can, if God wills, be saved by their realization of their indebtedness to God (so that they are humble and thankful) and by their realization of their accountability before God (so that they are fearful and strive to avoid disobedience and the sins that flow from it). If you have any doubt that mere human power intending good but not surrendering to the guidance of God, can realize good in the world, then reflect on what Western powers have achieved. Reflect on whether even the promise of leisure and autonomy (which, sadly, is what people mean nowadays by “the good life”) has been achieved. Reflect on the state of the earth and its resources. In spite of their colossal excesses of wealth, their intellectual, military and technological superiority, the Western states have not been able to secure even an easy material life for their own citizens, let alone for others outside their borders – and, for most people, there is no question of greater ease of heart and mind, or reliable improvements in fairness and justice. Rather, we see increasing stress and frustrated rage, distrust, antagonism, together with a savage self-centredness expressed in extreme concentrations of wealth and power on one side, poverty and helplessness on the other. Instead of being free, people are slaves to the tyranny of a political-economic model that is destroying the resources of the whole world, and people have no resources of will with which even to slow down, let alone stop, that destruction.
It is easy to recognize the pharaonic cast of mind in great tyrants or tyrannical systems, and the cruelty of the states and nations governed by them. But Pharaoh is, as this surah affirms, only an example, a teaching device. We are meant to learn about, and look for, that disposition in ourselves, in how we value ourselves, in how we relate to our neighbours, to our human and natural environment. A poor individual who has no power in the world may think himself safe from the disposition of Pharaoh, and say: “I am too weak and too poor to be in any danger of that.” In fact, weakness and poverty are not shields against the pharaonic disposition. The root of that disposition lies not in the abuse of power but in the failure to appreciate that whatever power we may have, great or small, it is a gift and favour from the Creator. The pharaonic attitude is to be convinced that whatever you have, you deserve better and more – the attitude is essentially thankless, therefore incapable of being content. In a weak, poor person such thanklessness may be hidden, covered up by a sullen, unspoken resentment. In the rich it is plainly visible and viciously ugly – that is why we find that already hugely wealthy individuals and nations cannot stop themselves from wanting even more. Now if a turn of events makes the poor, weak person rich and powerful, what can restrain him from the same cruel insatiability, unless it is remembrance of his indebtedness before God and his accountability to Him?
The modern world and its disposition is, fundamentally and perhaps incurably, pharaonic. So, we are told, it is “a jungle out there”; it is kill or be killed, a battle for survival that only the fittest win. So, we are told, it is the impersonal force of competition that regulates the affair, not God. This is a lie. If there is any jungle left in this world, we do not see in it any “law of the jungle” in the sense of a restless, relentless, destructive competition with a few winners taking all. On the contrary, what we see, in reality, is a beneficent co-existence of innumerable and diverse species of animate and inanimate creatures. If all these creatures were conscious, we would be right to describe their behaviours as disciplined by mutual and reciprocated restraint and respect. It is, overall, a balanced system that favours life and its diversity. The “law of the jungle”, if there is such a thing, is not cut-throat competition, it is co-existence and co-operation; not a malevolent greed for hegemonic dominance, but a constraining of needs and appetites so that there is both living and letting live. The pharaonic individual looks at the world and sees scarcity of resources and a struggle for each to grab as much as he can at the expense of others; the believer, if he is a believer, should know better than this. In reality there is a super-abundance of resources in the world; there is scarcity only in the will to share and distribute them with fairness and justice.
That is why in this surah the obvious question is asked. It is obvious, but it needs asking because we are forgetful: Is the creation of man greater or the creation of the heavens and earth that comprise man’s liveable environment? If the answer is obvious, and it surely is obvious, then why is it that humans strut about like petty pharaohs, proclaiming their autonomy and mastery, the sufficiency of their powers of cunning and contrivance, as if there were no boundary to their mastery of themselves or to their capacity to manipulate nature and control events?
Self-evidently, there are boundaries. When shall we admit it? On the Day when the first trumpet sounds out, and the second follows it. On that Day hearts beat in agony and eyes are cast down. No strutting about then, for sure. But here and now, there is need for an effort to remember indebtedness and accountability. Many are not at all ready for that, not at all disposed to the necessary humility and fear before God. Human beings can make alterations in what has been given them; also, they can destroy, but they cannot create, life. So it is that they, forgetting that their lives were given them, cannot believe that after death there is another life. It makes no sense to them; it cannot make sense without the effort of belief in God and the Last Day. It is for that effort that God gave human beings freedom of will. But do we use it for that purpose? Surely it will take but a single shout and they will be awake. Awake to the reality that was always obvious, but too late then.
The opening verses of this surah are often read as referring to the winds. There is some sense to this interpretation. It is true that humans build windmills, and they do use the wind to drive sailing boats. Nevertheless, unlike earth, water and fire, the wind cannot be touched, cannot be grasped. We cannot get hold of it. So it serves as a figurative way to bring to mind the subtlety and immensity of God’s power, to which we are subject. The winds can be fertilizing and life-giving, and the winds can also be fiercely destructive – there are many examples in the Qur’an of both. In the poetry of many languages, the wind is associated with what cannot be controlled, with that which is truly free. So it serves as a figurative way to bring to mind that the out-strippers will out-strip us; we cannot outrun the winds, or outrun the arrow of time, or escape the inevitable ordained for each of us and the whole creation. Yet, bear in mind also the subtlety, the fineness, of wind and how that is combined with its power to bring (from our point of view) benefit or harm on individual occasions. The winds can be seen, figuratively, as forces greater than ourselves and utterly independent of us; a familiar, natural phenomenon which is, nevertheless, on the border between the visible and the invisible.
The surah recalls compactly the story of Pharaoh and God’s messenger, Musa, `alayhi s-salam. Consider the grounds for the self-confidence of Pharaoh: he picked up Musa as a helpless child, brought him up in his own household, his own world and culture. And the people of Musa were the slaves of Pharaoh, whose people felt free to kill off the Israelites’ menfolk and let live their womenfolk and use them as they pleased. Indeed, Pharaoh was great in the land; perhaps also, he did great things, like provide law and order even if through tyranny. Musa himself seems to feel some debt to him; for sure he is in fearful awe of Pharaoh, and God has to strengthen his resolve to face him. Now God is God of Pharaoh as well as God of Musa. There is only one God, and He is the most merciful of the merciful. So it is that the command to Musa is to go and present to Pharaoh the opportunity to mend his ways, to alter his perspective, to waken to reality. That opportunity is available to all human beings until they are in the jaws of death. It is a choice of relationship with God: between unbelief and thankfulness; between arrogance and humility; between proud rebellion and fearful obedience. But to benefit from that opportunity, the human being must have a will to grow in the grace and favour of God. We may not expect to do so without an effort to rid ourselves of the stains of unbelief, thanklessness, pride and arrogance, and an effort to live with an eye to the Day of accountability. That Day is rushing towards us, just as it was rushing towards Pharaoh. He was secure in his position in the world, convinced of his own cunning and power and his right to power, and he was wrong absolutely on every single count.
In the drowning of Pharaoh and his earthly power there is a lesson indeed for one who fears [God and the Last Day]. After the question I mentioned earlier, Are you harder to create or is the heaven that He built?, the surah reminds us of the scale of what we have been given: the boundless canopy of the heavens, the onward thrust of time cycling through day and night, the secure and traversable, fertile earth providing for people and their livestock. The whole of this will pass and give way to the Day when we shall take full note of all that we did and all that we intended, and having done so we shall know why we have merited the Garden or the Fire. Even our own death, let alone, the ending of the world, seems very far away to us, when we look from the here and now. But the surah states emphatically that, looking back from that Day, the whole life of the world will seem a very short span indeed, the twinkling of an eye. Many of us can confirm that: when we look back over our lives, we find ourselves saying “It seems like it was only yesterday that I started doing such-and-such, though in fact twenty years have passed since then.”
They ask you about the Hour… People do still ask this question, as if it was an event in the world, like the date of an examination or a job interview. It is not. Rather, it is the event of the ending of the world – there is no “when” about it. We know only the certainty that it will be, just as we know with certainty that we will die, but we do not know exactly when. Our not-knowing is a mercy from God, so that, being uncertain how long we have, we can more strongly taste our freedom of will and so better value our time, and make better use of it to grow in humility and fear of God.
