Deadly Clashes in Gaza: Hamas and Dughmush Clan Fight Leaves 27 Dead

Hamas and Dughmush

Background of the Dughmush Clan

The Dughmush clan, also spelled Doghmush, is based primarily in Gaza City’s Sabra neighborhood. Over the decades, the clan has developed deep ties with multiple Palestinian factions, including Hamas, Fatah, and the Army of Islam, an Al-Qaeda-affiliated group once led by Mumtaz Dughmush. Known for its strong local influence, the clan has a long history of violent clashes with Hamas, including a major confrontation in 2008 when a Hamas police officer was killed. That incident led to a Hamas raid on Dughmush strongholds, resulting in several clan fatalities.

The October 2025 Clashes

The recent outbreak of violence began when Hamas forces reportedly targeted a Dughmush stronghold near the Jordanian Hospital in Gaza City. The Dughmush clan alleges that Hamas exploited the ongoing ceasefire with Israel as a pretext to confront them, accusing some clan members of collaborating with Israel. Hamas officials, however, contend that Dughmush fighters ambushed Hamas operatives, killing two elite members and injuring five others.

Fighting quickly spread into Tel al-Hawa and other nearby areas, with heavy gunfire and localized street battles reported. According to eyewitnesses, the intense exchanges involved both armed clan members and Hamas security units, causing significant casualties and destruction.

Aftermath and Response

In the aftermath, the Hamas-controlled Interior Ministry moved to restore order, issuing warnings against unauthorized armed actions. Authorities also extended a limited amnesty to individuals previously involved in theft or looting, provided they did not participate in the recent clashes.

The violence has heightened concerns about internal security in Gaza, especially in light of the recent ceasefire with Israel. U.S. President Donald Trump publicly suggested that Hamas had been granted temporary authority to conduct internal security operations within the Gaza Strip, aiming to curb lawlessness and restore order after months of conflict.

Regional Implications

The clashes underscore the fragile stability of Gaza, where familial, political, and militant factions often intersect. Analysts warn that continued clashes between powerful local clans and Hamas could destabilize Gaza further, complicate humanitarian efforts, and risk reigniting broader conflict.

As the situation develops, the international community remains watchful, urging all parties to avoid further bloodshed and work toward maintaining the fragile ceasefire in the region.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

TLP Leader Syed Ahmed Shah Bukhari Killed in Muridke Clash During Pro-Palestine March in Punjab

TLP Leader Syed Ahmed Shah Bukhari Killed in Muridke Clash During Pro-Palestine March in Punjab

Syed Ahmad Shah Bukhari

Lahore, Oct 13: A senior leader of Tehreek-e-Labbaik Pakistan (TLP), Syed Ahmed Shah Bukhari, was killed on Monday in an encounter with Pakistani security forces during ongoing pro-Palestine demonstrations in Muridke, Punjab. The incident occurred amid violent clashes between TLP supporters and law Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel enforcement personnel as protesters attempted to march toward Islamabad in solidarity with Palestinians.

According to eyewitness accounts and statements from TLP’s central leadership, Bukhari—also referred to in some reports as Ahmad Bukhari—was shot dead when Rangers allegedly opened fire on protesters. TLP has described his death as a case of “martyrdom,” claiming that security forces used live ammunition against unarmed demonstrators. Videos circulating on social media show scenes of chaos, with gunfire, tear gas, and injured protesters being carried away.

The confrontation in Muridke marks one of the most violent episodes in the current wave of pro-Palestine protests that began on October 10, when TLP supporters launched a march from Lahore toward the capital. The party accuses the Pakistani government of failing to take a firm stance against Israel amid the ongoing Gaza conflict.

Muridke Massacre
Muridke Lahore Protest / Image Credit To/ Reuters

TLP sources claim that multiple protesters were killed and more than 50 injured in the Muridke clashes alone. The group has vowed to continue the march despite the government’s security crackdown and has branded the forces involved as “Israeli-backed agents.”

So far, Punjab Police have not issued an official statement regarding Bukhari’s killing. However, interior ministry sources have justified the use of force, arguing that the march posed a threat to law and order. Authorities have heavily fortified the route to Islamabad with barriers and shipping containers, attempting to prevent protesters from advancing further north.

The TLP’s latest confrontation adds to its long history of tense standoffs with the Pakistani state. Founded in 2015 following the execution of Mumtaz Qadri, the group has staged several violent protests in recent years, including deadly clashes in 2021 that forced government concessions.

