Bollywood actress Nargis Fakhri has reportedly married her long-time partner, Kashmiri-born businessman Tony Beig. While Fakhri has not made an official announcement, images from their wedding celebration have surfaced on social media, fueling speculation.
According to a report by The Times of India, the wedding took place last weekend, and the couple is now enjoying their honeymoon in Switzerland.
According to Pinkvilla, Tony Beig is a successful US-based entrepreneur and the chairman of a well-known company. He also manages several ventures. His business journey began in 2006, and over the years, he has built a strong reputation in the industry.
Born in 1984, Tony, a Kashmiri-born businessman based in Los Angeles, has largely stayed out of the public eye.His father, Shakeel Ahmad Beig, served as the Deputy Inspector General (DIG) of the Jammu and Kashmir Police.
Tony later moved abroad, earning an MBA in Business, Management, and Marketing from Victoria University in Melbourne, Australia.
Fans are eagerly awaiting an official confirmation from Nargis Fakhri, who is known for her roles in films such as Rockstar and Madras Cafe.
Beirut witnessed an unprecedented gathering on Sunday as tens of thousands of mourners filled a stadium to bid farewell to Hezbollah’s former leader, Hassan Nasrallah. The funeral, considered Lebanon’s largest in two decades, drew high-profile officials from Iran and Lebanon, along with Hezbollah supporters from across the region. The event took place nearly five months after Nasrallah was killed in an Israeli airstrike, marking a pivotal moment for the Iran-backed militant group.
A Leader’s Final Journey
Hassan Nasrallah, a key figure in Hezbollah’s rise to prominence, was killed in an Israeli airstrike targeting the group’s main operations center in southern Beirut. His leadership spanned over three decades, during which he transformed Hezbollah into a formidable political and military force in the Middle East. He was widely respected among Iran-backed factions, including groups in Iraq, Yemen, and Palestine.
His funeral was held alongside that of his cousin and successor, Hashem Safieddine, who was also killed in an Israeli airstrike days later. While Nasrallah was laid to rest in Beirut, Safieddine’s burial took place in his hometown in southern Lebanon. Both leaders had been temporarily buried in undisclosed locations for security reasons.
A Massive Funeral Procession
The funeral procession began early Sunday, with thousands of mourners gathering in Beirut’s main sports stadium. As Nasrallah’s coffin was paraded through the streets, men on platforms tossed flowers and clothing items in an attempt to have them touch the coffin, believing it would bring blessings.
Prominent officials attended the ceremony, including Iran’s Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Qalibaf and Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi. Their arrival in Lebanon was notable, as it coincided with the lifting of a temporary ban on flights from Iran, which Lebanese authorities had imposed following Israeli allegations of Hezbollah smuggling funds via commercial flights.
Hezbollah’s Message of Defiance
As the funeral took place, Hezbollah’s Secretary-General, Naim Kassem, addressed the crowd via a televised speech. “Today, we bid farewell to an exceptional historical, national, Arab, and Islamic leader,” he stated. Kassem reassured supporters that Hezbollah remained strong, emphasizing that “the resistance is still present in numbers and weapons, and the inevitable victory is coming.”
The funeral also carried a strong anti-Israel and anti-American sentiment. Thousands of attendees waved Hezbollah’s yellow flags and chanted slogans such as “Death to Israel” and “Death to America.” Nasrallah’s speech from the 2006 war against Israel was played, reinforcing Hezbollah’s long-standing opposition to Israeli occupation.
Israel’s Response and Security Concerns
In a display of military dominance, Israeli jets flew low over Beirut during the funeral. Israeli Defense Minister Israel Katz later confirmed the operation, stating, “Whoever threatens to annihilate Israel and strike Israel—that will be his end.”
Meanwhile, tensions escalated further as the Israeli military launched a series of airstrikes on Hezbollah positions in southern and eastern Lebanon. The Israeli army claimed the strikes targeted military sites containing rocket launchers and weapons. Lebanon’s state news agency reported at least one civilian injury—a Syrian woman—during the attacks.
