Developing Story

Developing Story

Microsoft Admits Supplying AI to Israeli Military Amid Gaza War: Denial of Civilian Harm Sparks Outcry

by
Microsoft Admits

On May 15, 2025, Microsoft acknowledged that it supplied advanced artificial intelligence (AI) and cloud computing services, including Azure cloud storage and AI tools, to the Israeli military during its ongoing conflict in Gaza. The admission, reported by outlets like the Associated Press and The Verge, came amid growing scrutiny of U.S. tech giants’ roles in military operations. Microsoft clarified that it found no evidence its technology was used to harm Palestinian civilians, a claim met with skepticism by critics citing the conflict’s devastating toll. This article examines Microsoft’s admission, the context of its involvement, the implications for AI in warfare, and the broader ethical and geopolitical ramifications.

Background: Microsoft’s Role and the Gaza Conflict

Microsoft has long been a key provider of cloud and AI services globally, with its Azure platform supporting diverse applications, from enterprise solutions to military operations. The Israeli military, known for its advanced technological capabilities, has increasingly integrated AI into its Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (ISR) systems, particularly since the escalation of the Gaza conflict following October 7, 2023. The conflict, marked by intense Israeli military operations, has resulted in significant civilian casualties, with over 43,000 reported deaths in Gaza by mid-2025, according to local health authorities.

Leaked contract documents, obtained by DropSite News, revealed that Microsoft’s services, including access to OpenAI’s GPT-4 model (via Microsoft’s partnership), saw a dramatic spike in usage by the Israeli military since the war began. Reports indicate Microsoft employees were embedded with Israeli military and intelligence units, assisting with the implementation of surveillance technologies in Gaza and the West Bank. These revelations, first detailed by +972 Magazine in August 2024, underscored the scale of Microsoft’s involvement.

Microsoft’s Admission: Details and Denials

In its May 15, 2025, statement, Microsoft confirmed providing the Israeli military with software, professional services, Azure cloud storage, and Azure AI capabilities. The company emphasized that its services were subject to an internal audit, which found “no evidence” that its technology was used to harm Palestinian civilians or destroy civilian infrastructure in Gaza. Microsoft’s statement, echoed across sources like The Boston Globe and Business Standard, positioned its role as compliant with international law and U.S. regulations governing technology exports.

However, Microsoft’s denial of harm has been contested. Investigations by +972 Magazine and the Associated Press suggest that AI models, including those from Microsoft and OpenAI, were used to enhance Israel’s “kill chain,” enabling faster identification and targeting of alleged militants in Gaza and Lebanon. A February 2025 report by Ahram Online noted that U.S.-provided AI accelerated Israel’s targeting processes, raising concerns about civilian casualties. Critics, including Utrecht University researchers, argue that AI-driven systems often increase civilian harm by prioritizing speed over precision, a pattern observed daily in Gaza.

Context: AI in Warfare and Ethical Concerns

The use of AI in military operations, particularly in Gaza, has sparked intense debate. Israel’s AI-based tools, supported by Microsoft’s Azure, reportedly compile data from mass surveillance, transcribing and translating it to inform targeting decisions. A January 2025ლ 2025 report by the Georgetown Security Studies Review highlighted how these systems enhance ISR capabilities, allowing rapid target identification. However, the lack of transparency about AI’s role in specific strikes fuels concerns about accountability.

Posts on X reflect public outrage, with users like @MouinRabbani noting “turmoil” at Microsoft over its Gaza involvement, and @MiddleEastEye reporting employee protests, such as Ibtihal Aboussad’s disruption of a 50th-anniversary event in April 2025, accusing Microsoft of “powering genocide.” These sentiments underscore the ethical dilemmas facing tech companies, as employees and activists demand divestment from military contracts.

Broader Implications

Ethical and Legal Questions

Microsoft’s provision of AI raises questions about compliance with international humanitarian law. The BDS Movement and AFSC Investigate argue that Microsoft’s services “empower and accelerate” Israel’s military operations, potentially implicating the company in war crimes. The lack of independent oversight over how its AI is used complicates Microsoft’s claim of no civilian harm, especially given Gaza’s high civilian death toll.

Geopolitical Ramifications

The controversy situates Microsoft within U.S.-Israel relations, where tech support is a strategic asset. The U.S. government’s permissive export controls, as noted in a Twin Cities Pioneer Press report, enable tech giants to supply AI without stringent oversight. This dynamic risks straining U.S. relations with Arab states and fueling anti-American sentiment, as seen in regional media like TRT World, which framed Microsoft’s role as enabling “genocide.”

Corporate Accountability

Microsoft faces internal and external pressure to reassess its military contracts. Employee unrest, reported by DropSite News, and public campaigns, like those by @SuppressedNws, signal a “tipping point” for corporate accountability. Unlike Amazon and Google, which also provide cloud services to Israel, Microsoft’s deep integration with OpenAI’s GPT-4 amplifies scrutiny, given OpenAI’s quiet removal of military use restrictions in 2024.

Challenges and Next Steps

Microsoft’s challenge lies in balancing its commercial interests with ethical responsibilities. The company’s audit, while reassuring to some, lacks transparency, as noted by The Verge, and fails to address how AI systems, inherently opaque, can be audited for harm in chaotic war zones. Future steps may include:

  • Enhanced Oversight: Independent audits and public reporting on military AI use.
  • Policy Reforms: Stricter U.S. export controls and corporate guidelines on AI in conflict zones.
  • Divestment Pressure: Responding to employee and activist calls to limit military contracts.

The upcoming Microsoft board meeting in June 2025, flagged by @andrewfeinstein on X, may see intensified employee demands for divestment, potentially shaping industry standards.

Conclusion

Microsoft’s admission of providing AI and cloud services to the Israeli military marks a pivotal moment in the debate over technology’s role in warfare. While the company denies its tools caused civilian harm, the scale of its involvement—evidenced by embedded employees, GPT-4 access, and surged usage—raises urgent ethical and legal questions. As investigations by +972 Magazine and the Associated Press reveal AI’s role in accelerating Israel’s military operations, Microsoft faces a reckoning over transparency and accountability. The Gaza conflict, with its profound human cost, underscores the need for tech giants to navigate their military ties with caution, lest they become complicit in violations of international law. Stakeholders should critically evaluate Microsoft’s claims, cross-referencing primary sources and monitoring upcoming talks for signs of policy shifts.

Sources:

  • Associated Press
  • The Verge
  • +972 Magazine
  • DropSite News
  • Middle East Eye
  • Georgetown Security Studies Review
  • Ahram Online
  • Utrecht University
  • Twin Cities Pioneer Press
  • BDS Movement
  • AFSC Investigate
  • TRT World
  • X Posts by @andrewfeinstein, @MouinRabbani, @SuppressedNws

You Might Also Like:

Al-Ayyala Dance Sparks Backlash During Trump’s UAE Visit

Taliban’s Ibrahim Sadr in Delhi Secret Visit Amid India-Pakistan Tensions

New COVID-19 Wave Hits Hong Kong, Singapore as Cases Surge Across Asia

Developing Story

India’s Boycott Wave Targets Turkey and Azerbaijan Over Pakistan Support

by
Turkey and Azerbaijan

In the wake of escalating tensions between India and Pakistan following Operation Sindoor on May 7, 2025, a significant boycott movement has emerged in India targeting Turkey and Azerbaijan. This civilian-led campaign, fueled by patriotic fervor and amplified through social media, responds to both nations’ explicit support for Pakistan after India’s military strikes on terror sites in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK). The boycott, reminiscent of India’s 2024 Maldives campaign, leverages economic and cultural influence to pressure nations perceived as aligning with Pakistan’s “terror state” agenda, particularly after the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, 2025. This article explores the origins, scale, and potential impacts of this boycott, highlighting its implications for India’s geopolitical strategy and the economies of Turkey and Azerbaijan.

Background: The Catalyst for the Boycott

The boycott movement was triggered by India’s Operation Sindoor, a pre-dawn airstrike targeting nine key terror installations across Pakistan and PoK, including Jaish-e-Mohammed’s base in Bahawalpur and Lashkar-e-Taiba’s nerve center in Muridke. Conducted in retaliation for the Pahalgam attack, which killed 25 Indian tourists and one local guide, the operation marked India’s deepest strikes inside Pakistan in decades. While most nations condemned the terror attack, Turkey and Azerbaijan issued statements supporting Pakistan, criticizing India’s actions as “unprovoked aggression” and expressing solidarity with Islamabad.

Turkey’s involvement escalated tensions further when the Indian Army revealed that 300–400 Turkish-made Songar drones were used by Pakistan in retaliatory strikes targeting Indian military bases and civilian infrastructure. Azerbaijan, closely aligned with Turkey, also condemned India’s strikes, expressing condolences for Pakistani civilian losses. These actions were perceived in India as direct support for Pakistan’s terror-sponsored agenda, sparking widespread outrage.

The Boycott Movement: Scale and Momentum

Social Media and Public Sentiment

The boycott campaign gained traction through social media, particularly on X, where hashtags like #BoycottTurkey, #BoycottAzerbaijan, and #NoTravelToTurkey trended with over 12,000 posts by May 8, 2025. Influential figures, including industrialist Harsh Goenka, actress Rupali Ganguly, and Shiv Sena MP Priyanka Chaturvedi, amplified the call to action. Goenka highlighted the economic contributions of Indian tourists, stating, “Indians gave Rs 4,000+cr to Turkey & Azerbaijan last year through tourism. Created jobs. Boosted their economy, hotels, weddings, flights. Today, both stand with Pakistan after Pahalgam attack. Plenty of beautiful places in India & the world. Please skip these 2 places.”