The Dachnipora Welfare Forum, Anantnag, has strongly condemned the immoral and indecent acts witnessed during the recent Physics Walla event held in the district. In a statement, the forum said that such behaviour is completely against the moral, cultural, and religious values of the people of Anantnag.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Master Abdul Rasid Mir, President of the Dachnipora Welfare Forum, expressed deep concern over the incident, calling it a disgraceful act that tarnishes the reputation of the district known for its dignity, respect, and moral integrity. He emphasised that education should enlighten the hearts and minds of the youth, not promote immodesty or disrespect in the name of modernity or entertainment.
The forum urged the local administration to take strict action against those responsible and to ensure that such un-Islamic and unethical acts are never repeated. It also appealed to parents, teachers, and community elders to guide the youth towards moral and respectful conduct in public events.
Reaffirming its commitment to protect the cultural and spiritual identity of Anantnag, the Dachnipora Welfare Forum vowed to oppose any attempt to corrupt the values and traditions of this sacred land.
In a moment that lit up global headlines and social media alike, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif delivered an unexpectedly emotional speech praising former U.S. President Donald Trump, calling him a “true man of peace” and once again nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
The dramatic exchange took place at an international summit in Sharm El-Sheikh, Egypt, attended by world leaders including those from the UK, France, Canada, and multiple Muslim countries. But among all the dignitaries, it was Shehbaz Sharif’s words that stole the spotlight — a performance that many have labelled as “Pakistan’s buttering diplomacy.”
🌍 Sharif’s Praise for Trump
Addressing Trump directly, Sharif declared,
“Today is one of the greatest days in modern history because, after tireless efforts, peace has finally been achieved.”
He credited Trump’s leadership for achieving ceasefires and peace accords, adding,
“President Trump has worked day and night to make this world a cradle of peace and prosperity.”
Sharif went on to remind the audience that Pakistan had already nominated Trump for the Nobel Peace Prize, saying,
“He prevented a war between India and Pakistan, both nuclear powers, and helped bring about a ceasefire. Now, he has also played a crucial role in bringing peace to Gaza, saving millions of lives across South Asia and the Middle East.”
🙌 A Salute to Trump’s Leadership
The Pakistani leader continued his praise, saying,
“Mr President, I salute your visionary leadership and guidance. I believe you are the man the world needed most at this time. History will remember your name in golden letters.”
Sharif then concluded with a personal prayer:
“May God bless you with long life so you can continue serving humanity.”
The audience watched in silence as Shehbaz’s words echoed through the hall — a speech that many saw as both flattering and strategic.
😄 Trump’s Reaction: ‘Wow, I Wasn’t Expecting That!’
Donald Trump, visibly pleased, smiled and responded,
“Wow, I wasn’t expecting that! That was truly beautiful — thank you very much.”
He later mentioned his relationship with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, saying,
“India is a great country led by my good friend. I think Pakistan and India will now have excellent relations.”
Turning towards Shehbaz Sharif, Trump joked, “Right?” — to which Sharif smiled back, drawing laughter from the crowd.
💬 Social Media Explodes with Reactions
As soon as the video clip went viral, social media platforms buzzed with commentary from both Pakistan and India.
A user named Razaq posted on X (formerly Twitter):
“Shehbaz Sharif stole the show at the Sharm El-Sheikh summit. Trump invited only him to speak among dozens of world leaders.”
Indian academic Professor Ashok Swain shared the video, commenting:
“Shehbaz Sharif is making it difficult for Modi to remain Trump’s favourite.”
Another user joked,
“Trump must be wishing he had Shehbaz in his election campaign — then he wouldn’t need Elon Musk.”
However, not everyone was impressed. Many criticised the Pakistani leader for what they called “excessive flattery” and “undiplomatic praise” that bordered on embarrassment.
🧭 Analysis: Diplomacy or Desperation?
Analysts are divided on the intent behind Shehbaz Sharif’s remarks. Some see it as a strategic move to rebuild trust with Washington after years of strained relations, while others believe it reflects Pakistan’s growing dependence on U.S. goodwill amid economic struggles.
Political observers also note that Sharif’s overt praise for Trump could signal Islamabad’s desire to align with a potential Trump comeback in the 2026 U.S. elections.
Still, critics argue that Pakistan’s diplomacy must balance admiration with dignity. As one columnist wrote, “Flattery may open doors, but it also lowers your standing at the table.”
🏁 Conclusion
Whether seen as genuine gratitude or calculated diplomacy, Shehbaz Sharif’s praise for Donald Trump has certainly made global headlines. His words — part admiration, part strategy — have revived debate over Pakistan’s foreign policy approach and how far it’s willing to go to secure international goodwill.
For now, one thing is clear: Pakistan’s buttering diplomacy has once again caught the world’s attention — and Donald Trump’s too.
In a significant diplomatic shift, the Afghan Taliban has declared the Kashmir issue an “internal matter” of India during a high-level meeting in New Delhi on October 10, 2025. The statement, made by Acting Afghan Foreign Minister Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi alongside India’s External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar, has ignited controversy, particularly in Pakistan, which views Kashmir as a disputed territory requiring international resolution.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
The joint India-Afghanistan statement condemned a recent terror attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir, on April 22, 2025, which claimed 26 lives, and reaffirmed Afghanistan’s commitment to preventing its soil from being used for terrorism against India. Muttaqi’s reference to India and Afghanistan as “contiguous neighbors”—implying recognition of the 106-km border through Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK)—further underscored the Taliban’s stance, aligning with India’s claim over the region.
Historical Context and Taliban’s Evolving Stance
The Taliban’s position marks a departure from its earlier ambiguity on Kashmir. In May 2020, spokesperson Suhail Shaheen dismissed rumors of supporting a “Ghazwa-e-Hind” against India, emphasizing non-interference. Post-2021 Kabul takeover, the Taliban briefly voiced sympathy for Kashmiri Muslims in September 2021 but reverted to neutrality by 2022, with Anas Haqqani stating Kashmir was “not part of our jurisdiction.” The 2025 statement, however, is the clearest alignment yet with India’s narrative, driven by pragmatic needs for regional stability and Indian humanitarian aid, including 500 annual ITEC scholarships.
Regional and Domestic Reactions
The statement has deepened India-Afghanistan ties, with India viewing the Taliban as a counterweight to Pakistan-backed militant groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba. However, it has strained Afghan-Pakistan relations, already tense over TTP activities. On social media platform X, Indian users hailed the Taliban’s stance as a diplomatic win, while Pakistani and Kashmiri groups decried it as a “betrayal” and violation of UN mandates. Kashmiri legal experts have called the statement “baseless,” arguing it ignores self-determination rights.
Broader Implications
The Taliban’s position reflects a delicate balancing act: maintaining ideological appeal to Muslim causes while avoiding conflicts that could invite Indian retaliation or global isolation. For India, the statement bolsters its outreach to Kabul, though security remains heightened in Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan, meanwhile, faces a diplomatic setback, with its narrative on Kashmir as an international issue further challenged.
In less than a decade, Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) has transformed from a street protest movement into one of Pakistan’s most influential and controversial political forces. Emerging from the emotional fallout of Punjab Governor Salman Taseer’s assassination in 2011, TLP has built its reputation as the uncompromising guardian of Namoos-e-Risalat — the honour of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). With fiery sermons, massive rallies, and shocking street power, the party has become a symbol of Pakistan’s deepening religious populism — and a nightmare for successive governments.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
The Origins: From a Grave to a Movement
TLP’s roots trace back to Mumtaz Qadri, the police bodyguard who killed Punjab Governor Salman Taseer for supporting reforms to Pakistan’s blasphemy laws. Qadri’s execution in 2016 ignited a wave of emotion among Sunni Barelvi Muslims. His funeral drew hundreds of thousands, and his grave became a pilgrimage site. Amid this surge of sentiment, Khadim Hussain Rizvi, a fiery cleric from Lahore, founded Tehreek-e-Labbaik Ya Rasool Allah (TLYRA) — a religious movement that soon evolved into a political force known as Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP) in 2015.
By 2017, TLP had become a household name, not through elections, but through its ability to paralyze the capital, Islamabad, and force ministerial resignations through mass sit-ins.
The Ideology: Faith, Fury, and Politics
At its heart, TLP’s ideology revolves around Khatm-e-Nabuwwat (Finality of Prophethood) and the unquestionable sanctity of Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him). The party calls for:
Strict enforcement of blasphemy laws, including capital punishment.
Expulsion of diplomats from countries accused of “insulting Islam,” such as France and the Netherlands.
