Saudi Arabia’s Skill-Based Work Permit System: A Strategic Leap Towards Vision 2030

Work Permit System

Saudi Arabia has embarked on a transformative journey with the introduction of a skill-based work permit system for expatriates, a pivotal reform under the ambitious Vision 2030 and the National Transformation Program. Announced by the Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development (HRSD), this system categorizes expatriate workers into three tiers—high-skill, skilled, and basic—based on criteria such as educational qualifications, professional experience, technical skills, wage levels, and age. Effective for existing workers from June 18, 2025, and for new arrivals from July 1, 2025, with full implementation for new expatriates by August 3, 2025, this initiative aims to modernize the labor market, attract global talent, and support the Kingdom’s mega-projects like NEOM, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, and Diriyah Gate. This article explores the intricacies of the new system, its alignment with national goals, implications for expatriates and employers, and its role in reshaping Saudi Arabia’s economic landscape.

Background: Vision 2030 and the Need for Labor Market Reform

Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, launched in 2016, is a blueprint for economic diversification, aiming to reduce the Kingdom’s reliance on oil by fostering growth in sectors like tourism, technology, entertainment, and innovation. The National Transformation Program, a key pillar of Vision 2030, focuses on enhancing human capital, improving labor market efficiency, and aligning workforce skills with global standards. With expatriates comprising 44.4% of the population and playing a significant role in sectors like construction, technology, and tourism, the labor market has historically relied heavily on foreign workers. However, the traditional work permit system, centered around the iqama (residency permit), treated all expatriates uniformly, regardless of their skills or expertise, leading to inefficiencies and skill mismatches.

The new skill-based work permit system addresses these challenges by introducing a structured framework to categorize workers based on their qualifications and contributions. This reform is designed to attract high-caliber professionals for giga-projects, reduce dependence on low-skilled labor, and enhance the Kingdom’s global competitiveness. It also aligns with Saudization goals, which prioritize local employment while ensuring expatriates meet specific competency standards.

The Skill-Based Work Permit System: Key Features

The HRSD’s new system classifies expatriate work permits into three categories: high-skill, skilled, and basic. This classification is determined by a points-based system evaluating five key criteria:

  1. Educational Qualifications: Higher academic credentials, such as advanced degrees, are weighted favorably, particularly for high-skill roles in fields like AI, data science, and engineering.
  2. Professional Experience: Relevant work experience, especially in specialized sectors, is a critical factor, allowing flexibility for candidates with practical expertise but lower formal education.
  3. Technical Skills: Specific skills, verified through the Professional Verification Program, ensure alignment with job requirements, particularly for technical roles in projects like NEOM.
  4. Wage Levels: Salary thresholds reflect the value of the role, with high-skill positions commanding higher wages, incentivizing top talent.
  5. Age: Younger workers may receive preference in certain categories, though the system allows exceptions for experienced professionals. Notably, workers over 60 in the basic category may face restrictions.

The system is managed through the Qiwa platform, a digital tool by HRSD that streamlines permit processing, job title verification, and compliance with the Saudi Standard Classification of Occupations (SSCO). Employers must ensure that job titles match actual duties and submit classifications via Qiwa, which supports transparency and efficiency. The system also incorporates skill verification tests to validate competencies, ensuring workers meet international standards.

Implementation Timeline

  • June 18, 2025: Classification and system upgrades began for existing expatriate workers.
  • July 1, 2025: The system took effect for new expatriates entering Saudi Arabia.
  • August 3, 2025: Full implementation for all new expatriate workers, with employers required to update records for existing workers by this date.

Alignment with Vision 2030 and Mega-Projects

The skill-based work permit system is intricately tied to Vision 2030’s goal of economic diversification. By prioritizing high-skill and skilled workers, Saudi Arabia aims to build a knowledge-based economy capable of supporting its ambitious giga-projects:

  • NEOM: A $500 billion futuristic city powered by AI and clean energy, NEOM requires professionals in technology, sustainability, and urban planning. The new system ensures that only qualified experts are recruited, reducing skill mismatches.
  • Qiddiya: Envisioned as a global hub for culture, entertainment, and sports, Qiddiya demands creative and technical talent to develop immersive experiences. The permit system facilitates the hiring of specialists in these fields.
  • The Red Sea Project: This eco-luxury tourism initiative relies on expertise in sustainable development and hospitality, areas where the new system prioritizes high-skill professionals.
  • Diriyah Gate: Focused on restoring Saudi Arabia’s historical roots, this project requires architects, historians, and cultural experts, supported by the system’s emphasis on specialized skills.

These projects are not merely construction efforts but transformative initiatives that integrate technology, sustainability, and cultural identity. The skill-based system ensures that the workforce aligns with these goals, fostering innovation and global competitiveness.

