Who Is Mohammad Yousuf Katari ? Teacher Arrested Providing Logistical Support to LeT Terrorists Behind Pahalgam Attack
- Mohammad Yousuf Katari, the officials said, is a teacher but also acted as an Over Ground Worker in Kulgam.
- He is believed to have links with Pakistan-based Laskar-e-Taiba (LeT) terror group.
- The officials said Katari had a role in providing logistical support to the terrorists involved in the Pahalgam attack, who were later killed during Operation Mahadev.
- Katari was zeroed in on, after an analysis of the equipment and weapons recovered from the LeT terrorists killed in Operation Mahadev.
- Operation Mahadev was carried out for weeks, starting May 22, when security forces received intelligence about the presence of terrorists in Dachigam near Srinagar. Three terrorists, including the mastermind of the Pahalgam attack, were killed in the operation.
- AK-47 and M9 assault rifles were among the weapons recovered from the hideout of the three terrorists, the officials said. The weapons were sent to a laboratory in Chandigarh for processing and reports confirmed the guns were used in the Pahalgam attack.
(Source Of This Information Is NDTV )
The 2025 Pahalgam Terror Attack: A Comprehensive Account of Tragedy and Its Aftermath
Introduction:
On April 22, 2025, the serene meadows of Baisaran Valley in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir—often called the “Switzerland of India”—became the site of one of the deadliest terrorist attacks in the region’s history. Nestled in the Lidder Valley, Pahalgam is renowned for its snow-capped peaks, lush greenery, and role as a gateway to the Amarnath Yatra, a significant Hindu pilgrimage. The attack, which claimed 26 lives and injured over 20, targeted tourists in a calculated assault that shattered the region’s fragile peace and escalated tensions between India and Pakistan to the brink of war. This article provides a detailed examination of the attack’s prelude, execution, immediate aftermath, investigations, military responses, and broader implications, drawing on official reports, survivor accounts, and expert analyses.
Historical Context: Kashmir’s Enduring Conflict
Jammu and Kashmir has been a contested region since the 1947 partition of India and Pakistan, with both nations claiming the Muslim-majority territory. The late 1980s saw a surge in insurgency, fueled by separatist and Islamist groups like Lashkar-e-Taiba (LeT) and Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM), responsible for attacks such as the 2008 Mumbai massacre (166 killed) and the 2019 Pulwama bombing (40 Indian paramilitary personnel killed). Over 70,000 deaths have marked the conflict, driven by militancy and cross-border infiltration.
Post-2019, after India revoked Article 370, stripping Kashmir of its semi-autonomy, a stringent security crackdown reduced militant incidents by over 50% by 2024, per government data. Tourism flourished, with over 2 million visitors in 2024, as India promoted Kashmir as a symbol of integration. Yet, underlying tensions persisted, evidenced by the June 2024 Reasi attack, which killed nine Hindu pilgrims, foreshadowing the sectarian violence in Pahalgam. Weeks before the 2025 attack, India’s extradition of Tahawwur Rana, a former Pakistan Army officer linked to LeT, heightened tensions. LeT’s commander issued a public call for “jihad” on April 16, 2025, signaling an imminent strike.
The Attack: A Brutal Ambush in Baisaran Valley
At approximately 2:45 PM on April 22, 2025, Baisaran Meadow—a scenic spot 5 km from Pahalgam town in Anantnag district—was bustling with tourists enjoying picnics and pony rides. The area’s isolation, accessible only by foot or horse, and lack of CCTV made it a vulnerable target. Between three to six heavily armed militants, dressed in camouflage, emerged from the surrounding forests, wielding AK-47 variants, an American M4 carbine, and grenades.
Eyewitnesses reported chilling details: the attackers segregated victims by religion, demanding some recite the Kalma (Islamic declaration of faith) or undergo physical checks to identify non-Muslims. “They asked us to recite the Kalma. Those who couldn’t were shot on the spot,” recounted a survivor from Mumbai, whose brother was among the victims. The 15-20 minute assault was marked by indiscriminate gunfire, with panicked ponies trampling some victims. A local Muslim pony operator, attempting to intervene, was killed, underscoring the attack’s broad toll despite its sectarian intent.
By 3:15 PM, the militants fled toward the Pir Panjal range, evading initial security cordons. Rescue operations swiftly airlifted the wounded to Srinagar’s SMHS Hospital, where over 100 security personnel secured the facility amid chaotic scenes of grief. The final death toll was 26: 23 Hindus (mostly from Maharashtra, Gujarat, and Uttar Pradesh), one Christian from Kerala, one local Muslim, and one unidentified foreigner. Over 20 others were injured, including children, with five initially in critical condition.
Victim Breakdown
| Victim Profile | Number | Details |
|---|---|---|
| Hindu Tourists | 23 | Families, professionals, pilgrims, and honeymooners from Indian states. |
| Christian Tourist | 1 | Member of a missionary group from Kerala. |
| Local Muslim | 1 | Pony operator killed while attempting to protect victims. |
| Unidentified Foreigner | 1 | Possible foreign national; identity pending DNA confirmation. |
| Injured | 20+ | Suffered gunshot wounds and trampling injuries; some required surgery. |
Immediate Aftermath: A Nation in Mourning
The attack sparked nationwide outrage, dominating headlines and social media. The hashtag #JusticeForPahalgam trended globally, amassing over 5 million posts within 24 hours. Prime Minister Narendra Modi, cutting short a foreign visit, condemned the attack as a “cowardly assault on humanity” and vowed retribution. Protests erupted in Delhi, Mumbai, and Srinagar, with Hindu nationalist groups demanding military action against Pakistan.