Posts on X emphasized national dignity, with users like Anant Ladha urging, “Azerbaijan (Baku) and Turkey should now see India’s power. We should ban these locations from our holidays.” Another user, Alok Jain, noted, “No more Baku visits please. In 2024, Azerbaijan witnessed a surge in Indian tourists. Show them the power of Indian tourists now!” The sentiment was clear: Indian money should not fund nations supporting Pakistan.

Travel Industry Response

The travel sector swiftly aligned with public sentiment. Major companies like EaseMyTrip, Cox & Kings, Ixigo, Travomint, and Pickyourtrail suspended bookings to Turkey and Azerbaijan, citing national security and traveler safety. EaseMyTrip’s founder, Nishant Pitti, issued an advisory: “Following the Pahalgam attack and escalating tensions between India & Pakistan, travellers are urged to stay aware. As Turkey & Azerbaijan have shown support for Pakistan, we strongly recommend visiting only if absolutely necessary.” Cox & Kings paused all new travel offerings to Azerbaijan, Turkey, and Uzbekistan, stating, “When national interest is at stake, we stand with India.”

By May 14, 2025, industry executives reported a 50–60% drop in bookings to both countries, with cancellations surging by 250% in just six days. EaseMyTrip noted 22% cancellations for Turkey and over 30% for Azerbaijan, while the Indian Association of Tour Operators reported 15–20% cancellations for outbound travel. Travel platforms like Atlys and Skyscanner, which had previously promoted Azerbaijan as a budget-friendly European destination, saw a sharp decline in inquiries.

Business and Trade Actions

Beyond tourism, Indian businesses joined the boycott. In Pune, apple traders at the APMC market stopped sourcing Turkish apples, with trader Suyog Zende stating, “Retail customers are also saying that they do not want Turkish apples.” Goa Villas announced it would no longer offer accommodation to Turkish citizens, citing Turkey’s “non-cooperative stance.” Some businesses, like Go Homestays, ended partnerships with Turkish accommodation providers. Former UP police chief Prakash Singh called for terminating route-sharing agreements between Indian and Turkish airlines.

The boycott also extended to cultural and entertainment sectors. Music composer Vishal Mishra canceled upcoming shows in Turkey and Azerbaijan, stating, “Travel transcends logistics—it’s about empathy.” These actions reflect a broader shift in consumer behavior, where geopolitical alignment influences economic decisions.

Economic Impact on Turkey and Azerbaijan

Tourism Revenue at Risk

In 2024, Turkey welcomed 3.3 lakh Indian tourists, a 20.7% increase from 2023, contributing approximately Rs 3,000 crore to its economy. Azerbaijan saw 2.43 lakh Indian visitors, a 108% surge, generating significant revenue through tourism, hospitality, and related sectors. Indian tourists, known for high per-capita spending (averaging $972 in Turkey), have been a key market for both nations due to easy visas, direct flights, and vibrant cultural offerings like Istanbul’s Ottoman architecture and Baku’s budget-friendly European appeal.

The boycott threatens substantial losses. A projected 50% drop in Indian tourist arrivals could cost Turkey and Azerbaijan billions, impacting jobs, hotels, and airlines. Azerbaijan, where Indians accounted for 13% of 2024 tourist arrivals, faces a particularly severe hit, as Baku’s tourism boom relied heavily on Indian visitors. Turkey, already grappling with economic challenges, risks further strain, with Indian investments of $227 million (2000–2024) also under scrutiny.

Comparisons to the Maldives Boycott

The current boycott draws parallels to India’s 2024 Maldives campaign, triggered by derogatory remarks against Prime Minister Narendra Modi. That boycott led to a sustained decline in Indian tourist arrivals, forcing the Maldivian government to backtrack. Industry experts predict a larger impact this time, given the scale of Indian tourism to Turkey and Azerbaijan and the emotional weight of the Pahalgam attack. WanderOn’s CEO Gaur told Moneycontrol, “I see a much larger impact as compared to the Maldives. Baku or Azerbaijan is on travellers’ minds because of Indian tourists.”

Geopolitical Context and Strategic Implications

Turkey and Azerbaijan’s Pro-Pakistan Stance

Turkey’s support for Pakistan is rooted in President Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s ambition to position himself as a leader of the Muslim world, often raising the Kashmir issue at global forums like the UN. Turkey’s supply of Songar and Bayraktar TB2 drones to Pakistan, used against India, marks a shift from ideological to military aggression. Azerbaijan, described by some as a “satellite state” of Turkey, aligns with Ankara due to close diplomatic, economic, and defense ties, further cemented by Pakistan’s support during Azerbaijan’s 2020 war against Armenia.

Out of over 50 Muslim-majority nations, only Turkey and Azerbaijan openly backed Pakistan post-Operation Sindoor, isolating Islamabad diplomatically. This has strengthened India’s narrative of Pakistan as a terror-sponsoring state, with civilians using economic boycotts to reinforce this stance.

Pivot to Armenia and Greece

The boycott has redirected Indian travel interest to “India-friendly” nations like Armenia and Greece. Armenia, a strategic partner with growing defense ties to India, is emerging as a tourism hotspot due to its cultural heritage and geopolitical alignment. Greece, an EU member with strong bilateral ties, is also gaining traction as an alternative to Turkey’s Mediterranean appeal. This shift could deepen economic and diplomatic ties, with Armenia expecting a tourism-driven boost to its hospitality and service sectors.

India’s Broader Strategy

The boycott reflects India’s no-tolerance policy on terrorism and its ability to mobilize civilian-led economic pressure as a geopolitical tool. By targeting tourism—a sector where India wields significant influence—citizens are enforcing a “strategic cultural blockade” against nations supporting Pakistan. This aligns with India’s broader efforts to isolate Pakistan diplomatically, as seen in the global condemnation of the Pahalgam attack. The movement also underscores the growing intersection of politics and consumer behavior, where travel choices reflect national interests.

Responses from Turkey and Azerbaijan

Turkey’s tourism board issued a statement inviting Indian travelers, emphasizing enhanced air connectivity and specialized experiences for Indian preferences. However, this was met with sharp rejection on X, with users stating, “Terror, trade, and tourism will not go together.” A viral letter, allegedly from Turkey’s Department of Tourism, acknowledged the boycott but failed to quell Indian anger. Azerbaijan has been less vocal, but its tourism board’s earlier projection of an 11% growth in Indian visitors through 2035 now appears optimistic.

Turkey’s President Erdogan doubled down, vowing to support the “brotherly people of Pakistan” while claiming efforts to de-escalate tensions. This stance, coupled with Turkey’s economic vulnerabilities, suggests the boycott could exacerbate existing challenges. Azerbaijan, heavily reliant on tourism for economic diversification, faces a similar risk.

Potential Long-Term Impacts

The boycott could reshape India’s tourism and trade relations with Turkey and Azerbaijan. Sustained cancellations and reduced air connectivity—potentially mirroring the Maldives’ post-boycott flight reductions—may force both nations to reassess their pro-Pakistan stance. Airlines like IndiGo and Turkish Airlines, operating 28 weekly flights to Istanbul, and Azerbaijan Airlines, with seven weekly flights to Delhi and Mumbai, may face commercial pressure to cut capacity.

For India, the pivot to Armenia and Greece could foster new economic partnerships, particularly in tourism, trade, and defense. However, the boycott risks escalating diplomatic tensions, especially with Turkey, a NATO member with significant regional influence. India’s ability to sustain this pressure will depend on the movement’s longevity and global perceptions of its anti-terrorism stance.

Conclusion

India’s boycott of Turkey and Azerbaijan is a powerful expression of civilian-led nationalism, driven by outrage over their support for Pakistan post-Operation Sindoor. By targeting tourism—a sector where India contributed Rs 4,000 crore to both nations in 2024—the movement underscores the economic leverage of Indian consumers. With travel companies, businesses, and influencers rallying behind the cause, the boycott threatens significant losses for Turkey and Azerbaijan while redirecting Indian interest to allies like Armenia and Greece. As a strategic tool, this campaign reinforces India’s no-tolerance policy on terrorism, signaling that economic and cultural ties are contingent on geopolitical alignment. Whether Turkey and Azerbaijan recalibrate their stance remains to be seen, but the boycott has already redefined the intersection of travel, politics, and national security in India’s fight against terrorism.

You Might Also Like :

Trump’s $600 Billion Saudi Investment Deal: Full Breakdown

Flight Operations Resume at Srinagar Airport After Suspension Due to Security Concerns

Three Terrorists Killed in Encounter with Security Forces in South Kashmir’s Shopian

Developing Story

PM Modi Declares Zero Tolerance for Terrorism, Sets New Security Doctrine After Operation Sindoor

by
PM Modi

In a historic and bold address to the nation following the success of Operation Sindoor, Prime Minister Narendra Modi unveiled a new national security doctrine, making it clear that India will no longer tolerate terrorism, nuclear blackmail, or the distinction between terrorists and their state sponsors. The Prime Minister’s speech marked a turning point in India’s strategic posture, emphasising a firmer, more proactive approach to national security.