Implications for Expatriates

For expatriates, the new system introduces both opportunities and challenges. The emphasis on skills and qualifications opens doors for professionals in high-demand fields, particularly those with expertise in AI, data science, engineering, and tourism. The points-based system allows flexibility, enabling workers with significant experience to qualify for higher tiers even without advanced degrees. However, expatriates must ensure their qualifications, certifications, and job roles are accurately documented and verified through the Qiwa platform.

Opportunities

  • Career Advancement: High-skill and skilled workers can access roles in prestigious projects, enhancing career prospects in a competitive market.
  • Job Mobility: The system builds on previous Vision 2030 reforms that relaxed exit visa restrictions and improved job mobility, allowing expatriates to switch employers more easily.
  • Global Appeal: By aligning with international labor standards, Saudi Arabia positions itself as an attractive destination for professionals seeking long-term opportunities.

Challenges

  • Increased Scrutiny: Expatriates’ qualifications and work history will face greater scrutiny, requiring up-to-date certifications and accurate job role documentation.
  • Age Restrictions: Workers over 60 in the basic category may face job restrictions, potentially limiting opportunities for older low-skilled workers.
  • Compliance: Expatriates must navigate the Qiwa platform and ensure compliance with verification tests, which may pose challenges for those unfamiliar with digital systems.

Expatriates are advised to update their professional credentials, obtain necessary certifications, and verify their job roles to align with the new standards. The HRSD’s comprehensive guide, available on its website, provides detailed instructions to facilitate this process.

Implications for Employers

Employers in Saudi Arabia face significant responsibilities under the new system. They must assess their foreign workforce, ensure job titles align with actual duties, and submit classifications through the Qiwa platform by August 3, 2025. This process involves:

  • Job Title Alignment: Employers must verify that job titles match the SSCO and reflect workers’ actual roles, reducing discrepancies that could lead to penalties during inspections.
  • Skill Verification: Workers may need to pass skill verification tests, requiring employers to invest in training or documentation to meet standards.
  • Compliance with Saudization: The system complements Saudization goals, requiring employers to balance local hiring with the recruitment of high-skill expatriates for specialized roles.

While the system increases administrative burdens, it also offers benefits. By prioritizing skilled workers, employers can access a more competent workforce, enhancing productivity and innovation. The digital Qiwa platform streamlines compliance, reducing manual processes and improving transparency.

Economic and Social Impact

The skill-based work permit system is a strategic move to enhance Saudi Arabia’s labor market efficiency and global competitiveness. Key impacts include:

  • Economic Diversification: By attracting high-skill professionals, the system supports growth in non-oil sectors like technology, tourism, and entertainment, reducing reliance on oil revenues. In Q1 2025, international tourism revenue reached $13.16 billion, reflecting the success of Vision 2030’s focus on tourism.
  • Workforce Efficiency: The system addresses skill mismatches, ensuring that workers’ qualifications align with job requirements, boosting productivity.
  • Global Talent Attraction: By aligning with international standards, Saudi Arabia becomes a magnet for global talent, particularly for projects like NEOM and Qiddiya.
  • Saudization Support: The system complements efforts to prioritize local employment, with initiatives like the “One Million Saudis in AI” program training 334,000 citizens in digital skills.
  • Social Integration: By fostering a skilled workforce, the system promotes knowledge transfer, enabling expatriates to teach Saudis skills like data science and AI engineering, as noted by HRSD.

The system also supports Saudi Arabia’s broader social goals, such as improving digital literacy and building a tech-enabled knowledge economy. By modernizing the labor market, the Kingdom aims to create a more inclusive and competitive environment.

Comparison with Regional Trends

Saudi Arabia’s skill-based system aligns with broader Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) trends toward workforce nationalization and skill-based reforms. For example, Qatar’s new labor law, part of Qatar National Vision 2030, prioritizes local hiring in the private sector, with strict compliance measures like fines and visa blocks. While Qatar focuses on reducing reliance on foreign labor, Saudi Arabia’s system balances local employment with the strategic recruitment of global talent, reflecting a dual approach to nationalization and globalization.

The UAE has also introduced AI-driven strategic planning for its 2031 Vision, emphasizing technology and innovation. Saudi Arabia’s focus on skill-based permits complements these regional efforts, positioning the Kingdom as a leader in labor market modernization.

Challenges and Future Considerations

While the skill-based work permit system is a significant step forward, it faces potential challenges:

  • Implementation Complexity: The transition to a points-based system requires robust digital infrastructure and employer compliance, which may strain smaller businesses.
  • Skill Verification: Ensuring accurate skill assessments across diverse professions is complex, particularly for roles requiring niche expertise.
  • Expatriate Adaptation: Workers unfamiliar with digital platforms or verification processes may struggle to comply, necessitating support from HRSD.
  • Balancing Saudization: The system must balance the influx of high-skill expatriates with opportunities for local workers, avoiding tensions in the labor market.