Kashmir’s tourism industry, a cornerstone of its economy, collapsed overnight. Flights to Srinagar were suspended, and the Amarnath Yatra, scheduled for July, was postponed. The economic loss was estimated at ₹500 crore ($60 million) in the first week alone. In Pahalgam, curfews and a heavy deployment of over 1,000 security personnel fueled local fears of reprisals, as residents—many dependent on tourism—faced uncertainty.
Internationally, the attack drew swift condemnation. U.S. President Donald Trump declared, “America stands with India against terror,” while Russian President Vladimir Putin and EU President Ursula von der Leyen echoed similar sentiments. The U.S. Embassy issued a Level 4 travel advisory for Kashmir, citing “sporadic violence.” Pakistan denied involvement and offered a joint probe, but India’s Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri pointed to “cross-border linkages,” escalating diplomatic tensions.
On April 24, Jammu & Kashmir Police announced a ₹20 lakh ($24,000) bounty per terrorist, releasing sketches based on survivor accounts. The National Investigation Agency (NIA) assumed control of the investigation on April 26, signaling a high-priority probe.
Perpetrators and Claim of Responsibility
The Resistance Front (TRF), a LeT offshoot formed in 2019, claimed responsibility via Telegram on April 22-23, citing India’s “occupation” of Kashmir and sharing a site photo. Though TRF later retracted its claim, External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar confirmed their involvement on July 18, corroborated by a UN Security Council report on July 29 noting TRF’s targeting of Hindu minorities.
Investigations identified five terrorists: three Pakistanis—Suleiman Shah (mastermind), “Afghan” alias Jibran, and Fauji—and two local aides, including one named Shah. All three main attackers were LeT operatives, per NIA findings. Recovered weapons included a Romanian AKMS, a Russian AKM hybrid, and a U.S. M4 carbine, pointing to an international supply chain.
A significant breakthrough came in October 2025, when a Huawei satellite phone (IMEI-linked to Inmarsat-4 F1) used by Suleiman Shah revealed pre-attack coordination with handlers in Pakistan. Controversially, JNU Professor Srikanth Kondapalli alleged that China supplied 120-129 satellite images of Pahalgam to Pakistan, breaching Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) anti-terror commitments. On October 5, 2025, Mohammad Yousuf Katari, a local teacher, was arrested for aiding the militants, traced via a discarded phone charger. The Financial Action Task Force (FATF) condemned the attack on June 17, linking it to terror financing networks, and the U.S. designated TRF a terrorist entity on July 18.
India’s Response: Military and Diplomatic Retaliation
India’s response was swift and multifaceted. “Operation Mahadev,” launched on April 22, involved ground offensives in Kashmir, culminating in the elimination of Suleiman Shah, Afghan, and Jibran on July 28 near Harwan forest, tracked via the Huawei phone. Recovered weapons bore fingerprints of international origins, per Home Minister Amit Shah.
Diplomatically, India closed the Attari-Wagah border, halted bilateral trade, and threatened to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty. Line of Control (LoC) skirmishes began on April 24. The crisis escalated with “Operation Sindoor” (May 6-10), where Indian airstrikes targeted nine “terror camps” in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK), destroying LeT and JeM infrastructure. Pakistan retaliated, downing an Indian drone, but a ceasefire was declared on May 10, reportedly mediated by the U.S. (though India denied external involvement). IAF Chief Amar Preet Singh later confirmed significant Pakistani losses, including F-16s, JF-17s, and C-130s.
Domestically, India demolished homes of suspected militant aides on April 25 and blocked 8,000 social media accounts for “national security,” sparking debates over free speech. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) was invoked for ongoing trials of accomplices.
Broader Implications: A Fragile Peace Exposed
The Pahalgam attack, the deadliest civilian assault in Kashmir since 2000, exposed critical security lapses despite India’s heavy troop presence (over 500,000 in the region). It underscored the risks of promoting tourism without robust safeguards, as noted by counter-terrorism analyst Tanya Mehra. TRF’s emergence as a potent threat highlighted evolving militant strategies, blending local recruitment with foreign backing.
Geopolitically, the attack deepened India-Pakistan animosity, reminiscent of the 2016 Uri and 2019 Balakot crises, but its civilian toll accelerated escalation. Allegations of Chinese involvement introduced a trilateral dynamic, prompting calls for SCO reforms. The UK urged restraint, while Russia issued travel warnings for Pakistan.
Socially, the attack fueled communal tensions, with rising Islamophobia in India and accusations of politicized “Hindu victimhood” narratives. As of October 2025, two terrorists remain at large, and trials continue. The FATF’s ongoing scrutiny of terror financing networks signals sustained global pressure.
Conclusion: Lessons from a Wounded Valley
The Pahalgam terror attack of April 22, 2025, claimed 26 lives and left an indelible scar on Kashmir’s psyche. Operations Mahadev and Sindoor marked a decisive shift in India’s counter-terrorism strategy, yet the tragedy exposed vulnerabilities in intelligence and regional stability. As Kashmir grapples with its aftermath, the attack serves as a grim reminder: peace in the valley remains elusive, demanding vigilance, dialogue, and international cooperation to ensure its meadows never again become battlegrounds.
You Might Also Like:
Watch Dr. Tariq Rasool’s Message to Kashmir’s Apple Orchard Owners: Diseases, Causes
After Three Weeks of Restrictions, Mirwaiz Umar Farooq Addresses Congregation at Jama Masjid