Operation Sindoor: A Defining Moment

Launched on May 7, 2025, Operation Sindoor was a coordinated tri-service military strike targeting nine major terror hubs in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). The strikes were India’s direct response to the April 22 terror attack in Pahalgam, which killed 26 civilians, including a Nepali national.

Operation Sindoor reportedly eliminated over 100 terrorists, destroyed multiple enemy infrastructure sites, and showcased India’s precision strike capabilities with minimal civilian casualties. The operation was conducted across air, land, and sea with calibrated restraint, demonstrating India’s advanced military capabilities and resolve.

Three Pillars of India’s New Security Doctrine

During his national address on May 12, PM Modi outlined three fundamental pillars of India’s new security framework:

1. Decisive Retaliation

The Prime Minister declared that any terror attack on Indian soil will now face immediate and decisive retaliation. India, he said, will no longer wait or plead on international platforms for action.

“We will respond to terrorism on our own terms. Terror hubs will be hit at their roots,” PM Modi affirmed.

2. No Tolerance for Nuclear Blackmail

Responding directly to veiled threats and past deterrent strategies employed by Pakistan, the Prime Minister made it clear that India will no longer be restrained by nuclear threats.

“We will not be intimidated. Any safe haven that thinks it is protected by nuclear cover will be targeted precisely,” he said, signalling a firm departure from past defensive postures.

3. No Distinction Between Terrorists and Their Sponsors

PM Modi also announced an end to the policy of treating terror groups and the governments sheltering them as separate. Referring to Pakistani military officials attending the funerals of slain terrorists, the Prime Minister said this proves Pakistan’s direct involvement in state-sponsored terrorism.

“There will be no leniency. If you protect terrorists, you are one,” he stated firmly.

Unity, Strength, and Made in India Defence

The Prime Minister praised the armed forces—Army, Air Force, Navy, BSF, and paramilitary forces—for their courage and precision in carrying out Operation Sindoor. He also highlighted India’s indigenous defence manufacturing capabilities, noting that Made in India defence equipment had proven itself in real combat scenarios.

“The world is now witnessing the power of Made in India weapons. This is 21st-century warfare, and India is ready,” he said.

“Era of Terrorism Must End”

Speaking on the occasion of Buddha Purnima, PM Modi invoked Lord Buddha’s teachings of peace, but stressed that peace must be backed by strength. He reiterated India’s vision of a Viksit Bharat (Developed India) where citizens can live in dignity and safety.

“This is not an era of war, but it cannot be an era of terrorism either. Zero tolerance is the only way forward,” he declared.

Global Reactions and Ceasefire Violations

Just days before his address, a ceasefire agreement had been reached between the Directors General of Military Operations (DGMOs) of India and Pakistan. However, PM Modi condemned Pakistan’s violations of the ceasefire, including drone incursions and LoC shelling, within hours of the agreement.

India has since warned of fierce responses to any future violations, with full operational authority granted to military commanders on the ground.

Conclusion

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s post-Operation Sindoor address is being viewed as a defining policy shift in India’s counter-terrorism and defence strategy. The new doctrine reinforces India’s position as a decisive power with zero tolerance for terrorism, a strong retaliatory posture, and a vision for peace through strength.

As the global community takes note of India’s evolving doctrine, it is clear that Operation Sindoor was not just a military response—it was a strategic message to the world.

You Might Also Like:

SIA Kashmir Busts Sleeper Cells Linked to Pakistan; Over 20 Locations Raided Across

Air Marshal AK Bharti: India Can Hit Every Pakistani Base, Responds to Drone Raid with Operation Sindoor

Indian Navy Ready to Strike: Vice Admiral Warns Pakistan Amid Operation Sindoor’s Maritime Dominance

Developing Story

Indian Navy Ready to Strike: Vice Admiral Warns Pakistan Amid Operation Sindoor’s Maritime Dominance

by
Indian Navy Ready to Strike

Director General Naval Operations Vice Admiral A N Pramod on Sunday said the Indian Navy has full maritime dominance and is prepared to deliver a massive blow in response to any provocation from Pakistan, under the ongoing framework of Operation Sindoor.

Vice Admiral Pramod issued a clear warning to Pakistan stating, “This time, if Pakistan dare take any action, Pakistan knows what we are going to do, that’s all,” he said.

Speaking in Delhi, the Director General Naval Operations said, “I will make few sentences and leave it for your imagination. First of all, we have quantitative and qualitative edge to deliver a massive blow to our adversary. And we completely dominate in the maritime front.”

He added that the Navy’s role is part of a broader joint operations plan. “Indian Navy’s action is part of the escalation ladder mechanism which we have worked out amongst three services.”

Earlier, The Indian Armed forces on Sunday held a detailed news conference addressed by the Director Generals of Military operations, Naval operations and Air operations, detailing the success of Op Sindoor in eliminating terror targets deep inside Pakistan.

Vice Admiral A N Pramod informed that the Indian Navy’s operational edge at sea played a decisive role in Pakistan’s “urgent request for ceasefire.”

Vice Admiral Pramod said, “Along with the kinetic actions by the Indian Army and Indian Air Force, the overwhelming operational edge of the Indian Navy at sea contributed towards Pakistan’s urgent requests for a ceasefire yesterday.”

Additionally, Vice Admiral Pramod said the Indian Navy executed a swift and calibrated maritime response after the Pahalgam terror attack on April 22, deploying major combat assets within 96 hours.

“In the aftermath of the Pahalgam terror attacks, on innocent tourists by Pakistani-sponsored terrorists, the Indian Navy’s carrier battle group, surface forces, submarines, and aviation assets were immediately deployed at sea with full combat readiness in concert with the joint operation plan of the Indian Defence Forces,” Vice Admiral said during a press briefing.

The Vice Admiral stated that weapon firings were conducted in the Arabian Sea to refine procedures and validate readiness. “The aim was to revalidate our crew, our armament equipment and platform readiness to deliver various ordnance on selected targets precisely,” he added.

Following the drills, forces remained forward deployed in the northern sea region. “Our forces remained forward deployed into the Northern Sea in a decisive and deterrent posture with full readiness and capacity to strike select targets, including Karachi, at a time of our choosing,” the Vice Admiral informed.

Vice Admiral Pramod said Pakistan’s naval and air assets remained largely inside harbours or close to shore. “The forward deployment of the Indian Navy compelled the Pakistani naval and air units to be in a defensive posture, which we monitored continuously,” he said.

He emphasised the Navy’s operational awareness throughout. “We had and continue to have good battlespace transparency, using our maritime domain awareness grid.”

India’s response, he said, was deliberate. “Our response has been measured, proportionate, non-escalatory and responsible from day one.”

“The calibrated approach considered all options, including the ability of the Indian Navy for offensive action from and at sea,” Vice Admiral Pramod said.

He said that the use of naval force was part of a larger, integrated plan.

“As part of this escalation control mechanism, the application of force by the Navy was planned in a synchronised manner, in coordination with the Army and Air Force,” he added.

He highlighted the inter-service cooperation, noting, “The highlight being teams from the three services working closely in an integrated manner. ”

Vice Admiral Pramod said, “As we speak, the Indian Navy remains deployed at sea in a credible deterrent posture to respond decisively to any inimical action.” (ANI)

Developing Story

India-Pakistan Ceasefire Reached After US Mediation, Agree To Stop All Military Action On Land, Sea And Air Effective 5 pm

by
India-Pakistan Ceasefire

In a dramatic diplomatic breakthrough, India and Pakistan have agreed to a full and immediate ceasefire across all domains—land, air, and sea—after what U.S. President Donald Trump described as a “long night of talks” led by his team. The announcement marks a rare moment of de-escalation between the two nuclear-armed neighbours, historically locked in decades of tension and conflict.

Shortly after President Trump claimed credit for mediating the ceasefire on social media, India’s Ministry of External Affairs issued an official statement confirming that a ceasefire understanding had been reached between the two nations.

“Director Generals of Military Operations (DGMOs) of India and Pakistan agreed that both sides would stop all firing and military action on land, air and sea from 5 pm,” stated Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri.

He added that both sides had issued internal instructions to enforce the ceasefire immediately. The statement further noted that the two DGMOs are scheduled to speak again on May 12 at 1200 hours to review the situation.

Pakistan Initiated Contact, Says India

According to Indian officials, the peace dialogue began after Pakistan’s Director General of Military Operations initiated a call earlier in the day. The ensuing discussion reportedly led to the mutual understanding that resulted in the ceasefire.

While tensions have simmered for months along the Line of Control (LoC) and the international border, both sides have now agreed to halt all military activities and avoid further escalation.

However, Indian officials were quick to clarify that the current understanding is limited strictly to military de-escalation.

“There is no decision to hold talks on any other issue at any other place,” India’s Ministry of External Affairs emphasized.

U.S. Role: High-Level Diplomacy at Work

President Trump took to his social media platform, Truth Social, shortly before India’s confirmation, claiming his administration had played a central role in mediating the agreement. He praised his team’s “hard work overnight” and described the ceasefire as a major foreign policy win.

Shortly afterward, U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio gave more context, saying that he and Vice President JD Vance had been deeply involved in the discussions.

“Over the past 48 hours, @VP Vance and I have engaged with senior Indian and Pakistani officials, including Prime Ministers Narendra Modi and Shehbaz Sharif… I am pleased to announce that the Governments of India and Pakistan have agreed to an immediate ceasefire and to start talks on a broad set of issues at a neutral site,” Rubio wrote on X (formerly Twitter).