Analysts warn that Bukhari’s death could spark further unrest across Punjab and other provinces, as the TLP leadership calls for nationwide sit-ins if their demands for stronger anti-Israel measures are not met.

As of Monday evening, negotiations between the government and TLP representatives were said to be underway, with officials seeking to defuse tensions and prevent another large-scale confrontation.

Taliban Reverses Ban on Women Journalists After Backlash During Muttaqi’s India Visit

Taliban

During Afghan Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s visit to India, a press conference at the Afghan Embassy excluded women journalists, despite their compliance with dress codes. This sparked outrage across Indian media, political leaders (e.g., Rahul Gandhi, Priyanka Gandhi), and activists, who criticized it as reflective of the Taliban’s gender-discriminatory policies. The Indian Ministry of External Affairs distanced itself, noting it was the Afghan Embassy’s decision.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel

Second Press Conference (October 12, 2025, New Delhi): Following intense criticism, a second “inclusive” press conference was held, allowing women journalists to participate. Over 50 journalists, including women, attended. Muttaqi faced tough questions on women’s rights, education bans in Afghanistan, and regional issues. He called the initial exclusion a “technical issue,” claimed education bans were “temporary,” and defended policies as “national traditions.” Critics noted contradictions with reports from UNESCO and human rights groups about severe restrictions on Afghan women.

Significance: The incident highlights how external pressure can push the Taliban to adjust, as seen in the inclusion of women journalists after backlash. However, it underscores the gap between their regional practices and universal Islamic principles of equality, as discussed previously.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Taliban Claims Killing 58 Pakistani Security Personnel in Border Clashes; Pakistan Condemns ‘Unprovoked’ Attacks

Afghan Taliban

Kabul, October 12, 2025 – In a press conference held in Kabul on Sunday, Afghan Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid claimed that 58 Pakistani security personnel were killed and 30 injured during a “retaliatory operation” along the Pakistan-Afghanistan border. The operation was allegedly in response to Pakistani airstrikes in Kabul and Paktika, which the Taliban labeled as a violation of Afghan sovereignty. Mujahid further stated that 20 Pakistani border posts were temporarily seized but returned after the fighting ceased. Nine Taliban fighters were reportedly killed and 16 injured in the clashes.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel

Pakistan’s military has not yet issued an official response to these claims. However, Pakistan’s Interior Minister Mohsin Naqvi condemned the Afghan attacks as “unprovoked” and a violation of international laws, citing firing on civilian populations. A Pakistani security source confirmed to the BBC that exchanges of fire occurred at multiple border points, including Angoor Adda, Bajaur, Kurram, Dir, Chitral, and Baramcha.

Background

The clashes are part of escalating tensions along the Durand Line, with both sides engaging in sporadic cross-border attacks since 2024. Pakistan accuses the Afghan Taliban of sheltering Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), which claimed responsibility for killing over 20 Pakistani security personnel in separate attacks in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa on October 11. The Taliban, in turn, accuses Pakistan of targeting its territory, including alleged airstrikes on October 8-10 in Kabul and Paktika aimed at TTP leaders.

Developments

  • October 11: Afghan Taliban launched attacks on Pakistani posts, claiming control over three posts in retaliation for Pakistan’s airstrikes.
  • October 12: Heavy overnight clashes led to Pakistan closing four border crossings, including Torkham and Chaman, disrupting trade and movement.
  • Afghan Defense Ministry: Acting Defense Minister Mullah Mohammad Yaqoob Mujahid warned that Afghanistan is prepared to defend its borders.

Regional Implications

The ongoing skirmishes threaten to further destabilize the region, with both sides reporting increasing casualties. The closure of border crossings has already impacted cross-border trade. Diplomatic efforts remain stalled, with Pakistan demanding action against TTP and Afghanistan rejecting claims of harboring militants.

This is a developing story, and further updates are expected as the situation evolves.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Taliban Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s Historic Visit to Darul Uloom Deoband Marks New Phase in India–Afghanistan Relations

Amir Khan Muttaqi

Amir Khan Muttaqi, the Acting Foreign Minister of Afghanistan’s Taliban-led government, made a significant visit to Darul Uloom Deoband, a renowned Islamic seminary in Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India. This visit, part of a six-day official trip to India from October 9 to October 16, marked a historic moment as the first high-level Taliban engagement in India since the group’s return to power in 2021. Facilitated by a temporary exemption from the UN Security Council’s Taliban Sanctions Committee, Muttaqi’s visit to Deoband highlighted the deep ideological and historical ties between Afghanistan and the Deobandi movement, while also signaling a new chapter in India-Afghanistan relations.