Implementation of Nizam-e-Mustafa — a full Sharia-based governance system.
Defense of Sunni Barelvi interests, often in opposition to Deobandi, Wahhabi, or Ahmadi groups.
While supporters view TLP as defenders of faith, critics describe it as a populist, vigilante movement that weaponizes religion for power. Its fiery rhetoric often glorifies “martyrs” like Mumtaz Qadri and justifies violence as a form of religious duty.
The Charismatic Firebrand: Khadim Hussain Rizvi
Khadim Rizvi’s thunderous speeches, laced with poetry, emotional appeals, and unfiltered anger, made him a folk hero among Pakistan’s lower and middle classes. His wheelchair and booming voice became symbols of defiance. Under his leadership, TLP staged the 2017 Faizabad sit-in, blocking Islamabad for 21 days. The protest forced the resignation of the Law Minister and ended with a military-brokered deal — a moment many analysts see as TLP’s real political birth.
Rizvi passed away in November 2020, but his legacy — and his movement’s energy — lived on through his son, Saad Hussain Rizvi.
The New Face: Saad Rizvi’s Strategic Street Power
When Saad Rizvi took the reins, many predicted TLP’s decline. Instead, he rebranded it with sharper organization, modern communication, and calculated defiance. Under his leadership, TLP clashed violently with police in 2021, 2023, and 2025 — each time over blasphemy-related or pro-Palestine issues. The group’s anti-France demonstrations turned deadly, leading to a temporary government ban under anti-terrorism laws. Yet, through backdoor negotiations, the ban was lifted months later — a testament to TLP’s political leverage.
As of October 2025, Saad Rizvi was reportedly injured during police firing amid massive pro-Palestine protests in Lahore, further fueling the group’s martyr narrative.
TLP’s Political Clout
Despite its militant street image, TLP has also grown into an electoral force. In the 2018 elections, it secured over 2.2 million votes, emerging as Pakistan’s fourth-largest party by vote count. By 2024, its share grew to nearly 2.9 million votes, even winning a seat in the Punjab Assembly for the first time.
While it still struggles to translate votes into power, its ability to split conservative vote banks has changed electoral dynamics, particularly in Punjab and Karachi.
Protests, Chaos, and Government Concessions
TLP’s name is synonymous with street anarchy and state paralysis. Key flashpoints include:
2017 Faizabad Sit-in: Islamabad shut down for three weeks; law minister resigned.
2018 Asia Bibi Protests: Violent nationwide unrest after the Christian woman’s acquittal.
2021 Anti-France Protests: Several police killed; led to a temporary party ban.
2023 Jaranwala Riots: TLP-linked mobs burned churches after blasphemy rumours.
2025 Gaza Marches: Deadly clashes in Muridke and Lahore; Saad Rizvi critically injured.
Each episode reinforces the image of TLP as a street-controlling force capable of bending governments to its will — often through bloodshed.
Criticism and Allegations
Analysts accuse TLP of acting as a state-tolerated pressure valve — a group unleashed to distract or destabilize opponents when needed, yet curbed when it crosses red lines. Its strong ties with Barelvi seminaries, mosques, and urban youth networks give it unmatched mobilization strength. However, human rights groups accuse it of inciting sectarian hatred, mob violence, and attacks on minorities.
Despite multiple bans and media blackouts, TLP continues to thrive on social media platforms, spreading its message through Telegram, TikTok, and YouTube.
Conclusion: A Movement Too Strong to Ignore
Whether seen as defenders of the Prophet’s honour or dangerous extremists, Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan has permanently altered Pakistan’s religious and political landscape. Its mix of faith, fury, and populism ensures it cannot be sidelined — even by the military or mainstream parties.
As Pakistan battles political instability, economic crisis, and rising extremism, TLP stands as both a symptom and symbol of a nation caught between democracy, religion, and rage.
Srinagar Police on Monday conducted coordinated search operations at multiple locations linked to individuals allegedly associated with the banned Jama’at-e-Islami (JeI) and Hurriyat Conference.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
A police spokesperson said that searches were carried out at the residences of (1) Mushtaq Ahmad Bhat @ Goga Shahib @ Mushtaqul Islam, son of Gh. Qadir Bhat, resident of Kashi Mohalla, Batamaloo; (2) Ashraf Sehrai, son of Mohd. Shumasdin, resident of Baghat; (3) Mehrajuddin Kalwal @ Raj Kalwal, son of Mohammad Amin Kalwal, resident of Rainawari Kalwal Mohalla, A/P Hamza Colony, Kenihama (presently in NIA custody); and (4) Zameer Ahmad Sheikh, son of Ghulam Nabi Sheikh, resident of Gulshan Nagar, Nowgam.
He said the searches were conducted strictly in accordance with legal procedures. During the operations, various materials including literature and photographs allegedly linked to banned separatist outfits were seized.
These actions form part of a broader campaign aimed at dismantling the terror and separatist ecosystem in the Valley by targeting its support structures and networks, he also said.
Police reaffirmed its commitment to maintaining peace and public order, asserting that action will continue against individuals and groups found involved in unlawful or anti-national activities.
Lahore, Oct 13: A senior leader of Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), Syed Ahmed Shah Bukhari, was killed on Monday in an encounter with Pakistani security forces during ongoing pro-Palestine demonstrations in Muridke, Punjab. The incident occurred amid violent clashes between TLP supporters and law Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel enforcement personnel as protesters attempted to march toward Islamabad in solidarity with Palestinians.
Image Credit To Bloomberg
According to eyewitness accounts and statements from TLP’s central leadership, Bukhari—also referred to in some reports as Ahmad Bukhari—was shot dead when Rangers allegedly opened fire on protesters. TLP has described his death as a case of “martyrdom,” claiming that security forces used live ammunition against unarmed demonstrators. Videos circulating on social media show scenes of chaos, with gunfire, tear gas, and injured protesters being carried away.
The confrontation in Muridke marks one of the most violent episodes in the current wave of pro-Palestine protests that began on October 10, when TLP supporters launched a march from Lahore toward the capital. The party accuses the Pakistani government of failing to take a firm stance against Israel amid the ongoing Gaza conflict.
Muridke Lahore Protest / Image Credit To/ Reuters
TLP sources claim that multiple protesters were killed and more than 50 injured in the Muridke clashes alone. The group has vowed to continue the march despite the government’s security crackdown and has branded the forces involved as “Israeli-backed agents.”
So far, Punjab Police have not issued an official statement regarding Bukhari’s killing. However, interior ministry sources have justified the use of force, arguing that the march posed a threat to law and order. Authorities have heavily fortified the route to Islamabad with barriers and shipping containers, attempting to prevent protesters from advancing further north.
The TLP’s latest confrontation adds to its long history of tense standoffs with the Pakistani state. Founded in 2015 following the execution of Mumtaz Qadri, the group has staged several violent protests in recent years, including deadly clashes in 2021 that forced government concessions.
Analysts warn that Bukhari’s death could spark further unrest across Punjab and other provinces, as the TLP leadership calls for nationwide sit-ins if their demands for stronger anti-Israel measures are not met.
As of Monday evening, negotiations between the government and TLP representatives were said to be underway, with officials seeking to defuse tensions and prevent another large-scale confrontation.
In the verdant landscapes of Kashmir, where the majestic Himalayas cradle a tapestry of cultural heritage and natural splendor, emerges a figure whose life story embodies resilience, scholarly pursuit, and an unwavering commitment to healing. Dr. Mohammad Sultan Khuroo, often simply revered as Dr. Khuroo, stands as one of India’s most distinguished gastroenterologists and hepatologists. Born into a lineage steeped in Islamic scholarship and Sufi traditions, his journey from the historic town of Sopore to global acclaim in medical science is a testament to the transformative power of education and empathy. As the Director of the Digestive Diseases Centre at Dr. Khuroo’s Medical Clinic in Srinagar, and a former Professor and Head of Gastroenterology at the Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS), Dr. Khuroo has not only pioneered treatments for complex digestive disorders but has also mentored generations of physicians, leaving an indelible mark on healthcare in South Asia and beyond.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Early Life: Roots in Sopore’s Scholarly Embrace
Dr. Khuroo’s origins trace back to Kralteng, a quaint hamlet in Sopore—a ninth-century town in North Kashmir renowned for its apple orchards and as a cradle of Kashmiri resilience. Born into an educated and respected family that had settled in the area in the early 20th century, young Mohammad Sultan grew up amidst an environment rich in intellectual and spiritual fervor. His family home became a hub for Islamic teachings, influenced by encounters with revered scholars and Sufi saints. This milieu profoundly shaped his worldview, instilling values of humility, service, and lifelong learning.