Regional and Political Implications
Nasrallah’s funeral underscored Hezbollah’s resilience despite recent setbacks. The group has faced significant challenges, including the collapse of the Assad regime in Syria, a crucial ally that facilitated weapons and financial support from Iran. Additionally, the U.S.-brokered ceasefire agreement following the 14-month war with Israel has restricted Hezbollah’s military presence along the Lebanese-Israeli border.
Political rivals have increasingly called for Hezbollah to disarm and transition into a purely political entity. However, the massive turnout at Nasrallah’s funeral was seen as a demonstration of Hezbollah’s continued influence and support among its followers.
Tight Security Measures
Given the scale of the funeral, authorities implemented extensive security measures across Beirut. Major roads were closed, the Lebanese army and police were placed on high alert, and the use of drones was strictly prohibited. Flights to and from Beirut’s Rafik Hariri International Airport were temporarily halted for four hours to ensure security.
Conclusion
Hassan Nasrallah’s funeral was not just a mourning event but also a statement of Hezbollah’s endurance in the face of adversity. With tensions between Hezbollah and Israel remaining high, the funeral’s massive turnout sent a strong message about the group’s continued political and military significance. As Lebanon navigates its complex political landscape, Hezbollah’s next steps will shape the region’s geopolitical future.
please write title and 18 words meta for this article ”Pakistan skipper Mohammed Rizwan won the toss and elected to bat first against arch-rivals India in their second clash of Group A at the Dubai International Stadium on Sunday.
Team India will lock horns against arch-rivals Pakistan in their second Group A clash at the Dubai International Stadium today in order to book their spot in the semifinals of the ongoing competition. The last time India and Pakistan clashed in a Champions Trophy event was during the 2017 edition’s final, when Virat Kohli-led star-studded unit was humbled by Men in Green at the peak of star batters’ run-chasing powers, being skittled out for 158 runs while chasing a mammoth 338 runs which Pakistan reached on the back of a century from Fakhar Zaman. Avenging this would be fresh on the minds of players who were part of this heart-wrenching defeat, and their fans would no doubt relish every moment of India dominating Pakistan with bat or ball. “Will bat first, looks like a good surface. Want to put up a good target. Every match is important in ICC events, we will keep things normal. The boys are familiar with these conditions, we have done well here and we want to do our best today. We lost our last game, but it is past for us now. One change – Fakhar is out, Imam is in,” Rizwan said after winning the toss. Men in Blue skipper Rohit Sharma said that there is no change in the team for this match. “Doesn’t really matter, they won the toss so we’ll bowl first. Looks similar to the last game, the surface is on the slower side. We have an experienced unit in batting, so we know what we need to do if the pitches get slower. Need an overall performance from the team – with bat and ball. The last game wasn’t an easy one for us, which is always nice. You want to be under pressure and test yourself. We are playing the same team,” Rohit said. Teams: India (Playing XI): Rohit Sharma (c), Shubman Gill, Virat Kohli, Shreyas Iyer, Axar Patel, KL Rahul (wk), Hardik Pandya, Ravindra Jadeja, Harshit Rana, Mohammed Shami, Kuldeep Yadav Pakistan (Playing XI): Imam-ul-Haq, Babar Azam, Saud Shakeel, Mohammad Rizwan (wk/c), Salman Agha, Tayyab Tahir, Khushdil Shah, Shaheen Afridi, Naseem Shah, Haris Rauf, Abrar Ahmed. (ANI)”
Hadi Matar, the man who stabbed and partially blinded the novelist Salman Rushdie onstage at a New York arts institute, was found guilty of attempted murder.
Matar, 27, can be seen in videos of the 2022 attack rushing the Chautauqua Institution’s stage as Rushdie was being introduced to the audience for a talk about keeping writers safe from harm, some of which were shown to the jury during the seven days of testimony.
Rushdie, 77, was stabbed with a knife multiple times in the head, neck, torso and left hand, blinding his right eye and damaging his liver and intestines, requiring emergency surgery and months of recovery.