He also applauded the leadership of Prime Ministers Modi and Sharif, crediting them for choosing diplomacy over conflict.

India’s Stand on Terror Remains Unchanged

Indian Foreign Minister S. Jaishankar also commented publicly, affirming the ceasefire but underlining that India’s position on terrorism remains firm.

“India has consistently maintained a firm and uncompromising stance against terrorism in all its forms and manifestations. It will continue to do so,” he posted.

Developing Story

Operation Sindoor: India Destroys Nine Terror Camps in Pakistan and POK in Overnight Precision Air Strikes

by
operation Sindoor

In a significant and decisive counterterrorism operation, India launched overnight aerial strikes on nine terror camps located in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (POK), targeting infrastructure used by groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba, Jaish-e-Mohammad, and Hizbul Mujahideen. The operation, carried out with high-precision weaponry and strategic planning, dealt a major blow to terrorist networks responsible for numerous attacks on Indian soil.

Precision Strikes Confirmed by Officials

Top Indian defence and foreign affairs officials, including Colonel Sofiya Qureshi, Wing Commander Vyomika Singh, and Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, jointly addressed the media to confirm the strikes. They described the mission as a “clean, clinical” strike operation that inflicted maximum damage on terror infrastructure while avoiding civilian or collateral harm. The officials clarified that no military establishments were targeted, and the use of niche technology and precision warheads ensured the destruction was limited to the intended facilities.

Targets in Pakistan: Deep Strikes Across the Border

Among the major targets in Pakistan were camps with a long history of training and harboring terrorists:

  • Sarjal Camp, Sialkot: Located just 6 km from the international border, this Lashkar-e-Taiba training camp was linked to the killing of four policemen in Jammu and Kashmir in March.
  • Mehmoona Joya, near Sialkot: A facility operated by Hizbul Mujahideen, it played a critical role in past attacks in the Kathua-Jammu region, including the 2016 Pathankot airbase attack.
  • Markaz Taiba, Muridke: Considered the headquarters of Lashkar-e-Taiba, this camp is infamous for training Ajmal Kasab, one of the perpetrators of the 2008 Mumbai attacks. David Headley, a key planner in the attack, also reportedly received training here.
  • Markaz Subhanallah, Bahawalpur: Jaish-e-Mohammad’s main recruitment and indoctrination hub, often frequented by its leader Masood Azhar, was also hit in the strikes.

Targets in POK: Camps Near the Line of Control

The operation also focused on terror camps located in POK, which have long served as launchpads for cross-border terrorism:

  • Sawai Nala, Muzaffarabad: Situated about 30 km from the LoC, this Lashkar-e-Taiba camp was a key training facility for terrorists who later carried out attacks in Gulmarg, Sonmarg, and Pahalgam.
  • Syedna Bilal, Muzaffarabad: A base used by Jaish-e-Mohammad for staging attacks across the LoC. Here, terrorists were trained in jungle warfare and explosives.
  • Gulpur, Kotli: This Lashkar base camp, 30 km from the LoC, was linked to terror activities in Rajouri-Poonch and the 2023 Poonch attack on a bus of pilgrims.
  • Abbas Camp, Kotli: Known for training suicide bombers, this camp could accommodate around 50 militants at a time and was a strategic hub for Lashkar operatives.
  • Barnala Camp, Bhimber: Just 9 km from the LoC, this camp provided advanced weapons and explosives training to new recruits, including survival tactics in rugged terrain.

Strategic Impact

According to Indian military sources, the operation marks one of the most extensive and precise strikes across the border in recent years. By focusing on high-value terror infrastructure and avoiding military targets or civilian areas, India has sent a clear signal: it will respond decisively to cross-border terrorism.

Officials noted that the success of this mission lay not only in the scale of damage inflicted but also in its execution — using advanced surveillance, intelligence inputs, and surgical precision. The strikes, they said, reaffirm India’s resolve to dismantle terror networks that threaten national security.

International Reactions and Next Steps

While official statements from Pakistan are awaited, India has briefed key international partners about the operation. New Delhi maintains that the strikes were a defensive measure, in line with its right to protect citizens from externally supported terror threats.

The Ministry of External Affairs is expected to release a formal dossier outlining evidence linking the destroyed camps to past terror incidents, aimed at garnering global support for continued pressure on Pakistan-based terror outfits.

Conclusion

The overnight destruction of nine terror camps in Pakistan and POK represents a landmark moment in India’s fight against terrorism. It not only neutralizes current threats but also serves as a powerful deterrent against future attacks. With zero reported collateral damage and pinpoint accuracy, the operation highlights a new era of intelligence-led precision in India’s counterterrorism strategy.

You Might Also Like:

India Shuts Baglihar and Salal Dam Gates Amid Tensions with Pakistan

Kashmir Police Detain Radical Social Media User for Spreading Anti-National Content

Maulana Abdul Aziz Ghazi Declares War With India ‘Un-Islamic,’ Slams Pakistan’s Leadership in Fiery Lal Masjid Sermon

Developing Story

CRPF Jawan Dismissed for Hiding Marriage to Pakistani Woman Amid India’s Tough Stand on Security

by
CRPF Jawan Dismissed

The Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF) has dismissed a jawan from service for hiding his marriage to a Pakistani woman and for sheltering her beyond the permitted visa duration, calling his actions a serious violation of service conduct and a threat to national security.

In an official statement, the CRPF said:

“In a matter of serious concern, CT/GD Munir Ahmed of 41 Battalion of CRPF has been dismissed from service with immediate effect for concealing his marriage to a Pakistani national and knowingly harbouring her beyond the validity of her visa. His actions were found to be in violation of service conduct and detrimental to national security.”

This decision comes at a time when India is adopting strict measures against Pakistan in response to its alleged support for cross-border terrorism—particularly in the wake of the recent terror attack in Pahalgam, where 26 people lost their lives.

In response to the attack, India has suspended the Indus Water Treaty and shut down the Integrated Check Post at Attari, intensifying diplomatic and strategic pressure.

Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, speaking on 23 April following a Cabinet Committee on Security (CCS) meeting, announced several key decisions:

  • Pakistani nationals are now barred from travelling to India under the SAARC Visa Exemption Scheme (SVES).
  • All previously issued SVES visas to Pakistani nationals are now cancelled.
  • Any Pakistani national currently in India under this visa has been given 48 hours to leave.
  • The strength of both Indian and Pakistani High Commissions will be reduced from 55 to 30, with changes to take effect by 1 May 2025.

Misri added that the CCS had reviewed the overall security scenario and instructed all forces to remain on high alert.

The committee also resolved to hold the perpetrators of the Pahalgam attack accountable, along with those who supported or enabled the act from across the border.

You Might Also Like:

SPO Caught Taking Bribe in Jammu, ACB Raids GMC Police Post

Srinagar Police Conducts Raids to Dismantle Terror Ecosystem, Intensifies UAPA Crackdown

Omar Abdullah Meets PM Modi, Discusses Pahalgam Terror Attack and J&K Security Concerns

Farooq Abdullah Visits Pahalgam, Affirms Kashmir’s Unity with India Amid Trade Ban on Pakistan

Developing Story

Renowned Islamic Scholar Maulana Mubarak Mubarki Passes Away, Funeral Led by Mirwaiz Umar Farooq

by
Maulana Mubarak Mubarki

Renowned Islamic scholar and preacher, Maulana Mubarak Mubarki, president of Bazm-e-Tawheed and Khateeb of Bazar Masjid, passed away on Friday, leaving behind a legacy of faith, unity, and service.

Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel

Known for his wisdom, humility, and deep commitment to Islamic teachings, Maulana Mubarki touched countless lives through his sermons and religious guidance.

One of his family members told news agency—Kashmir News Observer (KNO), that his funeral will be held in two parts – first at 2:30 pm at his residence in Sanat Nagar, and later at 4 pm at Bohri Kadal Chowk near Bazar Masjid.

He said that Mirwaiz Umar Farooq is expected to lead the funeral prayers at Bazar Masjid.

Meanwhile, Mirwaiz Dr Umar Farooq also expressed deep sorrow over his demise, calling it a personal loss.

“A few weeks ago, I visited him to inquire about his health. Despite his frailty, he recognised me and spoke with warmth and clarity. His death is a misfortune for Kashmir,” he said—(KNO)

You Might Also Like:

Srinagar Police Raids 21 Locations to Dismantle Terror Infrastructure Linked to UAPA Cases

Amit Shah Reaffirms Zero Tolerance on Terrorism After Pahalgam Attack, Vows Strong Action

Hashim Ali, Dal Lake Shikara Fruit Seller, Offers Free Fruit Chaat to Tourists After Pahalgam Attack

Developing Story

Houses of Two Lashkar-e-Taiba Terrorists Demolished After Pahalgam Attack That Killed 26 Tourists

by
Lashkar-e-Taiba

The residential houses of two Lashkar-e-Taiba Terrorists destroyed by the authorities on Friday in Tral and Bijbehara area of South Kashmir, three days after Pahalgam terror attack in which 26 Tourists and one civilian were killed in an attack .

Officials said that the authorities demolished the houses of Asif Sheikh and Adil Thoker in Tral and Bijbehara, accused of being involved in the Pahalgam terror attack.