His paternal grandfather, the late Haji Fateh Khuroo (1885–1958), was a polymath in his own right—a scholar of Persian literature whose recitations of the Quran could captivate audiences with their melodic depth and emotional resonance. This legacy of erudition extended to Dr. Khuroo’s father and extended family, including notable entrepreneurs like the late Haji Abdul Samad Pandith and the philanthropist Haji Abdul Jabbar Pandith, whose devotion to worship and social welfare mirrored the family’s ethos of communal upliftment. Sopore, with its history of quiet revolutions against adversity—be it natural calamities or socio-political upheavals—instilled in Dr. Khuroo an early appreciation for perseverance. In his own reflections, he has often recounted the town’s struggles and triumphs, crediting them for forging his determination to effect positive change, much like the steady, unyielding flow of the Jhelum River that borders his birthplace.
Education was the bridge from these humble roots to higher aspirations. Dr. Khuroo pursued his MBBS and MD in Medicine at the University of Kashmir, where his academic excellence shone through amid the challenges of a region marked by geopolitical tensions. Eager to specialize, he advanced to the prestigious Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education and Research (PGIMER) in Chandigarh, earning his DM in Gastroenterology. These formative years were not merely academic; they were a crucible for honing a patient-centered approach, influenced by Kashmir’s tradition of holistic care that blends medical science with cultural sensitivity.
Academic and Professional Ascendancy: Building Institutions and Expertise
The 1980s marked a pivotal era for healthcare in Jammu and Kashmir, as the state sought to establish world-class medical facilities amid its isolation. In 1982, Dr. Khuroo answered the call to join the newly founded Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) in Srinagar—a visionary tertiary care center conceived to bring cutting-edge medicine to the Valley. As one of the institution’s founding senior physicians, he rose swiftly through the ranks, becoming Professor and Head of the Department of Gastroenterology, and later Chairman of the Department of Medicine. Under his stewardship, SKIMS evolved into a beacon of excellence, particularly in digestive and liver diseases, training hundreds of specialists and conducting groundbreaking research tailored to regional health challenges like hepatitis and parasitic infections prevalent in the Himalayan foothills.
Dr. Khuroo’s international stature was cemented during his tenure as Consultant and Head of Gastroenterology and Liver Transplantation at the King Faisal Specialist Hospital and Research Centre in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Here, he bridged Eastern and Western medical paradigms, contributing to advancements in organ transplantation and infectious disease management. His global recognition is underscored by prestigious fellowships: FRCP from the Royal College of Physicians (Edinburgh) in 1997, FACP in 1998, and MACP (Emeritus) in 2000 from the American College of Physicians. These honors reflect not just clinical prowess but a career defined by ethical rigor and innovative problem-solving.
Upon returning to Kashmir, Dr. Khuroo founded the Digestive Diseases Centre at his eponymous clinic in Srinagar’s SK Colony, Qamarwari—a state-of-the-art facility that continues to serve as a lifeline for patients with complex gastrointestinal ailments. The clinic, affiliated with his official website (drkhuroo.in), emphasizes multidisciplinary care, integrating diagnostics, endoscopy, and therapeutic interventions under one roof. His practice philosophy is rooted in the “patient’s bill of rights,” championing dignity, informed consent, second opinions, and cultural respect—a rare ethos in high-pressure medical environments.
Pioneering Contributions to Medicine: Research and Innovation
Dr. Khuroo’s legacy extends far beyond the clinic, etched deeply in the annals of medical literature. With over 14,000 citations on Google Scholar, his research portfolio spans decades, focusing on gastroenterology, hepatology, and infectious diseases endemic to South Asia. A trailblazer in viral hepatitis, he conducted seminal studies on hepatitis E—a waterborne pathogen disproportionately affecting developing regions—elucidating its epidemiology, transmission, and clinical spectrum. His work on echinococcosis, a parasitic liver disease rampant in pastoral communities, includes a landmark prospective study (2019–2024) at his clinic, identifying alveolar echinococcosis cases and advancing diagnostic protocols.
Notable among his innovations is the development of therapeutic endoscopy techniques for biliary and pancreatic disorders, as well as protocols for managing acute liver failure in resource-limited settings. Dr. Khuroo’s publications in journals like The Lancet and Gastroenterology have influenced global guidelines, while his involvement in liver transplantation programs has saved countless lives. In Kashmir, where conflict and geography exacerbate health disparities, his research on trauma-induced gastrointestinal complications has informed emergency care strategies. Recently, he delivered the Dr. Farooq Ashai Oration in 2024, underscoring his ongoing role as a thought leader.
Beyond papers and protocols, Dr. Khuroo’s impact lies in his mentorship. He has trained technicians, nurses, residents, and fellows with a hands-on intensity, fostering a cadre of ethical practitioners. His autobiography-like reflections on Sopore’s evolution mirror his teaching style: narrative-driven, empathetic, and aimed at inspiring systemic change.
Personal Life: A Tapestry of Family, Faith, and Fulfillment
Dr. Khuroo’s personal narrative is as enriching as his professional one. His marital union with Haleema—a partnership described as a “huge success”—has been a pillar of support, blending familial warmth with shared values of service. The couple’s life in Srinagar reflects Kashmiri hospitality, with the clinic often doubling as a space for community outreach. Family members, including his children like Dr. Naira Sultan Khuroo, carry forward this legacy in pathology and beyond.
Faith remains a quiet compass for Dr. Khuroo, echoing his family’s Sufi roots. He approaches medicine as a divine calling, treating each patient with the reverence once reserved for Quranic recitations in his ancestral home. In retirement from institutional roles, he channels this energy into writing, community health initiatives, and the clinic, embodying the Sufi ideal of selfless contribution.
Legacy: Healing Hearts and Histories
As of October 2025, Dr. Mohammad Sultan Khuroo, at over eight decades, remains an active force in medicine—a living archive of Kashmir’s medical renaissance. His clinic bustles with patients from across the subcontinent, a testament to his enduring appeal. In an era of fragmented healthcare, Dr. Khuroo’s story reminds us that true healing transcends diagnoses; it is woven from respect, innovation, and an unyielding bond with one’s roots.
For those inspired by his path, resources like his official website offer glimpses into his work, while his scholarly output invites deeper exploration. Dr. Khuroo is not merely a doctor; he is a bridge between tradition and tomorrow, proving that from the quiet valleys of Sopore, one can touch the world.
Afghanistan’s Taliban Foreign Minister, Amir Khan Muttaqi, began a week-long official visit to India in October 2025. His itinerary includes a significant stop at Darul Uloom Deoband, a renowned Islamic seminary in Uttar Pradesh. The visit has attracted widespread attention for its historical, ideological, and diplomatic symbolism.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
The Visit
Amir Khan Muttaqi’s visit marks the highest-level interaction between India and the Taliban regime since the group’s return to power in 2021. His arrival in India comes amid efforts by the Taliban to strengthen regional relations and project a softer image abroad.
While in India, Muttaqi is scheduled to meet Indian officials, engage with Afghan students, and visit key religious and educational centres. Among these, his visit to Darul Uloom Deoband stands out as the most symbolically charged moment of the trip. He is expected to meet senior clerics, tour the seminary’s campus, and interact with students, including several from Afghanistan who are studying there.
What is Darul Uloom Deoband?
Darul Uloom Deoband was founded in 1866 in the town of Deoband, Uttar Pradesh. Over time, it became one of the most respected Islamic seminaries in South Asia. The seminary follows the Hanafi school of Islamic jurisprudence and advocates a reformist, education-based approach to preserving Islamic teachings.
The “Deobandi” school of thought that emerged from this institution spread widely across India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Afghanistan. Many religious scholars, teachers, and movements across South Asia trace their spiritual or academic lineage to Deoband. Its influence can be seen in thousands of affiliated madrasas across the region.
Deoband’s Connection to Afghanistan and the Taliban
The link between Deoband and Afghanistan runs deep. For more than a century, Afghan scholars have studied at Darul Uloom Deoband and taken its teachings back home. The Deobandi school’s ideas became popular in Afghanistan during the 20th century, especially among religious students who sought Islamic reform rooted in scholarship rather than politics.