The writer was among the first to testify at the Chautauqua County Court in Mayville, calmly describing to jurors how he believed he was going to die and showing them his blinded eye by removing his adapted spectacles with a blacked-out right lens.
Matar was found guilty of attempted murder in the second degree and assault in the second degree for stabbing Henry Reese, the co-founder of Pittsburgh’s City of Asylum, a non-profit group that helps exiled writers, who was conducting the talk with Rushdie that morning.
He will be sentenced on April 23, and faces up to 25 years in prison.
Speaking after the verdict, Chautauqua County District Attorney Jason Schmidt praised the scores of audience members who rushed to Rushdie’s aid when he was attacked.
“The Chautauqua Institution community, which I believe saved Rushdie’s life when they intervened, I would say to you that this entire community deserved swift justice here, and I’m glad that we were able to achieve that for them.”
Nathaniel Barone, a public defender representing Matar, said his client was disappointed by the verdict.
“The video, I think, was extremely damaging to Matar,” Barone said outside the courtroom, referring to video of the attack that was shown repeatedly to jurors, sometimes in slow motion. “It’s that old expression, a picture is worth a thousand words.”
After the knife assault, Matar told the New York Post that he had traveled from his home in New Jersey after seeing the Rushdie event advertised because he disliked the novelist.
Matar, a dual citizen of his native US and Lebanon, said in the interview that he was surprised Rushdie had survived, the Post reported.
Matar did not testify at his trial. His defense lawyers told jurors that the prosecutors had not proved beyond reasonable doubt the necessary criminal intent to kill needed for a conviction of attempted murder, and argued that he should have been charged with assault.
Matar also faces federal charges brought by prosecutors in the US attorney’s office in western New York, accusing him of attempting to murder Rushdie as an act of terrorism. He is due to face those charges at a separate trial in Buffalo.
On February 22, 2025, Nael Saleh Barghouti, a name etched into the annals of Palestinian resistance, walked free after 44 years in Israeli prisons—the longest-serving Palestinian political prisoner in history. Born on October 27, 1957, in the village of Kobar near Ramallah, Barghouti’s journey from a defiant schoolboy to a symbol of steadfastness culminated today in a release marred by exile, barring him from returning to the West Bank soil he fought for. His story is one of resilience, loss, and an unyielding commitment to his people, set against the backdrop of Israel’s occupation since 1967.
Barghouti’s resistance began early. At 10, during the 1967 Six-Day War, he witnessed Israeli forces invade Kobar, bombing the village entrance. Joining his family on their rooftop, he chanted against the soldiers and threw stones—a child’s act of defiance that foreshadowed a life of struggle. Raised in a farming family, he attended Kobar’s primary school before moving to Prince Hassan School in Birzeit. An avid reader of Palestinian, Arab, and Islamic history, his education was cut short in December 1977, when, at 20, he was arrested for anti-occupation activities and sentenced to three months in military prison.
Released in early 1978, Barghouti’s freedom was fleeting. In April, he, his brother Omar, and cousin Fakhri were arrested, charged with killing an Israeli officer near Ramallah. The military court, notorious for its near-100% conviction rate of Palestinians, handed him a staggering 117-year sentence. Thus began a decades-long odyssey behind bars, where he would evolve from a young activist into a revered figure among Palestinian prisoners.
Prison became Barghouti’s crucible. Initially aligned with the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), he joined Fatah, the backbone of the Palestine Liberation Organization (PLO) under Yasser Arafat. In 1983, disillusioned by the PLO’s defeat in Lebanon’s 1982 war—where Israel expelled the group to Tunisia amid massacres like Sabra and Shatila—he broke away to join Fatah al-Intifada, a splinter faction. As that group waned in the 1980s, he embraced the emerging Islamic Resistance Movement (Hamas) during the First Intifada in 1987, reflecting a shift toward Islamist resistance. Inside jail, he earned the title “Dean of Palestinian Prisoners,” mentoring others and advocating for their rights.