Future considerations include expanding training programs to upskill both expatriates and Saudis, enhancing the Qiwa platform’s user-friendliness, and continuously updating classification criteria to reflect evolving industry needs. The HRSD’s commitment to publishing detailed guidance and leveraging digital tools suggests a proactive approach to addressing these challenges.

Conclusion

Saudi Arabia’s skill-based work permit system marks a bold step toward modernizing its labor market and achieving Vision 2030’s ambitious goals. By categorizing expatriates into high-skill, skilled, and basic tiers, the system ensures that the workforce aligns with the Kingdom’s economic diversification objectives, particularly for transformative projects like NEOM, Qiddiya, the Red Sea Project, and Diriyah Gate. While expatriates and employers face new responsibilities, the system offers significant opportunities for career advancement, workforce efficiency, and global competitiveness. As Saudi Arabia continues to refine its labor policies and invest in human capital, the skill-based work permit system positions the Kingdom as a hub for innovation and talent, paving the way for a dynamic, future-ready economy.

Linda Yaccarino Resigns as CEO of X, Calls Tenure a “Lifetime Opportunity”

Omar Abdullah Revives SKICC & JKTDC Boards, Orders Big Reforms to Boost Tourism

Jammu Police Recovers ₹75 Lakh in Job Scam, Marks First BNSS Property Attachment in India

Bihar Man Mithlesh Kumar Mukhiya Brutally Thrashed, Forced to Marry Aunt Over Alleged Affair

Linda Yaccarino Resigns as CEO of X, Calls Tenure a “Lifetime Opportunity”

Linda Yaccarino

Linda Yaccarino has resigned as CEO of Elon Musk-owned X.

The former NBCUniversal ad sales executive announced her decision on Wednesday via a post on social media, as per The Hollywood Reporter.

“After two incredible years, I’ve decided to step down as CEO of X. When Elon Musk and I first spoke of his vision for X, I knew it would be the opportunity of a lifetime to carry out the extraordinary mission of this company,” she posted on the platform.

Linda said that she is extremely proud of the X team.

“I’m incredibly proud of the X team – the historic business turn around we have accomplished together has been nothing short of remarkable. We started with the critical early work necessary to prioritize the safety of our users–especially children, and to restore advertiser confidence. This team has worked relentlessly from groundbreaking innovations like Community Notes, and, soon, X Money to bringing the most iconic voices and content to the platform. Now, the best is yet to come as X enters a new chapter with @xai,” she wrote.

“I’m immensely grateful to him for entrusting me with the responsibility of protecting free speech, turning the company around, and transforming X into the Everything App. X is truly a digital town square for all voices and the world’s most powerful culture signal. We couldn’t have achieved that without the support of our users, business partners, and the most innovative team in the world,” she added.

Yaccarino did not specify why she is departing the company. (ANI)

Iranian President Pezeshkian Accuses Israel of Assassination Attempt, Calls for Trust Before Restarting Nuclear Talks

Pezeshkian

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said in an interview released on Monday that Israel, which last month fought a 12-day war with Iran, had attempted to assassinate him.

The remarks came less than a month after Israel launched its unprecedented June 13 bombing campaign against Iran, killing top military commanders and nuclear scientists.

The Israeli attacks took place two days before Tehran and Washington were set to meet for a new round of nuclear talks, stalling negotiations that were aimed at reaching a deal over Iran’s atomic programme.

“They did try, yes. They acted accordingly, but they failed,” Pezeshkian told US media figure Tucker Carlson in response to a question on whether he believed Israel had tried to kill him.

“It was not the United States that was behind the attempt on my life. It was Israel. I was in a meeting… they tried to bombard the area in which we were holding that meeting,” he said, according to a translation of his remarks from Persian, in apparent reference to an alleged assassination attempt during the recent war.

More than 900 people were killed in Iran during the conflict, according to the judiciary.

The Israeli attacks drew waves of retaliatory drone and missile fire, killing 28 people in Israel, according to authorities.

‘Forever wars’

The 12-day war between Iran and Israel saw it, along with the United States, launching strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities at Fordo, Isfahan and Natanz.

A ceasefire between Iran and Israel took hold since June 24.

On June 16, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu did not rule out plans to assassinate Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, saying it would “end the conflict” after reports emerged at the time that US President Donald Trump had vetoed the move.

During the interview with Carlson, Pezeshkian accused Netanyahu of pursuing his “own agenda” of “forever wars” in the Middle East, and urged the United States not to be dragged into it.

“The US administration should refrain from getting involved in a war that is not America’s war, it is Netanyahu’s war,” he said.

He added that his country has “no problem” restarting nuclear talks, provided that trust can be reestablished between the two countries.

“We see no problem in re-entering the negotiations,” the Iranian president said.

“There is a condition … for restarting the talks. How are we going to trust the United States again?”