When the Taliban emerged in the 1990s, many of its leaders and clerics were graduates of Pakistani seminaries that themselves followed the Deobandi model. The ideological foundation of the Taliban—its emphasis on Islamic law, education, and social conservatism—reflects this heritage. Visiting Deoband, therefore, carries strong symbolic meaning for the group.
For the Taliban, Darul Uloom Deoband represents their spiritual origin. It is seen as the mother institution of the Deobandi movement, whose teachings shaped the religious outlook of their founders. By visiting Deoband, Amir Khan Muttaqi is reaffirming the historical and ideological link between the Taliban and the broader Deobandi tradition.
Why the Visit Matters
The visit has multiple layers of significance — religious, political, and diplomatic.
1. Affirming Ideological Roots
By visiting Deoband, Muttaqi acknowledges the Taliban’s doctrinal foundation. It is a gesture of respect toward the institution that shaped the religious and intellectual background of many Taliban scholars. The visit also signals to the Taliban’s followers that their movement remains committed to its original Deobandi teachings.
2. “Spiritual Diplomacy”
Muttaqi’s trip is not just political; it also represents what can be called spiritual diplomacy. Instead of focusing on military or economic agendas, the visit is built around cultural and religious connections. Engaging with Deoband allows the Taliban to present themselves as part of a broader Islamic scholarly tradition rather than an isolated militant movement.
3. Expanding Beyond Pakistan
Historically, the Taliban’s religious and logistical support came largely from Pakistan. But this visit to India — particularly to an Indian religious seminary — suggests that the group wants to diversify its relationships. Visiting Deoband gives the Taliban an opportunity to connect with religious institutions in India, signaling that their movement’s spiritual roots go beyond any one country.
4. India’s Perspective
For India, this visit presents both opportunities and challenges. On one hand, it allows New Delhi to open a non-political channel of communication with Afghanistan’s ruling authorities. Cultural and religious exchanges are less controversial than direct diplomatic recognition. On the other hand, India must carefully manage the optics of hosting Taliban officials, given global concerns about the group’s policies.
Nevertheless, India’s decision to allow the visit to Deoband reflects a pragmatic approach. It recognizes that religious diplomacy can play a role in building regional stability and understanding, even between countries with complex histories.
5. Public Relations and Image Building
For the Taliban, the visit also helps project a more moderate image. Engaging with an Indian institution known for scholarly learning allows them to show that they are interested in education, tradition, and dialogue. It is part of the Taliban’s broader effort to appear more open and diplomatic since their return to power.
Potential Outcomes
The Deoband visit could lead to several developments in the coming months and years.
Educational Cooperation: More Afghan students may be encouraged to study at Deoband or similar institutions in India. This could revive traditional educational links that existed before decades of conflict disrupted them.
Cultural Exchange: The visit might promote greater cultural understanding between India and Afghanistan, rooted in shared South Asian Islamic heritage.
Shift in Regional Balance: If the Taliban continue building connections with Indian religious institutions, it could slightly reduce Pakistan’s exclusive influence over the group’s religious and educational landscape.
Diplomatic Engagement: Though India does not officially recognize the Taliban government, informal engagements like this could lay the groundwork for future dialogue on issues like trade, security, and humanitarian aid.
Controversies and Concerns
Despite its symbolic value, the visit has sparked mixed reactions.
Some observers view it as an important step toward regional engagement, while others fear it may be seen as legitimizing the Taliban regime. Human rights groups have raised concerns that such visits should not overshadow the Taliban’s restrictions on women’s education and other freedoms in Afghanistan.
For India, there is also a delicate balance to maintain. While religious diplomacy can open doors, any visible closeness with the Taliban could attract criticism from domestic and international audiences. Therefore, the government’s approach has remained cautious — allowing the visit, but keeping it largely limited to religious and cultural grounds.
Deoband’s Position
Darul Uloom Deoband itself remains a respected centre of Islamic education, known for promoting religious scholarship and discipline. It does not involve itself in political activities and often distances itself from political interpretations of its teachings.
Scholars at Deoband are expected to welcome the visiting delegation as part of their tradition of hospitality but are unlikely to make any political statements. Their focus will likely remain on spiritual and educational matters, reinforcing that Deoband’s role is religious, not political.
Broader Meaning
The visit highlights the enduring influence of Deoband in shaping Islamic thought across South Asia. More than a century after its founding, this institution continues to be a point of reference for millions of Muslims across the world. Its reach extends far beyond India’s borders — influencing seminaries, scholars, and movements in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and beyond.
By returning to the source of their spiritual inspiration, the Taliban leadership is symbolically acknowledging their intellectual debt to Indian scholars. This also shows how religious ideas, unlike political boundaries, have long connected the peoples of South Asia.
The Road Ahead
Whether this visit leads to real change remains to be seen. Symbolism alone cannot replace substantive progress. But it does create space for dialogue, understanding, and education — all of which are essential for peace in the region.
For the Taliban, visits like these can help soften their international image and create opportunities for cooperation beyond politics. For India, it’s a reminder of how its cultural and religious institutions can serve as bridges of influence and dialogue even with complex neighbours.
Ultimately, Amir Khan Muttaqi’s visit to Darul Uloom Deoband is more than a courtesy call. It represents an intersection of history, faith, and diplomacy — where religion becomes a medium of communication between two nations with deep, intertwined pasts. Whether this connection leads to constructive engagement or remains a symbolic gesture will depend on the willingness of both sides to build on shared heritage for a more stable future.
Darul Uloom Deoband, a prominent Islamic seminary founded in 1866 in Deoband, Uttar Pradesh, India, holds a pivotal place in the ideological framework of the Taliban, the militant group that has ruled Afghanistan during 1996–2001 and since 2021. The Deobandi movement, originating as an anti-colonial Islamic revivalist effort, has significantly influenced the Taliban’s strict interpretation of Sharia law and their vision for an Islamic society. This article explores the historical, ideological, and operational connections between Darul Uloom Deoband and the Taliban, highlighting why the seminary remains central to the group’s worldview.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
Historical Context of Darul Uloom Deoband
Founded by scholars Muhammad Qasim Nanautavi and Rashid Ahmad Gangohi in response to British colonial rule after the 1857 Indian Rebellion, Darul Uloom Deoband aimed to preserve Sunni Hanafi Islam. The Deobandi movement emphasized a return to core Islamic principles, rejecting Western influences and promoting taqlid (adherence to classical Hanafi jurisprudence). Initially non-violent, it aligned with India’s independence struggle, collaborating with figures like Mahatma Gandhi. Post-Partition, its ideology spread to Pakistan and Afghanistan through a network of madrasas, some of which later adopted militant interpretations.
Ideological Influence on the Taliban
The Taliban, emerging in 1994, are ideological heirs of the Deobandi movement. Their rigid enforcement of Sharia—banning women’s education, music, and Western customs—reflects Deobandi puritanism, blended with Pashtun tribal codes (Pashtunwali) and Saudi-funded Wahhabi elements from the 1980s Soviet-Afghan War. Key connections include:
Education of Taliban Leaders: Most Taliban founders, including Mullah Omar, were educated at Deobandi-affiliated madrasas in Pakistan, such as Darul Uloom Haqqania, often called the “University of Jihad.” Many current Taliban leaders are alumni of these institutions.
Jihadist Framework: During Pakistan’s Zia-ul-Haq era (1977–1988), Deobandi madrasas, backed by state and Saudi funding, trained mujahideen fighters. This infrastructure birthed the Taliban, who sought to establish an “Islamic Emirate” in Afghanistan, echoing Deoband’s anti-foreign stance.
Global Deobandi Network: Darul Uloom Deoband’s model inspired thousands of madrasas worldwide, creating a decentralized ideological pipeline. The Taliban explicitly claim Deobandi heritage, with leaders like Mullah Omar addressing Deoband events, such as its 150th anniversary in 2001.
Direct Support and Endorsements
Darul Uloom Deoband has historically supported the Taliban:
During the Taliban’s 1996–2001 rule, Deoband endorsed actions like the destruction of the Bamiyan Buddhas, justifying them as anti-idolatry measures.
In 2001, Mullah Omar delivered a keynote at a Deoband-affiliated event in Peshawar, reinforcing ties.
In 2021, Deoband’s principal, Maulana Arshad Madani, urged the Taliban to govern with pragmatism and tolerance, drawing parallels to Deoband’s anti-colonial legacy. However, the seminary has remained silent on controversial Taliban policies, such as the 2022–2023 bans on women’s education and work, despite criticism for ideological alignment.