Background and Context

Muttaqi’s trip to India began on October 9, 2025, with his arrival in New Delhi, where he held high-level discussions with India’s External Affairs Minister, S. Jaishankar, on October 10. The talks focused on critical issues such as security, trade, counter-terrorism, and regional stability. India reiterated its stance that Afghan soil must not be used for terrorist activities, a concern rooted in the region’s complex security dynamics. In response, Muttaqi assured that the Taliban government was committed to preventing Afghanistan from becoming a haven for international terrorist groups. Addressing the media, he emphasized the Taliban’s vision of a “strong Islamic Emirate” free from external threats.

The visit to Darul Uloom Deoband on October 11 was a carefully planned stop, reflecting the seminary’s profound influence on Afghan religious and political thought. Founded in 1866, Darul Uloom Deoband is one of South Asia’s most prestigious Islamic institutions, known for shaping the Deobandi school of Sunni Islam. This movement, emphasizing Islamic reform, strict adherence to Hanafi jurisprudence, and anti-colonial resistance, has significantly influenced Afghanistan’s religious landscape. Many Taliban leaders, as well as scholars from seminaries like Darul Uloom Haqqania in Pakistan, trace their intellectual lineage to Deoband’s teachings. The institution is often referred to as the “spiritual center” (roohani markaz) for the Deobandi movement, making Muttaqi’s visit both symbolically and diplomatically significant.

Muttaqi framed the visit as an effort to “reconnect and restore historic ties” between Afghanistan and Deoband, distancing the Taliban from Pakistan’s Deobandi networks and asserting ideological independence. The visit was described as an act of “religious diplomacy,” underscoring the Taliban’s attempt to present themselves as legitimate heirs to a scholarly tradition rather than merely a militant group.

Details of the Visit

Arrival and Reception

Muttaqi arrived at Darul Uloom Deoband at approximately 11:00 AM IST on October 11, 2025, for a four-hour visit. He was warmly welcomed by the seminary’s leadership, including Rector Mufti Abul Qasim Nomani, the Mohtamim (chancellor), and Maulana Arshad Madani, President of Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, a prominent Deobandi-affiliated organization. The reception was marked by a sense of camaraderie, reflecting the long-standing educational and scholarly connections between Afghanistan and the institution. Maulana Arshad Madani referred to Deoband as the Taliban’s “Madar-e-Ilmi” (intellectual cradle), highlighting its role in shaping Afghan Islamic scholarship.

Interactions with Students and Faculty

During his visit, Muttaqi engaged with approximately 12 Afghan students enrolled in the Daura-e-Hadith program, a prestigious year-long course focused on advanced Hadith studies. These students represent a continuation of the historical flow of Afghan scholars to Deoband, a tradition dating back to the 19th century. Muttaqi’s interactions were described as cordial, with discussions centered on the importance of Islamic education and the role of Deoband in fostering scholarly exchange.

He also toured the seminary’s historic library, one of the largest repositories of Islamic manuscripts in South Asia, which houses rare texts on theology, jurisprudence, and Hadith. The visit to the library underscored the Taliban’s interest in reinforcing their scholarly credentials through association with Deoband’s intellectual legacy.

Public Address

At 3:00 PM IST, Muttaqi delivered a public address to an audience of students, faculty, and local community members. In his speech, he expressed gratitude for the warm hospitality and emphasized the shared history between Afghanistan and Darul Uloom Deoband. He voiced hope for increased Afghan student enrollment at the seminary, signaling a desire to strengthen educational ties. The address was well-received, with attendees noting Muttaqi’s focus on unity and mutual respect.

Security Arrangements

Given the high-profile and sensitive nature of the visit, extensive security measures were put in place. Local police, in coordination with intelligence agencies, deployed comprehensive security arrangements around the seminary. The presence of security personnel ensured a smooth and incident-free visit, reflecting India’s cautious approach to hosting a Taliban official.

Significance of the Visit

Historical and Ideological Ties

The visit to Darul Uloom Deoband holds profound significance due to the seminary’s historical influence on Afghanistan. Since its founding, Deoband has been a beacon of Islamic scholarship, attracting students from across the Muslim world, including Afghanistan. Afghan scholars who studied at Deoband in the 19th and 20th centuries played a key role in spreading Deobandi ideas, which later influenced the Taliban’s ideological framework. By visiting Deoband, Muttaqi sought to reaffirm these ties, positioning the Taliban as a movement rooted in scholarly tradition rather than solely in militancy.