You Might Also Like:

Rahul Gandhi to Visit Kashmir Friday After Pahalgam Horror

You Won’t Believe How Much Rebica Khan Earned from Her First TikTok Video

Omar Abdullah Leads All-Party Unity Against Pahalgam Attack, Hails Hero Who Died Saving Tourists

Newlywed Navy Officer Killed in Pahalgam Terror Attack—Wife’s Heartbreaking “Last Salute” Shatters the Nation

Developing Story

Soldier Killed in Ongoing Encounter in Udhampur’s Basantgarh: Army

by
Indian Army in Kathua encounter

A soldier has been killed in the ongoing encounter in the Basantgarh area of Udhampur, Army said on Thursday.

In a post on X, Army’s White Knight Corps, said that the soldier was injured during the initial exchange of fire and later succumbed to his injuries.

“Based on specific intelligence, a joint operation with police was launched today in Basantgarh. Contact was established and a fierce firefight ensued,” the Army said.

It said that one of soldier sustained grievous injuries in the initial exchange and later succumbed despite best medical efforts.

The Army added that the operations is still going on—(KNO)

Developing Story

Pahalgam Terror Attack: 28 Killed in ‘Mini Switzerland’ Meadow, Lashkar-Linked Group Claims Responsibility

by
Terror Attack in Pahalgam

In one of the deadliest terror attacks in Kashmir since the 2019 Pulwama bombing, 28 people, mostly tourists, were killed and over a dozen others injured on Tuesday afternoon when terrorists opened fire at Baisaran meadow, a scenic tourist spot near Pahalgam.

The attack took place around 2:30 pm in Baisaran, often called ‘Mini Switzerland’ for its picturesque setting surrounded by pine forests and snow-capped peaks. The area lies about six kilometres from Pahalgam town and is a popular destination for pony rides, picnics, and local food stalls.

According to eyewitnesses and local officials, heavily armed terrorists suddenly entered the open meadow and began firing at groups of tourists. Panic spread as people scrambled for safety. Many of the victims were visiting from different parts of India.

Soon after the attack, The Resistance Front (TRF)—a shadow group believed to be linked to the banned Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT)—claimed responsibility. While a government confirmation is still awaited, intelligence agencies are treating the claim seriously.

As per early reports cited by PTI, the terrorists are suspected to have infiltrated from Kishtwar in Jammu and travelled to Baisaran via Kokernag in South Kashmir, indicating a well-planned movement through forested routes.

Security and intelligence agencies have identified Saifullah Kasuri, also known as Khalid, a senior commander of Lashkar-e-Taiba, as the mastermind behind the massacre. He is believed to have coordinated the attack from across the border.

The Indian Army, CRPF, and local police have launched a large-scale anti-terror operation in the region. Search teams and drones are being used to track down the assailants, and additional troops have been deployed in the surrounding areas.

The government has urged the public to remain calm and vigilant. The Prime Minister, Union Home Minister, and senior security officials are closely monitoring the situation.

This attack has once again raised serious concerns about cross-border infiltration and the safety of civilians in high-tourist zones in Kashmir.

Emergency Control Room – Srinagar:
📞 0194-2457543, 0194-2483651
📱 7006058623

24/7 Tourist Help Desk – Police Control Room, Anantnag:
📞 9596777669, 01932-225870
📱 WhatsApp: 9419051940

Jammu and Kashmir Tourist Department:
📱 8899931010, 8899941010, 9906663868, 9906906115

The situation remains tense, and security has been tightened across the region. A large-scale search operation is ongoing as authorities attempt to track down those responsible.

Developing Story

Terror Attack in Pahalgam: 26 Tourists Killed, Amit Shah Heads to Kashmir for Emergency Security Review

by
Terror Attack in Pahalgam

In a shocking and tragic turn of events, 26 tourists were killed and several others injured in a terrorist attack in the Baisaran Valley area of Pahalgam today. The attack took place in the upper meadows of this popular tourist destination, known for its scenic beauty and peaceful surroundings.

Witnesses reported hearing gunshots as terrorists emerged from the nearby woods and opened fire on unarmed tourists without warning. The area where the attack happened is only reachable on foot or by ponies, making rescue efforts especially challenging. Military helicopters have been deployed to airlift the injured to hospitals.

Following the attack, Union Home Minister Amit Shah immediately left for Srinagar on the instructions of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, who personally spoke to him and requested that he visit the site. Mr Shah is expected to chair an emergency security review meeting with top officials from all agencies involved.

Earlier, he held a high-level meeting at his Delhi residence, attended by Intelligence Bureau Chief Tapan Deka, Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan, and CRPF Chief Gyanendra Pratap Singh. Jammu and Kashmir DGP Nalin Prabhat, along with Army officials, joined through video conferencing. Mr Shah also reached out to former Chief Minister Omar Abdullah and the current Lieutenant Governor Manoj Sinha.

Lieutenant Governor Sinha confirmed that a major anti-terror operation is now underway to track and eliminate those responsible. “The perpetrators of this heinous attack will have to pay a very heavy price,” he said, adding that he has directed the local administration and health teams to prioritise medical treatment for the injured.

Among the victims was a man from Shivamogga district in Karnataka, shot in front of his wife and son. Upon hearing of his death, Karnataka CM Siddaramaiah held an emergency meeting with senior state officials to gather full details.

Prime Minister Modi strongly condemned the attack, calling it a “cowardly and inhuman act”. He added that India’s resolve to defeat terrorism remains firm and will only grow stronger. Former CM Omar Abdullah called the attack “an abomination” and said he was “shocked beyond belief.” “These terrorists are inhuman and must be condemned in the strongest terms,” he posted on social media.

Rajnath Singh, the Defence Minister, described the attack as “cowardly and highly reprehensible”.

Mehbooba Mufti, leader of the Peoples Democratic Party, also expressed deep concern. “This violence is unacceptable and must be strongly denounced. Kashmir has always welcomed tourists with open arms. A full investigation is required to ensure justice and prevent such attacks in future,” she said.

The attack comes during the peak of tourist season and while the registration for the Amarnath Yatra is ongoing. The 38-day pilgrimage is scheduled to begin on July 3, with routes passing through Pahalgam and Baltal. The increased tourist footfall was expected to bring economic relief to the region.

Amit Shah, during his recent visit to Jammu and Kashmir, had already ordered strict measures to wipe out terrorism and ensure zero tolerance for cross-border infiltration.

Ravinder Raina of the BJP and Congress President Mallikarjun Kharge both condemned the attack. Mr Raina said, “These cowardly terrorists targeted innocent visitors,” while Mr Kharge called it “a blot on humanity”.

Security forces are currently combing the area in search of the attackers, and the entire region remains on high alert.

You Might Also Like:

Farooq Abdullah Seeks Centre’s Help After Ramban Landslides

Schools in Kashmir Valley to Remain Closed on April 21 Due to Bad Weathe

Four Pakistani Stars Shine in ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier 2025 Team of the Tournament

Developing Story

Suspected Terror Attack on Tourists Sparks Panic in Pahalgam, Casualties Feared

by
Indian Army in Kathua encounter

Pahalgam, South Kashmir — A suspected terrorist attack targeted a group of tourists in the popular hill station of Pahalgam on Monday evening, creating widespread panic in the area just as the summer tourist season begins to ramp up.

Preliminary reports suggest the attackers opened fire near a well-known sightseeing spot, causing chaos among visitors. Although official confirmation is awaited, initial accounts indicate there may be casualties. Eyewitnesses described a scene of confusion and fear as tourists scrambled for safety amid the sound of gunfire.

A senior police official told Rising Kashmir that security forces swiftly responded by launching a cordon and search operation to locate the attackers. “We are verifying the nature of the incident. Casualties are feared, but we are awaiting confirmation from the ground,” the official said.

Additional paramilitary and police forces have been deployed to secure the area. As a precautionary measure, tourist movement has been temporarily restricted while the investigation is ongoing.

So far, the identity and affiliation of the assailants remain unknown, and no group has claimed responsibility for the attack.

The incident comes at a critical time for the region, which has recently seen a notable rise in tourist activity, especially with the approach of the summer season. Local businesses had been optimistic about a strong season after a lull in past years due to the pandemic and regional unrest.

This attack, if confirmed to be terror-related, risks denting confidence in travel safety and may impact the tourism-dependent economy of the region.

Authorities are expected to release an official statement soon with further details on the attack and any confirmed injuries or fatalities.

You Might Also Like:

Farooq Abdullah Seeks Centre’s Help After Ramban Landslides

Schools in Kashmir Valley to Remain Closed on April 21 Due to Bad Weathe

Four Pakistani Stars Shine in ICC Women’s World Cup Qualifier 2025 Team of the Tournament

Developing Story

Landslide in Ramban, Over 200 to 250 Houses Damaged, Three people, including 2 Children Dead

by
Landslide in Ramban

Three people, including two children, lost their lives after a landslide hit Jammu and Kashmir’s Ramban district on Sunday, Deputy Commissioner Baseer-Ul-Haq Chaudhary said.

For Latest Updates Please Join Us At WhatsApp

Chaudhary said that around 200-250 houses have been damaged in the incident.

“Due to incessant rainfall and cloudburst, the National Highway was closed at several places. In Ramban, houses and hotels have been damaged. Two houses collapsed due to a landslide in Bagahana village, where 3 people have lost their lives. Around 200-250 houses have been damaged. Maximum damage occurred in Ramban town. A rescue operation is being carried out. NDRF team is on the way and all local teams are also deployed here,” he said.