Divergence and Criticism
While Indian Deobandis emphasize peaceful coexistence, issuing fatwas against terrorism in 2008, the Afghan and Pakistani Deobandi strains have embraced militancy. This divergence highlights intra-Deobandi tensions, with the Taliban’s extremism drawing criticism from moderate Muslims. The seminary’s influence thus cuts both ways: it provides the Taliban with theological legitimacy but also exposes divides within the broader Deobandi movement.
Geopolitical Implications
Darul Uloom Deoband’s significance lies in its role as the intellectual “mothership” of Deobandi Islam, a movement with over 150 years of global influence through organizations like Jamiat Ulema-e-Islam and Tablighi Jamaat. For the Taliban, it offers:
Legitimacy: Framing their rule as resistance against foreign “infidel” powers, from Soviets to Americans.
Recruitment and Training: A theological basis for jihad, sustained through madrasa networks.
Regional Tensions: While empowering the Taliban, Deoband’s militant offshoots contribute to instability, particularly in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations, as seen in recent cross-border strikes.
Conclusion
Darul Uloom Deoband remains a cornerstone of the Taliban’s ideological and operational framework, providing the theological foundation for their vision of an isolated, Sharia-governed society. While the seminary itself distances from the Taliban’s extremism, its historical endorsements and the proliferation of its ideology through madrasas have cemented its influence. Understanding this connection is crucial for grasping the Taliban’s motivations and the broader dynamics of Islamic militancy in South Asia.
Question: Assalamu alaykum wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh, Shaykh. I hope you are well. Alhamdulillah, I greatly benefit from your Sunday classes. I had a quick question, if that’s okay. What is your opinion regarding men wearing gold-plated watches? Please feel free to respond whenever it’s convenient for you. Jazakallahu khayran for your continued guidance and teaching.
Answer: Salam, Wa alaykum assalam wa rahmatullahi wa barakatuh. Alhamdulillah, may Allah reward you for your kind words and your eagerness to learn.
Regarding your question about men wearing gold-plated watches: The ruling depends on the nature and amount of the gold plating. If the watch is merely coloured to resemble gold, or the plating is so thin that no actual gold can be gathered from it, even if it were to be scraped or melted, then, according to many jurists, there is no harm in wearing it. In this case, it does not come under the prohibition of gold for men, as it is not genuinely gold in substance but only resembles it in appearance.
However, if the plating consists of an actual layer of gold that could be collected if removed, then the watch would be considered to contain real gold, and in that case it would be impermissible for a man to wear it, as it falls within the general prohibition of gold for men found in authentic ahadith.
That said, even in the case where the plating is insignificant and technically permissible, it is generally preferable to avoid such items. This is because they may give the appearance of wearing gold, leading others to suspect that one is wearing genuine gold, or to imitate him in doing so. Caution and avoidance of doubtful matters is always closer to piety.
For the first time in the history of Kashmir Valley, a unique and historic initiative was taken under the leadership of Agha Syed Muhammad Hadi Al-Mousavi Al-Safavi, President of Anjuman Sharie Shian, when an Economic Guidance and Entrepreneurship Camp was organised for youth from the platform of an Imambargah and Mosque.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
This was the first occasion that a religious institution offered such guidance for youth empowerment, self-reliance, and employment generation.
Nature and Purpose of the Camp
The aim of this extraordinary event was to encourage the youth of the valley towards self-employment, entrepreneurship, and economic independence. Speakers at the camp emphasised that in today’s era, along with education and worship, economic stability is also an essential part of the Islamic way of life.
Participation of Government and Private Institutions
Representatives from various government and non-government organisations, as well as bank officials, attended the camp. They provided detailed information about government schemes, loan facilities, startup support, and subsidy programmes. Participants were informed about how they could start their own businesses by taking advantage of different schemes offered by the Government of India and the J&K UT administration.
Youth Response and Enthusiasm
Dozens of young people from different parts of the valley took part in the camp. The youth described Agha Syed Muhammad Hadi Al-Mousavi Al-Safavi’s initiative as a spiritual and practical revolution. One participant remarked:
“We have always heard religious teachings from the Imambargah, but today we received guidance for our practical and economic life as well. This is a new light for us.”
Address by Agha Syed Muhammad Hadi Al-Mousavi Al-Safavi
While presiding over the camp, Agha Syed Muhammad Hadi Al-Mousavi Al-Safavi said:
“Islam is a complete code of life. It not only teaches worship but also encourages honesty, hard work, trade, and economic self-reliance. Today, our youth must seek both spiritual and economic guidance from the mosque and Imambargah.”
He further announced that Anjuman Sharie Shian would continue organising similar economic and social training programmes in different districts of the valley to help the youth become self-sufficient and dignified members of society.
Public and Social Reaction
This historic step has been widely appreciated by social and public circles. Experts noted that if religious leadership takes an active role in social and economic guidance, it could open the door to sustainable development in Kashmir. At the public level, this initiative is being hailed as a practical example of blending faith and worldly life.
Conclusion
This programme has become a shining example of combining religious and economic awakening in Kashmir. Through his foresight and active leadership, Agha Syed Muhammad Hadi Al-Mousavi Al-Safavi has proven that when the message of religion is linked with practical life, the youth can become a source of transformation not only for themselves but for the entire society.
Continuing its sustained drive against elements involved in unlawful activities, Police on Wednesday conducted coordinated searches on at multiple locations associated with members of the proscribed organisation Jamaat-e-Islami (JeI) within the jurisdiction of Police District Budgam.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel
The raids were carried out in the Soibugh and Chadoora areas at the residences of individuals linked with the banned outfit. The searches were conducted as part of ongoing investigations aimed at ascertaining their possible involvement in activities having potential to disturb public order and tranquility.
The operation reflects Budgam Police’s proactive approach in dismantling networks connected to the terror ecosystem and in thwarting any attempts to disturb peace and normalcy in the district.
Budgam Police reaffirmed its unwavering commitment to ensuring peace, security, and rule of law, reiterating that strict action will be taken against any individual or group found involved in activities prejudicial to public safety and the stability of the region.
Two faculty members from Baba Ghulam Shah Badshah University (BGSBU), Rajouri — Dr. Mohd Asgher and Dr. Arif Tasleem Jan from the Department of Botany — have been listed among the world’s top 2% scientists for the year 2025 by Stanford University, USA.
The ranking, prepared by a team of experts at Stanford University, recognises scientists based on their research impact, citations, and contributions to their respective fields. Both Dr. Asgher and Dr. Jan have made significant contributions in the field of plant sciences, with their research widely published in reputed international journals.
The Vice-Chancellor of BGSBU congratulated the two scientists for bringing global recognition to the university and appreciated their dedication to research and innovation. The achievement is being seen as a proud moment for the institution and a motivation for young researchers in Jammu and Kashmir.
The surah ”Surat al-`Ankabut”begins with the question: |a hasiba n-nasu |an… It is not right to translate hasiba as ‘think’/‘imagine’ or ‘suppose’/‘conjecture’. The meaning here is ‘reckon’, ‘calculate’, to use reason to weigh up options in order to come to a judgment about the value of this or that option. The opening verses makes it clear that people tend towards what is a miscalculation, namely that by declaring their faith, by saying that they have believed in God and His Messenger, they have assured their salvation. They have not.
The miscalculation is to say ‘we have believed’ and to expect nothing to follow from that by way of rights and duties, by way of material and immaterial alterations in all our thoughts and intentions, and in all our actions from the smallest to the largest, from very private, individual preferences to collective powers and policies, social and economic structures of public consequence. The miscalculation is to think of faith as a proclamation, a gesture in words or in rituals or both, when it is in reality a commitment to a way of life that differs radically from the way of life of those who do not have faith in God and His Messenger.
Our thoughts, intentions and actions are judged in some respects, necessarily (because we all live on the same earth under more or less similar conditions), by the same criteria that apply to the thoughts, intentions and actions of non-believers – criteria like accuracy, efficiency, profitability, pleasure, and suchlike. But, because we claim that we have faith in God and His Messenger, we are also and always subject to another criterion, namely whether we have measured up to the standards in thought and deed that are commanded and commended by God and His Messenger. Most strikingly, believers can never be sure – in the way that it is possible to be sure in respect of the ‘secular’ criteria just mentioned – that they have pleased God. Believers can only know that they have made effort, they can never know that they have succeeded. This uncertainty, when combined with a firm faith in God’s word, in His promise to judge us by the best of what we tried to do and to forgive our failings and sins, is the foundation of humility and cautious reserve when we make judgments about others or about ourselves, when we make plans and take decisions for ourselves or for others. The certainty that God will judge us, combined with uncertainty as to what that judgment will be, is the foundation of the desire to remember God and be remembered by Him, to never abandon Him and never be abandoned by Him. It is also the foundation of tolerance and respect in all human relationships and in all transactions with the non-human world.