The years took a toll. Barghouti’s parents died—his father in 2004, his mother in 2005—both denied his presence at their funerals. Physical and psychological abuse marked his detention, yet his spirit endured. After 33 uninterrupted years, freedom came in October 2011 via the Wafa al-Ahrar deal, where Hamas swapped 1,027 prisoners, including Barghouti, for Israeli soldier Gilad Shalit. Returning to Kobar at 54, he sought normalcy, marrying Iman Nafeh, a former prisoner who had served 15.5 years. Their November 2011 wedding was a national celebration, a rare moment of joy after decades apart. “He was desperate to claim a sense of normalcy,” Iman recalled. Barghouti farmed his land and enrolled at al-Quds University to study history, chasing dreams deferred.
That dream shattered in June 2014. Israeli forces rearrested him, citing a speech at Birzeit University as a violation of the exchange deal—an accusation critics called baseless. His 117-year sentence was reinstated, a move condemned as a breach of the 2011 agreement. Iman, who had spent only 31 months with him, watched helplessly as soldiers took him before he could harvest his crops. Back in prison, Barghouti resumed his advocacy, joining Hamas’s 2021 “Jerusalem Is Our Promise” electoral list before its cancellation by Mahmoud Abbas. In December 2023, he endured the “Three-Hour Assault,” a brutal beating by guards that fractured his ribs, part of escalating abuses post-October 7, 2023.
Today’s release, tied to a Hamas-Israel ceasefire deal, ends his 44-year ordeal—34 years until 2011, plus a decade since 2014. Yet, it’s bittersweet. Israel insists on deporting him, likely to Egypt or Qatar, denying him a return to Kobar. Iman, restricted from traveling, faces another separation. “He will refuse exile if it means leaving his land,” she told reporters, echoing his deep ties to the West Bank. The deal, exchanging Palestinian prisoners for Israeli hostages, reflects Israel’s policy of exiling those convicted of killing Israelis, a practice decried as collective punishment.
Barghouti’s story mirrors the Palestinian experience under occupation. Since 1967, Israel has controlled the West Bank, expanding settlements—over 700,000 settlers by 2025—displacing families like his. Military courts, with conviction rates exceeding 99%, have detained thousands, often without due process. Barghouti’s 44 years surpass even global records for political imprisonment, a stark symbol of this system. His shifts—Fatah to Hamas—trace the liberation struggle’s evolution, from secular nationalism to religious resistance, shaped by defeats and uprisings.
His personal losses are profound. Beyond his parents, his brother Omar spent 26 years imprisoned, and the family faced relentless raids and demolitions. His brief freedom in 2011-2014 offered a glimpse of life—marriage, farming, study—only for it to be snatched away. Iman’s words in These Chains Will Be Broken capture their bond: “Our love was a victory against the prison system.” Yet, exile now threatens that victory, a final twist in a saga of endurance.
What lies ahead? At 67, Barghouti’s health is frail—years of torture, starvation, and beatings have left scars. Yet, his release galvanizes Palestinians. Some liken him to Nelson Mandela, a prisoner-turned-leader, though exile complicates that path. His voice, honed by decades of reflection, could resonate from abroad, uniting factions or inspiring the diaspora. For now, he steps into an uncertain future, a free man denied his home.
Nael Barghouti’s 44 years encapsulate a struggle larger than himself. From a boy on a rooftop to the “Dean” behind bars, he embodies resistance against overwhelming odds. Today’s release closes a chapter, but not the story—of a man, a family, and a people who refuse to break.
India is set to lock horns with arch-rivals and host Pakistan in the highly anticipated Champions Trophy clash at the Dubai International Stadium on Sunday.
The game is a high-stakes battle for both teams, as while Pakistan will try to keep their title defence alive, India will aim to almost confirm its berth in the semis.
The game is also being touted as an opportunity for India to avenge the loss of the 2017 Champions Trophy Final when Virat Kohli’s men were deprived of putting their hands on the ICC trophy.