Deputy Chief Minister of Jammu and Kashmir, Surinder Chaudhary, has reached Ramban to assess the situation following the flash flood and landslide.

Heavy rainfall in Ramban on Sunday triggered landslides that blocked the Jammu-Srinagar National Highway (NH-44), damaging many houses and vehicles.

Authorities have urged people to avoid travelling on the highway until the weather improves and clearing operations are completed.

Earlier in the day, People’s Democratic Party (PDP) chief Mehbooba Mufti expressed deep concern over the landslides and flash floods in Ramban. She urged the Omar Abdullah-led Jammu and Kashmir government to evacuate vulnerable people and provide essential supplies.

She said, “The devastating landslides triggered by relentless rains along the Ramban section of the Jammu-Srinagar Highway have claimed lives, buried vehicles, and stranded many. Urge the administration to prioritise the immediate evacuation of vulnerable groups–elderly, women, and children–while providing food, water, and medical aid. Swiftly clear debris, restore connectivity and implement long-term measures like early warning systems and infrastructure upgrades to prevent such tragedies.”

Jammu and Kashmir Chief Minister Omar Abdullah also expressed grief over the incident.

In a post shared by the Chief Minister’s Office on X, Abdullah said, “Extremely anguished by the tragic landslide and flash flood in Ramban, which has caused considerable damage to life and property. My thoughts are with the affected families in this difficult hour. We are in touch with the local administration to ensure immediate rescue efforts wherever needed.

Later today, I will be reviewing restoration, relief, and repair plans. For now, the focus remains on managing the situation on the ground. Citizens are advised to follow travel advisories and avoid non-essential movement in vulnerable areas.”

He also extended condolences to the families of the victims and assured them that rescue and relief work is underway. (ANI)

You Might Also Like:

Farooq Abdullah Seeks Centre’s Help After Ramban Landslides

Schools in Kashmir Valley to Remain Closed on April 21 Due to Bad Weathe

Mehbooba Mufti Criticises NC-Led Government, Accuses It of Failing Public Expectations

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq Solemnises Nikah in Srinagar; Asaduddin Owaisi Attends Private Ceremony

Developing Story

Mirwaiz Umar Farooq Solemnises Nikah in Srinagar; Asaduddin Owaisi Attends Private Ceremony

by
Mirwaiz Umar Farooq

In a significant yet private ceremony, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq, the prominent religious and political leader of Jammu and Kashmir, solemnised a Nikah in Srinagar today.

The event drew attention as Member of Parliament and AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi was present during the occasion. His visit to the Kashmir Valley was private and remained low-key, with no formal political engagements reported.

Join Us at WhatsApp

Sources said the Nikah was conducted in accordance with Islamic traditions and was attended by close family members and select guests.

Owaisi’s presence at the event marked a rare public appearance with the Mirwaiz, highlighting cordial ties between the two leaders.

The ceremony remained peaceful and concluded smoothly, reflecting the respect and significance associated with Mirwaiz Umar Farooq’s religious stature in the region.(NOK)

You Might Also Like :

NIT Srinagar to Host Rang-e-Chinar 2025 Cultural Fest on 2nd–3rd May

Half a Million U.S.-Funded Weapons Unaccounted for After Taliban Takeover

Bangladesh Seeks Apology and $4.32 Billion Compensation from Pakistan

Developing Story

Flash Floods and Landslides in Ramban: Three Dead, Over 100 Rescued in Jammu and Kashmir

by
Landslides in Ramban

Heavy rains wreaked havoc across Jammu and Kashmir’s Ramban district early Sunday morning, triggering deadly flash floods and landslides that killed three people and left more than 100 residents stranded. Rescue teams, braving continuous downpours and difficult terrain, managed to pull dozens of people to safety as devastation spread across multiple areas.

Join Us at WhatsApp

Deaths and Widespread Destruction

A cloudburst in Seri Bagna village proved fatal, killing three people, including brothers Aqib Ahmad and Mohd Saqib. Officials reported that rescue efforts were still ongoing in the village, and more updates were awaited.

The death toll from rain-related incidents across the Jammu region has now reached five in just two days. On Saturday night, two more individuals — including a woman — died and another was injured after being struck by lightning in the Arnas area of Reasi district.

In Dharam Kund village of Ramban, about 40 residential houses were damaged due to sudden flash floods. Ten houses were fully destroyed, and many others suffered partial damage. The floodwaters, fed by an overflowing stream, swept away several vehicles.

Despite heavy rainfall and continuous threats from further cloudbursts, local police and emergency teams acted swiftly to rescue over 100 trapped villagers. “The teams showed extraordinary courage and commitment,” one official said.

National Highway Closed and Traffic Disrupted

Landslides and mudslides at nearly a dozen spots between Nashri and Banihal forced the complete suspension of traffic along the strategic Jammu-Srinagar National Highway — the only all-weather road connecting Kashmir with the rest of India. A part of the highway near Panthiyal was reportedly washed away.

“Vehicular movement has been stopped from both sides. Commuters are advised not to travel until the weather improves and the road is cleared,” said a spokesperson for the traffic department. Hundreds of travelers remain stranded along the 250-kilometre stretch.

Government Response and Relief Efforts

A senior government official, speaking on condition of anonymity, said there had been “massive damage” throughout the district. “Cloudbursts, hailstorms, landslides, and high-speed winds have caused major destruction. Right now, our focus is to protect lives. Assessment and aid distribution will follow soon.”

Jammu and Kashmir’s Chief Minister Omar Abdullah called for an emergency meeting to assess the ongoing situation. Meanwhile, Union Minister Jitendra Singh praised the efforts of the Ramban district administration, led by Deputy Commissioner Baseer-ul-Haq Chaudhary.

“There was heavy hailstorm, multiple landslides, and strong winds throughout the night. The prompt response by the district administration saved several precious lives,” Singh said on social media platform X (formerly Twitter). He also offered further support from his own resources if necessary and urged the public not to panic.

Looking Ahead

As rescue efforts continue, authorities remain alert to the possibility of more rain and landslides. Relief camps are being set up for displaced residents, and road-clearing operations are underway. However, the full extent of damage will only be clear once the weather stabilizes.

The current crisis highlights the vulnerability of the mountainous region to extreme weather events and the urgent need for strengthened disaster preparedness across Jammu and Kashmir.

You Might Also Like :

NIT Srinagar to Host Rang-e-Chinar 2025 Cultural Fest on 2nd–3rd May

Half a Million U.S.-Funded Weapons Unaccounted for After Taliban Takeover

Bangladesh Seeks Apology and $4.32 Billion Compensation from Pakistan

Developing Story

Bangladesh Seeks Apology and $4.32 Billion Compensation from Pakistan for 1971 War and Bhola Cyclone Aid

by
Bangladesh Seeks Apology

In a significant diplomatic development, Bangladesh has officially urged Pakistan to issue a formal apology for the atrocities committed by its forces during the 1971 War of Liberation. Additionally, Dhaka has raised a long-pending financial claim of $4.32 billion, which includes its share of pre-1971 assets and foreign aid money meant for cyclone victims.

A Dark Chapter in History

The 1971 War of Liberation led to the independence of Bangladesh after a brutal nine-month conflict with Pakistan. The war began following Operation Searchlight, a military crackdown launched by the Pakistani army to suppress Bengali demands for autonomy. The operation resulted in the killing of an estimated 30 lakh (3 million) people and the rape of over one million women, making it one of the darkest episodes in South Asian history.

Despite the passage of over five decades, Bangladesh has not received a formal apology from Pakistan for the war crimes and human rights violations committed during the conflict. The issue remains a sensitive one in Bangladesh’s national consciousness and continues to affect bilateral relations.

Unresolved Financial Claims

During recent Foreign Office Consultations (FOC) held in Dhaka at the State Guest House Padma, Bangladesh’s Foreign Secretary Md. Jashim Uddin brought up the subject of financial claims pending since 1971. He pointed out that Pakistan has yet to hand over Bangladesh’s rightful share of the financial assets of undivided Pakistan.

The $4.32 billion claim includes:

  • Bangladesh’s share of pre-1971 Pakistani government assets.
  • Unpaid provident funds and savings instruments.
  • Aid money sent by the international community following the 1970 Bhola Cyclone.

Notably, $200 million in foreign aid, which was intended to assist victims of the devastating Bhola Cyclone, was never allocated to the eastern region, now Bangladesh. The cyclone, which struck in November 1970, claimed up to 500,000 lives, according to the World Meteorological Organisation, making it the deadliest tropical cyclone in recorded history.

Repatriation and Relief Camp Concerns

Bangladesh also raised the issue of more than 300,000 stranded Pakistanis, often referred to as “Biharis,” who have been living in relief camps across the country since 1971. Their repatriation has been a long-standing concern that both nations have failed to resolve over the decades.

Building a Path Forward

Despite the serious nature of these unresolved issues, both nations have expressed a desire to improve relations. Md. Jashim Uddin announced that Pakistan’s Deputy Prime Minister and Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar is scheduled to visit Bangladesh on April 27-28, 2025, which could provide an opportunity to address these matters more constructively.

There are also hopes of launching direct flights between Bangladesh and Pakistan, which could promote increased people-to-people contact and economic cooperation.