“We re-entered the negotiations, then how can we know for sure that in the middle of the talks the Israeli regime will not be given the permission again to attack us?”

Musk–Bannon Feud Erupts: Legal Threats, Personal Insults, and the MAGA Movement’s Deepening Civil War

Musk–Bannon

The ongoing feud between tech billionaire Elon Musk and former Trump strategist Steve Bannon erupted into a firestorm of personal insults and legal threats over the July 4th weekend, exposing deep divisions within the MAGA movement. The clash, sparked by Musk’s proposal for a new political party called the “America Party,” has escalated into a public spectacle, with Musk labeling Bannon a “fat, drunken slob” and calling for his arrest, while Bannon retaliated by questioning Musk’s U.S. citizenship and demanding his deportation.

The Spark: Musk’s “America Party” Proposal

The latest chapter in this bitter rivalry began when Musk, the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI, polled his 220 million X followers on July 4, 2025, about launching a third political party to challenge President Donald Trump and the Republican Party. The poll, which garnered overwhelming support with 80% in favor, prompted Musk to declare, “The people have spoken. A new political party is needed in America to represent the 80% in the middle!” He dubbed this proposed party the “America Party,” a move that drew immediate ire from Bannon, a staunch Trump loyalist and host of the War Room podcast.

Bannon, who served as Trump’s chief strategist during his first administration, lambasted Musk on his podcast, calling him “Elmo the Mook” and falsely claiming he is not a U.S. citizen. “No, brother, you’re not an American. You’re a South African,” Bannon said, despite Musk having been a naturalized U.S. citizen since 2002. “Only a foreigner could do this… If we take enough time and prove the facts of that, you should be deported,” Bannon added, accusing Musk of having ulterior motives for his proximity to Trump.

Musk’s Fiery Retort

Musk wasted no time hitting back, taking to X to deliver a scathing personal attack. “The fat, drunken slob called Bannon will go back to prison and this time for a long time. He has a lifetime of crime to pay for,” Musk wrote on July 4, 2025, in a post that quickly went viral. In a follow-up post, Musk escalated his rhetoric, stating, “Evil oozes from his face like a disease,” intensifying the personal nature of the feud.

Bannon, who served four months in federal prison in 2024 for contempt of Congress after defying a subpoena related to the January 6, 2021, Capitol riot investigation, has been a vocal critic of Musk for months. His attacks have included calls for investigations into Musk’s alleged drug use, his federal contracts, and even his immigration status, despite Musk’s well-documented U.S. citizenship.

A Broader MAGA Rift

The Musk-Bannon feud is emblematic of a larger “MAGA civil war” between the movement’s populist and techno-oligarchic factions. Bannon, a self-styled populist nationalist, has long criticized Musk as a “globalist” whose influence threatens the core values of the Make America Great Again movement. In a January 2025 interview with an Italian newspaper, Bannon called Musk a “truly evil guy” intent on establishing “techno-feudalism on a global scale” and vowed to “run him out” of Trump’s orbit.

Musk, once a close ally of Trump and head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), has seen his relationship with the president sour since early 2025. The tipping point came in June when Musk publicly criticized Trump’s “Big, Beautiful Bill,” a multi-trillion-dollar spending package, and even called for his impeachment, prompting Bannon to label the feud a “national security issue.” Musk’s subsequent exit from his advisory role and his public spat with Trump, including threats to decommission SpaceX’s Dragon spacecraft, further strained ties.

The “America Party” proposal has deepened these tensions, with Bannon accusing Musk of undermining Trump’s leadership. “So now we’re the movement of ‘if you don’t agree with us 100% you should be deported’? If this is what MAGA has become, it sure as hell has no resemblance to the movement of free thinkers I’ve been in since the start,” a Trump critic commented on X, reflecting broader discontent with the infighting.

Personal Attacks and Legal Threats

The feud has taken a particularly nasty turn with both men trading personal insults. Bannon’s “Elmo the Mook” jab and his accusations of Musk’s disloyalty were met with Musk’s claims that Bannon’s criminal history warrants a lengthy prison sentence. Bannon was previously pardoned by Trump in 2021 during a fraud investigation, but his 2022 contempt conviction led to his recent incarceration. Musk’s allegations of a “lifetime of crime” remain unsubstantiated, but they underscore the intensity of their mutual animosity.

Bannon has also pushed for probes into Musk’s business dealings, including SpaceX’s government contracts and alleged drug use, as reported by The New York Times. In response, Musk has doubled down, using his platform to mock Bannon’s appearance and character while rallying support for his vision of a centrist political alternative.

Implications for the MAGA Movement

The Musk-Bannon clash highlights a growing rift within the Republican Party, with Musk’s techno-oligarchic faction advocating for deregulation and innovation, and Bannon’s populist base prioritizing traditionalist values and loyalty to Trump. Political analysts suggest this division could weaken Trump’s coalition as he navigates his second term.