The visit also served to distinguish the Taliban’s Afghan identity from Pakistan’s Deobandi networks, particularly seminaries like Darul Uloom Haqqania, often dubbed the “Taliban’s university.” By engaging directly with Deoband, the Taliban signaled a desire to reclaim their intellectual heritage independently of Pakistani influence.

Diplomatic Implications

Muttaqi’s visit is a milestone in India-Afghanistan relations, which have been cautious but pragmatic since the Taliban’s 2021 takeover. India has provided humanitarian aid to Afghanistan, including food, medicine, and educational support, but has stopped short of formally recognizing the Taliban government. The Deoband visit offers India an opportunity for “theological engagement,” a soft-power approach to influence Taliban policies, particularly on contentious issues like women’s rights and governance inclusivity.

However, the visit has sparked debate in India. Supporters view it as a pragmatic step to engage with Afghanistan’s de facto government and secure India’s regional interests, especially in countering terrorism. Critics, however, argue that hosting a Taliban official risks legitimizing a regime with a controversial human rights record, particularly its restrictions on women’s education and employment.

Regional and Global Context

The visit comes amid growing international pressure on the Taliban to moderate its policies. Countries like India, China, and Russia have engaged with the Taliban to varying degrees, driven by strategic interests in regional stability and counter-terrorism. Muttaqi’s visit to Deoband, coupled with his meetings in New Delhi, reflects the Taliban’s efforts to gain international legitimacy while maintaining their Islamic identity.

Post-Deoband Itinerary

Following the Deoband visit, Muttaqi’s itinerary included a visit to the Taj Mahal in Agra on October 12, 2025, showcasing India’s cultural heritage. On October 13, he was scheduled to engage with Indian business leaders through the Federation of Indian Chambers of Commerce and Industry (FICCI) to explore trade opportunities. Additional engagements included addresses at think tanks like the Vivekananda International Foundation and meetings with Afghan diaspora communities in India, underscoring the multifaceted nature of his trip.

Public and Media Reactions

Recent posts on X captured live footage of Muttaqi’s arrival at Darul Uloom Deoband, with clips showing a warm reception and excerpts from his address. Indian media outlets reported mixed reactions, with some praising the visit as a bold diplomatic move and others questioning its implications. Afghan diaspora members expressed cautious optimism, hoping the visit would foster educational exchanges and improve bilateral ties.

Conclusion

Mawlawi Amir Khan Muttaqi’s visit to Darul Uloom Deoband on October 11, 2025, was a landmark event, blending religious diplomacy with strategic outreach. By reconnecting with the intellectual cradle of the Deobandi movement, the Taliban sought to reinforce their scholarly legitimacy while strengthening ties with India. For India, the visit offered a chance to engage with Afghanistan’s leadership through a unique lens of shared history and ideology. As the Taliban navigates global isolation and India balances pragmatic diplomacy with domestic concerns, the Deoband visit will likely remain a pivotal moment in shaping future bilateral relations.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Taliban FM Amir Khan Muttaqi’s India Visit Marks Major Diplomatic Shift Amid Strained Pakistan Ties

Taliban FM Amir Khan Muttaqi

On October 9, 2025, Taliban Acting Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi arrived in New Delhi for an eight-day visit, marking the highest-level engagement between India and the Taliban regime since the group’s return to power in August 2021. This trip, facilitated by a temporary UN Security Council waiver exempting Muttaqi from long-standing sanctions, came on the heels of his participation in the Moscow Format talks and underscored a significant thaw in India-Afghanistan relations. Amid escalating tensions with Pakistan, including Pakistani airstrikes on Afghan soil just hours before key meetings, Muttaqi’s statements from Indian territory delivered a pointed rebuke to Islamabad on cross-border terrorism. This analysis delves into the visit’s context, key developments, and broader implications, drawing on strategic, security, and geopolitical lenses to explore how this engagement reshapes South Asian dynamics.

Afghan Diplomacy: Taliban Vows No Threat to India

Background: From Hostility to Pragmatic Engagement

India’s relationship with the Taliban has historically been fraught with suspicion. During the Taliban’s first rule (1996-2001), India viewed the group as a Pakistani proxy, particularly after events like the 1999 IC-814 hijacking and the sheltering of anti-India militants such as Al Qaeda. Post-2001, India invested over $3 billion in the US-backed Afghan Republic, supporting infrastructure and development while aligning against the Taliban insurgency. The 2021 Taliban takeover prompted India to evacuate its personnel and close its embassy in Kabul, halting visa issuances due to security fears.