Mutual Interests and Future Cooperation

Pakistan’s Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch, who led her country’s delegation at the FOC, separately met with Bangladesh’s Chief Adviser Muhammad Yunus and Foreign Affairs Adviser Md. Touhid Hossain. During the discussions, she stressed the need to tap into the potential of intra-regional trade and cooperation.

“We have huge intra-regional markets on our own right. We should use it,” Baloch said, adding, “We can’t miss the bus every time.”

While both countries remain cautious, the meetings suggest a shared interest in turning the page—provided that historical injustices are acknowledged and addressed in good faith.

Developing Story

Political Earthquake: Ex-RAW Chief Claims Farooq Abdullah Privately Backed Abrogation of Article 370

by
farooq

In a revelation that has sent shockwaves through Jammu and Kashmir’s political landscape, former Research and Analysis Wing (RAW) chief A.S. Dulat has claimed in his latest book, published by Juggernaut, that National Conference (NC) leader Farooq Abdullah privately supported the Indian government’s decision to abrogate Article 370 in August 2019. This claim, despite Abdullah and his party’s public condemnation of the move as a “betrayal,” has ignited fierce debate and drawn sharp reactions from regional political figures, raising questions about the NC’s stance and the behind-the-scenes dynamics of one of India’s most contentious policy decisions.

The Revelation: Dulat’s Account

Dulat, a seasoned intelligence officer with deep ties to Kashmir’s political elite, writes that Farooq Abdullah expressed private willingness to support the abrogation of Article 370, which granted special autonomous status to Jammu and Kashmir. According to Dulat, Abdullah lamented the lack of consultation, asking, “We would have helped (pass the proposal). Why were we not taken into confidence?” This suggests that the NC patriarch was open to cooperating with the central government’s move, despite the party’s vocal opposition.

Further fueling speculation, Dulat notes a secretive meeting between Farooq Abdullah, his son Omar Abdullah, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi in New Delhi just days before the abrogation on August 5, 2019. “What transpired…nobody will ever know,” Dulat writes, as quoted by Hindustan Times. The opacity of this meeting has added intrigue, with critics suggesting it may have been a pivotal moment in shaping Abdullah’s stance.

Following the abrogation, which revoked Article 370 and bifurcated Jammu and Kashmir into two Union Territories, Farooq Abdullah was detained for seven months under the Public Safety Act. During this period, Dulat claims, Delhi discreetly probed Abdullah’s position, seeking to ensure he would “accept the new reality.” This raises questions about whether Abdullah’s detention was partly a means to align him with the central government’s agenda.

Political Reactions: A Firestorm of Accusations

The claims have elicited sharp responses from rival political leaders in Jammu and Kashmir, who have seized the opportunity to challenge the NC’s credibility and question its public narrative.

Sajad Lone: “No Surprise”

Sajad Lone, the Peoples Conference Chief and MLA from Handwara, described Dulat’s revelation as “very credible,” citing Dulat’s close relationship with Farooq Abdullah. In a series of posts on X, Lone portrayed Dulat as Abdullah’s “closest ally” and “alter ego,” lending weight to the claims. Lone suggested that the NC’s public opposition to the abrogation was a facade, accusing the party of “perfecting playing the victim card.”

Lone pointed to the 2019 meeting with Modi as evidence of Abdullah’s complicity, sarcastically imagining Abdullah saying, “Humey roney deejiye—Aap apna kaam karein—hum aap kay saath hain” (Let us cry, you do your work, we are with you). He further speculated that the NC’s strong performance in the 2024 Jammu and Kashmir Assembly elections was a “prize” for services rendered in 2019, framing it as a calculated move in the “national interest.” Lone also mocked the NC’s likely response, predicting they would dismiss the claims as a conspiracy and lean on their allies in Delhi to silence critics.

Iltija Mufti: A Betrayal Normalized

Iltija Mufti, a leader of the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP), echoed Lone’s skepticism, accusing Farooq Abdullah of complicity in the abrogation. In a post on X, Mufti, daughter of PDP chief Mehbooba Mufti, described Dulat as an “ardent Abdullah supporter” and argued that the claims clarified long-standing doubts about the NC’s role. She alleged that Farooq Abdullah deliberately chose to stay in Kashmir instead of attending Parliament during the abrogation, thereby helping to “normalize gutting of J&K’s constitution & subsequent betrayal.”

Mufti’s remarks reflect the PDP’s ongoing rivalry with the NC, with both parties vying for influence in Kashmir’s fractured political landscape. Her accusations amplify the narrative that the NC’s public stance was a performance, masking a more pragmatic alignment with Delhi.

The Context: Article 370 and Its Aftermath

The abrogation of Article 370 was a landmark decision by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP)-led central government, fulfilling a long-standing ideological goal. The move stripped Jammu and Kashmir of its special status, repealed Article 35A (which granted special rights to permanent residents), and reorganized the state into two Union Territories—Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh—under direct central control. The decision was accompanied by a massive security lockdown, internet shutdowns, and the detention of prominent political leaders, including Farooq Abdullah, Omar Abdullah, and Mehbooba Mufti.

The NC, under Farooq and Omar Abdullah, has consistently opposed the abrogation publicly, framing it as an assault on Kashmir’s identity and autonomy. The party’s 2019 election manifesto promised to restore Article 370, and its leaders have repeatedly criticized the move in speeches and media appearances. However, Dulat’s claims suggest a disconnect between the NC’s public rhetoric and private negotiations, potentially undermining its credibility among its voter base.

The NC’s Silence and the Road Ahead

As of now, the National Conference has not issued an official response to Dulat’s claims or the accusations from Lone and Mufti. The party’s silence may reflect a strategic choice to avoid engaging with a narrative that could alienate its supporters, particularly in the Kashmir Valley, where resentment over the abrogation remains strong. Alternatively, it may signal internal deliberations on how to address the allegations without fueling further controversy.

The timing of the revelations is significant. The NC’s strong performance in the 2024 Jammu and Kashmir Assembly elections, where it emerged as the single-largest party and formed a government with Omar Abdullah as Chief Minister, has bolstered its regional influence. However, Dulat’s claims risk casting a shadow over this victory, providing ammunition to rivals like the Peoples Conference and PDP, who are eager to portray the NC as duplicitous.

Broader Implications

Dulat’s account underscores the complex interplay of public posturing and private pragmatism in Jammu and Kashmir’s politics. The region’s leaders have long navigated a delicate balance between local sentiments and Delhi’s authority, often engaging in backchannel dialogues that remain hidden from public view. If true, Abdullah’s private support for the abrogation could reflect a pragmatic recognition of the central government’s resolve, even as he maintained a public stance aligned with his electorate’s aspirations.The controversy also highlights the enduring sensitivity of Article 370’s abrogation.More than five years later, the issue remains a flashpoint, with regional parties leveraging it to rally support and settle scores. For the central government, Dulat

Developing Story

PM Modi’s Visit to Inaugurate Vande Bharat Express in J&K Postponed

by
PM Modi

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s scheduled visit to Jammu and Kashmir on April 19 for the inauguration of the much-awaited Vande Bharat Express from Katra to Srinagar has been postponed, officials said on Monday.

Officials told the news agency—Kashmir News Observer (KNO) that the PM’s visit to inaugurate the Vande Bharat Express on a stretch of the Udhampur-Srinagar-Baramulla Rail Link (USBRL), a 272-km-long mega railway project, has been postponed.

Preparations were already underway for the high-profile visit, with mock drills and trial runs being conducted on the USBRL section.

Speaking to KNO, Chief Area Manager (CAM) Kashmir, Saqib Yousuf Yatoo (IRTS), confirmed the postponement of the PM’s visit, stating that no fresh date has been announced yet.

The Vande Bharat Express, specially designed to operate in sub-zero temperatures of the Kashmir Valley, is already stationed at Katra. The train consists of eight fully air-conditioned coaches equipped with cab heating, HVAC systems with 9kW heating capacity, sealed gangways, infotainment displays, CCTV surveillance, LED lighting, mobile charging ports, automatic plug doors, and electro-pneumatic brakes.

Although the train is capable of running at speeds up to 160 km/h, it will operate at a limited speed of 85 km/h between Katra and Srinagar, as per the Commissioner of Railway Safety (CRS) approval.

Officials said the journey will reduce travel time between the two cities to just three hours, compared to the current 6–7 hours by road.

The USBRL project spans 272 km and includes 119 km of tunnels. It connects major areas including Udhampur, Reasi, Ramban, Anantnag, Pulwama, Budgam, Srinagar, and Baramulla. Two iconic engineering marvels—the Chenab Bridge, the world’s highest railway bridge, and the Anji Khad Bridge, India’s first cable-stayed railway bridge—are part of this ambitious project.

The Chenab Bridge stands at 467 meters, making it 35 meters taller than the Eiffel Tower. Officials revealed that around 29,000 tonnes of steel were used in its construction. Designed to withstand earthquakes up to magnitude 8, the bridge posed significant engineering challenges due to its location in a high-seismic zone.

Approved in 1994–95 and declared a National Project in 2002, the USBRL has been completed in phases. Key sections such as Qazigund–Baramulla (2009), Banihal–Qazigund (2013), Udhampur–Katra (2014), and Banihal–Sangaldan (2020) have already been commissioned. A trial run of MEMU trains was also successfully conducted last year on the electrified Reasi–Sangaldan section.

Currently, train services in the Valley are operational only on the Sangaldan–Baramulla section, while long-distance trains terminate at Katra.