“Musk and Bannon represent two poles of the MAGA spectrum,” said political commentator Kate Plummer in a Newsweek report. “Musk’s side embraces unconventional lifestyles mixed with a cultish belief in capitalism; Bannon’s Traditionalists make a more religious, populist appeal.” The outcome of this feud could shape the future of the Republican Party, especially as Bannon’s allies position him as a potential 2028 presidential contender.

What’s Next?

As the feud shows no signs of cooling, both Musk and Bannon continue to leverage their platforms—Musk’s X and Bannon’s War Room—to rally supporters. Musk’s poll results suggest significant public interest in a new political party, though third-party efforts historically face steep challenges in the U.S. electoral system. Meanwhile, Bannon’s influence within MAGA remains strong, bolstered by his media presence and ties to Trump’s base.

For now, the war of words continues, with Musk and Bannon trading barbs that resonate far beyond their personal rivalry. As one X user put it, “This is less about policy and more about who gets to define the soul of Trumpism.” Whether this feud will lead to concrete political or legal consequences remains to be seen, but it has undeniably electrified the political landscape in the summer of 2025.

Trump Threatens 10% Tariff on Nations Backing ‘Anti-American’ BRICS Policies as Trade Tensions Escalate

trump

Trump Threatens 10% Tariff on Nations Backing ‘Anti-American’ BRICS Policies as Trade Tensions Escalate

Washington, July 7, 2025 — Former U.S. President Donald Trump, poised for a potential return to the White House in November, has issued a bold new warning amid escalating global trade tensions. In a late-night post on Truth Social this Sunday, Trump declared that the United States would impose an additional 10% tariff on any country aligning itself with what he called the “Anti-American policies of BRICS.” The move marks a sharp escalation in the ongoing standoff between Washington and the expanding BRICS alliance.

“Any Country aligning themselves with the Anti-American policies of BRICS will be charged an ADDITIONAL 10% Tariff,” Trump wrote. “There will be no exceptions to this policy.”

This statement comes just days before the expiration of a 90-day pause on higher U.S. tariffs that the Trump administration had implemented earlier this year to give time for trade negotiations. Trump said the U.S. government would begin sending formal tariff letters to dozens of countries starting Monday at noon (Washington time).

Why This Matters

BRICS — the influential economic bloc comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa — has been expanding both its membership and influence. During its latest summit held over the weekend, BRICS leaders condemned U.S. and Israeli military actions against Iran and called for the withdrawal of Israeli troops from Gaza. The group also pushed for a “just and lasting” resolution to ongoing conflicts in the Middle East. Among the attendees were Chinese Premier Li Qiang and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Though Trump did not explicitly define what constitutes “Anti-American” policies, his threat comes amid growing concerns in Washington over BRICS’ efforts to create an alternative global financial architecture that reduces dependence on the U.S. dollar. Trump has previously threatened 100% tariffs on BRICS nations if they attempt to settle trade in local currencies rather than the dollar.

The Bigger Picture: A Battle for Global Trade Power

Trump’s latest warning signals renewed U.S. resistance to BRICS-led efforts to challenge Western economic dominance. At the summit, BRICS leaders reaffirmed their commitment to developing a cross-border payment system, a long-discussed initiative aimed at facilitating trade without reliance on Western financial systems like SWIFT.

Chinese Premier Li Qiang called for reforming global governance, highlighting the rise of “unilateralism and protectionism,” a veiled criticism of the U.S. approach under both the Biden and Trump administrations.

“Today’s world is more turbulent, with unilateralism and protectionism on the rise,” Li said. “China is willing to work with BRICS countries to promote global governance in a more just, reasonable, efficient and orderly direction.”

India, while traditionally a U.S. partner, has also shown growing interest in de-dollarization and strategic autonomy within BRICS, making Trump’s blanket tariff threat particularly complicated.

What’s Next?

Trump’s comments have already injected new uncertainty into global trade markets, especially for middle-income countries that trade with both the U.S. and BRICS members. Analysts say that developing economies may now face pressure to “choose sides,” potentially forcing them to align with Washington or risk economic penalties.

China’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs has not yet responded to Trump’s statement. However, observers expect Beijing to issue a strong rebuttal, particularly if the U.S. follows through with tariff impositions.

If implemented, the 10% tariffs could affect dozens of countries, including U.S. allies who have expressed support for BRICS initiatives, such as Argentina, Egypt, and the UAE, which recently participated in BRICS forums.

Global Reaction and Concerns

Trade experts warn that Trump’s aggressive tariff plan may spark retaliation from BRICS-aligned countries and exacerbate global supply chain disruptions. The possibility of a tit-for-tat trade war looms large, just as the world economy shows signs of fragile recovery post-COVID and amid ongoing regional conflicts.

Meanwhile, U.S. businesses dependent on global exports and imports fear a fresh wave of cost increases and market volatility, especially in sectors like technology, agriculture, and pharmaceuticals.