However, realpolitik has driven a gradual reset. By June 2022, India reopened a technical mission in Kabul to manage humanitarian aid, and unannounced visits by Taliban officials to Delhi built trust. Key milestones included a January 2025 meeting in Dubai between Muttaqi and India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri, and India’s response to the April 2025 Pahalgam terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir, where the Taliban condemned the incident—a rare alignment that facilitated deeper dialogue. The September 2025 earthquake in Afghanistan further accelerated ties, with India delivering aid via Iran’s Chabahar port, positioning itself as Kabul’s “first responder.”

Meanwhile, Taliban-Pakistan relations have soured dramatically. Once close allies, the two now trade accusations: Pakistan blames the Taliban for harboring Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) militants, leading to airstrikes, while the Taliban counters that Islamabad seeks to destabilize Afghanistan. This rift has created space for the Taliban to diversify partnerships, hedging against over-reliance on Pakistan and seeking legitimacy from neighbors like India.

Key Events of the Visit

Muttaqi’s itinerary included bilateral talks with External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar on October 10, focusing on diplomatic, trade, economic, and regional issues. In a joint press conference, Jaishankar announced India’s decision to upgrade its Kabul mission to a full embassy, signaling de facto engagement without formal recognition. Muttaqi hailed India as a “close friend,” emphasizing mutual respect, trade, and people-to-people ties, and proposed a consultative mechanism for stronger relations. He also suggested joint India-Afghanistan-US talks to address trade barriers, such as tariffs imposed by US President Donald Trump.

The visit extended beyond Delhi, with Muttaqi scheduled to meet Indian business leaders, visit the Taj Mahal, and tour the Darul Uloom Deoband seminary in Uttar Pradesh—a nod to cultural and religious linkages. Notably, Pakistan’s airstrikes on alleged TTP hideouts in Kabul, killing 30 militants just before the Jaishankar-Muttaqi meeting, added urgency to discussions on security.

Muttaqi’s Message on Terrorism: A Veiled Warning to Pakistan

The visit’s centerpiece was Muttaqi’s assurances on counterterrorism, framed as a direct swipe at Pakistan. He asserted that the Taliban has “eliminated all terror groups” from Afghan soil over the past four years, including Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammad (JeM), claiming “not a single one of them is in Afghanistan” and that “not an inch of land is controlled by them.” Muttaqi urged other countries—implicitly Pakistan—to “act against such terror groups like Afghanistan did for peace.”

In a stern warning, he stated: “The courage of Afghans should not be tested. If someone wants to do this, they should ask the Soviet Union, America, and NATO, so they can explain that it is not good to play games with Afghanistan.” He accused Pakistan of a recent border blast and airstrikes, calling them “wrong” and “provocative,” and emphasized that problems cannot be resolved through violence. Jaishankar echoed this, labeling cross-border terrorism a “shared threat” and subtly referencing Pakistan’s occupation of Kashmir by calling Afghanistan a “contiguous neighbor.”

Security Implications: Countering Threats Amid Distrust

At its core, the visit addresses India’s security concerns over Afghanistan-based militants targeting its interests, particularly in Kashmir. The Taliban’s pledges align with India’s priorities, as evidenced by their condemnation of the Pahalgam attack and assurances against groups like ISKP, Al Qaeda, AQIS, LeT, and JeM. Experts note this as a “convergence of security interests,” where India prioritizes pragmatism over ideological differences, such as the Taliban’s restrictions on women and minorities.

For Pakistan, Muttaqi’s rhetoric exposes vulnerabilities: Islamabad’s accusations against Kabul for TTP safe havens are countered by Taliban claims of Pakistani-sponsored destabilization. This could escalate border clashes, with Pakistan’s Defense Minister warning that “patience has run out.” Substantiated reports of internal Taliban fissures—pro- and anti-Pakistan factions—add complexity, potentially spilling over into regional instability.

Economic and Trade Aspects: Opening Routes for Growth

Economically, the visit pushes for open trade corridors, including via Chabahar port, to boost bilateral trade. Muttaqi reiterated demands for more visas, investments, and resumed infrastructure projects, while India eyes Afghanistan’s mineral reserves. This aligns with regional frameworks like the Moscow Format, promoting Afghan participation in economic projects to counter China-Pakistan influence via the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC).

AspectIndia-Afghanistan BenefitsChallenges for Pakistan
Trade RoutesEnhanced access via Chabahar; joint US talks on tariffs.Reduced leverage over Afghan transit; counters CPEC dominance.
Aid & InvestmentHumanitarian support (e.g., earthquake relief); mineral exploration.Isolation amid refugee deportations and border closures.
ConnectivityLinks to Central Asia; people-to-people ties.Heightened competition in regional trade hubs.