You Might Also Like:

Cyber Police Kashmir Cracks Down on 50 Mule Accounts Linked to Online Fraud

J&K Students Association Thanks Dr. S. Jaishankar for Rescuing Trafficked Kashmiri Youth

Omar Abdullah Slams Waqf Amendment Act 2025, Calls It Discriminatory and Unconstitutional

Developing Story

Jammu & Kashmir Political Crisis: Rumours of 8 National Conference MLAs Planning to Defect Amid Turmoil

by
National Conference

Jammu and Kashmir (J&K) is no stranger to political turbulence, but recent developments have pushed the region into a fresh storm. A single, unverified post on X from April 15, 2025, claimed that eight National Conference (NC) Members of the Legislative Assembly (MLAs) are poised to defect, threatening the stability of the NC-led government. This rumor, though lacking confirmation from credible sources, has amplified existing tensions surrounding the controversial Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, and the stalled restoration of J&K’s statehood. These issues have ignited fury across the political spectrum, with opposition parties like the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and J&K People’s Conference (JKPC) accusing the NC of betrayal and inaction. This article delves into the alleged defections, the Waqf Act controversy, the statehood deadlock, and their combined impact on J&K’s fragile political landscape.

To Join Us On WhatsApp Click Here

The Defection Rumor: Fact or Fiction?

The claim that eight NC MLAs are ready to defect originated from a post by @AnnNewsKashmir on X, dated April 15, 2025. The NC holds 42 seats in the 90-seat J&K Legislative Assembly, making it the largest party in the coalition government, alongside six Congress MLAs and support from independents and smaller parties. A defection of eight MLAs could destabilize Chief Minister Omar Abdullah’s government, potentially forcing a realignment or even collapse of the ruling coalition.

However, no mainstream media outlet, official NC statement, or Assembly record has corroborated this claim as of April 15, 2025. The lack of named MLAs, motives, or destinations for the alleged defectors further casts doubt on the rumor’s credibility. In J&K’s volatile political history, defections are not uncommon—past examples include PDP MLAs joining the BJP in 2018—but such moves typically involve public posturing or negotiations, none of which are evident here. The X post may reflect local gossip or deliberate misinformation, a common tactic in J&K’s polarized environment. Until verified, the defection story remains speculative, but it has nonetheless fueled public and political unease.

The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025: A Religious and Political Flashpoint

The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, passed by Parliament on April 4, 2025, and enforced from April 8, 2025, after President Droupadi Murmu’s assent, has emerged as a central trigger for J&K’s unrest. The Act introduces changes to the management of waqf properties—endowments held in trust for Muslim religious and charitable purposes. Key amendments include digitizing waqf records, establishing time-bound dispute resolution tribunals, penalizing mismanagement, and controversially, mandating non-Muslim representation on waqf boards. Supporters, including the BJP-led central government, argue these reforms promote transparency and protect marginalized Muslim communities, such as widows and divorcees.

In J&K, where over 65% of the population is Muslim (per the 2011 Census), the Act has been widely criticized as an overreach into religious autonomy. Critics, including NC, PDP, and JKPC leaders, argue that it undermines Muslim control over sacred sites like mosques, shrines, and graveyards, potentially exposing them to disputes or confiscation. The inclusion of non-Muslims in waqf management is particularly contentious, seen by many as discriminatory when compared to other religious trusts, like Hindu temple boards, which face no similar mandate.

The J&K Legislative Assembly became a battleground over the Act during its budget session, ending April 8, 2025. NC MLAs, including Hilal Lone, Salman Sagar, and Abdul Majeed Larmi, staged dramatic protests, tearing copies of the Act and demanding its withdrawal. They sought an adjournment motion to discuss the law, but Speaker Abdul Rahim Rather, an NC veteran, rejected it, citing the Act’s sub-judice status in the Supreme Court. This decision sparked chaos, with the session adjourned for three days without passing any resolutions, including one condemning the Act.

Opposition parties seized the moment. PDP leader Iltija Mufti accused the NC of orchestrating a “theatrical” protest to mask its failure to pass a resolution, unlike Tamil Nadu’s Assembly, which explicitly opposed the Act. JKPC chief Sajad Lone called the NC’s actions a “drama,” noting that the Speaker’s ruling was questionable since the Supreme Court had not yet admitted the Waqf petitions. Lone lamented that J&K, India’s only Muslim-majority region, failed to take a stand, leaving a “blot” on its legacy.

The NC responded by escalating its legal fight. On April 11, 2025, three NC MLAs—Arjun Singh Raju, Reyaz Khan, and Hilal Lone—filed a Supreme Court petition challenging the Act as a “constitutionally alarming interference” in Muslim religious affairs. CM Omar Abdullah defended the protests, stating the Act “hurt the sentiments of the majority” in J&K. Yet, critics like PDP’s Waheed Para pointed to Abdullah’s meeting with Union Minority Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, who introduced the Waqf Bill, as evidence of NC’s weak opposition, suggesting a covert alignment with the BJP.

Statehood Restoration: A Promise Unfulfilled

Parallel to the Waqf controversy, the delay in restoring J&K’s statehood has deepened public and political frustration. J&K lost its statehood and special status in August 2019 when Article 370 was revoked, reducing it to a Union Territory under direct central control. The NC’s 2024 election campaign hinged on restoring statehood, with promises from PM Narendra Modi and Home Minister Amit Shah reinforcing expectations.

However, as of April 15, 2025, no concrete timeline exists. Omar Abdullah, after meeting Shah, expressed hope but admitted no firm commitment was made. The Assembly’s failure to pass three statehood resolutions during the chaotic Waqf protests further eroded trust. BJP leaders, like J&K unit chief Sunil Sharma, have tied statehood to the “complete eradication” of terrorism and separatism, a vague condition that critics argue delays restoration indefinitely.

Opposition parties have pounced on the NC’s inaction. PDP’s Iltija Mufti accused the government of prioritizing administrative perks, like officer transfers, over statehood advocacy. JKPC’s Sajad Lone questioned why the NC, with its majority, couldn’t push a resolution, hinting at internal disarray or external pressure. Public sentiment, already strained post-2019, is turning cynical, with many viewing the NC’s protests as a distraction from its governance failures.

Political Ramifications and Opposition Dynamics

The Waqf and statehood controversies have exposed fault lines within J&K’s political ecosystem. The NC, despite its electoral mandate in October 2024, risks squandering goodwill. Its majority should enable decisive action, yet the Assembly’s dysfunction—marked by protests against its own Speaker—suggests internal rifts or strategic missteps. The opposition, particularly the PDP and JKPC, has capitalized on this, framing the NC as complicit with the BJP’s agenda. Allegations of an NC-BJP “understanding” stem from historical alliances, like their 2014 coalition, and Abdullah’s recent interactions with BJP ministers.

The PDP, with eight seats, and JKPC, with one, lack the numbers to topple the government but are amplifying public discontent. Their protests in Srinagar and social media campaigns have kept pressure on the NC, though their own past ties with the BJP weaken their moral stance. The Congress, an NC ally with six seats, has been vocal on the Waqf issue, with MLA Nizamuddin Bhat demanding discussion, but its influence within the coalition remains limited.

The BJP, with 29 seats, has stayed relatively quiet, letting the NC face the heat. Its insistence on linking statehood to security goals aligns with its national narrative but alienates J&K’s Muslim majority, who see the Waqf Act as part of a broader centralizing agenda.

Broader Implications for J&K

The current crisis reflects deeper issues in J&K’s post-2019 reality. The revocation of Article 370 promised integration and development but left a governance vacuum, with locals feeling disenfranchised. The Waqf Act controversy taps into fears of cultural erosion, as waqf properties—mosques, shrines, and lands—are tied to Kashmiri identity. Statehood, meanwhile, symbolizes autonomy, and its delay fuels distrust in both the NC and the central government.

Public protests, though smaller than in 2019, are growing, particularly in the Kashmir Valley. The NC’s Supreme Court challenge may rally its base, but failure to deliver on statehood could erode its credibility. The opposition’s aggressive posturing risks further polarizing the electorate, while the BJP’s hardline stance may deepen alienation.

Verifying the Defection Claim

The defection rumor, while unconfirmed, underscores J&K’s fragile trust in institutions. Social media platforms like X can amplify unverified claims, necessitating caution. Readers should cross-check with primary sources, such as NC press releases, Assembly proceedings, or statements from MLAs. As of now, the claim lacks substance, but its persistence highlights the NC’s vulnerability amid mounting crises.

Conclusion

J&K stands at a crossroads. The Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025, has inflamed religious and political sensitivities, while the statehood delay has exposed the NC’s governance challenges. The rumored defection of eight MLAs, though unverified, reflects the broader instability threatening the region’s first elected government in six years. The NC must navigate internal dissent, opposition attacks, and public expectations while confronting a central government with differing priorities. Whether it can restore trust and deliver on its promises will shape J&K’s future—politically, socially, and culturally. For now, the region remains a tinderbox, with every move watched closely by its people and beyond.

You Might Also Like:

Cyber Police Kashmir Cracks Down on 50 Mule Accounts Linked to Online Fraud

J&K Students Association Thanks Dr. S. Jaishankar for Rescuing Trafficked Kashmiri Youth

Omar Abdullah Slams Waqf Amendment Act 2025, Calls It Discriminatory and Unconstitutional