Unlike the 50-over and T20 World Cups, Pakistan holds a 3-2 advantage over India in the Champions Trophy. The most notable encounter remains the 180-run triumph in the 2017 Champions Trophy final, which makes Sunday’s game even more exciting for fans from both sides of the border.
It is pertinent to note that Pakistan’s win in 2017 came during the peak of star India batter and former India captain Virat Kohli, at a time when no target was considered too much for the team. Virat, who holds a great record against Pakistan, will look forward to returning to his old colours in the all-important game.
Pakistan will fly to Dubai after conceding a 60-run defeat against New Zealand in the tournament opener in their backyard.
There were plenty of issues visible on the ‘Men in Green’ side. From ace pacers, Shaheen Shah Afridi and Naseem Shah struggling to pick up wickets in powerplay and the bowlers failing to restrict runs in the death overs, to the batters failing to build partnerships and some big names like Babar Azam, skipper Rizwan struggling for form. Pakistani side’s problems have further been compounded by Fakhar Zaman — hero of the 2017 CT final — being ruled out of the tournament due to injury.
On the other hand, Team India will come riding high on confidence after a convincing 6-wicket win against Bangladesh in their campaign opener.
The ‘Men In Blue’, however, will have to be in its top form heading into the match. While India was able to inflict a strong top-order collapse restricting Bangladesh to 35/5, it allowed the opponents to escape a 154-run stand between Jaker Ali and Towhid Hridoy took Bangladesh to a respectable total of 228 runs.
Also during the run-chase, India struggled against Rishad Hossain’s spin and was reduced to 144/4 during the run-chase, from where the game could have gone either way. Virat Kohli in particular struggled against spin, taking 10 balls to open his account and scored only a sluggish 22 off 38 balls, before perishing to spin.
While stars have aligned more often than not for India’s top stars against Pakistan in recent years, they will have to find a way to deal with the fiery pace of Shaheen Shah Afridi, Haris Rauf and Naseem Shah and the crafty spin bowling of Abrar Ahmed and Salman Agha and a rock-solid batting line-up headlined by Babar Azam and Mohammed Rizwan.
Also, the absence of Jasprit Bumrah will give Pakistan an added motivation to go hard against India, who have an inexperienced fast-bowling line-up headlined by Mohammed Shami, the veteran who has just made a return from an injury that sidelined him for more than a year, and young Harshit Rana.
Sunday’s game might effectively decide the fate of the semi-finals of the Champions Trophy, and fans will be looking forward to a nail-biting encounter between the two arch-rivals.
Pakistan: Mohammad Rizwan (c), Babar Azam, Imam-ul-Haq, Kamran Ghulam, Saud Shakeel, Tayyab Tahir, Faheem Ashraf, Khushdil Shah, Salman Ali Agha, Usman Khan, Abrar Ahmed, Haris Rauf, Mohammad Hasnain, Naseem Shah, Shaheen Shah Afridi. (ANI)
Legendary former pacer Wasim Akram has strongly defended Pakistan’s squad, dismissing accusations of favouritism in team selection after their loss to New Zealand in the Champions Trophy opener on Wednesday at Karachi’s National Bank Stadium.
Speaking on a sports show alongside Cheteshwar Pujara and Nikhil Chopra, Akram affirmed that Pakistan’s current squad includes the country’s top players, refuting suggestions that selections were influenced by personal connections. “If I’m being honest, I’ll say this—these are our best players. If someone was better, they would’ve been selected. There’s no place for ‘parchi’ (favouritism) at this level,” Akram stated confidently.
Pakistan’s campaign has been dealt a blow with the injury of opening batter Fakhar Zaman, who has been ruled out of the tournament. Imam-ul-Haq has been called up to replace him for the remaining matches of the Champions Trophy.
Fakhar’s injury occurred while fielding against New Zealand when he fell awkwardly during the opening over. After a medical evaluation, it was confirmed that he would not be fit to continue, and the Event Technical Committee of the ICC Men’s Champions Trophy 2025 approved Imam-ul-Haq’s inclusion as a replacement.