Conclusion

As the U.S. under Donald Trump ramps up its protectionist stance and BRICS accelerates its efforts to reshape global economic governance, the world finds itself at a critical crossroads. Whether this escalates into a full-blown trade war or forces a new balance of power will depend on the next moves in Washington, Beijing, New Delhi, and beyond.


Hamas Submits Positive Response to Gaza Ceasefire Proposal, Raising Hopes for End to Ongoing War

Gaza Ceasefire

Hamas announced that it had “submitted a positive response” to a 60-day ceasefire proposal with Israel in Gaza, indicating progress toward a potential agreement after months of stalled efforts, CNN reported

In a statement on Friday, Hamas said it had responded positively to the mediators and expressed readiness to begin talks on the implementation of the framework.

Hamas has “submitted a positive response to the mediators, and the movement is fully prepared to immediately enter into a round of negotiations regarding the mechanism for implementing this framework,” the group said.

Israel had earlier accepted the US-backed proposal, clearing the way for both sides to begin final negotiations to work out details before a ceasefire is finalized, CNN reported.

As reported by CNN, Bishara Bahbah, a Palestinian-American interlocutor who has been in direct contact with Hamas, welcomed the response in a Facebook post, stating, “We are now much closer to ending this cursed war.”

He added that Hamas had introduced “amendments it deemed necessary.”

“In my view, these amendments will not prevent reaching a ceasefire agreement within the coming week, God willing,” he said.

An Israeli source familiar with the developments said earlier on Friday that a positive response from Hamas was anticipated, and that the changes made to the proposal language were not expected to disrupt the progress toward a deal, CNN reported.

Under the terms of the proposal, of the 50 Israeli hostages still held in Gaza, 10 — including 8 living hostages on the first day — would be released during the ceasefire, along with the bodies of 18 others. In exchange, an unspecified number of Palestinian prisoners and detainees would be freed.

Following the initial release, Israel would withdraw from parts of northern Gaza, and the two sides would begin talks on a permanent ceasefire.

Hamas has been directed to release the hostages without any public displays or ceremonies. Additional hostages would be released on four other dates outlined in the proposal, CNN reported.

Earlier, US President Donald Trump cautioned Hamas against rejecting the ceasefire deal, warning that “it will not get better — it will only get worse,”

“I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social.

According to Al Jazeera, at least 57,130 Palestinians have been killed and more than 130,000 injured since October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched an attack in southern Israel that left approximately 1,139 people dead. In Gaza, hundreds of thousands have been displaced multiple times, with widespread destruction of cities, hospitals, and schools. The UN estimates that 85 per cent of Gaza is now under Israeli military control. (ANI)

Trump Announces Israel’s Approval of 60-Day Gaza Ceasefire Deal, Warns Hamas Against Rejection

trump

United States President Donald Trump said that Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalise a 60-day ceasefire in Gaza.

Trump cautioned Hamas against rejecting the ceasefire deal, warning that “it will not get better — it will only get worse.”

Qatar and Egypt, who, according to Trump, “worked very hard to help bring Peace”, will deliver the final proposal. He also stated that negotiations to end the war would continue during the proposed ceasefire period.

“My Representatives had a long and productive meeting with the Israelis today on Gaza. Israel has agreed to the necessary conditions to finalize the 60 Day CEASEFIRE, during which time we will work with all parties to end the War. The Qataris and Egyptians, who have worked very hard to help bring Peace, will deliver this final proposal. I hope, for the good of the Middle East, that Hamas takes this Deal, because it will not get better — IT WILL ONLY GET WORSE. Thank you for your attention to this matter!” Trump wrote on his social media platform, Truth Social.

The announcement came less than a week before Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s scheduled visit to the United States on July 7.

Meanwhile, Israeli airstrikes have continued across Gaza. On Monday, Israel launched at least 50 aerial strikes, with a significant focus on eastern Gaza City, following forced evacuation warnings issued by the Israeli military, according to Al Jazeera.

Citing medical sources, Al Jazeera reported that Israeli forces killed at least 68 Palestinians in Gaza on Sunday, including 47 in Gaza City and the northern areas of the territory.

According to Gaza’s Health Ministry, the ongoing war has so far claimed at least 56,500 lives and wounded 133,419 people. In comparison, around 1,139 people were killed in Israel during the October 7 attacks, during which more than 200 individuals were taken captive. (ANI)

Israel Allows Return to 12 Gaza Border Communities, Declares No Security Impediment

12 Gaza Border Communities

Israeli residents of Gaza border communities will be allowed to return to their homes as the Israeli government declared on Sunday that there is “no security impediment” to living in the area.

This decision, approved Sunday by the Cabinet in a telephone referendum, follows assessments by the Israel Defense Forces and the Ministry of Defense. Consequently, funding for those staying in temporary absorption facilities will be halted for those deemed able to return.