Those who say ‘we have believed in God and His Messenger’ are affirming that God created them and created the world, that God is good and loves the good, that He cares for His creatures and accordingly provides for them not only their sustenance, their means of survival, but also the means of their salvation, the guidance communicated by His Prophets and Messengers and the Books that they brought to mankind. But those who do not want this affirmation to be tested, who do not want the rights and duties that are concomitant with this affirmation, are in effect saying that, after the creation of themselves and of the world, they have no further need of God. It is as if they said: ‘You made the world, and each of us. Thank you very much. We will take it from here. We appreciate your gifts, now leave us be to make our own way as we see fit to do.’ The assumption behind this familiar posture is that we are, though mortal and limited in our powers, self-sufficient.
This assumption — of which we are rarely conscious and which we almost never articulate – has serious consequences for our d‚n, our way of life. It reduces ‚m~n, our faith, to something that we might write on our identity papers, as we write our family name, place of birth, gender, and the like. But God has made it clear throughout His Book, and quite explicitly in this surah, that He does not judge our faith as it is written on our identity papers, but as it is impressed and imprinted on our bodies and minds through the manifold processes of our human effort in the whole of our lifetimes, be they short or long. He has promised that He will judge us by the best of what we tried to be and do, and that He will forgive us the rest. We depend on that promise, but we cannot make that promise come true simply by declaring that we are Muslims, and showing some level of attachment to certain of the symbols of being Muslim, such as diet and costume.
The surah takes its name from the mention, in the middle of the surah, of the frailty of the spider’s web. I have explained elsewhere that the names of the surahs of the Qur’an are a convention that developed as a useful shorthand to refer to one surah rather than another. These names are not part of the Revelation and do not carry its authority – by contrast, the forms and order of words and passages within surahs and the arrangement of the surahs, do carry the authority of God because they were settled at the end of the lifetime of the Messenger of God, salla l-lahu alayhi wa-sallam, under the supervision of Jibr‚l,alayhi s-salam. So we should not suppose that the titles indicate the theme(s), or indicate a special focus or perspective on the theme(s), of the surahs to which they are attached. However, because the reference to the spider’s web occurs in the middle of the surah, separating/connecting the two main sections (vv. 1-40, vv. 42-69), this title perhaps does have a significance that is worth dwelling upon.
A spider’s web (v. 41) is indeed a frail thing, and we can easily brush it aside. But a bird’s nest, or the nests that ants build, are also easily destroyed, and these could have served the purpose if the purpose was only to indicate frailty. The spider’s construction (bayt) is not made out of bits and pieces of material it gathers from the world around it (like a bird’s nest, for example). Rather, the spider builds its ‘house’ from material spun out from within itself. There are general patterns in the webs of different species of spiders, but no two individual webs are identical, albeit similar. Each web carries the impress of the individual effort of the spider that built it and is conditioned by the specificity of its circumstances (its ‘history and geography’, we could say). Thus, the bayt of the spider offers us a likeness of the delusion of self-sufficiency which afflicts many of mankind (v. 39 mentions Korah, Pharaoh and Haman as famous examples of this delusion).
The spider is not the target of criticism. Like all non-human animate creatures, it is glorifying God in its effort of life, and this effort is its worship. It is not glorifying itself (like the humans mentioned by title or name, of whom God says: fa-’stakbaru f‚ l-|ar‡). In reality, the material substances within the spider’s body, the inherited know-how individually applied as web-building competence, the material existence of the objects from which the spider suspends the master-thread around which it hangs the other threads, are all givens, preceding the spider’s constructive effort, as are the creatures for whose entrapment the particular web is particularly scaled. That is not to mention the existence of the universe and its adherence to principles of symmetry and geometry, to the ‘laws’ that constrain the relevant physics and chemistry of wetness and dryness, of toughness and flexibility, of lightness and stickiness, etc. The spider’s effort of construction is not self-dependent at all, though it might believe so if it were possible for a non-human creature to be Pharaonic in disposition.
Great pyramids to house the self-important dead and impress the living; hierarchies of wealth and status, ponderous and cruel machinations to manipulate and control the labour of others, to concentrate wealth and power – all these are causes and effects of the delusion of self-sufficiency, of the falsehood of self-dependence, of the self-centred belief that God has so endowed mankind that certain human beings (if they have the cultural ambition) can somehow be as if gods, despite their mortality, and that God is very impressed with them for this ambition. It is hard to think of any foolishness greater than the foolishness of trying to impress God, either with one’s sin or with one’s holiness.
As God makes clear to us in this surah – and our present emergencies make clear to us in the planet-wide breakdown of systems that sustain life and what is so precious and necessary to us of variety and beauty ,and which we should wish to preserve or improve for future generations – this boastful human self-centredness is a life-destructive delusion. Any and all of our human efforts are dependent on given conditions and antecedent circumstances. We are obliged to acknowledge these givens with gratitude — the human arts and sciences that merely express ‘wonder’ do not count as gratitude. Meeting this obligation orients and scales our energies so that the harm we are capable of does not become attractive to us. If it does we come to believe the harm to be good (or necessary for a future good) and commend it to others, or even coerce others also to believe that it is good. Refusing this obligation guarantees that we are drawn to what is harmful as if it were beneficial. Consequences follow. That is the sunnah of God, and the sunnah of God cannot be altered. The affirmation and declaration of faith must be tested and proven before it can be rewarded with the approval of God. If it were otherwise, we could not appreciate (the relative) freedom of thought and action that is the expression of our particular dignity and status in the creation.
The delusion of self-dependence is persistent in human nature, and as believers we have a particular duty to be vigilant against it and to alert others to it by speech and example. Pharaoh and Korah and Haman were arrogant about their know-how (in respect of ordering a state and material resources, building complex structures, making money, manipulating the minds of others) and this arrogance made their ignorance and error incurable. God says: ‘So we took each one in his sin (dhanb): and of them was he over whom We sent a hurricane; and of them was he that was overwhelmed by the Shout; and of them was he whom We made the earth to swallow; and of them was he whom We drowned. It was not for God to wrong them, but they did wrong themselves.’
Mohammad Yousuf Katari, the officials said, is a teacher but also acted as an Over Ground Worker in Kulgam.
He is believed to have links with Pakistan-based Laskar-e-Taiba (LeT) terror group.
The officials said Katari had a role in providing logistical support to the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack, who were later killed during Operation Mahadev.
Katari was zeroed in on, after an analysis of the equipment and weapons recovered from the LeT terrorists killed in Operation Mahadev.
Operation Mahadev was carried out for weeks, starting May 22, when security forces received intelligence about the presence of terrorists in Dachigam near Srinagar. Three terrorists, including the mastermind of the Pahalgam attack, were killed in the operation.
AK-47 and M9 assault rifles were among the weapons recovered from the hideout of the three terrorists, the officials said. The weapons were sent to a laboratory in Chandigarh for processing and reports confirmed the guns were used in the Pahalgam attack.
The 2025 Pahalgam Terror Attack: A Comprehensive Account of Tragedy and Its Aftermath
Introduction:
On April 22, 2025, the serene meadows of Baisaran Valley in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir—often called the “Switzerland of India”—became the site of one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in the region’s history. Nestled in the Lidder Valley, Pahalgam is renowned for its snow-capped peaks, lush greenery, and role as a gateway to the Amarnath Yatra, a significant Hindu pilgrimage. The attack, which claimed 26 lives and injured over 20, targeted tourists in a calculated assault that shattered the region’s fragile peace and escalated tensions between India and Pakistan to the brink of war. This article provides a detailed examination of the attack’s prelude, execution, immediate aftermath, investigations, military responses, and broader implications, drawing on official reports, survivor accounts, and expert analyses.
Historical Context: Kashmir’s Enduring Conflict
Jammu and Kashmir has been a contested region since the 1947 partition of India and Pakistan, with both nations claiming the Muslim-majority territory. The late 1980s saw a surge in insurgency, fueled by separatist and Islamist groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), responsible for attacks such as the 2008 Mumbai massacre (166 killed) and the 2019 Pulwama bombing (40 Indian paramilitary personnel killed). Over 70,000 deaths have marked the conflict, driven by militancy and cross-border infiltration.