Imam, who has been part of the Pakistan Shaheens squad, displayed good form recently with a stunning 98-run performance in a warm-up match against South Africa.
Pakistan’s tournament opener against New Zealand ended in a 60-run defeat, with Pakistan chasing a target of 321. Despite a valiant effort from Khushdil Shah (69 off 49) and Babar Azam (64 off 90), Pakistan were bowled out for 260. New Zealand’s century makers, Will Young and Tom Latham, along with a rapid 61 from Glenn Phillips, powered their team to a commanding win.
Now, Pakistan’s hopes of defending their title rest on their upcoming match against arch-rivals India, with the team needing a victory to stay alive in the tournament.
Updated Pakistan Squad for Champions Trophy: Mohammad Rizwan (c), Babar Azam, Imam-ul-Haq, Kamran Ghulam, Saud Shakeel, Tayyab Tahir, Faheem Ashraf, Khushdil Shah, Salman Ali Agha, Usman Khan, Abrar Ahmed, Haris Rauf, Mohammad Hasnain, Naseem Shah, Shaheen Shah Afridi.
In a further push to the local manufacturing, the entire iPhone 16 lineup, including the newly-launched iPhone 16e, is now being assembled in India for domestic market as well as for exports, as industry experts on Thursday cleared the air around the new device being compared to now-retired iPhone SE.
The new Apple device, with A18 chip, breakthrough battery life, Apple Intelligence, and a 48MP 2-in-1 camera system, is being manufactured/assembled for local consumption as well as for export to select countries.
According to experts, iPhone 16e is not iPhone SE4 and the whole “comparison is futile”.When iPhone SE was launched, it was another masterstroke at that time. However, times have changed since then.
“Essentially, Apple retired the SE lineup and extended the iPhone 16 lineup with a new entry point. iPhone SE was no longer adding any value to consumers, developers or Apple,” said Neil Shah, Partner and Co-Founder at Counterpoint Research.The iPhone SE which was positioned as a “Special Edition,” which brought nostalgia of older and smaller design, was priced around $400.
However, the iPhone SE lost its value and popularity, which used to be once 16 per cent of the total iPhone sales volumes, dropped to 1 per cent last year.
According to Shah, consumers now prefer better cameras, bigger displays and faster processors.“With all this background, what Apple did was to extend the 16 series with a newer ‘base version’ of iPhone 16 and now retired SE,” Shah explained.
According to industry experts, the company has done well with streamlining the series, reducing fragmentation in design and experience and able to charge $599 (US)/Rs 59,999 (India) with the newest entry point for the best Apple experiences.
Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, has once again captured the public’s heart with a touching new photograph of her and daughter Princess Lilibet. The image, shared recently, shows the pair walking hand-in-hand across a grassy field, both barefoot and dressed in white dresses. The serene moment was shared by Meghan alongside an exciting announcement about her latest business venture, As Ever.
A New Chapter: As Ever
In a video posted on her Instagram account earlier this week, Meghan introduced her new lifestyle brand, As Ever. The brand is described as a project she has been working on for some time, and one that she has poured her heart into. Meghan revealed that As Ever is not just a business, but a reflection of her personal journey and values.
Meghan explained the meaning behind the name As Ever, stating, “’As ever’ means ‘as it’s always been’ or some even say ‘in the same way as always’.” The brand will focus on lifestyle, wellness, and sustainable living, aligning with many of the causes Meghan has championed over the years, including environmentalism, mental health, and women’s empowerment.
The Sweet Photo of Meghan and Lilibet
The photograph of Meghan and Lilibet, featured on Meghan’s new website for As Ever, showcases a rare, intimate moment between the mother and daughter. The image is both simple and powerful, capturing the bond between the two as they share a peaceful moment outdoors. The sight of the barefoot duo walking hand-in-hand through a picturesque setting adds a personal and family-centered touch to the announcement.
This heartwarming photo comes at a time when Meghan has been making strides in both her professional and personal life, with her Netflix series set to launch in just a few weeks. The candid nature of the image provides a glimpse into her life beyond the public spotlight, offering a personal connection with her fans and followers.