Geopolitical Ramifications: A Shift in Alliances

Geopolitically, the visit signals the Taliban’s quest for legitimacy, with Russia as the first to grant de jure recognition in July 2025, followed by engagements from China, Iran, and Central Asia. For India, it counters Chinese and Pakistani influence, secures borders, and integrates Afghanistan into South-Central Asian connectivity. Analysts like Brahma Chellaney describe it as a “cautious reset,” prioritizing strategic interests over values.

Pakistan faces isolation: the Taliban’s independence challenges its historical control, potentially opening avenues for Indian support to anti-Pakistan elements like TTP or BLA, though unsubstantiated. Broader effects include messages to the US (opposing military bases) and a multipolar shift, with India hedging against US-Pakistan realignment under Trump.

Challenges and Criticisms: Balancing Pragmatism with Principles

Critics highlight risks: the Taliban’s unreliability on women’s rights and minorities could undermine long-term ties, and India’s engagement might tacitly legitimize the regime without formal recognition. Domestically, it contrasts with past arrests of Indian Muslims for Taliban sympathies, drawing irony from opposition figures. For the Taliban, over-engagement with India risks alienating Pakistan and China.

In conclusion, Muttaqi’s visit represents a calculated convergence of interests, with his anti-terrorism message isolating Pakistan while advancing India-Afghanistan ties. This could foster regional stability if sustained, but hinges on verifiable actions against militants and economic deliverables. As one expert notes, it’s a “setback for Pakistan,” reshaping alliances in a volatile neighborhood.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Noor Wali Mehsud TTP Leader Reportedly Killed in Kabul Airstrike: Pakistan’s Bold Cross-Border Strike Shakes Region

Noor Wali Mehsud

As of October 10, 2025, multiple media outlets and social media reports indicate that Noor Wali Mehsud, the leader of the Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) since 2018, was targeted and possibly killed in an airstrike in Kabul, Afghanistan, on the night of October 9. The strike is widely attributed to Pakistani forces, marking a rare and bold cross-border operation deep into Afghan territory. However, confirmation remains unverified, with no official statements from Pakistani or Taliban authorities, and some conflicting claims emerging.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel

Key Details from Reports:

  • Location and Nature of the Strike: Explosions were reported near Abdul Haq Square in central Kabul. Sources describe it as a precision drone or fighter jet airstrike targeting a vehicle carrying Mehsud and potential TTP successors, including Qari Saifullah Mehsud and Khalid Mehsud. Eyewitnesses noted the vehicle was severely damaged, with Mehsud reportedly moving freely inside at the time.
  • Casualties and Status: Initial reports from Afghan media and security analysts claim Mehsud was killed, along with his bodyguard and deputies. However, some updates suggest all three survived, describing it as a “major miss” for Pakistan. No civilian casualties have been confirmed, but the strike’s urban location raises concerns.
  • Context and Timing: The operation occurs amid escalating Pakistan-Afghanistan tensions over TTP safe havens in Afghanistan. It coincides with the Taliban acting foreign minister’s visit to India, interpreted by analysts as a strategic signal from Pakistan to both Kabul and New Delhi. Mehsud, born in 1978 in South Waziristan, Pakistan, has a $5 million U.S. bounty on his head for orchestrating attacks on Pakistani forces and civilians.

Official Responses:

  • Pakistan: No comment from military or government sources, though Pakistani media outlets are aggressively reporting the strike as a success.
  • Taliban/Afghanistan: Investigations are underway, but no public statement has been issued. Taliban-affiliated channels warn of potential retaliation, including suicide bombings in Pakistan.
  • TTP: Silent so far, which could indicate disarray if the strike succeeded.

Broader Implications:

This incident represents the first reported Pakistani airstrike inside Kabul, potentially heightening regional instability. If confirmed, Mehsud’s death could fracture TTP leadership and reduce attacks on Pakistan, but it risks broader Taliban-Pakistan conflict. Analysts note past unconfirmed reports of Mehsud’s death (e.g., in 2021 drone strikes), urging caution.

Updates are evolving rapidly; monitoring official channels is recommended for verification.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Former Pakistani Senator Mushtaq Ahmad Khan Freed from Israeli Custody After Gaza Aid Mission Arrest

Senator Mushtaq Ahmad Khan

Former Pakistani senator Mushtaq Ahmad Khan has been released from Israeli detention after being arrested while participating in the Global Sumud Flotilla, a humanitarian convoy attempting to deliver aid to Gaza through the Mediterranean Sea.Click Here To Follow Our WhatsApp Channel

The flotilla, carrying 479 international activists, was intercepted by Israeli forces around 6–7 October 2025. Among those detained were prominent climate activist Greta Thunberg and several others from different countries.