The decision applies to twelve localities, including Be’eri, Kfar Aza, Nir Oz, Sufa, Netiv HaAsara, Nir Yitzhak, Kerem Shalom, Ein Hashlosha, Nirim, Nahal Oz, Kissufim, and Holit.

Other communities such as Nahal Oz, Kissufim, Holit, Kfar Aza, and Be’eri will continue to rely on temporary housing until reconstruction is complete.

The Tekuma administration, responsible for rebuilding areas damaged during the October 7 attacks, confirmed that renovation work in Kerem Shalom, Re’im, Nirim, and Ein Hashlosha is finished, allowing residents to return starting July 1. Sufa, Nir Yitzhak, and Netiv HaAsara will also reopen on this date. Nahal Oz’s restoration is expected by August, just in time for the new school year, while Kissufim’s rebuilding will conclude in November 2025.

Holit, Kfar Aza, and Be’eri are projected to be ready for return sometime in 2026.

The Families’ Headquarters for the Return of the Abductees commented on the move, saying, “If there is no security obstacle to returning to live in the Gaza Envelope, then there is certainly no obstacle to ending the fighting in Gaza. Now all that remains is to reach a comprehensive agreement to return all 50 abductees. The Gaza Envelope will earn the name ‘the land of resurrection’ when all the abductees return home.”

While the military ban has been lifted, the government confirmed support will continue for those not yet ready to move back. The state will fund 90 percent of rent for another year for residents who prefer to remain in temporary accommodations during ongoing repairs.

At least 1,180 people were killed, and 252 Israelis and foreigners were taken hostage in Hamas’s attacks on Israeli communities near the Gaza border on October 7. Of the 50 remaining hostages, around 30 are believed to be dead. (ANI/TPS)

Srinagar Police Attaches Property Worth ₹50 Lakh of Notorious Drug Peddler Under NDPS Act

Iran Urges WHO to Condemn Israel, U.S. for Attacks on Civilians and Health Facilities During June Conflict

Parliamentary Panel Begins J&K Visit to Review Administration and Grievances, Meets Officials Ahead of Amarnath Yatra

Republicans Demand Trump Revoke Zohran Mamdani’s Citizenship After NYC Mayoral Win, Citing Socialism and Security Concerns

Revoke Zohran Mamdani’s Citizenship

In a stunning and controversial political escalation, prominent Republican groups and far-right figures are calling on President Donald Trump to revoke the U.S. citizenship of Zohran Mamdani—a 33-year-old Democratic Socialist and newly elected Democratic nominee for New York City Mayor. Mamdani made history on June 25, 2025, by defeating former New York Governor Andrew Cuomo in the Democratic primary. However, his resounding victory has triggered intense backlash from conservative quarters, who are labeling him a threat to American values, national security, and the “soul of New York.”

Who is Zohran Mamdani?

Zohran Kwame Mamdani is a Ugandan-born, Queens-based politician, filmmaker, and community organizer. He immigrated to the U.S. as a child and became a naturalized citizen in 2018. A self-proclaimed democratic socialist, Mamdani first rose to political prominence as a member of the New York State Assembly, representing Astoria, Queens. His platform emphasizes bold progressive policies such as rent control, public transportation reform, free municipal services, and aggressive taxation on the wealthy. His mayoral campaign gained traction among working-class New Yorkers, immigrant communities, and left-leaning voters.


The Republican Backlash

1. Communist Control Act Cited

The New York Young Republican Club (NYYRC) issued a public statement invoking the Communist Control Act of 1954, a Cold War-era law that was designed to bar communists from holding positions of influence. While the act has been deemed unenforceable by courts, Republicans argue Mamdani’s policy agenda is so radical that it falls under the statute. The NYYRC accused him of trying to “destroy New York City from within” and demanded denaturalization and deportation.

Former President Donald Trump amplified these calls on his Truth Social account, calling Mamdani a “100% Communist Lunatic,” and claiming “he wants to replace American greatness with foreign radicalism.”


2. Immigration and ICE Conflict

One of Mamdani’s key proposals—removing Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) from New York City—sparked outrage from Republican leaders. Mamdani described ICE as a “fascist institution” and vowed to make NYC a true sanctuary city.

Trump’s border advisor Tom Homan rejected this stance, asserting that federal law overrides local ordinances. “It’s game on. We will triple down on ICE in cities like this,” Homan warned. Republicans view Mamdani’s anti-ICE rhetoric as indicative of a broader threat posed by pro-immigrant, leftist politicians.


3. Allegations of Extremism and Anti-Semitism

Tennessee Republican Congressman Andy Ogles accused Mamdani of extremism, citing a 2017 rap lyric in which he referenced the “Holy Land Five”—leaders of a Muslim charity convicted of funding Hamas. Ogles demanded a DOJ investigation into whether Mamdani misrepresented affiliations during his naturalization process.