A Vision for the Future
Meghan’s announcement of As Ever marks a significant step in her career after stepping back from royal duties with her husband, Prince Harry. Over the past few years, the couple has focused on various philanthropic initiatives, and Meghan’s new brand is poised to reflect her passion for creating positive change in the world. With the support of her family, including Lilibet, who is seen in the photo with her mother, Meghan’s venture is likely to resonate with many who admire her authenticity and commitment to causes close to her heart.
In addition to the launch of As Ever, Meghan also teased the upcoming release of her Netflix series. This series is expected to further explore themes of personal growth, well-being, and social impact, all of which align with the mission of her new brand.
A Bright Future Ahead
As Meghan embarks on this new chapter with As Ever, it’s clear that her vision extends beyond business. It’s a blend of her lifestyle, her values, and her commitment to making a difference. The heartwarming photo of Meghan and Lilibet serves as a reminder of the importance of family, connection, and the pursuit of passions that can have a meaningful impact on the world.
With a focus on authenticity and sustainability, As Ever seems poised to be a reflection of Meghan’s journey — one filled with love, purpose, and the support of her family. As she continues to grow in her professional and personal endeavors, Meghan’s fans are sure to be excited to see what’s next for her and her brand.
In the meantime, the photo of Meghan and Lilibet serves as a reminder of the simple joys in life and the importance of cherishing those moments with the ones we love.
Elon Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur and CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is no stranger to headlines. From his ambitious ventures in space exploration to his polarizing presence on social media, Musk has consistently been a figure of global fascination. However, recent claims by conservative US influencer Ashley St Clair have added a deeply personal and controversial dimension to his public persona. St Clair alleges that Musk is the father of her five-month-old child, which, if true, would make this his 13th child. This article delves into the details of the claim, the reactions it has sparked, and the broader implications for Musk’s personal and professional life.
The Claim: Ashley St Clair’s Bombshell Announcement
On a seemingly ordinary day, Ashley St Clair, a conservative influencer known for her political commentary, sent shockwaves across social media with a post on X (formerly Twitter). In her statement, St Clair revealed that she had given birth to a child five months prior and that Elon Musk was the father. She explained that she had kept this information private to protect her child’s privacy and safety but felt compelled to go public after learning that tabloid media intended to expose the story.
“Five months ago, I welcomed a new baby into the world. Elon Musk is the father. I have not previously disclosed this to protect our child’s privacy and safety, but in recent days, it has become clear that tabloid media intends to do so, regardless of the harm it will cause,” St Clair wrote.
The announcement immediately sparked a frenzy of speculation and debate. Musk, who is already the father of 12 children from previous relationships, has not publicly acknowledged the child or directly responded to St Clair’s claim. However, his reaction to a five-year-old post from St Clair, in which she joked about seeking his attention for a marriage proposal, added fuel to the fire. Musk simply commented, “Whoa,” leaving many to wonder whether this was an acknowledgment, a dismissal, or merely a reaction to the resurfaced post.
Who Is Ashley St Clair?
Ashley St Clair is a conservative political commentator and influencer with a significant following on social media. Known for her outspoken views and engagement in political discourse, St Clair has built a reputation as a vocal advocate for conservative causes. Her claim about Musk being the father of her child has thrust her into an even brighter spotlight, raising questions about her motivations and the nature of her relationship with the billionaire.
In an interview with the New York Post, St Clair provided additional details about her alleged relationship with Musk. She claimed that Musk had provided her with a luxurious apartment in New York’s Financial District and a security detail but denied any romantic involvement. According to St Clair, she spent her pregnancy alone and was asked to keep the pregnancy private. She also shared text messages exchanged with Jared Birchall, Musk’s money manager, which appear to show her compliance with Musk’s request to keep his name off the birth certificate for privacy and security reasons.