According to reports, Israel accused the flotilla of supporting Hamas and detained many of its participants. Greta Thunberg and 341 activists were deported on 6 October, while Mushtaq Ahmad Khan was freed a day later. He is now safe at the Pakistani Embassy in Amman, Jordan, and is expected to return to Pakistan soon.

Pakistan’s Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar confirmed Khan’s release on X (formerly Twitter), thanking friendly nations for their support in diplomatic efforts to secure his freedom.

Claims of Mistreatment in Israeli Custody

After his release, Mushtaq Ahmad Khan shared a video message describing the harsh conditions faced by detainees. He alleged that more than 150 activists were tortured, with dogs set upon them, and that they were chained, beaten, and psychologically abused during detention.

He called the prison conditions “inhumane and degrading” and accused Israeli authorities of committing serious human rights violations. The video was recorded in Jordan, where Khan vowed to continue supporting the freedom of Palestine and the protection of Al-Aqsa Mosque.

Greta Thunberg’s Reaction

Greta Thunberg, who was released earlier, criticised world governments for what she described as “complicity in Israeli aggression.” She shared her experience of detention but did not confirm reports of physical abuse involving dogs or chaining.

Pakistan’s Diplomatic Response

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs said that Pakistan had been in close contact with Israeli and Jordanian authorities through diplomatic channels. The ministry confirmed that efforts are now underway to arrange Khan’s return to Pakistan.

This incident has renewed global attention on Israel’s treatment of humanitarian activists and ongoing human rights concerns linked to the Gaza conflict.


Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Trump Again Claims Credit for Ending India-Pakistan Crisis Through Trade and Tariffs

Trump Threatens Iran

US President Donald Trump has once again claimed that he personally ended the India-Pakistan crisis following Operation Sindoor through the power of trade and tariffs. His latest comments came on Monday (local time) during a public address, where he said that his trade policies helped stop several global conflicts — including the one between India and Pakistan.

Trump’s Latest Statement

Speaking at an event, Trump said, “We’re a rich country again, we’re a powerful country because, you know, I’ve ended seven wars, at least half of them were because of my ability at trade and because of tariffs.”
He continued, “If I didn’t have the power of tariffs, you would have at least four of the seven wars raging. If you look at India and Pakistan, they were ready to go at it. Seven planes were shot down… I don’t want to say exactly what I said, but what I said was very effective. Not only did we make hundreds of billions of dollars, but we’re a peacekeeper because of tariffs.”

Trump also mentioned that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney would soon visit the United States, likely to discuss tariffs. He said, “A lot of companies are leaving Canada, Mexico, and even China to come into the US. Nobody’s seen anything like it.”

Repeated Claims About Ending Conflicts

This is not the first time Trump has made such claims. On September 21, during the American Cornerstone Institute Founder’s Dinner, Trump again said that he stopped wars between several countries, including India and Pakistan, Thailand and Cambodia. He stated, “We are forging peace agreements and stopping wars. Think of India and Pakistan — and you know how I stopped that? With trade. They want to trade. I have great respect for both leaders. But when you take a look at all of these wars we’ve stopped…”

He went on to list other countries he said he influenced toward peace, such as Armenia and Azerbaijan, Kosovo and Serbia, Israel and Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia, and Rwanda and Congo. “We stopped all of them. And 60 percent of them were stopped because of trade,” Trump claimed.

India’s Official Response

However, India’s Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) has repeatedly rejected Trump’s statements. Indian officials have clarified multiple times that there was no foreign intervention or mediation in any conflict or operation between India and Pakistan.
Following Trump’s earlier comments in September, MEA officials stated that India’s position has always been clear — all matters with Pakistan are to be handled bilaterally, without third-party involvement.

Background: Operation Sindoor

Operation Sindoor refers to a major Indian military operation earlier this year, which escalated tensions between India and Pakistan. Several military and diplomatic exchanges followed, drawing international attention. Despite global concern, both countries managed to prevent the conflict from spreading further. Trump’s recent remarks appear to link this de-escalation to his trade-based diplomacy, though no evidence supports this claim.

Trump’s Broader Narrative

Throughout his presidency and campaign speeches, Trump has often highlighted his role as a global dealmaker and peacekeeper. He frequently argues that his trade tariffs and economic policies give the United States leverage to influence world peace.
By linking trade power to peace agreements, Trump aims to portray his administration as one that achieved both economic and diplomatic victories.