Further, Mamdani’s pledge to arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu if he visits NYC—based on ICC war crime warrants—has drawn sharp criticism. GOP Representative Elise Stefanik called him “an anti-Semite disguised as a progressive,” while far-right commentator Laura Loomer went as far as to suggest Mamdani’s leadership could “cause another 9/11.”


4. Citizenship and “American-ness” Attacks

Mamdani’s relatively recent citizenship—granted in 2018—has become a political target. Republican Councilwoman Vickie Paladino argued it’s “insane” that someone “so recently naturalized” could govern America’s largest city. “He wasn’t even born here. He hasn’t lived the American experience long enough to lead it,” she said.

This echoes Donald Trump’s past “birther” rhetoric and attempts to question the legitimacy of immigrant politicians. Critics say such remarks are racially and religiously coded, blending Islamophobia and nativism.


5. Strategic Red Scare and Base Mobilization

Analysts see the GOP’s uproar as part of a strategic effort to galvanize its conservative base ahead of upcoming elections. By branding Mamdani as a radical and foreign threat, Republicans aim to associate the Democratic Party with “un-American” policies.

Stephen Miller, Trump’s longtime policy aide, stated: “This is the Great Replacement, live and in action. If you don’t fight it now, you’ll lose your country.” The GOP is using Mamdani’s win to paint a picture of Democratic extremism and justify crackdowns on immigration and dissent.


Legal Context: Can Mamdani Be Stripped of Citizenship?

Legally speaking, the demand to revoke Mamdani’s citizenship is unlikely to succeed.

  • The Communist Control Act has been ruled unconstitutional in its application to citizens’ rights.
  • The First Amendment protects political beliefs, even unpopular or radical ones.
  • Denaturalization is extremely rare and only permitted if a person is found to have committed fraud or concealed material facts during their naturalization process.

Thus far, no credible evidence has emerged suggesting Mamdani’s citizenship was obtained unlawfully.


Mamdani’s Response

In response to the attacks, Mamdani remained defiant. In a public statement, he said:

“This is not about me. This is about a broader movement for justice, dignity, and working-class power in New York City. These attacks are the last gasps of a fearful political establishment.”

He also dismissed accusations of extremism and anti-Semitism, saying, “They are trying to divide our city by using fear. But New York belongs to all of us—immigrants, workers, people of all faiths.”


Conclusion

The calls to revoke Zohran Mamdani’s citizenship highlight a growing polarization in American politics, where identity, ideology, and immigration have become central battlegrounds. While the legal path to denaturalization is practically nonexistent in this context, the political battle is just beginning. As Mamdani prepares for the general election in November 2025, he is likely to remain at the center of one of the most charged and symbolic debates over what it means to be American in the 21st century.


Srinagar Police Attaches Property Worth ₹50 Lakh of Notorious Drug Peddler Under NDPS Act

Iran Urges WHO to Condemn Israel, U.S. for Attacks on Civilians and Health Facilities During June Conflict

Parliamentary Panel Begins J&K Visit to Review Administration and Grievances, Meets Officials Ahead of Amarnath Yatra

Trump Warns of Possible New Strikes on Iran Over Uranium Enrichment, Backs Nuclear Site Inspections

Trump Threatens Iran

President Donald Trump said on Friday he would consider bombing Iran again if Tehran was enriching uranium to a level that concerned the United States, and he backed inspections of Iran’s bombed nuclear sites.

As per report published by The Reuters, “Sure, without question, absolutely,” Trump said when asked about the possibility of new bombing of Iranian nuclear sites if deemed necessary at some point.

At a White House news conference, Trump said he plans to respond soon to comments from Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamanei, who said Iran “slapped America in the face” by launching an attack against a major U.S. base in Qatar following last weekend’s U.S. bombing raid.

Trump also said he would like inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency or another respected source to be able to inspect Iran’s nuclear sites after they were bombed last weekend.

Trump said he believes the sites were “obliterated.” He has rejected any suggestion that damage to the sites was not as profound as he has said.

But Trump said he would support the IAEA, the U.N. nuclear watchdog, going in to check the sites that were bombed.

Advertisement · Scroll to continue

Report This Ad

The agency’s chief, Rafael Grossi, said on Wednesday that ensuring the resumption of IAEA inspections was his top priority as none had taken place since Israel began bombing on June 13.

However, Iran’s parliament approved moves on Wednesday to suspend such inspections. Iran’s foreign minister Abbas Araqchi indicated on Friday that Tehran may reject any request by the head of the agency for visits to Iranian nuclear sites.

Trump also said he does not believe Iran wants to still seek a nuclear weapon after U.S. and Israeli bombing raids.

He said Iran still wants to meet about the way forward. The White House had said on Thursday that no meeting between the U.S. and an Iranian delegation has been scheduled thus far.