Post-2019, after India revoked Article 370, stripping Kashmir of its semi-autonomy, a stringent security crackdown reduced militant incidents by over 50% by 2024, per government data. Tourism flourished, with over 2 million visitors in 2024, as India promoted Kashmir as a symbol of integration. Yet, underlying tensions persisted, evidenced by the June 2024 Reasi attack, which killed nine Hindu pilgrims, foreshadowing the sectarian violence in Pahalgam. Weeks before the 2025 attack, India’s extradition of Tahawwur Rana, a former Pakistan Army officer linked to LeT, heightened tensions. LeT’s commander issued a public call for “jihad” on April 16, 2025, signaling an imminent strike.
The Attack: A Brutal Ambush in Baisaran Valley
At approximately 2:45 PM on April 22, 2025, Baisaran Meadow—a scenic spot 5 km from Pahalgam town in Anantnag district—was bustling with tourists enjoying picnics and pony rides. The area’s isolation, accessible only by foot or horse, and lack of CCTV made it a vulnerable target. Between three to six heavily armed militants, dressed in camouflage, emerged from the surrounding forests, wielding AK-47 variants, an American M4 carbine, and grenades.
Eyewitnesses reported chilling details: the attackers segregated victims by religion, demanding some recite the Kalma (Islamic declaration of faith) or undergo physical checks to identify non-Muslims. “They asked us to recite the Kalma. Those who couldn’t were shot on the spot,” recounted a survivor from Mumbai, whose brother was among the victims. The 15-20 minute assault was marked by indiscriminate gunfire, with panicked ponies trampling some victims. A local Muslim pony operator, attempting to intervene, was killed, underscoring the attack’s broad toll despite its sectarian intent.
By 3:15 PM, the militants fled toward the Pir Panjal range, evading initial security cordons. Rescue operations swiftly airlifted the wounded to Srinagar’s SMHS Hospital, where over 100 security personnel secured the facility amid chaotic scenes of grief. The final death toll was 26: 23 Hindus (mostly from Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh), one Christian from Kerala, one local Muslim, and one unidentified foreigner. Over 20 others were injured, including children, with five initially in critical condition.
Victim Breakdown
Victim Profile
Number
Details
Hindu Tourists
23
Families, professionals, pilgrims, and honeymooners from Indian states.
Christian Tourist
1
Member of a missionary group from Kerala.
Local Muslim
1
Pony operator killed while attempting to protect victims.
Unidentified Foreigner
1
Possible foreign national; identity pending DNA confirmation.
Injured
20+
Suffered gunshot wounds and trampling injuries; some required surgery.
Immediate Aftermath: A Nation in Mourning
The attack sparked nationwide outrage, dominating headlines and social media. The hashtag #JusticeForPahalgam trended globally, amassing over 5 million posts within 24 hours. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, cutting short a foreign visit, condemned the attack as a “cowardly assault on humanity” and vowed retribution. Protests erupted in Delhi, Mumbai, and Srinagar, with Hindu nationalist groups demanding military action against Pakistan.
Kashmir’s tourism industry, a cornerstone of its economy, collapsed overnight. Flights to Srinagar were suspended, and the Amarnath Yatra, scheduled for July, was postponed. The economic loss was estimated at ₹500 crore ($60 million) in the first week alone. In Pahalgam, curfews and a heavy deployment of over 1,000 security personnel fueled local fears of reprisals, as residents—many dependent on tourism—faced uncertainty.
Internationally, the attack drew swift condemnation. U.S. President Donald Trump declared, “America stands with India against terror,” while Russian President Vladimir Putin and EU President Ursula von der Leyen echoed similar sentiments. The U.S. Embassy issued a Level 4 travel advisory for Kashmir, citing “sporadic violence.” Pakistan denied involvement and offered a joint probe, but India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri pointed to “cross-border linkages,” escalating diplomatic tensions.
On April 24, Jammu & Kashmir Police announced a ₹20 lakh ($24,000) bounty per terrorist, releasing sketches based on survivor accounts. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) assumed control of the investigation on April 26, signaling a high-priority probe.
Perpetrators and Claim of Responsibility
The Resistance Front (TRF), a LeT offshoot formed in 2019, claimed responsibility via Telegram on April 22-23, citing India’s “occupation” of Kashmir and sharing a site photo. Though TRF later retracted its claim, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar confirmed their involvement on July 18, corroborated by a UN Security Council report on July 29 noting TRF’s targeting of Hindu minorities.
Investigations identified five terrorists: three Pakistanis—Suleiman Shah (mastermind), “Afghan” alias Jibran, and Fauji—and two local aides, including one named Shah. All three main attackers were LeT operatives, per NIA findings. Recovered weapons included a Romanian AKMS, a Russian AKM hybrid, and a U.S. M4 carbine, pointing to an international supply chain.
A significant breakthrough came in October 2025, when a Huawei satellite phone (IMEI-linked to Inmarsat-4 F1) used by Suleiman Shah revealed pre-attack coordination with handlers in Pakistan. Controversially, JNU Professor Srikanth Kondapalli alleged that China supplied 120-129 satellite images of Pahalgam to Pakistan, breaching Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) anti-terror commitments. On October 5, 2025, Mohammad Yousuf Katari, a local teacher, was arrested for aiding the militants, traced via a discarded phone charger. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) condemned the attack on June 17, linking it to terror financing networks, and the U.S. designated TRF a terrorist entity on July 18.
India’s Response: Military and Diplomatic Retaliation
India’s response was swift and multifaceted. “Operation Mahadev,” launched on April 22, involved ground offensives in Kashmir, culminating in the elimination of Suleiman Shah, Afghan, and Jibran on July 28 near Harwan forest, tracked via the Huawei phone. Recovered weapons bore fingerprints of international origins, per Home Minister Amit Shah.
Pakistani policemen demonstrate their skills during a special elite police training course at a police training centre in Nowshera, a district in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Province on February 11, 2015. Dozens of male and female police took part in a commando training course, introduced by the local police as an additional skill for the police to be deployed to confront terrorism and extremism which is routinely on the rise in this South Asian nuclear-armed country. AFP PHOTO / A MAJEED
Diplomatically, India closed the Attari-Wagah border, halted bilateral trade, and threatened to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty. Line of Control (LoC) skirmishes began on April 24. The crisis escalated with “Operation Sindoor” (May 6-10), where Indian airstrikes targeted nine “terror camps” in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), destroying LeT and JeM infrastructure. Pakistan retaliated, downing an Indian drone, but a ceasefire was declared on May 10, reportedly mediated by the U.S. (though India denied external involvement). IAF Chief Amar Preet Singh later confirmed significant Pakistani losses, including F-16s, JF-17s, and C-130s.
Domestically, India demolished homes of suspected militant aides on April 25 and blocked 8,000 social media accounts for “national security,” sparking debates over free speech. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) was invoked for ongoing trials of accomplices.
Broader Implications: A Fragile Peace Exposed
The Pahalgam attack, the deadliest civilian assault in Kashmir since 2000, exposed critical security lapses despite India’s heavy troop presence (over 500,000 in the region). It underscored the risks of promoting tourism without robust safeguards, as noted by counter-terrorism analyst Tanya Mehra. TRF’s emergence as a potent threat highlighted evolving militant strategies, blending local recruitment with foreign backing.
Geopolitically, the attack deepened India-Pakistan animosity, reminiscent of the 2016 Uri and 2019 Balakot crises, but its civilian toll accelerated escalation. Allegations of Chinese involvement introduced a trilateral dynamic, prompting calls for SCO reforms. The UK urged restraint, while Russia issued travel warnings for Pakistan.
Socially, the attack fueled communal tensions, with rising Islamophobia in India and accusations of politicized “Hindu victimhood” narratives. As of October 2025, two terrorists remain at large, and trials continue. The FATF’s ongoing scrutiny of terror financing networks signals sustained global pressure.
Conclusion: Lessons from a Wounded Valley
The Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, 2025, claimed 26 lives and left an indelible scar on Kashmir’s psyche. Operations Mahadev and Sindoor marked a decisive shift in India’s counter-terrorism strategy, yet the tragedy exposed vulnerabilities in intelligence and regional stability. As Kashmir grapples with its aftermath, the attack serves as a grim reminder: peace in the valley remains elusive, demanding vigilance, dialogue, and international cooperation to ensure its meadows never again become battlegrounds.