St Clair’s decision to go public, she said, was driven by the actions of a tabloid media outlet that began investigating the story. “I am sad that my hand was forced by the media to do this now. But there is also a sense of relief because I have been forced to live in secrecy for almost a year of my life,” she stated.
Elon Musk’s Reaction: Silence and Speculation
Elon Musk’s response to St Clair’s claim has been notably muted. Beyond his cryptic “Whoa” comment on the resurfaced post, Musk has not publicly addressed the allegation. This silence has led to widespread speculation about his involvement and the validity of St Clair’s claim.
Some observers have interpreted Musk’s lack of response as an indication that the claim may be unfounded or exaggerated. Others have suggested that his silence is a strategic move to avoid fueling further media attention. Musk, who is known for his active and often controversial presence on social media, has previously used the platform to address personal matters, making his silence in this instance particularly noteworthy.
The Social Media Frenzy
St Clair’s announcement has ignited a firestorm of discussion on social media. The claim has been met with a mix of skepticism, curiosity, and outrage. Some users have accused St Clair of orchestrating a calculated attempt to involve Musk, while others have expressed sympathy for her situation and called for respect for her privacy.
One X user, Milo, highlighted a five-year-old post in which St Clair joked about seeking Musk’s attention for a marriage proposal. “Ashley St Clair plotted for HALF A DECADE to ensnare Elon Musk,” Milo wrote, suggesting that the claim may be part of a long-term plan. St Clair responded by pointing out that Musk “goes through women pretty fast,” further fueling the debate.
Musk’s reaction to the resurfaced post—a single-word comment of “Whoa”—has been interpreted in various ways. Some see it as an acknowledgment of the claim, while others view it as a dismissive or sarcastic response. The ambiguity of Musk’s reaction has only added to the intrigue surrounding the story.
Privacy and Media Ethics
One of the central themes of this controversy is the issue of privacy. St Clair has emphasized that her decision to go public was motivated by a desire to protect her child from media scrutiny. “Kids should be off limits for journalists,” she wrote in a post announcing her decision to take a break from X. “Will be spending time with my family & logging off for a while.”
The role of tabloid media in forcing St Clair’s hand has also raised questions about media ethics. St Clair claims that she was compelled to reveal the information after learning that a tabloid outlet was planning to publish the story. This raises important questions about the balance between public interest and individual privacy, particularly when it involves children.
Elon Musk’s Growing Family
If St Clair’s claim is true, this would be Musk’s 13th child. Musk is already the father of 12 children from previous relationships, including his first son, Nevada Alexandar, with Canadian author Justine Wilson, and his son X Æ A-12 with musician Grimes. Musk’s large family has been a topic of public interest, particularly given his outspoken views on population growth and his belief in the importance of having children to ensure the future of humanity.
Musk’s approach to fatherhood has been unconventional, to say the least. He has spoken openly about his desire to have many children and has been involved in various controversies related to his personal life. The addition of a 13th child, if confirmed, would further cement Musk’s status as one of the most prolific fathers among the world’s elite.
The Broader Implications
The controversy surrounding St Clair’s claim has broader implications for Musk’s personal and professional life. As one of the most high-profile figures in the world, Musk’s actions and decisions are subject to intense scrutiny. A claim of this nature has the potential to impact his public image, particularly if it leads to legal or financial repercussions.
For St Clair, the announcement represents a significant moment in her life and career. While it has brought her increased attention, it has also exposed her to criticism and skepticism. Her decision to go public with the claim reflects the challenges faced by individuals navigating the intersection of personal privacy and public interest.
Conclusion
The claim that Elon Musk may have welcomed his 13th child with Ashley St Clair is a story that encapsulates the complexities of modern celebrity culture. It raises important questions about privacy, media ethics, and the responsibilities that come with immense wealth and influence. As the situation continues to unfold, it serves as a reminder of the human stories that often lie behind the headlines.
Whether or not the claim is ultimately proven true, it has already left an indelible mark on the public discourse surrounding Elon Musk. For now, the world watches and waits for further developments, as one of the most enigmatic figures of our time navigates yet another chapter in his extraordinary life.