Critics Question the Claim

Experts and diplomats have questioned Trump’s repeated claims, calling them exaggerated and politically motivated. Analysts say that while trade discussions can support diplomacy, there is no verified record showing that US tariffs directly ended the India-Pakistan conflict.
Many believe Trump’s statements are part of his ongoing effort to build his foreign policy image ahead of the next election.

Conclusion

While President Trump continues to take credit for ending the India-Pakistan crisis through trade and tariffs, India has firmly denied any such involvement. His comments, repeated several times in recent weeks, have once again stirred debate about his claims and their accuracy.
For now, India maintains that peace and stability in South Asia depend on bilateral dialogue — not third-party mediation or trade pressure from abroad.

Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes

A Reflection on Surat-al-Ankabut : Faith, Effort, and the Delusion of Self-Sufficiency

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home

Hamas Signals Support for Trump’s Gaza Ceasefire Plan, Hostage Deal, and Transitional Governance

Hamas

Hamas has expressed conditional agreement to key elements of U.S. President Donald Trump’s 20-point ceasefire plan for Gaza, announced on October 1 during a White House meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. The plan seeks to halt the nearly two-year conflict sparked by Hamas’s October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed approximately 1,200 people and took 251 hostages.

Key Points of Trump’s Ceasefire Plan

  • Immediate ceasefire to halt hostilities.
  • Release of all 48 remaining Israeli hostages (20 believed alive) in exchange for Palestinian prisoners, including 250 serving life sentences and 1,700 detained since the war began.
  • Phased Israeli withdrawal from Gaza.
  • Disarmament of Hamas.
  • Establishment of a transitional international-led government for Gaza.
  • Increased humanitarian aid to address Gaza’s crisis.

Hamas’s Response

On October 3, Hamas announced it would:

  • Release all hostages (alive or dead) within 72 hours, contingent on “field conditions” allowing safe extraction amid ongoing fighting.
  • Support an immediate ceasefire and end to hostilities.
  • Step back from governing Gaza, favoring a technocratic or international administration.

However, Hamas rejected or sought further negotiations on:

  • Disarmament, insisting it will not occur until Israel’s “occupation” of Gaza ends completely.
  • Full Israeli withdrawal and guarantees for Palestinian rights, to be discussed within a “unified Palestinian national framework.”
  • Other unspecified elements, including the scope of prisoner releases and Gaza’s long-term political future.

A senior Hamas official told Al Jazeera that disarmament is non-negotiable without an end to Israel’s blockade and occupation, though the group described its response as “constructive.”

International and Regional Reactions

  • United States: President Trump called Hamas’s response a sign they are “ready for a lasting peace,” ordering Israel to halt Gaza bombings immediately to facilitate hostage releases. He set a deadline of 6 p.m. ET on Sunday, October 5, warning of severe consequences if unmet. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt described it as a “significant opportunity.”
  • Israel: Netanyahu’s office indicated readiness to implement the first phase (hostage release and ceasefire) but has not fully endorsed the plan. Israeli strikes continued in Gaza on October 3–4, including near al-Shifa Hospital, drawing criticism.
  • Qatar and Egypt: As key mediators, both nations welcomed the development and are coordinating with the U.S. to advance talks.
  • United Nations: Secretary-General António Guterres urged all parties to “seize the opportunity” for peace.
  • United Kingdom: Prime Minister Keir Starmer called it a “significant step forwards,” demanding swift implementation.
  • France: President Emmanuel Macron stated that a ceasefire and hostage release are “within reach.”
  • Germany: Chancellor Friedrich Merz described it as the “best chance for peace” in nearly two years.
  • Turkey: President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan labeled it a “constructive step” but demanded Israel commit to a two-state solution.

Current Developments

Negotiations continue through mediators, with optimism for progress on hostage releases and humanitarian aid. However, challenges remain, particularly regarding Hamas’s refusal to disarm and the ongoing Israeli military operations. Analysts suggest Trump’s influence over Netanyahu could be pivotal, though internal divisions within Hamas may delay progress. As of October 4, no final agreement has been reached, but the talks represent a potential breakthrough in the protracted conflict.

Shah Faesal: Kashmiri IAS Officer’s Journey of Courage, Change, and Commitment to Bandipora

After Three Weeks of Restrictions, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq Addresses Congregation at Jama Masjid

Mehbooba Mufti Criticizes Government for Criminalizing Kashmiris, Condemns Seizure of Geelani’s Widow’s Home